To paraphrase a fool, he's closer to LeBron than he is to us.I got a kick out of Oshae initiating the offense, taking guys off the dribble and even trying out some pull-ups and fallaways. It’s a good reminder of how insanely good these guys are, even the “scrubs.”
You'll probably get your wish more post-ASB.I've abandoned any "big picture" level criticism of Joe Mazzulla as a coach. But I will say I wish he played the energy guys like Brissett a little more during this "doldrums" part of the season.
It’s so tough to evaluate true talent level (as a viewer) against a B or C squad. The tools look great, but against what defense? I remember thinking Andray Blatche was a real up and comer based on garbage time in DC.I got a kick out of Oshae initiating the offense, taking guys off the dribble and even trying out some pull-ups and fallaways. It’s a good reminder of how insanely good these guys are, even the “scrubs.”
I’d expect him to pick up his option. He’s unlikely to get more than the vet min as a FA and has a reasonable role here.I continue to be a Brissett fan. I'd love if we could find a way to retain him as a deep bench piece.
4th wing, behind the Jays and Hauser, with a defense-first role when he does see the court? I do imagine he's very useful at practice, as a foil for the starters. But we don't really expect him to get much better at shooting or passing, right? I'd think there are probably better deep bench options out there that we might want to explore as longshot development projects. For now that's his role, and for the vet min it's no big deal, but I'm not super excited to have him taking a roster spot long term.I’d expect him to pick up his option. He’s unlikely to get more than the vet min as a FA and has a reasonable role here.
That’s why I expect him to pick up his option. He isn’t getting a deal that pays more than the vet min from anyone.4th wing, behind the Jays and Hauser, with a defense-first role when he does see the court? I do imagine he's very useful at practice, as a foil for the starters. But we don't really expect him to get much better at shooting or passing, right? I'd think there are probably better deep bench options out there that we might want to explore as longshot development projects. For now that's his role, and for the vet min it's no big deal, but I'm not super excited to have him taking a roster spot long term.
They could also give him another 1+1 min with a player option. He gets a tiny bit of security, and the team gets early bird rights in 2025.That’s why I expect him to pick up his option. He isn’t getting a deal that pays more than the vet min from anyone.
Yes, I'm just asking the question (because I'm unsure of what I think) as to how the Celtics view him. Obviously he's got an option so he can come back. Clearly was a culture fit, though everyone looks like a fit when you're winning like we did. But do they think he has long term (bench) potential, or is just a stopgap for now? If he going to be one of the first to make way for the next prospect / 2nd rounder / reclamation project? I'd think Svi, Davison, Peterson and maybe Queta are ahead of him in line to walk the plank, though all but Svi are on two-way deals. They already chucked Banton and Lamar Stevens (who I thought were clearly more useless). Springer and Walsh will get another year at least. Tillman, Kornet and the top-8 playoff rotation are obviously staying and ahead of him, unless they decide to leave. So it may well be that he is the most disposable player who is on the first-team roster and can't be optioned to Maine.That’s why I expect him to pick up his option. He isn’t getting a deal that pays more than the vet min from anyone.
I am pretty sure his option is barely more than the vet minimum at this point. Both his option and the vet min for someone with his tenure is in the $2.5 million range (https://www.spotrac.com/nba/cba/minimum)I’d expect him to pick up his option. He’s unlikely to get more than the vet min as a FA and has a reasonable role here.
Yeah, the C's save tax $$$ staying at 14. With 3 two-ways 15 isn't all that necessaryCan the Cs save tax money by keeping the roster spot open all year, or do they eventually have to fill it? Could make sense to bring him back: he still has some upside, and they'd be able to easily retain him if he somehow popped.
At the same time, with Baylor on the team, and Hauser re-signed, there aren't many wing minutes left, even if some guys get hurt.
Yes, they can save money. There is only an "Incomplete Roster Charge" to the cap (as a cap hold, really) if the active roster is <12 players. Then again, right now our marginal tax multiple is 4.25, so even at a vet min (which counts as $2.09M vs cap this year), he would effectively cost the team $10.96M, after the $8.87M in tax on top of his salary. Having him available has value if we have a midseason injury, but also there are always replacement players available (or in Maine) who can do the job, so that's a steep price just to have him be a sure thing.Can the Cs save tax money by keeping the roster spot open all year, or do they eventually have to fill it? Could make sense to bring him back: he still has some upside, and they'd be able to easily retain him if he somehow popped.