Denver Nuggets (2) vs Minnesota Timberwolves (3) - 2024 WC Second Round

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,757
I think perhaps what you're missing from Celtics fans is the annoyance that the media is like oh Denver way better because they won a title and Celtics so lucky to even be in the ECF bc whomever they play has injuries (with some but a little mention of Zing being out) and then Denver with no notable injuries bows out in the second round, it's now again that the Celtics have it so easy bc the team with no notable injuries just lost. EDIT: This like media 101 in our era. It's kinda maddening.
The Celtics are listed as the favorite by virtually...everyone. And have been since before the season. So obviously the consensus is they are the best team and not at all lucky to be in the ECF. The idea they are some sort of media victim is just silly.

To point out -- correctly -- that the opposition in the playoffs has been, er, quite underwhelming 1) is also correct and 2) doesn't contradict that the Celts would still be a favorite if their opponents were better/healthier.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,914
NOVA
The Celtics are listed as the favorite by virtually...everyone. And have been since before the season. So obviously the consensus is they are the best team and not at all lucky to be in the ECF. The idea they are some sort of media victim is just silly.

To point out -- correctly -- that the opposition in the playoffs has been, er, quite underwhelming 1) is also correct and 2) doesn't contradict that the Celts would still be a favorite if their opponents were better/healthier.
I get that Vegas and most of us here believe the Celtics are the best team. I just don't see that kind of consensus at all among the media. In fact, many media have discounted what the Cs have accomplished and many until tonight argued that the Celts will go down to the Nuggets and some have said they'd be lucky to win a single game against them. That's all I was pointing out. I don't see where I'm wrong.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,914
NOVA
I guess I'm confused by your response because it's been well-documented here that the current Celtics narrative nationally and even locally among the media is BS.
 

Sox and Rocks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
5,886
Northern Colorado
The Celtics are listed as the favorite by virtually...everyone. And have been since before the season. So obviously the consensus is they are the best team and not at all lucky to be in the ECF. The idea they are some sort of media victim is just silly.

To point out -- correctly -- that the opposition in the playoffs has been, er, quite underwhelming 1) is also correct and 2) doesn't contradict that the Celts would still be a favorite if their opponents were better/healthier.
Exactly. And the same can/should be said of the Nuggets last year (except for the fact that they weren't the favorite by most, if anyone, before the season). But this thread has shown multiple opinions otherwise.

The latter certainly applies to both the Nuggets of last year and the Celtics of this year.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
10,205
The Celtics are listed as the favorite by virtually...everyone. And have been since before the season. So obviously the consensus is they are the best team and not at all lucky to be in the ECF. The idea they are some sort of media victim is just silly.

To point out -- correctly -- that the opposition in the playoffs has been, er, quite underwhelming 1) is also correct and 2) doesn't contradict that the Celts would still be a favorite if their opponents were better/healthier.
I don’t think anyone has said that the Celtics are lucky to be in the ECF….your second paragraph is 100% right
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
10,205
I missed the talk that they were some sort of juggernaut dynasty. They've been described exactly as they are: a terrific team with probably the best starting 5, but incredibly thin. They were favored to come out of the West, which I think was totally fair, but it's not like anyone is particularly shocked they lost...everyone saw their faults.

I'm reading 2 things in this thread: how overrated Denver's title is for having a path that was relatively easy in last year's playoffs, and that somehow the Celts -- who were and are the title favorite -- are being dis-respected (before they've even won a title) for having their even easier path this year noted.
Yes to all of this.

No one was acting like the Nuggets were a juggernaut. The closest to that in the media is probably KOC, who is a doofus and almost a parody at this point.

What I’ve seen is people recognizing that Jokic is the best player in the world and picking them with the rationale of “their the champions and until they get beat, I am not picking against them” which happens literally every year when it comes to these exercises
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,336
Hingham, MA
Hopefully you're consistent and will discredit a possible Celtics Championship this year, should it come to fruition, in the same manner. After all, 8 (without Butler), 4 (without Mitchell), 6, and either 3 or 5 is basically the same, no?
I never said their title didn’t count or wasn’t earned. What I said was I didn’t understand why they were considered this unstoppable force like the Bulls or the Warriors given that they have never had a dominant season. Just look at the all time net rating leaders.
 
Last edited:

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
12,093
Yes to all of this.

No one was acting like the Nuggets were a juggernaut. The closest to that in the media is probably KOC, who is a doofus and almost a parody at this point.

