I don't have any problem with the McCoy trade, nor letting Maclin walk at that amount.
Cole is also a move I'm fine with, very surprised how much money he got actually, but I'd always prefer to let a guy go a year too early than a year too late
Can't complain with the money for Graham nor the Maxwell aggression, nor going hard after McCourty (though the seeming lack of a plan b at safety seems a bit worrying)
All of this I agree. There is only one crazy move and it's the latest, and if someone high in the draft wants BRadford this would make a lot more sense. Though EVEN THEN I don't understand how it took Foles AND a 2nd round pick AND a 4/5th round swap. Foles and the swaps or the 2nd round and the swaps fine. All? That seems crazy.
If he really thinks Bradford is his guy, then I don't get it but fine. I can understand paying for your guy, just this isn't who anyone thought his guy was. If he's the guy then why no contract negotiations before the deal? You can't give up all this and then not extend him, if he does well you're over a barrel to pay up big, and if he is hurt sure the trade gets less damaging as some picks come back.
Surely if BRadford is to stay then the contract needs to be extended, and I have no idea how that looks. Bradford is a knee injury from done you'd have to think so can't be a lot of guaranteed money, and maybe Bradford would rather bet on himself, like MAclin did.
I liked all the other moves. OR at least I'm ok with them. I do think the offense needs some playmakers though, you're looking at Cooper, Huff and Matthews at WR and Polk and Sproles at RB and a ? at RG. The D is a safety and CB from looking set. But that's two big holes.