Per the KOC article, Miami allows the highest % of FGAs from 3 in the league, even more than the Bucks. So we should probably expect some game to game variance like we saw in the Bucks series. Hopefully the Celts are a little more consistent.I think that it's going to be pretty simple. With all of the switching and attention the Heat will put on the Jays, it's going to come down to guys like Smart, Grant and Horford taking advantage of open threes.
To the earlier question about defense, this is my guess---they largely play it straight and rotate guys on Butler to give him different looks, with some Smart, some Grant, and a lot of Jaylen.For the first time this series, the Celts can plan to just man up on defense and switch everything, basically playing to their strengths. When they did this against MIL, GA got his, but the rest of their team pretty much had zilch. I don't see anyone on MIA who is in GA's league.
They also allowed teams to shoot 38% from 3 in the regular season. If they do this against the Celtics, this will be a short series.Per the KOC article, Miami allows the highest % of FGAs from 3 in the league, even more than the Bucks. So we should probably expect some game to game variance like we saw in the Bucks series. Hopefully the Celts are a little more consistent.
True, but we also need to remember this about Jimmy Butler: Dude has a LOT of miles on him. You start getting him into the deep water of a physical series with the Celtics wing strength and he may start to wear down after the first few games.To the earlier question about defense, this is my guess---they largely play it straight and rotate guys on Butler to give him different looks, with some Smart, some Grant, and a lot of Jaylen.
Butler is very tough, and part of what makes him tough is his ability to draw fouls. Celtics are very good at limiting fouls and whether they can do so vs him will be pretty key, because Miami is short on shot-making if Butler isn't able to get into the mid-20s on points, imo. What they have that Milwaukee didn't is depth of threats----and those guys beyond Butler/Herro (Strus, Lowry if healthy, Bam, Oladipo) will get some points. Butler, and to a lesser degree Herro, are the guys who can beat you one on one.
They also allowed teams to shoot 38% from 3 in the regular season. If they do this against the Celtics, this will be a short series.
You're right. Looked at it backwards. My bad.They shot 38% for the season. They allowed teams to shoot 33.9%.
agreedI'm going to push back on this--by "mismatch", I mean "forces help/significant attention when he gets the ball". Bam Adebayo is an extremely good basketball player, but he's not that. The Celtics can mostly defend him straight up with current personnel, particularly relative to someone like Giannis or Durant or Kyrie.
Again, people really have PTSD from when he was running P&R against Kemba, with Theis as the C's best center, and Jaylen/Jayson being significantly weaker/younger.
EDIT: don't take my word for it; watch the below, and ask yourself how much of that will be available vs Boston:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55Npsec7qT8
Jimmy Butler is a very good player, but he is not in the same universe as Giannis or Durant as a scorer. You absolutely cover him singly, and he's not getting 40 against the Celtics' defenders barring unsustainably hot shooting.What is the defensive approach given that Miami has better outside shooting? Do you try to cover Butler singly and without help and let him get his 40 to avoid him setting up shooters?
Or he gets to the line 18 times.Jimmy Butler is a very good player, but he is not in the same universe as Giannis or Durant as a scorer. You absolutely cover him singly, and he's not getting 40 against the Celtics' defenders barring unsustainably hot shooting.
Sure, although we just played 2 guys who scare me much more in that regard, so the Cs are at least mentally prepared for it.Or he gets to the line 18 times.
Giannis’ high was 15 in the series and only 6 yesterday, only 2 in the final 38 minutes. I think the Celts will be ok in this aspect.Or he gets to the line 18 times.
So I hear what you say, particularly since ATL and PHI without a healthy Embiid aren't very good defensively. But I did go back and watch the highlights of the MIA-BOS game from March (linked below) and a couple of things stood out / I remembered.I'm going to push back on this--by "mismatch", I mean "forces help/significant attention when he gets the ball". Bam Adebayo is an extremely good basketball player, but he's not that. The Celtics can mostly defend him straight up with current personnel, particularly relative to someone like Giannis or Durant or Kyrie.