What I’ve seen is people recognizing that Jokic is the best player in the world and picking them with the rationale of “their the champions and until they get beat, I am not picking against them” which happens literally every year when it comes to these exercises
I think we have to be fair to KOC though.. the Celtics aren’t going to be able to beat Denver in the finals.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,761
Blaming Malone for not getting Jokić rest when up 20 doesn’t make any sense for a couple reasons. One, it was down to a 1-2 possession game when Jokić would even be considered to get a blow around the 3Q intermission. Two, they were up 20 a minute into the 3Q following a 20 min HT break. Three, do people forget so quickly how teams have made runs on Denver this postseason the moment Jokic’s fanny hits the chair?

The Nuggets misses a ton of open threes and missed an opportunity to put the game away. It’s easy to search for other reasons why they lost and so many point to the coach as if the answer to stopping a Wolves run is less Jokic on the floor.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,743
around the way
Blaming Malone for not getting Jokić rest when up 20 doesn’t make any sense for a couple reasons. One, it was down to a 1-2 possession game when Jokić would even be considered to get a blow around the 3Q intermission. Two, they were up 20 a minute into the 3Q following a 20 min HT break. Three, do people forget so quickly how teams have made runs on Denver this postseason the moment Jokic’s fanny hits the chair?

The Nuggets misses a ton of open threes and missed an opportunity to put the game away. It’s easy to search for other reasons why they lost and so many point to the coach as if the answer to stopping a Wolves run is less Jokic on the floor.
Yeah game 7 was Jokic and Murray and pray for rain. Hard to imagine what evidence anyone has that some JAG would have been more effective than a gassed Jokic. Nobody else on that team was doing jack.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,603
Blaming Malone for not getting Jokić rest when up 20 doesn’t make any sense for a couple reasons. One, it was down to a 1-2 possession game when Jokić would even be considered to get a blow around the 3Q intermission. Two, they were up 20 a minute into the 3Q following a 20 min HT break. Three, do people forget so quickly how teams have made runs on Denver this postseason the moment Jokic’s fanny hits the chair?

The Nuggets misses a ton of open threes and missed an opportunity to put the game away. It’s easy to search for other reasons why they lost and so many point to the coach as if the answer to stopping a Wolves run is less Jokic on the floor.
I think Malone will look back and wish he'd given Joker a few more minutes off. He was probably hoping they could keep the lead around 10-12 despite the runs in the 3Q and that might break Minnesota. For all we know he tried during one of the TOs and Joker told him no.

But point taken too. Things happened very fast, he rode his horses and Minnesota made a few more plays. Nothing really to see here. Minnesota took the game. It wasn't given to them.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
31,163
Blaming Malone for not getting Jokić rest when up 20 doesn’t make any sense for a couple reasons. One, it was down to a 1-2 possession game when Jokić would even be considered to get a blow around the 3Q intermission. Two, they were up 20 a minute into the 3Q following a 20 min HT break. Three, do people forget so quickly how teams have made runs on Denver this postseason the moment Jokic’s fanny hits the chair?
Agree that it would have been hard to get Jokic out in the 3Q but Malone subbed out Jokic at 2Q / 9:14 with DEN up 30-19 and then subbed him back in at 2Q / 7:50 w DEN up 33-22 (Murray was in the middle of hitting 2 FTs). Maybe a couple of more minutes here helps Jokic in the 2H. Who knows?

I was in the car listening to the TV feed so I couldn't tell what the urgency was to get Jokic back in the game with a 10 point lead - although MIN quickly climbed back to within 5 after Jokic subbed back in (though DEN ended the 2Q on a 19-9 run to get it to 15).
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,336
Hingham, MA
Agree that it would have been hard to get Jokic out in the 3Q but Malone subbed out Jokic at 2Q / 9:14 with DEN up 30-19 and then subbed him back in at 2Q / 7:50 w DEN up 33-22 (Murray was in the middle of hitting 2 FTs). Maybe a couple of more minutes here helps Jokic in the 2H. Who knows?

I was in the car listening to the TV feed so I couldn't tell what the urgency was to get Jokic back in the game with a 10 point lead - although MIN quickly climbed back to within 5 after Jokic subbed back in (though DEN ended the 2Q on a 19-9 run to get it to 15).
Yeah that was jumping the gun. Give him a few more minutes, ok, what's the worst that happens, the Wolves tie the game? So what.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,757
I think Malone will look back and wish he'd given Joker a few more minutes off. He was probably hoping they could keep the lead around 10-12 despite the runs in the 3Q and that might break Minnesota. For all we know he tried during one of the TOs and Joker told him no.

But point taken too. Things happened very fast, he rode his horses and Minnesota made a few more plays. Nothing really to see here. Minnesota took the game. It wasn't given to them.
I think that's fair. Folks keeping pointing to the short time the Nuggets were up 20, but they had a comfortable lead for much of the game -- at least from early in the 2nd Q. I have no problem with Malone "riding his horses" -- I hear DeAndre Jordan isn't what he once was. :) And it's definitely 20/20 hindsight to see Jokic barely making it up and down the court at the end of the game and say that should have been anticipated. Malone's a good coach and presumably knows Jokic's endurance as well as anyone and god knows Thibs has run his players well past most understandings of what is advisable, and yet they played through it (different question as to whether or not that led to injury propensity), so what do any of us know?

