Thank you so much for posting this. Simply an awesome article, though I could have done without the "beloved Patriots" line at the end, as it kind of destroys the objectivity that was otherwise displayed.m0ckduck said:Sorry if this has been posted already:
https://nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/the-last-days-of-football/
The issue is that something like the deflation nonsense really isn't a PR disaster. To you and me out seems like it should be, but to the general public it isn't. Not even close.Red(s)HawksFan said:It was wildly popular and profitable before Goodell, so its not as though correlation equals causation here. A monkey could hold the title of commish and the league will make money.
Goodell has been at the helm for PR disaster after PR disaster. I don't think replacing him will hurt profitability or popularity. It likely can only help.
This is the hard reality for Pats fans. Don't expect vindication even if the NFL finds no evidence of wrongdoing.SumnerH said:The issue is that something like the deflation nonsense really isn't a PR disaster. To you and me out seems like it should be, but to the general public it isn't. Not even close.
SumnerH said:The issue is that something like the deflation nonsense really isn't a PR disaster. To you and me out seems like it should be, but to the general public it isn't. Not even close.
RSFnFL said:Did I miss this a week ago? The league has come out and said they have evidence that the Patriots did this intentionally?
"The league said Jan. 23 that evidence shows the Patriots intentionally deflated footballs in their 45-7 victory over Indianapolis that gave them the AFC championship and a trip to Arizona to face Seattle in a game they won 28-24."
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12271531/indianapolis-colts-gm-tipped-nfl-patriots-deflating-footballs-troy-vincent-says
semsox said:Mort on Mike and Mike right now, floundering with the stuff he's saying. No mention of the Rappaport report. Even specifically said that "the investigation was initiated by the league, not the media." Fuck that guy
Jed Zeppelin said:Yeah, the only "evidence" is and ever has been that the balls were underinflated when inspected, a claim which has itself become less and less relevant since the adult scientists had their say and the initial Mort tweet has proven to likely be a sack of crap in the first place.
Aside from Grigson, the sore loser many times over, Mort has had the most damaging impact on this entire thing with two little tweets--one to spread misinformation and one to tell everyone how distraught the league was over it. Not that they were ever very trustworthy but thanks to Mort, his league sources now have roughly the same credibility as the ever popular "someone familiar with X's thinking."
edit: "Integrity" needs to go away. The word is meaningless coming from an organization and individuals who have none. This is classy LDT all over again.
deanx0 said:
So if it turns out that the info from the NFL was wrong, this will be the *second* time in less than a year that Mort was used by the NFL to spread an incorrect narrative only to be left hanging after the fact. I assume that he figured there was no way they'd do him so quickly after the Rice video debacle, and so he probably thought the info about the balls was rock solid, particularly if he was told that the league was "distraught" over the findings.
I get that his sources and relationship with the league are important, but doesn't he have to turn on them at some point?
I wouldn't classify as a PR disaster but I don't buy into the theory that this has been good for the league. Ratings for the Super Bowl were right around what you'd expect normally.SumnerH said:The issue is that something like the deflation nonsense really isn't a PR disaster. To you and me out seems like it should be, but to the general public it isn't. Not even close.
I didn't think so. But the language ESPN used is pretty clear/strong and I wonder what was actually released from the NFL on Jan 23.soxin6 said:
The league has never stated that. This is just more of the usual ESPN BS
I'd like to see it kept open just so we can share when each media member eats crow.H78 said:I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'd like to cast my vote that we lock this thread.
Why?
Don't care what anyone says about this anymore we won the Super Bowl LOLZ
H78 said:I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'd like to cast my vote that we lock this thread.
Why?
Don't care what anyone says about this anymore we won the Super Bowl LOLZ
Ed Hillel said:A side point, but not only did Rapoport report all of this information, but he did so on nfl.com. Do you think the league is letting him do that if there's any false information there? Mort is a clownshow, and if it turns out he was wrong on this, at least this shitshow will end with his reporting "integrity" taking a huge hit.
C4CRVT said:First of all, the mainstream media stopped putting effort into this story a long time ago.
There are two sets of people who still care: Pats fans who all now realize that the whole thing was a joke precipitated on the Pats because of sore loser Baltimore and Indy staff AND jealous idiots who have made zero attempts to wrap their tiny brains around what actually happened and are looking for something to get worked up about.
I listened to Mike and Mike for about half an hour this morning and a little talk radio on my way home last night.
80% of the press last night seemed to be about Carrol's decision.
100% of the air time on M&M this morning was about Johnny Manziel.
There are interesting, compelling things going on in the world of sports. The mainstream sports media isn't in the business of spending much time on it. It's all about whatever they decide is the most sensational story of the moment. Whatever.
H78 said:I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'd like to cast my vote that we lock this thread.
Why?
Don't care what anyone says about this anymore we won the Super Bowl LOLZ
I totally understand, but as a Pats fan what I'm saying is no matter what happens this whole thing has proven to be a complete joke. Goodell docks us a pick? This is a joke. Nothing happens at all? This is still a joke. We won the Super Bowl. The balls used in that game were guarded better than the White House lawn. Brady had one of the greatest Super Bowl performances ever using those footballs against arguably one of the best defenses ever. He shut this whole thing down with his play; anyone who hangs on to the Deflategate thing is just doing so because they have an ax to grind, and as Pats fans, I think we can now openly mock those people because of what happened in SB49. My conscience is totally clear no matter what Wells (lol) reports.drleather2001 said:
Because the issue isn't resolved yet. It's still theoretically possible that Goodell just says "fuck it" and docks the Patriots a draft pick.