Again, people really have PTSD from when he was running P&R against Kemba, with Theis as the C's best center, and Jaylen/Jayson being significantly weaker/younger.
Realistically speaking, I think it is more likely that Rob doesn't play a single minute in the series than it is that he is back "healthy and not too rusty." Hoefully I am wrong but until he gets on the floor I am skeptical that he'll be back and we saw from before he was hurt that there was plenty of rust there.If Timelord is back, healthy, and not tooo rusty, this could be a quick series. This is a much better match-up for him than the Bucks series. He can play off PJ Tucker in his help defender role and really make things difficult for Jimmy, Bam, etc.
I was mostly playing but there will be a game or two where Butler has 10+ FTA. I'm not entirely sure the Celtics lose if Butler scores 40+ anyway.Giannis’ high was 15 in the series and only 6 yesterday, only 2 in the final 38 minutes. I think the Celts will be ok in this aspect.
One can understand the Pritchard/Robinson comps, but Grant Williams is absolutely the "How the fuck is this guy beating us?" guy to other fanbases.Despite some bad calls. I really like that the refs have let the players play more physical basketball so far in the playoffs. As great as Giannis is the Celtics were clearly the better team. Switch the luck (bad call) fluky Giannis 3 and the series is 5 or 6 games. The Buck's supporting cast just didn't deliver. Lopez was scoring for about a quarter and the Cs were in trouble.
The exciting thing for me is this Heat-Celtics matchup has an 80s Sixers/Celtics matchup vibe. Sure Doc and Larry were stars, but the games would rely on two other guys stepping up, and coaches adjusting on the fly. There will be a lot of Xs and Os here, and chances for guys to shine. I like the Cs chances due to the play of Pritchard and Grant. I hope Pritchard annoys Heat fans like Duncan Robinson annoyed me in the bubble series.
Jaylen scored 25 in the first half of game 2...Who hasn't had a "game" yet?
Jaylen
Smart
TL
PP
White
Like the Al Horford game or the Grant Williams game.
Yeah, it's easy to forget now after everything that happened in the rest of the game and the subsequent five games, but game 2 was The Jaylen Show until everyone else got in on the fun.Jaylen scored 25 in the first half of game 2...
That's fair. I guess it says something when it doesn't really shock me when Jaylen has 25 in a half though. He finished with 30 in 38 minutes.Jaylen scored 25 in the first half of game 2...
Is there any way to figure out shooting percentage on the first free throw versus the 2nd? I've been saying for a very long time, Jaylen is a mess on his first free throw (usually front rims it) and then almost always buries the 2nd. If someone told me he shot 60% on the 1st free throw, and 90% on the 2nd, I'd believe it without hesitation.This may be a nothingburger, but in addition to Jaylen's shaky handles the last two games, he has also missed 6 free throws (5 for 11). Wonder if there is something going on there. Hopefully not. Overall for the playoffs he is at 76.8% vs. 75.8% for the regular season, so perhaps it was just regression to the mean. But he hasn't looked all that confident at the line the last two games.
In game 7 he missed the first of two, made the second, and then his last two misses were 0-1 each (I think on and-ones). Would you consider an and-one to be the first or the second free throw? If you consider it to be like the first free throw, then your theory holds water.Is there any way to figure out shooting percentage on the first free throw versus the 2nd? I've been saying for a very long time, Jaylen is a mess on his first free throw (usually front rims it) and then almost always buries the 2nd. If someone told me he shot 60% on the 1st free throw, and 90% on the 2nd, I'd believe it without hesitation.
And if so, that makes it simple Jaylen. Pretend it's the 2nd free throw (just kidding, I try to play golf that way, pretend every swing is the same as that layup you just flush every fucking time, doesn't work).
