Seriously. "How many Tom Bradys have we seen? 5?"...what the fuck.John Harbaugh taking a lot of credit for a running QB revolution that he hasn’t created.
Off his leg into his handsHow does nobody see that hit the ground? It fucking bounced.
Get thee to an optometrist. Or a better TV. Or both.How does nobody see that hit the ground? It fucking bounced.
Medical science still hasn’t developed a cure for the second part of your sentence.Obviously I don’t see what everyone else does and I am rooting for the Browns pretty hard but I don’t understand why we have reply if that is a catch. It hit the fucking ground.
From an angle biased to the back of the football, it looks that way. From the other angles, it doesn't. It's textbook inconclusive.Obviously I don’t see what everyone else does and I am rooting for the Browns pretty hard but I don’t understand why we have reply if that is a catch. It hit the fucking ground.
You may believe that it hit the ground, but there is no angle that shows that is bounced off the ground and not his leg. Replay isn’t to overturn calls that don’t clearly show something was called wrong.Obviously I don’t see what everyone else does and I am rooting for the Browns pretty hard but I don’t understand why we have reply if that is a catch. It hit the fucking ground.
It didn’t, look at the shadow it bounces off his leg to his hand (arguably, it definitely does not clearly hit the ground)Obviously I don’t see what everyone else does and I am rooting for the Browns pretty hard but I don’t understand why we have reply if that is a catch. It hit the fucking ground.
This is the one area I don’t like the rule that says if you call it not a score the coach has to challenge. The ref on the field had no idea. The receiver’s back was to him. So call it a score and get review. But then we give super importance a call they were guessing about.About as close a call as you can have. One of those “called on the field” wins the day things.
Exciting touchdowns are better for the game, right?This is the one area I don’t like the rule that says if you call it not a score the coach has to challenge. The ref on the field had no idea. The receiver’s back was to him. So call it a score and get review. But then we give super importance a call they were guessing about.
It might be my old fading mind, but somewhere back in time I thought he was pretty good. He seems to have morphed into every play and every player is fantastic no matter the shit show.Collinsworth isn’t an analyst. He’s a cheerleader.
Not that he isn't trying...Legitimately surprised that Baker hasn’t thrown an INT yet in a slop fest like tonight
If it helps, I thought it pretty clearly went through his hands, bounced off his leg and hit the ground. His right hand and right arm weren’t under the ball, they were to the left of the ball, so unless it was a magic ball that levitated above the ground, it had to hit the ground. The camera angle where I thought it was “clear and obvious” was the front view that zoomed in.Hey look you fuckers if you like a rule that says you can catch it on the bounce then you win. Great it’s fucking basketball now!
Anyway, fuck Harbaugh’
well he is the Michael Jordan of the NFL and throwing 4ints is just like missing some shots in the NBALamar has great poise when he throws INTs.
95% of my NFL consumption is basically just reading this forum, and it’s kind of amazing to mostly read the threads here, and then turn on this game (between two above 500 teams!!). I think you all are spoiled like crazyanytime you want to complain about Mac Jones, just think about this game and whatever the fuck it is
Feels like even if they throw three incompletions the Browns aren’t going to score any more.Baltimore just needs to kill some clock and not turn it over, even if they don’t score.