True, but I believe the quote was "head start" which I would argue implies extra preparation, not rest.The extra day to rest is pretty valuable especially at this time of year when everyone is banged up.
Wasn't that the game originally scheduled for 1pm and shifted to 8 due to weather (ice storm the night before)?Travel time.
I mean, it's nonsense coach-speech, but that's where it's coming from.
I think you can play one safety deep and shade him to help on Brown. The Steelers' second leading receiver is Bell. Sammie Coates has two catches since Week 5, and Darrius Heyward-Bey is the only other Steeler with a 40-yard catch on the season. You don't really need to worry about anyone except Brown winning deep.Run defense is the biggest key to this game on both sides. If Pats can run the ball effectively, it will open up the intermediate level of the field for the RBs and Edelman which then the Steelers can't stop the Pats. If Steelers can run the ball well, it likely means an extra player in the box for the Pats and that means maybe not being able to bracket AB. Without the benefit of seeing the film from Week 7 to see if they did this I would think the Pats will want to play 2 deep safeties this week to keep everything in front.
I agree that the Pats need to be able to atleast slow down the Steelers run game, but over the last couple of years, the Patriots have come out throwing (and been really successful at it) against the Steelers, no matter the quality of their pass defense.Run defense is the biggest key to this game on both sides. If Pats can run the ball effectively, it will open up the intermediate level of the field for the RBs and Edelman which then the Steelers can't stop the Pats.
Maybe not, but Eli Rogers isn't too bad, pushing 50 catches for 600 yards, and has had 5+ catches in 4 of last 5.I think you can play one safety deep and shade him to help on Brown. The Steelers' second leading receiver is Bell. Sammie Coates has two catches since Week 5, and Darrius Heyward-Bey is the only other Steeler with a 40-yard catch on the season. You don't really need to worry about anyone except Brown winning deep.
QB Ben is Ben. He has been mediocre in postseason, and hasn't really had a Ben like game in months, and has played conservatively. Could blow up and have a miserable game, could throw 5TD's neither would be a big surprise
Good summary Mike. I think the two bolded points go hand in hand.Big question is can Sammy Coates play and do anything, He had 5 monster weeks to start the year broke his finger and has been invisible since. Steelers offense is built around the deep pass, and really has no option other than Brown right now.
I don't know but I suspect the fans at the Blade will have some very specific greetings for Mr. Tomlin next Sunday. Nantz, Simms and crew are going to have to make sure that they muffle the crowd sounds or the viewing audience are going to hear some very bad words.Why exactly does Tomlin saying "We gonna be ready for that ass" mean?
it means the steelers are going to be ready to play the patriots in the opinion of mike tomlin.Why exactly does Tomlin saying "We gonna be ready for that ass" mean?
What are woof tickets?it means the steelers are going to be ready to play the patriots in the opinion of mike tomlin.
oh and it's "woof tickets"
nothing to see here really, other than brown made a pretty dumb decision
he means he doesn't want everybody barking at the pats and giving them bulletin board material.What are woof tickets?
The Pats have historically covered top receivers with their second-best corner and safety help. Do you see them using this strategy this week and if so, do they use Butler in this role given the lack of other options for Pittsburgh? Did they follow him with one of those two when they played earlier this year?I think you can play one safety deep and shade him to help on Brown. The Steelers' second leading receiver is Bell. Sammie Coates has two catches since Week 5, and Darrius Heyward-Bey is the only other Steeler with a 40-yard catch on the season. You don't really need to worry about anyone except Brown winning deep.
If it's Butler, I hope he watches film of that time Brown juked him with that made-you-look move. I was rewatching that all weekend. Can't afford a repeat in the playoffs.The Pats have historically covered top receivers with their second-best corner and safety help. Do you see them using this strategy this week and if so, do they use Butler in this role given the lack of other options for Pittsburgh? Did they follow him with one of those two when they played earlier this year?
Time for Denz to get a new name. InstaFace -> InstaChat.BB on Brown Facebook Live video: "I'm not on Snapface or InstaChat so I don't know about that."
To add to that, here's the Pats' pass defense in 2016, both home and away:For those who have been saying BR is not the same player on the road, his career splits tell that story.
At home: 99.5 rating
Away: 88.8 rating
This season has shown a wider disparity.
Home: 116.7
Away: 78.4
That away slate included WAS, MIA, IND, BUF, and PHI, plus the division opponents of BAL, CIN, and CLE
That's hardly a murderers row.
For context, Brady's splits:
Home: 98.1
Away: 96.3
Brady this season
Home: 112.6
Away: 111.9
Figure out how to reasonably contain Bell and NE gives themselves a very good chance of going to the Super Bowl.