But, knowing what we saw of Jokic over the last 6 or 8 minutes of the game, I think it's fair to surmise that a few minutes more of rest throughout the game may have been advisable.
 

astrozombie

New Member
Sep 12, 2022
441
Ended up watching the whole second half last night and it was immensely entertaining. Jokic looked like something wasn't clicking at that point and the whole team suffered for it. And I'm a fan of Ant Man but I am borderline terrified of the Cs playing against him in the Finals.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,562
AZ
I think that's fair. Folks keeping pointing to the short time the Nuggets were up 20, but they had a comfortable lead for much of the game -- at least from early in the 2nd Q. I have no problem with Malone "riding his horses" -- I hear DeAndre Jordan isn't what he once was. :) And it's definitely 20/20 hindsight to see Jokic barely making it up and down the court at the end of the game and say that should have been anticipated. Malone's a good coach and presumably knows Jokic's endurance as well as anyone and god knows Thibs has run his players well past most understandings of what is advisable, and yet they played through it (different question as to whether or not that led to injury propensity), so what do any of us know?

But, knowing what we saw of Jokic over the last 6 or 8 minutes of the game, I think it's fair to surmise that a few minutes more of rest throughout the game may have been advisable.
Looks like he played 38-40 minutes in the other wins in the series but maybe some of that was garbage time.

Yeah. I guess the way I look at it, the thing that is great about a 20 point lead is you can get outscored by 19 and win. It is like having money in the bank that you can spend different ways. It’s all hindsight, like other posters are saying, but seeing him quit and put his mouth guard away while it was still a game most teams try to extend was just jarring. Maybe it wouldn’t have mattered ether way.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,846
Looks like he played 38-40 minutes in the other wins in the series but maybe some of that was garbage time.

Yeah. I guess the way I look at it, the thing that is great about a 20 point lead is you can get outscored by 19 and win. It is like having money in the bank that you can spend different ways. It’s all hindsight, like other posters are saying, but seeing him quit and put his mouth guard away while it was still a game most teams try to extend was just jarring. Maybe it wouldn’t have mattered ether way.
Particularly when we just saw 2 games in one series with 5-6 point comebacks in the last 30 seconds.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,472
Imaginationland
I will never bet against the Celtics.
Most of my pessimism is I doubt KP will be back to 100%
I may be one of the few saying this (and definitely no one in the national media would agree), but Boston can win the title without KP, or at least with him at less than 100%. That's what Denver losing means - they weren't an unstoppable offensive juggernaut, but their late game execution and Jokic personally were just terrible matchups for Boston. Without Porzingis, the current Celtics are a more top heavy version of last year's team (weaker bench, stronger closing five) that made it to game 7 of the ECF. Both Dallas and Minnesota have major weaknesses of their own, especially if Ant is coming back down to earth.

I'm not buying a version of reality in which Boston without KP (29-6 when he's not playing) can't beat a couple of teams that they finished 8-14 games ahead of in the regular season. Without KP, we might be slight underdogs against one of them. With KP (even less than 100%), we'll be solid favorites.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,812
Row 14
Ended up watching the whole second half last night and it was immensely entertaining. Jokic looked like something wasn't clicking at that point and the whole team suffered for it. And I'm a fan of Ant Man but I am borderline terrified of the Cs playing against him in the Finals.
Jokic just got mucked up with KAT who is completely unpredictable. He was cooking Gobert but the moment KAT took Joker and Gobert could move back to Gordon, everything shut down. Ant was awful especially the first half of the game last night. He was bailed out by the centers.

Edit - I forgot Naz Reid who was incredible
 
Last edited:

astrozombie

New Member
Sep 12, 2022
441
Jokic just got mucked up with KAT who is completely unpredictable. He was cooking Gobert but the moment KAT took Joker and Gobert could move back to Gordon, everything shut down. Ant was awful especially the first half of the game last night. He was bailed out by the centers.

Edit - I forgot Naz Reid who was incredible
Yeah, good points on KAT and Ant. I was shocked when they flashed Ant's first half stats.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,906
Saint Paul, MN
Jokic just got mucked up with KAT who is completely unpredictable. He was cooking Gobert but the moment KAT took Joker and Gobert could move back to Gordon, everything shut down. Ant was awful especially the first half of the game last night. He was bailed out by the centers.

