2018 NCAA Pool

Dan Murfman

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2001
4,219
Pawcatuck
Bonus points don’t double. 10 beating the 2 gets you 10 points. 2 for the second round and 8 bonus points. The surprising thing thing about Honsel picking Loyola is he only got 1 bonus point last round as he had them beating Texas a 10 seed.
 

Rossox

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 13, 2004
1,605
Metrowest
Thought that Duke loss was the dagger, but looks like Nova over Michigan will still do it. I’ll be in the minority not pulling for Loyola next weekend.
 

Dan Murfman

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2001
4,219
Pawcatuck
So Erik will be a big Loyola fan. If they win he will take 4 of the 5 top spots. He’s not guaranteed to win. If Kansas wins or if Nova beats Michigan he won’t win.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,163
I'd be curious to see how many points a theoretical bracket would have if it took all 1 seeds to the Final Four but upsets in all of the other games, but had the correct winner. Like this year if you project Villanova to win it all and got that right and chose upsets in basically every other game, would you be ahead of the field? Or what if you picked the correct winner overall and picked an upset in literally every other game including the other 1 vs 16 games? I have no idea where that bracket would stand, but if it is even close then that points to picking a bracket that is more about strategy than about actually picking games. That's boring to me.
Here's why this breaks down:

Picking all 1s then nailing Final 4 results:

Round 1: 29 points. Awesome.
Round 2: 4 points. (Nova and Kansas as #1's). That's it. Loyola nets you 0 because you'd be picking the upset, the 14th seeded Wright St who you picked to beat Tennessee. You'd go 2-14 in round 2. The FSU over Xavier upset? You're picking #1's.


If you switched this to picking the overall winner and upsets everywhere else? A bit better:

Round 1: 45 points, adding in the UMBC win.
Round 2: You'd lose the points for Kansas (let's just assume Nova wins) because you'd pick the upset. So, that's it, just Nova's points--2 of them.
Round 3: You're only getting points for Villanova, so 4 more, up to 51.
Round 4: You only have Villanova alive, so 8 more points, up to 59.

You'd be in 233rd place. Out of 286.

So, long story short (I may be off a tiny bit, but nothing big) what you were thinking might happen doesn't. Essentially because there aren't as many upsets as you think, and those second round upsets that actually happen? In these brackets you describe you'd be picking 16th seeds to win again.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,163
Thought that Duke loss was the dagger, but looks like Nova over Michigan will still do it. I’ll be in the minority not pulling for Loyola next weekend.
Michigan over Villanova gets me 3rd place.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,520
Hingham, MA
Here's why this breaks down:

Picking all 1s then nailing Final 4 results:

Round 1: 29 points. Awesome.
Round 2: 4 points. (Nova and Kansas as #1's). That's it. Loyola nets you 0 because you'd be picking the upset, the 14th seeded Wright St who you picked to beat Tennessee. You'd go 2-14 in round 2. The FSU over Xavier upset? You're picking #1's.


If you switched this to picking the overall winner and upsets everywhere else? A bit better:

Round 1: 45 points, adding in the UMBC win.
Round 2: You'd lose the points for Kansas (let's just assume Nova wins) because you'd pick the upset. So, that's it, just Nova's points--2 of them.
Round 3: You're only getting points for Villanova, so 4 more, up to 51.
Round 4: You only have Villanova alive, so 8 more points, up to 59.

You'd be in 233rd place. Out of 286.

So, long story short (I may be off a tiny bit, but nothing big) what you were thinking might happen doesn't. Essentially because there aren't as many upsets as you think, and those second round upsets that actually happen? In these brackets you describe you'd be picking 16th seeds to win again.
Thanks for this
 

Rossox

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 13, 2004
1,605
Metrowest
So Erik will be a big Loyola fan. If they win he will take 4 of the 5 top spots. He’s not guaranteed to win. If Kansas wins or if Nova beats Michigan he won’t win.
If Nova beats Michigan he will most certainly not win.
I’m your Huckleberry.
 

Dan Murfman

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2001
4,219
Pawcatuck
It was a good weekend for payments. I am now down to one person who I've sent a couple of emails and I haven't heard back. I'll keep trying so the prizes will be:

1st $2785
2nd $1393
3rd $668
4th $445
5th $279
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,381
It was a good weekend for payments. I am now down to one person who I've sent a couple of emails and I haven't heard back. I'll keep trying so the prizes will be:

1st $2785
2nd $1393
3rd $668
4th $445
5th $279
Any chance it is Honsel?

 

bostonbeerbelly

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 26, 2008
2,239
San Fran
I lost all chances when Duke lost. Michigan over Duke would have got me 5th, but overall I did terrible this year. Will try again next year, maybe with a new strategy.
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,924
Henderson, NV
Got the finalists, but sucked really badly early in the tournament. How badly?

Picked 7 lower seeds to win in the first round - went 1-6 in those games (Butler the only winner)
18-14 overall in the first round and got a grand total of 3 bonus points.
8-8 overall in the second round and got a grand total of 1 bonus point.
3-5 in the Sweet Sixteen
2-2 in the Elite Eight
2-0 in the Final Four

Tough to win with 4 bonus points in the whole tournament. If I wasn't so bad with those lower seeds, I'd probably have a shot.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,163
So, do I attempt to hedge tonight? Anyone feel like taking Michigan straight up for like $200?
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,163
Ugh. Well, this was the longest I was in it.

Next year!

Thanks again for running it.
 

Dan Murfman

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2001
4,219
Pawcatuck
So done for another year. During the tournament we had a little discussion about the scoring. My biggest thing about not changing it is I've done it this way for 20 years. But are there any changes I should think about?
 

bostonbeerbelly

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 26, 2008
2,239
San Fran
So done for another year. During the tournament we had a little discussion about the scoring. My biggest thing about not changing it is I've done it this way for 20 years. But are there any changes I should think about?
I think I have been in this for about 10 years now, and I see no reason to change it. It was a bit disheartening halfway through to think Honsel could score 3 out of the 5 prize slots and walk away with $3-4K, but in the end he won I think $1100.

I tried to look at some numbers and one of the scenarios I did was picking every upset 4-8, and then picking all the 1's & 2's to reach the elite 8, all 1's in the final 4, and so on...getting Nova correct.

While that strategy would get you in the top 15, you wouldn't be winning any money.

This year was a pretty big outlier, we have never seen a #1 go down first round, an 11 made it to the final 4.

I vote no changes.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,087
New York City
So done for another year. During the tournament we had a little discussion about the scoring. My biggest thing about not changing it is I've done it this way for 20 years. But are there any changes I should think about?
My only suggestion would be to raise the ante. Otherwise, this pool is awesome.
 

Jeff Van GULLY

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
4,035
Dan, it seems to me there has been a growing amount of players playing 5-10 brackets in recent years. With it being an upset bonus pool and growing the amount of entries I know it makes sense but to me it's a bit of a turn off. I still play but have dropped down to just one entry this year.

I'm sure there are lots of folks who feel the exact opposite of me but I would like it if you maxed individual entries to 5.
 

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
Dan, it seems to me there has been a growing amount of players playing 5-10 brackets in recent years. With it being an upset bonus pool and growing the amount of entries I know it makes sense but to me it's a bit of a turn off. I still play but have dropped down to just one entry this year.
So, people entering more than one bracket have caused you to stop entering more than one bracket?