Drummond - TheisWhat are the defensive matchups for the Nets, starters?
Assume the Nets start Drummond, KD, Brown, Curry, and KI as they did in the play in.
Great point. Individual matchups/talent do not account for the Celtics cohesiveness advantage as a unit. The other thing is that the Nets really lack a second wing defender so finding matchup advantages should be a 48 minute drain on the Nets. Tatum had 50+ against our one game against this lineup.But if the Celtics play the way they have been and the shots fall this analysis of who has better players in meaningless because the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. If the Celtics play together on offense and defense like they have been — it’s over.
I'm not aware of any bad blood between Kyrie and Tatum, so this must be about JT wanting to prove himself against the biggest star in the conference.On NBC series preview, Mannix said that he's hearing from people out of JT's camp that he really wanted BRK.
Isn't Mannix the reporter who came out and said he'd heard Horford was unvaccinated -- after Al had publicly said he was vaxxed?On NBC series preview, Mannix said that he's hearing from people out of JT's camp that he really wanted BRK.
Sorry yes you are correct - it's about him measuring up against KD. I should have added that.I'm not aware of any bad blood between Kyrie and Tatum, so this must be about JT wanting to prove himself against the biggest star in the conference.
You're correct too but I wouldn't be shocked if JT really wanted to play KD given what he's said about KD in a couple of podcasts (Draymond's and Reddick's) and given that by all reports, JT really wants to win the MVP next year and a great way to show that JT's on the top level is to take down KD.Isn't Mannix the reporter who came out and said he'd heard Horford was unvaccinated -- after Al had publicly said he was vaxxed?
I'm not aware of any bad blood between Kyrie and Tatum, so this must be about JT wanting to prove himself against the biggest star in the conference.
Tatum says that he’s still close to Kyrie and that they talk fairly regularly and talks about how much he’s learned from him.Sorry yes you are correct - it's about him measuring up against KD. I should have added that.
You're correct too but I wouldn't be shocked if JT really wanted to play KD given what he's said about KD in a couple of podcasts (Draymond's and Reddick's) and given that by all reports, JT really wants to win the MVP next year and a great way to show that JT's on the top level is to take down KD.
BTW, JB also said that he's gotten closer with KI lately as KI has been "hitting him up" to talk recently.Tatum says that he’s still close to Kyrie and that they talk fairly regularly and talks about how much he’s learned from him.
8/13 for Big Al.Horford had a game that has to be on his short list for best as a Celtic. 20 points, 15 rebounds in 41 minutes. Shot 8 of 16 from the field, 2 for 2 from three, and played fantastic defense, especially down the stretch.
I think so. There was minimal (if any) small ball with Durant at the 5 today. I think the problem with that (Durant at 5) is that it means playing Bruce Brown as the power forward.It seems pretty clear that the Nets are a much better defensive unit with Claxton as Drummond really struggles with the speed of the game. I think we’ll see less of Andre and more small-ball with Durant at the 5 that they’ve used a little bit down the stretch.
The board battle will get even sillier, too, but it might be the lesser of two evils for BKN.I think so. There was minimal (if any) small ball with Durant at the 5 today. I think the problem with that (Durant at 5) is that it means playing Bruce Brown as the power forward.
Certainly possible. But I came away thinking that the Celtics can clean up a few things and get better, and I am not sure if Brooklyn can do the same.Its remarkable how closely matched these teams were for game one. The composition of scoring is very different for each club but aside from shooting, both teams went to the line 24 times, both had 12 steals and even turnovers were pretty close.
I hope the predictions of a five game series are still accurate but this feels like its going the distance, especially after that game.
Prolly more white, smart, brown, Tatum too. Which paired with al is very switch and tough on the guards.I would guess that less Drummond will mean less Theis/more GW. I think that is OK for the Celtics. Theis doesn't offer much in this series, and Grant, his cold-shooting today aside, can.
I hope you are correct but the Nets coaching/players will adjust too. These are veterans and they know what works against the Cs defense and will push things there.Certainly possible. But I came away thinking that the Celtics can clean up a few things and get better, and I am not sure if Brooklyn can do the same.
Edit: The Celtics might also have shown some struggles early with the long layoff between games.
Maybe the most overlooked contribution to the Cs' win was KI's elbow to JB's nose (not sure why it wasn't at least reviewed) that lead to JB bleeding from his nose.The Celtics who battled in the 4th and would not allow this game be lost were Marcus Smart, Al Horford, and Jaylen Brown.
