They can’t re spot it if it wouldn’t result in a first, since this is officially a coach’s challenge. And you lose the challenge/TO.They won't lose the timeout. They'll spot it closer to the line to gain, but not give them the first down.
They can’t re spot it if it wouldn’t result in a first, since this is officially a coach’s challenge. And you lose the challenge/TO.They won't lose the timeout. They'll spot it closer to the line to gain, but not give them the first down.
How did Gene not mention this immediately? Unless I missed it?He pulled the ball back, this isn’t the EZ
Yes. This. It drives me crazy. A player reaches the ball forward to cross the goal line, and as soon as he does that, the play is over and it's a touchdown. But a player reaching forward in the field of play and pulls it back doesn't (or SHOULDN'T) get credit for the for forward reach if he pulls it back on his own. It's like a runner crossing the line to gain, then cutting backward to avoid a tackle. He doesn't get "forward progress" in that case. But they give these guys this version of "forward progress" all the time and it makes no sense.He pulled the ball back!
The challenge is if he got a first down or not. Moving inches forward without a first down is a lost challenge.They won't lose the timeout. They'll spot it closer to the line to gain, but not give them the first down.
Nice!Pacheco is who you call upon to stop the bleeding.
@CFB_Rules already weighed in in @Mystic Merlin ‘s post. But I agree that the two lines of divergence in the thread is fascinating. It’s like a time travel show / movie.Thread full of people who watch a ton of football and no one knows what the rule is here.
Park Ave involved right?That’s just an incorrect overturn
Thanks for this. That is what I thought too.That’s just an incorrect overturn
Nobody knows nothing.It wasn't even close. Terrible officiating.