Let's say BB stays on until he retires. What does that mean for the franchise?

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,977
Dallas
They are not the worst coached team in the league. They are probably bottom 10 though and that's bad enough.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,865
Melrose, MA
So I have not been in the camp of BB being a problem. But now I’ll ask things this way - what’s the upside to keeping him for a 2-3 year final run given what we have seen post-Brady?
Is there any reason to believe that he can build from where the team is today to legit contender in whatever time he has left?
 

P'tucket rhymes with...

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2006
11,663
The Coney Island of my mind
Which teams are playing worse right now? HOU is playing much, much better football right now. Let that sink in and take off the glasses.
I'm not wearing any glasses, and there's no argument that was a world class goatfuck. But you can find that sort of mindboiggling nonsense in 3-5 games on any give weekend. Unless you think the OL is secretly world class and that Mac Fucking Jones is Brady in disguise, 7-7 doesn't sniff the bottom of the league.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,296
Imaginationland
That was worse than the butt fumble. It doesn't hold a candle to Leon Lett.

That was the worst ever.
In a vacuum maybe. Adding context, this is definitely worse. The Cowboys still won the super bowl after Lett's play. Not that this Patriots team was a serious super bowl contender, but this all but ensures that they will miss the playoffs.
 

IdiotKicker

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
10,902
Somerville, MA
Is there any reason to believe that he can build from where the team is today to legit contender in whatever time he has left?
That’s kind of where I am at. Like, he’s the best ever. But he has a couple years left and his first few post-Brady have resulted in likely two seasons out of the playoffs. From a risk-reward perspective, what is the case for keeping him? I mean, the BB thing to do is to move on before it gets too late. And it might already be too late.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
26,019
Los Angeles, CA
Meyers throwing to Mac can't possible be what they coached. I'd love to hear what they called.

Edit: I mean I don't think they coach laterals like that...
Why are they lateralling in the first place though? That's a desperate move you make when you're down with no time left. It's obviously risky.
 

Marbleheader

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2004
11,745
This franchise deserves every bit of what happened at the end. Top to bottom failure. Big changes ahead.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,169
Tuukka's refugee camp
That’s kind of where I am at. Like, he’s the best ever. But he has a couple years left and his first few post-Brady have resulted in likely two seasons out of the playoffs. From a risk-reward perspective, what is the case for keeping him? I mean, the BB thing to do is to move on before it gets too late. And it might already be too late.
The team doesn’t have a ton of talent (at least on offense) yet is still 7-7 a year after making the playoffs with a rookie QB despite losing multiple coaches every year due to sustained past success and promoted coordinators taking assistants with them.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,011
I feel 100% confident none of the coaches said "hey if you get the chance to throw the ball 20 yards backwards to the least athletic guy on the field... take that" on the final play.

I think people keep blaming dumb plays on the coaches instead of the players who make the decisions. The coaches don't have mind control... things like a delay of game... sure might be bad coaching. Things like idiotic decisions in the run of play is on the player, that isn't anything you can coach out, it isn't not knowing a rule, it's just an idiot being an idiot.

I think just the fact that we are 500 is some proof of pretty good coaching, as is the defense, and that we have one of the best 3rd quarter records in the league.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,865
Melrose, MA
That’s kind of where I am at. Like, he’s the best ever. But he has a couple years left and his first few post-Brady have resulted in likely two seasons out of the playoffs. From a risk-reward perspective, what is the case for keeping him? I mean, the BB thing to do is to move on before it gets too late. And it might already be too late.
The cases for keeping him (in no particular order):

1. Nostalgia
2. Last hurrah/orderly transition. You bring in, say, BOB to fix the offense (to the extent it is possible), have one more decent year, then take over (if you want BOB taking over).
3. The team really is a lot better than it seems, and BB really can right the ship.

None of those seem convincing.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,977
Dallas
Sure seems like the players improved there on the laterals. Rham's was ok - but Meyers made an idiotic play. Why are we putting a guy going off script on the coaching staff?
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,938
Deep inside Muppet Labs
I feel 100% confident none of the coaches said "hey if you get the chance to throw the ball 20 yards backwards to the least athletic guy on the field... take that" on the final play.

I think people keep blaming dumb plays on the coaches instead of the players who make the decisions. The coaches don't have mind control... things like a delay of game... sure might be bad coaching. Things like idiotic decisions in the run of play is on the player, that isn't anything you can coach out, it isn't not knowing a rule, it's just an idiot being an idiot.
Dumb players continuing to get playing time while mistakes are not cleared up is 100% on the coaching staff.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,336
Here
So I have not been in the camp of BB being a problem. But now I’ll ask things this way - what’s the upside to keeping him for a 2-3 year final run given what we have seen post-Brady?
He took a total turnaround team and built a top 5 defense that will be good for years to come. Picking Patricia was abysmal, but he’ll get a mulligan and reset the offense next year. He at least deserves that chance.
 