I buy that. Although in theory that rest should have given similar defensive energy to the Nets — who allowed Jaylen to waltz right to the rim after the Kyrie 3.Maybe the most overlooked contribution to the Cs' win was KI's elbow to JB's nose (not sure why it wasn't at least reviewed) that lead to JB bleeding from his nose.
The trainers having to work on JB's bleeding gave the Cs a blow and I think really helped JT as he was able to move to his feet on defense forcing KD to put up his last heave.
Amazing win.
I was thinking this too in the first quarter. Irving and Durant were casually tossing in free throws and the Celts were missing them. They just seemed wound a bit tighter than the vets on Brooklyn.That game was extremely intense, especially at the beginning. I have to think that affects the younger Celtics more than it does Durant or Kyrie.
If Kyrie guards Tatum like he did on the last play, I’m good with that.I think we're a game or two away from Kyrie imploding and demanding to guard Tatum. Despite his production, I thought he looked a bit rattled.
C's in four still seems reasonable to me.
BRK was defending the 3P line and doing anything not to foul. Pretty typical of a team up 3 in the last minute to give up an easy 2.I buy that. Although in theory that rest should have given similar defensive energy to the Nets — who allowed Jaylen to waltz right to the rim after the Kyrie 3.
That was on Durant, who was [sort of] covering Tatum. He was caught ball watching and Tatum cut right behind him for the layup. Kyrie can't possibly be expected to provide much resistance in the paint against a skilled scorer who has at least a half a foot on him (and a head of steam).If Kyrie guards Tatum like he did on the last play, I’m good with that.
Yeah.. Kyrie's man was actually out on the three point line. He cheated down into the lane to try and keep anyone from going to the rim. Didn't help the Nets either that two players flew past Smart on the pump fake leaving the other three Nets to guard five.That was on Durant, who was [sort of] covering Tatum. He was caught ball watching and Tatum cut right behind him for the layup. Kyrie can't possibly be expected to provide much resistance in the paint against a skilled scorer who has at least a half a foot on him (and a head of steam).
I think this is possible.. but the C's were also a few good possessions away from winning by ten as well. A lot of things had to go right today for the Nets to get it close late. Hopefully the C's also chill out a bit in game 2 and hit some more wide open shots in the first half.. and also a couple fewer layups.I hope you are correct but the Nets coaching/players will adjust too. These are veterans and they know what works against the Cs defense and will push things there.
In short, I am prepared for more games like this one. I hope I am wrong and they adjust and roll over them.
This is right. The Nets defended their asses off all game as myself and @Cellar-Door have been talking about when people say they are an awful defensive team. They absolutely are not. We have a dogfight on our hands here.BRK was defending the 3P line and doing anything not to foul. Pretty typical of a team up 3 in the last minute to give up an easy 2.
After JB passed to Smart, he relocated to the top of the key. KD switched on to him otherwise JB has a wide-open 3P. JT cutting was someone else's responsibility, although since Brown and Claxton committed to Smart, the Cs at that point were basically playing 5 on 3.That was on Durant, who was [sort of] covering Tatum. He was caught ball watching and Tatum cut right behind him for the layup. Kyrie can't possibly be expected to provide much resistance in the paint against a skilled scorer who has at least a half a foot on him (and a head of steam).
They will try to adjust but I am not sure how much more they have in the arsenal. Kyrie won't shoot as well as he did, although Durant shooting better will offset that. They got strong games out of Dragic and Claxton, maybe that will continue. I don't know what they do to make themselves better.I hope you are correct but the Nets coaching/players will adjust too. These are veterans and they know what works against the Cs defense and will push things there.
In short, I am prepared for more games like this one. I hope I am wrong and they adjust and roll over them.
BRK tries hard on defense but they just don't have the length on defense other than KD. Claxton helps a lot but if he can't hit his FTs he might get fouled off the court if the series becomes tight.This is right. The Nets defended their asses off all game as myself and @Cellar-Door have been talking about when people say they are an awful defensive team. They absolutely are not. We have a dogfight on our hands here.
You raise an interesting point. Taking game one should, in theory, help the less experienced (though they do have plenty of playoff run) Celtics settle down going forward. It definitely felt like there were sequences where the Nets successfully mucked up Boston's sets and it affected them for a while after on both ends of the court.I think this is possible.. but the C's were also a few good possessions away from winning by ten as well. A lot of things had to go right today for the Nets to get it close late. Hopefully the C's also chill out a bit in game 2 and hit some more wide open shots in the first half.. and also a couple fewer layups.