Let me offer an alternative analysis to must win game 1. BTW: I assume that chance at a sweep means "win the next 4"Winning Game 1 is absolutely critical for having a chance at a sweep. In fact, if they let G1 slip away I’d have to say there’s just no way you can expect a sweep, no matter what they do the rest of the way. Of course, even if they pull it out Tuesday night, they would still have to bring it in G2 and win that to even think they could sweep the series. A split in Miami might feel like a good result but if it’s a sweep you’re after you just have to take both games - really there isn’t a path without doing that.
It's called the calibration effect - the same effect that makes subsequent dart throws more accurate than the first. So yes, it's very common for people to be more accurate on the second FT as opposed to the first. Here's a 2019 paper that discusses this: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ashwin-Phatak/publication/339539161_Better_with_each_throw-a_study_on_calibration_and_warm-up_decrement_of_real-time_consecutive_basketball_free_throws_in_elite_NBA_athletesMit_jedem_Wurf_besser_-_eine_Studie_zur_Kalibrierung_und_anfang/links/5e58edb34585152ce8f5199e/Better-with-each-throw-a-study-on-calibration-and-warm-up-decrement-of-real-time-consecutive-basketball-free-throws-in-elite-NBA-athletesMit-jedem-Wurf-besser-eine-Studie-zur-Kalibrierung-und-anfaen.pdf?origin=publication_detailIs there any way to figure out shooting percentage on the first free throw versus the 2nd? I've been saying for a very long time, Jaylen is a mess on his first free throw (usually front rims it) and then almost always buries the 2nd. If someone told me he shot 60% on the 1st free throw, and 90% on the 2nd, I'd believe it without hesitation.
And if so, that makes it simple Jaylen. Pretend it's the 2nd free throw (just kidding, I try to play golf that way, pretend every swing is the same as that layup you just flush every fucking time, doesn't work).
No. It's the playoffs. If the C's don't take game 1, they should make the Heat earn it. Schedule losses aren't always losses.Let me offer an alternative analysis to must win game 1. BTW: I assume that chance at a sweep means "win the next 4"
1) Game 1 feels like a schedule loss. Miami is rested and disciplined, Boston is banged up and coming off an emotional high
2) Boston has several players who could benefit from a few extra days off. In particular
AH : his efficiency, especially on the offensive end, seems to be much better the fewer his minutes
TL: he seems to be someone who is more likely to get hurt the further he is from 100% health.
MS: the "wolverine" has great recuperative powers, until he doesn't
Thus: does it make sense to rest these 3? Let DW, PP, DT ... and even Neismith .. get some real minutes. Your odds of winning game 1 drop, but they weren't great. And who knows, the limited minutes of these guys means they are not banged up. They might pull off a minor miracle.
And the benefit is for the rest of the series, especially game 2, you have a AH,TL, and MS at improved efficiency. If you believe ( I do!) that a healthy celtics team is Just Better than the Heat, that should increase the odds of winning, probably in 6.
I am not sure I buy the above argument, but I can't reject it. I agree with the notion that Miami is going to pull a page from the 80s and play a punishing physical game. If so, the benefits of 2 days of recuperation (pre game 1) might disappear by game 3.
Perhaps a tight cap on minutes in Game 1-- they all come off the bench?
I completely buy that effect. Perhaps it's because I'm a massive Jaylen fanboy and pay very close attention to everything he does, but it seems to me that he is an outlier to the extreme with it. I could be completely wrong, and definitely don't have the time to check every box score to come up with the numbers, but he seems to have always been a pretty terrible free throw shooter on the 1st ones (and the one and ones), and as good as anyone at the second free throw.It's called the calibration effect - the same effect that makes subsequent dart throws more accurate than the first. So yes, it's very common for people to be more accurate on the second FT as opposed to the first. Here's a 2019 paper that discusses this: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ashwin-Phatak/publication/339539161_Better_with_each_throw-a_study_on_calibration_and_warm-up_decrement_of_real-time_consecutive_basketball_free_throws_in_elite_NBA_athletesMit_jedem_Wurf_besser_-_eine_Studie_zur_Kalibrierung_und_anfang/links/5e58edb34585152ce8f5199e/Better-with-each-throw-a-study-on-calibration-and-warm-up-decrement-of-real-time-consecutive-basketball-free-throws-in-elite-NBA-athletesMit-jedem-Wurf-besser-eine-Studie-zur-Kalibrierung-und-anfaen.pdf?origin=publication_detail
Hmm, watching those clips again now.So I hear what you say, particularly since ATL and PHI without a healthy Embiid aren't very good defensively. But I did go back and watch the highlights of the MIA-BOS game from March (linked below) and a couple of things stood out / I remembered.