This issue is entirely separate from the Super Bowl.
jimbobim said:I realize as a lurker my opinion probably means less then nothing but this thread is an awesome clearinghouse for sanity, nuance, and outrage concerning this nonsense assault on the Patriots legacy via an utter fraud of an investigation.
Until Goodell hopefully meekly admits he's got nothing I think the thread's utility remains.
Also Grigson can go eat a bunch of scum for being the worlds biggest cry baby. It would be the ultimate justice for the Pats to open up the title defense against the Colts. They might try and score 100.
That happened two years ago. How quickly we forget the Seattle reign. :buddy:Dogman2 said:
I think the Pats will open at home and the Colts game is in Indy. I know Baltimore opened in Denver last season but that had to do with the Orioles playing at home at the same time.
Koufax said:If it turns out that the NFL had nothing on the Pats then Chris Collingsworth should be fired. He's a darn good analyst but his ominous tone at the end of the Superbowl was such a turd in the punchbowl that it should be the end of the line for him if he was just making it up when he intimated that he had some deep dark secret that he couldn't reveal on national TV.
H78 said:I totally understand, but as a Pats fan what I'm saying is no matter what happens this whole thing has proven to be a complete joke. Goodell docks us a pick? This is a joke. Nothing happens at all? This is still a joke. We won the Super Bowl. The balls used in that game were guarded better than the White House lawn. Brady had one of the greatest Super Bowl performances ever using those footballs against arguably one of the best defenses ever. He shut this whole thing down with his play; anyone who hangs on to the Deflategate thing is just doing so because they have an ax to grind, and as Pats fans, I think we can now openly mock those people because of what happened in SB49. My conscience is totally clear no matter what Wells (lol) reports.
This is officially a non-story to anyone who can connect 'A' and 'B.' In a way I hope Goodell has no evidence but still docks us a low pick, because it'll give Kraft the resolve he needs to start the movement that'll get rid of him once and for all.
Know what was proven over the last two weeks? Bill Belichick is great at his job. Tom Brady is great at his job. Fuck, Malcolm Butler is great at his job. Roger Goodell, no matter what happens with 'Deflategate', has proven to be awful at his job. That's all I need to happily move on from all of this garbage.
Don Buddin's GS said:So the ballboy in question turns out to be "elderly" and ducks into the bathroom with the balls to take a whiz and it takes him 98 seconds. Being kinda elderly myself, I know it would take me at least 98 seconds to find my dick. NFW I'm gonna be able to deflate 12 footballs in that short of a timeframe. The Pats see old dude do this on the security cameras and immediately turn it into the NFL.
Question: How does old dude taking a whiz transform into "a person of interest" which is lawyer speak for perp?
SumnerH said:
This isn't true. A person of interest is often a potential witness or other non-suspect.
I completely agree. I live in CT and have to interact with obnoxious Jets and Giants fans on a daily basis. I've been hearing about Spygate for 7 years and if I have to hear more bitching about cheating and tainted legacies I don't think I could take it.JimD said:
No. Any findings of wrongdoing and punishments levied will be completely blown out of proportion by the media to prove New England's guilt. If the NFL has zero proof of wrongdoing, I hope Kraft pushes for complete vindication.
snowmanny said:On Mike and Mike today Mortenson speculated that the league would be checking surveillance cameras from other games to see if there was a "pattern" of suspicious activity by the Patriots, and again mentioned the regular season game against the Colts and that lower psi balls were on the list of issues that Indianapolis had asked the refs to look out for in the playoff game.
snowmanny said:On Mike and Mike today Mortenson speculated that the league would be checking surveillance cameras from other games to see if there was a "pattern" of suspicious activity by the Patriots, and again mentioned the regular season game against the Colts and that lower psi balls were on the list of issues that Indianapolis had asked the refs to look out for in the playoff game.
This is going to make for an interesting 'pattern' since the Indy game was on the road.snowmanny said:On Mike and Mike today Mortenson speculated that the league would be checking surveillance cameras from other games to see if there was a "pattern" of suspicious activity by the Patriots, and again mentioned the regular season game against the Colts and that lower psi balls were on the list of issues that Indianapolis had asked the refs to look out for in the playoff game.
At this point though I also wonder what the point could possibly be. The world is stuck with the Pats as the winners what good does it do to force some stupid, trumped up charge against them?E5 Yaz said:
What's becoming clear is that Mort and Rappaport are dealing with different sources ... perhaps sources with different agendas. There's so much back room information floating around that it's best not to look at what is leaked, but why that kind of information would be leaked.
Consider this report from Mort: If the NFL finds that the Patriots ball attendant takes a whizz every time after he gets the footballs from the refs, they can claim a "pattern," which can lead to that lower threshold of proof of "suspicious activity" ... even if they can't prove the attendant deflated the balls.
I think it's a mistake at this stage to believe the agenda in play is to determine what happened in the AFC championship game. The people involved on all sides are playing a much higher-stakes poker game.
wiffleballhero said:At this point though I also wonder what the point could possibly be. The world is stuck with the Pats as the winners what good does it do to force some stupid, trumped up charge against them?
The smartest, easiest thing to do is to end the whole thing and claim (as I suppose they could 'honestly' do) that this shows just how serious they are about the integrity of the game.