Kyrie and KD seemed completely unflappable but the Celtics' main guys have a lot of playoff experience. In hindsight, the Nets' biggest mistake on the last possession was not letting Marcus take that three. Claxton and Bruce Brown completely sold out closing out on Smart which could be read as a lack of experience/composureI was thinking this too in the first quarter. Irving and Durant were casually tossing in free throws and the Celts were missing them. They just seemed wound a bit tighter than the vets on Brooklyn.
yeah, they're mediocre. HOWEVER... they are exploitable by size, the Celtics were inconsistent about exploiting it. Every time they go to that 3 guard lineup the Celtics need to drive Tatum or Brown to the rim over and over, if they don't score or get fouled, they set up open shots or putbacks when Drummond has to rotate to protect the rim. One reason the final play going without a TO was smart is that was a nightmare lineup for BKN to defend with even for 12 seconds... KD is good on ball, but get him off-ball on the perimeter and he's less effective, Kyrie is also not good offball and gives up a ton of size, Dragic is a massive negative, Claxton is solid and Brown is okay on-ball but undersized.This is right. The Nets defended their asses off all game as myself and @Cellar-Door have been talking about when people say they are an awful defensive team. They absolutely are not. We have a dogfight on our hands here.
Except in the high-leverage moments when Kyrie let players blow right past him for layups and dunks. They have defensive talent in Brown, Durant, and Claxton, but they also have a ton of holes and they're not very deep, which got exposed several times tonight. The Celtics beat them in points in the paint 56-32 and outrebounded them 43-29. Neither of those stats are flukey considering the rosters for both teams and how small the Nets are. Less consistent stats - FG%/Turnovers - both went the Nets way tonight.The Nets defended their asses off all game as myself and @Cellar-Door have been talking about when people say they are an awful defensive team.
Oh my god, please do this Nash! I would love to see Irving-Brown-Mills (or Dragic)-Curry-Durant vs. Smart-White-Brown-Tatum-Horford. The Nets would get crushed on the boards and the Celtics would score even more easily in the paint.think we’ll see less of Andre and more small-ball with Durant at the 5 that they’ve used a little bit down the stretch.
They tried hard. But it seemed the Celtics had about at least a dozen more "easy" shots.This is right. The Nets defended their asses off all game as myself and @Cellar-Door have been talking about when people say they are an awful defensive team. They absolutely are not. We have a dogfight on our hands here.
There might be a flip side to that that was on display this afternoon. If your name is Al Horford, you have 14 years in the league. You've played 124 playoff games, reached the ECF 3 times, but never gone any further. And you might think that this is your last, best, chance at a ring. And that might have an impact on your leadership and play.I know this stuff ranges into areas we can't but measure but KD and Kyrie have each won a ring. At the very least, this series has a different meaning for them than it does Boston. Maybe that doesn't mean much or has a nebulous impact. However I think the players with rings have an advantage of sorts not just with experience but with the stakes overall.
Yes, there is more the Celtics can do here. Early in the third quarter, there was a play where a Celtic drove and swung it to Horford in the corner. Horford was covered by... the 6'2" Seth Curry. And Horford did exactly the right thing to do in that situation - took Curry into the post and got the easy bucket. Brooklyn cannot deny those kind of opportunities to the Celtics for whole games.yeah, they're mediocre. HOWEVER... they are exploitable by size, the Celtics were inconsistent about exploiting it. Every time they go to that 3 guard lineup the Celtics need to drive Tatum or Brown to the rim over and over, if they don't score or get fouled, they set up open shots or putbacks when Drummond has to rotate to protect the rim. One reason the final play going without a TO was smart is that was a nightmare lineup for BKN to defend with even for 12 seconds... KD is good on ball, but get him off-ball on the perimeter and he's less effective, Kyrie is also not good offball and gives up a ton of size, Dragic is a massive negative, Claxton is solid and Brown is okay on-ball but undersized.
Jaylen went right at Dragic forcing Brown to double all the way at the baseline, Kyrie had to cover the pass to White, Claxton was looking to keep Horford from the rim, KD was hedging between Tatum and helping on Jaylen as Brown fell off. Nobody was on Smart. Jaylen made the pass, both Claxton and Brown closed out, leaving a bad spot of Kyrie/KD/Dragic against 4 players... BUT both left their feet, so Dragic stepped up, KD chose Brown, leaving Tatum to cut right behind him, putting Kyrie as the only rim protector (and even he was hedging because White was open for 3.
Part of that is a scramble, part of it is that they have too many small guys on the floor.