IdiotKicker

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
10,902
Somerville, MA
The team doesn’t have a ton of talent (at least on offense) yet is still 7-7 a year after making the playoffs with a rookie QB despite losing multiple coaches every year due to sustained past success and promoted coordinators taking assistants with them.
So why keep doing that is kind of my point? What is going to click next year of the year after? Because I’m the NFL, turnaround are not 5-year projects. They’re usually 2-3 because of draft impact and free agency. So given that we’ve done one of those cycles once and have a coach who maybe has time for one more and then to leave, why not look for someone who can stick around after that next cycle and maybe produce better results?

I love BB. He is the best ever. But what about the post-Brady era has us saying “Maybe the next few years will be different?” That’s the case I’m making. Not that he’s horrible. But that if he’s just ok and only has a few years left, what’s the point?
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,977
Dallas
I feel 100% confident none of the coaches said "hey if you get the chance to throw the ball 20 yards backwards to the least athletic guy on the field... take that" on the final play.

I think people keep blaming dumb plays on the coaches instead of the players who make the decisions. The coaches don't have mind control... things like a delay of game... sure might be bad coaching. Things like idiotic decisions in the run of play is on the player, that isn't anything you can coach out, it isn't not knowing a rule, it's just an idiot being an idiot.

I think just the fact that we are 500 is some proof of pretty good coaching, as is the defense, and that we have one of the best 3rd quarter records in the league.
Agree 100% this thread is just an extension of the game thread right now. I get why people are pissed but if players go off-script I don't think it is fair to blame the coaching staff. If they called a run and to go into OT and the players don't do that... that's on them.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,011
Dumb players continuing to get playing time while mistakes are not cleared up is 100% on the coaching staff.
I mean... who else is gonna play? Are we going to cut Meyers who is our best WR and replace him with a street FA? We're too thin and too injured to bench guys for a dumb mistake.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,003
Unreal America
Fire the whole team and staff into the sun. Just dumb fuck football. We used to watch teams beat themselves now they beat themselves.
This is where I’m at. There’s maybe 10 guys on the roster I’d keep. The rest are replaceable, and dumb as shit to boot. The staff is all replaceable. Tear it all down.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,903
Belichick still has enough earned trust with me that I don't think he should move on quite yet. But he needs to scrap pretty much his entire staff and start from scratch. The wholes of bad coaching are everyone on this team.

The last play was such a disaster, but don't forget the supreme special teams fuck up that led to the blocked punt in the first half. That shit used to never happen.
 

GreyisGone

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
2,289
Agree 100% this thread is just an extension of the game thread right now. I get why people are pissed but if players go off-script I don't think it is fair to blame the coaching staff. If they called a run and to go into OT and the players don't do that... that's on them.
Is it? We spent two decades celebrating how great the Patriots were because they were the most disciplined team in the NFL because of their coaching. It has to cut both ways.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,011
I actually thought Patricia was pretty good today and the QB play was abysmal tbh.
yep coaching was generally good today, 2 players had terrible mistakes (Cardona snapping early, Jakobi's disaster) and the QB was terrible, and despite that we were positioned to win.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,938
Deep inside Muppet Labs
I mean... who else is gonna play? Are we going to cut Meyers who is our best WR and replace him with a street FA? We're too thin and too injured to bench guys for a dumb mistake.
Your best receiver by definition doesn’t do something that fucking brain dead. Ergo Meyers is nowhere near our best receiver.

This coaching staff has shown there are no consequences for bad play anyway. No wonder the players are fucking idiots.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,378
They’re borderline elite on one side of the ball and are sticking in games with horrible o-line play and some of the worst quarterback play in the league. Firing Bill is a be careful what you wish for situation, I really believe that.

A seat that should never have been possible to get hot should be warm for the Patricia and Judge hires alone, and the frequency with which they’ve made dumb mistakes for 3 years running is not a good sign. But I don’t see canning Bill being the solution.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,169
Tuukka's refugee camp
So why keep doing that is kind of my point? What is going to click next year of the year after? Because I’m the NFL, turnaround are not 5-year projects. They’re usually 2-3 because of draft impact and free agency. So given that we’ve done one of those cycles once and have a coach who maybe has time for one more and then to leave, why not look for someone who can stick around after that next cycle and maybe produce better results?

I love BB. He is the best ever. But what about the post-Brady era has us saying “Maybe the next few years will be different?” That’s the case I’m making. Not that he’s horrible. But that if he’s just ok and only has a few years left, what’s the point?
I don’t like making change for change sake. This post screams that to me given they’re a borderline playoff team that made the playoffs last year and I don’t really think everyone here would be okay with bottoming out despite how sexy it’s become to intentionally suck.