I mean, hey, the guy needs money. And the burden for working in the public eye for one of the most visible businesses in the region is obviously no different than that for civil or criminal liability.
Patty Martel said her daughter did not press to renew the restraining orderat the request of the Remy family. Jennifer had spoken to Remy’s mother, who begged her not to file any kind of complaint because it would ruin Remy’s life; she also told Jennifer they would protect her, Patty Martel said
Yes it does. It doesn't make it easier but it does. Unless JERRY and his wife are charged with a crime civil or criminal, why shouldn't he be allowed to work? I would assume NESN and the Red Sox have done their due diligence as this has moved forward.Myt1 said:Does it, now?
Maybe they believed it.Foulkey Reese said:People are really just going to paper over the Remys begging this girl not to press charges?
Sure seems like the Remys are pretty terrible people.
I enjoy things more when they feature less terrible people.
mauidano said:People are really just going to paper over the Remys begging this girl not to press charges?
mauidano said:Yes it does.
Because people are fired, literally every second of every day, for things that have nothing to do with whether they are charged with a crime?It doesn't make it easier but it does. Unless JERRY and his wife are charged with a crime civil or criminal, why shouldn't he be allowed to work? I would assume NESN and the Red Sox have done their due diligence as this has moved forward.
Myt1 said:If you think Phoebe Remy acted alone with no consultation with her husband in asking Martel not to cooperate and can't even grasp how anyone would judge anybody but Jared Remy here, or how anyone could have predicted that the 'roid head who liked to beat up women might have decided to retaliate against the woman who got him charged, then your imaginations are poor, stunted things.
And, under the current Massachusetts bail statute, release on personal recognizance is the default position except in rare cases after a dangerousness hearing that typically don't include simple domestic violence, especially when the victim is unwilling to cooperate. But let's not let facts get in the way of us doing our best to bend over backwards to avoid putting blame on the people who raised the woman-beater and murderer and putting it instead on the "police" and "proper authorities".
Remy himself states that Jared had issues from a very young age and yet the Remy family allegedly talked the victim out "ruining his life" by seeking legal protection from him despite the fact that he had just been released from jail for a domestic incident right before the victim was killed. Is Remy a bad parent? I don't know, but it is noteworthy that all of Remy's three kids have a rap sheet. And yes, I am a parent of two young men.joe dokes said:Out of curiosity, and in line with what Savin said about his kids, I wonder how many of the "he's a bad parent, too" folks have kids. Because they certainly lack any understanding of how it can all go wrong despite a parent's best efforts.
Savin Hillbilly said:
This is the stuff that really gets my hackles up.
I am the father of a young adult son who is, thank God, about as unlike what we know of Jared Remy as it's possible to be. He's a gentle, civilized, responsible, thoughtful human being. I could no more imagine him beating a woman to death than I can imagine him sprouting wings and flying.
This has little to do with me. Sure, I did my best to instill all these qualities in him, but I also tried to instill in him a love of baseball (fail) and an interest in literature (extreme fail). The truth is that I won the lottery. You can be the best parent you want to be, and shit can still go wrong. I know of examples among my friends--nothing that went anywhere near as terribly wrong as Jared Remy, granted, but still kids who are going to have trouble supporting themselves or staying out of trouble. These parents are good people and I know firsthand that they did a good job. They lost the lottery.
It's certainly true that bad parenting can lead to bad people. But so can good parenting. Maybe Jerry Remy is a shitty father, or maybe he just lost the lottery. I don't know. What I do know is that unless he is no kind of human being at all, the price he is paying right now is unimaginable, and more than sufficient punishment for his sins.
Oh, I can imagine it. Given Remy's history of beating women and the fact that his father got him a cushy job that he got fired from for selling steroids, I just find it incredibly unlikely. But if you want to slip into solipsism, knock yourself out.Savin Hillbilly said:If you find it impossible to believe that Phoebe Remy acted alone--or even that she acted against the specific wishes of her husband--in asking Martel not to cooperate, then I'd say your imagination is a poor, stunted thing.
Kids aren't a result of a random number generator. You're writing like Chuck Klosterman when he says that the chance if anything happening is 50-50, it either does or doesn't.Of course I have no idea whether that's how it really went down. But neither do you, unless you're privy to information the rest of us are not.
This is the stuff that really gets my hackles up.
I am the father of a young adult son who is, thank God, about as unlike what we know of Jared Remy as it's possible to be. He's a gentle, civilized, responsible, thoughtful human being. I could no more imagine him beating a woman to death than I can imagine him sprouting wings and flying.