He couldn't wait to get that line out.BB on Brown Facebook Live video: "Not on SnapFace, not too worried what they put out on InstaChat."
Special teams matter and pats fumbling on punts and kickoffs have made games closer than need be, including the last oneThe Steelers are a good team but I keep coming back to this thought.
Which Offense would you prefer to have if you could chose?
Which Defense would you prefer to have?
Isn't the answer to those questions both the Pats?
So while I can easily envision a game that the Pats lose, I just think the Pats are the better team in all aspects.
Yeah, but you can't shut down everything. If they can limit Brown and Bell and stiffen up in the red zone, I think they'll live with Rogers getting 60 yards and converting a few third downs.Maybe not, but Eli Rogers isn't too bad, pushing 50 catches for 600 yards, and has had 5+ catches in 4 of last 5.
They've played it more by matchup the past couple seasons (Ryan / Rowe on the bigger guy, Butler on the faster / quicker guy) and Butler has primarily drawn Brown in the last two matchups, which makes sense. I think they'll do the same here, and Butler will have help on deep routes and on crossing patterns for the most part.The Pats have historically covered top receivers with their second-best corner and safety help. Do you see them using this strategy this week and if so, do they use Butler in this role given the lack of other options for Pittsburgh? Did they follow him with one of those two when they played earlier this year?
I don't care that he called the Pats assholes or was otherwise animated in a post-game speech. No shocker in any of that and nothing that moves the needle in any way.Its a nothingburger and if we had something similar (as others have stated upthread, something like that would be very unlikely to happen with the Patriots) and it was getting similar coverage, I believe the royal SoSH "we" would be dismissive of it. Tomlin called the Patriots assholes in their locker room during a private speech. I suspect that isn't the first time the Patriots have been called names and I bet the language has been far more shocking from other opponents as well.
Thanks.They've played it more by matchup the past couple seasons (Ryan / Rowe on the bigger guy, Butler on the faster / quicker guy) and Butler has primarily drawn Brown in the last two matchups, which makes sense. I think they'll do the same here, and Butler will have help on deep routes and on crossing patterns for the most part.
I'm assuming Belichick and Adams will make sure that the Papa Johns app won't work in Gillette, along with all the rest of the Steelers communications.If it's Butler, I hope he watches film of that time Brown juked him with that made-you-look move. I was rewatching that all weekend. Can't afford a repeat in the playoffs.
I don't think there was any smack talk in what Bell said. He followed up, paraphrasing, "we feel like we can beat anyone" with "it will take our best game, it will take better than our A game to beat NE".And last, that he cautioned that they not provide the Pats with fodder and Bell thereupon talked a little smack, as mild as it was, was also amusing. Make no mistake, if Bell has said that not in the context of Tomlin's comments, I would have just shrugged. That Bell's comments followed his coach's admonition was fun stuff.
I am not counting on any of that to matter on Sunday night. But with six days to go, and the Bs looking like corpses today, I'll take my amusements where I can get them.
I've always heard wolf tickets but apparently woof is a recognized alternate variant.What are woof tickets?
And:sell wolf tickets. v. To make threats or boasts, especially if empty and/or if made to intimidate someone.
2007, Stanley Tookie Williams, Blue Rage, Black Redemption: A Memoir, page 59: I stood there in silence listening to Ollie build himself up by selling wolf tickets about what he planned to do to me.
2010, Theodore Dallas Ashford, A Lone Pine Traveler (ISBN 1453567852), page 145:
"A lot of selling of wolf tickets but never any blood. I wish they would kill one of themselves so there would be some peace around here."
2010, Donald Hall, Dock Ellis in the Country of Baseball (ISBN 1439146020), page 164:
"Dock has never fired a gun at anyone. He may possibly have sold a reporter a handful of wolf tickets."
La Russa went public about concerns over Kerry Wood’s inside pitches, which was followed by Cards pitcher Dan Haren hitting his counterpart on the Cubs, Matt Clement.
Baker took it as an attempt at “selling wolf tickets,” or overtly trying to intimidate his team,
Before I clicked through, I was expecting this to be from a NYT writer.Baker took it as an attempt at “selling wolf tickets,” or overtly trying to intimidate his team
Is it somehow related to 'crying wolf'?
I'm not wearing my glasses and read this originally as "Ben could throw STD's".QB Ben is Ben... could throw 5TD's neither would be a big surprise
People have made that speculative connection but there's no evidence for it AFAIK. Wiktionary speculates a different origin: that "woof tickets" is the original, from "woofing".Is it somehow related to 'crying wolf'?
i've always understood that "woof" is the original and "wolf" was a variant that arose out of white people hearing it wrong, that eventually became the norm, or at least accepted.Is it somehow related to 'crying wolf'?