Also Butler is shooting 36% from 3P during the playoffs but that probably has at least a little to do with who he was being guarded by. Obviously if Butler can hit 36% from 3P against BOS, that's a bigger problem.
- The Cs have had problems with guarding Bam in the PnR. (If my memory serves me, the Cs have had a horrible time defending the Bam-Butler PnR in particular). In the highlights, you'll see that a few times. The Cs are spread out to guard shooters, and Bam either has the open shot or an easy roll to convert. Will be interesting to see what Ime does to defend this.
- Kyle Lowry killed the Cs on a few threes going to his left. I presume that will be in bold on the scouting report so they can figure that out like the figured out Jrue's left hand.
- Strus had two blocked shots and a big charge down the stretch so again, I think he's playing better defense than Robinson was.
- The Cs can get easy buckets with ball movement. Their problem on offense came when the ball stagnated.
I think MIA will cause problems for BOS that they didn't have against MIL or BRK since MIA has more than two players who can consistently put the ball into the basket. I don't think they are insurmountable but I do think MIA will be tougher than MIL.
And hopefully, BOS has learned that it can't have extended lapses like it did against MIL.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8CwqSyMgRk
Even though he is (unfairly) blamed for the game 5 loss, MS had good game 5.Who hasn't had a "game" yet?
Jaylen
Smart
TL
PP
White
Like the Al Horford game or the Grant Williams game.
Ouch. Do they play it safe with Smart in G1 in hopes of better heath the rest of the series?Good news bad news
View: https://twitter.com/celtics/status/1526259469986013185?s=21&t=YLuxTILsyQLMO4em1q8w0A
Boston Celtics: Marcus Smart suffered a mid-foot sprain in Game 7 against the Bucks, according to Coach Udoka, and is questionable for Game 1 against the Heat. Rob Williams will be available with no minutes restriction.
Given he left in a walking boot, it’s pretty ideal. Especially if Timelord is back.ugh - that's more bad than good
This needs to be on a sliding scale--PP's "game" is gonna be much different than JB or Marcus. One could argue that 14 points in 17 minutes, with 4/6 from three in a Game 7, is that game for a guy like PP.Who hasn't had a "game" yet?
Jaylen
Smart
TL
PP
White
Like the Al Horford game or the Grant Williams game.
MRI clean is all you need to know.Wolverine will be fine.
What a grind. Sometimes we complain about too much time between games "for TV." But 7 games in 13 days seems like something that doesn't happen in the regular season.Full schedule is out:
Game 1: Tuesday, May 17 in Miami; 8 p.m. pregame/8:30 tip
Game 2: Thursday, May 19 in Miami; 8 p.m. pregame/8:30 tip
Game 3: Saturday, May 21 at TD Garden; 8 p.m. pregame/8:30 tip
Game 4: Monday, May 23 at TD Garden; 8 p.m. pregame/8:30 tip
Game 5 (if necessary): Wednesday, May 25 in Miami; 8 p.m. pregame/8:30 tip
Game 6 (if necessary): Friday, May 27 at TD Garden; 8 p.m. pm pregame/8:30 tip
Game 7 (if necessary): Sunday, May 29 in Miami; 8 p.m. pregame/8:30 tip