This has little to do with me. Sure, I did my best to instill all these qualities in him, but I also tried to instill in him a love of baseball (fail) and an interest in literature (extreme fail). The truth is that I won the lottery. You can be the best parent you want to be, and shit can still go wrong. I know of examples among my friends--nothing that went anywhere near as terribly wrong as Jared Remy, granted, but still kids who are going to have trouble supporting themselves or staying out of trouble. These parents are good people and I know firsthand that they did a good job. They lost the lottery.
It's certainly true that bad parenting can lead to bad people. But so can good parenting. Maybe Jerry Remy is a shitty father, or maybe he just lost the lottery. I don't know. What I do know is that unless he is no kind of human being at all, the price he is paying right now is unimaginable, and more than sufficient punishment for his sins.
Unless you think that Remy and Martel had similar levels of agency in this situation, your comparison utterly fails. And I think you have too much experience with this subject to think that.Rovin Romine said:I agree.
Most parents have some degree of influence over what happens to their kids; generally, if you pay attention to the kids (and read to them), they often turn out well adjusted. On the other hand, even very well adjusted and "well raised" kids can go nutty when exposed to maladjusted peers, drugs, or any kind of subculture for which they're not suited. And on yet another notes, sometimes (though more rarely) rotten parents can produce children who grow up into very decent human beings - usually with some kind of positive input through well adjusted peers or some kind of subculture for which they're very well suited. (By subculture I mean anything that gives their life purpose and structure.)
All of the above assumes there's no organic problem with the child's brain, btw. Or there's no traumatizing events in the child's life (for which the parents themselves are not responsible).
The final take away point is that while Remy may have had a hand in causing Jared's childhood problems, or even mitigating Jared's childhood problems (we don't know which), at some point Jared had the ability to move further and further from the family influence. By the time he ultimately killed, he was a full fledged adult.
Whether one wants to assign moral responsibility to Jared as a fully autonomous being or whether one might consider other factors (drug/steroid use, history of violence between the parties, lingering childhood trauma, diminished capacity for self restraint due to whatever), it's pretty farcical to think that in the absence of new facts, Remy, or worse, "the Remy family" is somehow the responsible party, or bears any significant amount moral blame.
To flip that (patently stupid concept), where was Jen's family - if they were so convinced that Jared was an actual immediate threat, why didn't a few people go over to help her move out? Why didn't they have Jen come stay with family or friends for a week or so? Does it make Jen's family morally blameworthy that they failed to intercede when their daughter and grandchild was faced with such *obvious* danger? Are these weak backboned people individuals you want to get custody of their grandchild? They couldn't even raise a daughter who was self confident enough to walk away from an abuser. . . So, in case you missed it, let me state overtly that I think this entire paragraph, and the line of thinking it represents is absurd - or at least as absurd as trying to blame Remy for this. I just offer it to illustrate the absurdity of casting any significant moral blame upon the parents of the parties. We're not dealing with 8 year olds here.
**
And on another note someone brought up, the trial would not happen until October, at the earliest.
Exactly. The strawman that anyone is suggesting that we put the mark of Cain on him and send him to Nod is one if the stupidest things I've read on the main board and it's getting repeated ad nauseum.Infield Infidel said:I'm more surprised NESN didn't have the balls to tell him no. I mean, when I went to Boston for the WS Parade, and saw Remy's restaurant, this case was the first thing that came to mind. And the Sox just had a great season and people should be talking about them defending the title, not the guy in the booth.
There's a million and one jobs Jerry Remy can do to earn a living.
On if he looks back and now thinks about the possibility that he may have been an enabler to his son: “Sure I do. Sure I do. I think about it all the time. This has brought a lot of reflection, past reflection, what did we do right, what did we do wrong. Was I an enabler? Yeah, I probably was. Probably with all of my kids. Would I do things differently now? Obviously with the end result you would hope you would maybe do something different. But I don’t know what I could have done different.
Infield Infidel said:I'm more surprised NESN didn't have the balls to tell him no. I mean, when I went to Boston for the WS Parade, and saw Remy's restaurant, this case was the first thing that came to mind. And the Sox just had a great season and people should be talking about them defending the title, not the guy in the booth.
There's a million and one jobs Jerry Remy can do to earn a living. And there are a lot of guys better at doing color. I often listen to road broadcasts anyway.
Corsi said:
And his restaurant is still consistently packed. NESN's ratings aren't going to suffer one iota over this.
Name one other job Jerry can do to earn a living. He's been broadcasting for nearly 30 years...
