Yes clearly it's a refereeing conspiracy.When they are checking a Liverpool goal we get super zoomed in shots of the hem of someone's sleeve. Here we get a wide angle quick view and they call it good.
I clearly didn't say that. Just wondering where the 2 lines showing the attacker's foot vs the defender's foot that we've seen on literally every other VAR review in history were.Yes clearly it's a refereeing conspiracy.
You're not wrong. Both are good to great creators and passers, but Tanguy does it from deeper on the pitch and is a better dribbler. GLC is a better defender with more stamina. Tanguy still the better player overall, but different skill sets. The GLC assist came from farther upfield than Tanguy likely would've been.What I was about to say while NBC was showing replays instead of the goal:
Spurs just don't have anyone in the side who can break the Liverpool press. I think they miss Ndombele's ability to dribble out of tight spaces. Lo Celso is a good passer but that's not his strength.
Oops.
Reguilon was subbed off last game and think the had a small limp. He may have a slight knock that means he can't go 90.Really annoyed at Davies over Reguilon. Davies is awkward at best going forward.
We are the only ones that care.Haller with a gorgeous overhead kick goal... just amazing
I thought it was a good one, it's the 3rd time he's come in elbows high, if it weren't his second nobodyu would have any doubt it's a yellowAre you kidding me? Second yellow for Benteke.
(That's a bullshit call)
Spares me the difficulty of deciding whether I want to go down the terrifying road of adding Benteke to my fantasy team.I enjoy Arlo trying to make this match sound exciting. Frankly it's been pretty dull. Not quite as bad as the old Mourinho-Benitez snoozefests from the 00s, but not exactly edge of your seat stuff either.
I don't know about dull. If either team could finish, it would be 4-3 someone.I enjoy Arlo trying to make this match sound exciting. Frankly it's been pretty dull. Not quite as bad as the old Mourinho-Benitez snoozefests from the 00s, but not exactly edge of your seat stuff either.
His elbows come in high because he is a big man. I thought both were very soft yellows. I can see the argument for both, but in my view both were not yellows like 75% of the time. You see them called, but twice especially is harsh.I thought it was a good one, it's the 3rd time he's come in elbows high, if it weren't his second nobodyu would have any doubt it's a yellow
Meh, to me if your arms are that far from your body and thrown back and you get the opponent in the face you can't be surprised to get a card. Keep your arms tighter to your body, especially if you already got a card for it.His elbows come in high because he is a big man. I thought both were very soft yellows. I can see the argument for both, but in my view both were not yellows like 75% of the time. You see them called, but twice especially is harsh.
Like the announcers said, the one defense of the ref is that he was consistent at least.
It's just kinda hard to jump like you're an Irish step-dancer, but I get your point, so I'll let it go there.Meh, to me if your arms are that far from your body and thrown back and you get the opponent in the face you can't be surprised to get a card. Keep your arms tighter to your body, especially if you already got a card for it.
It's definitely a close call, but as long as you're consistent I'm fine with either, especially given that you're trying to avoid head injuries, so guys keeping the elbows tighter is a good thing.It's just kinda hard to jump like you're an Irish step-dancer, but I get your point, so I'll let it go there.
I'm especially cranky because my German team gave up a 2-0 lead after the 80th minute last night (though this morning for me) as well.