6/29 vs MIA - It's Never Enough

patinorange

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 27, 2006
31,050
6 miles from Angel Stadium
Then the standings should be re-ordered by run differential. There's no way of knowing if regression is likely. They could easily just keep getting better as the season goes along
Tough to gage against this poor excuse for an offense, but their pitching looked pretty damn good. They look like a real baseball team.
 

SemperFidelisSox

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2008
31,444
Boston, MA
I think the point is more that Rob Refsnyder batting 3rd is a damning indictment of the teams poor roster construction, not that he can’t hit left handed pitching.
 

soxin6

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
7,034
Huntington Beach, CA
The Red Sox have had some amazing offensive performances that have inflated their run differential, but this team is beyond streaky. They are all or nothing and it has been a whole lot of nothing since the first two games against the Twins.
 

dhappy42

Straw Man
Oct 27, 2013
15,771
Michigan
Yeah but… if they’re not ready you could be hurting their development.
I’ve never understood this. You hurt a minor leaguer’s development if you call him up to sit on the bench. If he starts, it should accelerate his development unless he’s so completely overmatched that it gets in his head.
 

LesterFan

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2010
15,113
Boston, MA
Then the standings should be re-ordered by run differential. There's no way of knowing if regression is likely. They could easily just keep getting better as the season goes along
Point is they're not as good as their record indicates and is not a team the Red Sox should be getting swept by at home. Teams with a similar RD as them are all hovering around .500.

Cards had a good run differential when we faced them.
Not true. They had a -21 going into the series.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,464
Can’t wait until the team with 4, maybe 5, All Star Starters comes into Fenway on the 4th.
They’re gonna win each game by 10 runs
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,681
Oregon
Point is they're not as good as their record indicates and is not a team the Red Sox should be getting swept by at home. Teams with a similar RD as them are all hovering around .500.
As the Marlins leave town, their RD is 0; the Red Sox are at +6 That's a minuscule difference and -- with the Marlins playing well and the Red Sox playing poorly, a sweep certainly was in the realm of possibility.
The Red Sox have been getting beaten by teams with poor run differentials all season. Maybe it Boston's that the mirage.

Your initial post in this discussion was this
Can't comprehend 2-13 at home vs NL teams. None of them even that good of a team.
If you believe that Miami, tied for the second-best record in the NL, is not "that good of a team," you're welcome to that opinion.
As things stand, however, I'm not buying it.
 
Last edited:

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,313
The headline on RedSox.com right now is "Bello stuns fish in finale," and I kept looking at the boxscore to see if I was reading it wrong. I was not reading it wrong.
 

budcrew08

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 30, 2007
8,631
upstate NY
I don't disagree, but who do you want to see? Rafaela was just promoted to WOOstah and hasn't had a AAA AB.
I guess I don’t really know. I think it’s just because this team was built to go 81-81 and that’s boring to me. But I also understand that record also has you I. Wild Card striking distance on Sept 1. So it’s kind of a catch 22.
 

donutogre

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,243
Philadelphia
The headline on RedSox.com right now is "Bello stuns fish in finale," and I kept looking at the boxscore to see if I was reading it wrong. I was not reading it wrong.
Uh yeah, that's some serious propaganda right there. I logged on to see the score and thought I misread an alert on my phone and thought maybe the Sox actually won 2-0, not the other way around.