I think he's morally culpable but think that legal culpability would be a stretch. Generally speaking, beginning and then abandoning a rescue in an active situation of imminent harm can lead to liability (under the theory that you're assuming the duty and because of that, others won't) but it think there are probably too many intervening causes here especially with regard to the "enabling" stuff.Jnai said:Nevermind if Remy is in any way culpable here, I'm pretty surprised he would say this:
(http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2014/01/28/jerry-remy-on-dc-im-just-going-to-come-back-and-see-how-it-goes/)
I have to imagine there's some sort of civil suit from all of this from her family. Doesn't this just open the floodgates as far as the family's real assets? Maybe he hasn't gotten legal advice, and I'm certainly no lawyer, but I would shut up about all of this ASAP.
Smiling Joe Hesketh said:
Completely irrelevant. He doesn't have the right to permanent employment. If NESN powers believe that his presence would hurt their brand and their business and thus cost them money, they would have every reason not to allow him back into the booth.
Well, I admit that he's probably not going to be able to start a daycare anytime soon, but maybe Remy's is hiring busboys.Corsi said:
And his restaurant is still consistently packed. NESN's ratings aren't going to suffer one iota over this.
Name one other job Jerry can do to earn a living. He's been broadcasting for nearly 30 years...
Smiling Joe Hesketh said:
Completely irrelevant. He doesn't have the right to permanent employment. If NESN powers believe that his presence would hurt their brand and their business and thus cost them money, they would have every reason not to allow him back into the booth.
Myt1 said:Unless you think that Remy and Martel had similar levels of agency in this situation, your comparison utterly fails. And I think you have too much experience with this subject to think that.
Corsi said:Reading this thread, you'd think Jerry killed the girl.
Maybe not the thread, just Myt1's posts.Corsi said:Reading this thread, you'd think Jerry killed the girl.
Well I will continue to listen to the other teams broadcasters, as I have for several years. Jerry's schtick has been tired and boring for years. When Eck returns I flip back on to NESN.Corsi said:
And his restaurant is still consistently packed. NESN's ratings aren't going to suffer one iota over this.
Name one other job Jerry can do to earn a living. He's been broadcasting for nearly 30 years..
Average Reds said:
If we're going to talk about the level of responsibility that Jerry Remy or his wife have for this horrible crime, this is the critical factor.
The issue isn't whether Jerry and Phoebe Remy were good parents or whether the upbringing of the kids has any connection to their collective troubles. The issue is that Phoebe Remy appears to have played an important role in persuading Jennifer Martel not to file for a restraining order against Jared right before he murdered her.
I have no idea what role Phoebe Remy's actions played in the death of Jennifer Martel - and there may be no connection, because someone willing to butcher the mother of their child in broad daylight in front of witnesses doesn't strike me as someone who would be dissuaded by a restraining order. But the juxtaposition of that request and the immediacy (and savagery) of the murder is something that will forever be associated with the Remys. While that may be tragic and unfair, it's hard to argue that it's unjust.
Nothing about "Remy's history of beating women" or "the fact that his father got him a cushy job...etc." makes it more or less likely that Phoebe Remy might have made a decision on her own to call Jenn Martel. If you disagree, show your work. There's no obvious causal connection between the two propositions.Myt1 said:Oh, I can imagine it. Given Remy's history of beating women and the fact that his father got him a cushy job that he got fired from for selling steroids, I just find it incredibly unlikely. But if you want to slip into solipsism, knock yourself out.
No one would deny that they fucked up, and I've already said so. My understanding is that Remy has admitted as much. However, I don't know (and if you do know, you still haven't provided evidence; see above) that anybody but Phoebe Remy "talked the woman out of cooperating with authorities."You're the one who is feigning disbelief that anyone might find the parents of the murderer who knew that their son liked to beat up women some degree of culpable for talking the woman out of cooperating with the authorities and then failing to provide the protection they promised.
Again, stop being a dick.I mean, how gauche, right?
Have you raised one? No, they're not the result of a random number generator, and when I talk about winning or losing a lottery of course I'm exaggerating. But the influence of parents on their children is much, much less (for better or worse) than anybody can understand who hasn't raised one. If you're a father, you should know better. If you're not, you might want to consider the possibility that you haven't the faintest fucking idea what you're talking about.Kids aren't a result of a random number generator.
Myt1 said:Unless you think that Remy and Martel had similar levels of agency in this situation, your comparison utterly fails. And I think you have too much experience with this subject to think that.
Judge Mental13 said:Between the age of 19 - 26 Jared Remy was arrested and charged with 11 crimes, 8 of which were violent crimes against women.
The fact that 8 years later Pheobe and Jerry let it get to 9 is absolutely fucking horrifying.