Edit - I forgot Naz Reid who was incredible
Yea, it works real well having Gobert cleaning up everyone's messes on the back line, rather than KAT trying to do that.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,812
Row 14
If that KAT played in 90% of their games, we'd be talking about them as the clear favorites to win it all. He was a menace.
You can only pull that KAT off against the 76ers, Lakers, Orlando, and Nuggets. Maybe against the Celtics with KP. Without a ball dominant big, that KAT is just a foul machine ready to unleash. the moops is right, KAT is awful at cleaning up in the back court.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,420

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
12,093
It always amuses me when players get upset for getting shown up. If you don't like getting disrespected on your home floor, maybe try not blowing 20 point leads?

View: https://twitter.com/legendz_nba/status/1792723605564084372
Eh.. I don’t think it’s too much to ask your opponents not to be dicks.. Jokic isn’t disrespectful.. Ant talks a lot of junk for someone who hasn’t won anything and only had 8 points into the third quarter.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,757
Oh spare me. And the Lakers were upset that the Nuggets talked so much trash to them last year, such tears. Grow up and deal with it...it's a wave. Jokic had no energy to run up the court at the end of the game but plenty to run after Edwards because he....waved? *faints from horror!* If it's so awful maybe he should run up to his own teammates when they do similar things? Or, heck, it's not just that Jamal Murray is famous for his celebrations, but now also for throwing crap on the court. Didn't see Jokic say anything to him (and that's actually sort of a serious issue)

By the way, the trash talk from the Nuggets included their excellent but quite bush coach, who last night bitched out a reporter for asking a legit question, while last year he was chanting "dynasty dynasty dynasty" and how he was "the Lakers daddy" or whatever it was after the Nuggets won. If you're going to dish it out, you can take a...wave. Best Alan Iverson voice: "a ...wave?"

One of the things I like basketball is it doesn't have that ridiculous baseball thing that guys aren't supposed to celebrate in any way. I thought it was great when Ant talked trash to (his childhood idol) Durant after they beat him and KD had just the right response. Laugh.
 

Montana Fan

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 18, 2000
8,982
Twin Bridges, Mt.
Oh spare me. And the Lakers were upset that the Nuggets talked so much trash to them last year, such tears. Grow up and deal with it...it's a wave. Jokic had no energy to run up the court at the end of the game but plenty to run after Edwards because he....waved? *faints from horror!* If it's so awful maybe he should run up to his own teammates when they do similar things? Or, heck, it's not just that Jamal Murray is famous for his celebrations, but now also for throwing crap on the court. Didn't see Jokic say anything to him (and that's actually sort of a serious issue)

By the way, the trash talk from the Nuggets included their excellent but quite bush coach, who last night bitched out a reporter for asking a legit question, while last year he was chanting "dynasty dynasty dynasty" and how he was "the Lakers daddy" or whatever it was after the Nuggets won. If you're going to dish it out, you can take a...wave. Best Alan Iverson voice: "a ...wave?"

One of the things I like basketball is it doesn't have that ridiculous baseball thing that guys aren't supposed to celebrate in any way. I thought it was great when Ant talked trash to (his childhood idol) Durant after they beat him and KD had just the right response. Laugh.
C’mon Billy B, it’s the heat of the moment, on both sides, nothing more.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,846
Oh spare me. And the Lakers were upset that the Nuggets talked so much trash to them last year, such tears. Grow up and deal with it...it's a wave. Jokic had no energy to run up the court at the end of the game but plenty to run after Edwards because he....waved? *faints from horror!* If it's so awful maybe he should run up to his own teammates when they do similar things? Or, heck, it's not just that Jamal Murray is famous for his celebrations, but now also for throwing crap on the court. Didn't see Jokic say anything to him (and that's actually sort of a serious issue)

By the way, the trash talk from the Nuggets included their excellent but quite bush coach, who last night bitched out a reporter for asking a legit question, while last year he was chanting "dynasty dynasty dynasty" and how he was "the Lakers daddy" or whatever it was after the Nuggets won. If you're going to dish it out, you can take a...wave. Best Alan Iverson voice: "a ...wave?"

One of the things I like basketball is it doesn't have that ridiculous baseball thing that guys aren't supposed to celebrate in any way. I thought it was great when Ant talked trash to (his childhood idol) Durant after they beat him and KD had just the right response. Laugh.
This. The Nuggets were happy to dish it out. Not so happy to have one of the biggest Game 7 chokes in history rubbed in their face.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,757
C’mon Billy B, it’s the heat of the moment, on both sides, nothing more.
Dang, Billy B -- that's a blast from the past! Took me a sec to even remember that was my former handle here...I'm amazed you remembered. But, hey, it's been many (too many) years. :)

(And you're probably right that shouldn't sweat the heat of the moment stuff. For some reason Malone saying "enough with the stupid dumb-ass questions" (or words similar to that) to a journalist just trying to do his job chapped my ass a bit last night given how cocky Malone is when he's winning. But you're right on Jokic).