Offseason rumors

Status
Not open for further replies.

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,034
Isle of Plum
Seems like that’s the price of doing business these days and I think you need to play ball at that number if you really think he’s a top of the rotation starter. Obviously we don’t really know how the FO views him but if they think he’s that guy and they want him, then I don’t see much of an option.
Yeah, I’m afraid @YTF has bingo here. Our ‘program’ has led to not drafting pitching high, not developing starting pitching successfully, and not making big FA investments (since Sale).

All of these are theoretically understandable in isolation, but together it looks like the FO may have picked the wrong year to decide to win.

C’mom Breslow show me sumthin’ ! Dump the prospects if you have to, we can always find someone half decent at any position…except SP.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,218
Thanks @kazuneko, good stuff.

I think the lesson here is all the pitchers the Sox have any realistic shot of landing are going to have warts. Which means it’s in many ways about finding the safest bet.

They have to find at minimum two that can reasonably be expected to give decent to better results in the rotation for the next 3 seasons or more, because not only is the vast majority of the rotation incredibly unreliable, but the AAA rotation stinks and the AA one isn‘t far behind it (which is why I think the farm system is wildly overrated outside of MLB.com, but that’s another story).

I mean, I even like Crawford and have no problem with him as a 4/5 but I’m not going to pretend even with last year’s success that his career 5.11 ERA in AAA doesn’t concern me.

There are of course several routes they can take, but with getting more insight from folks that have watched a lot of Imanaga, I’m less confident in penciling him in as a sure fire 3/4 type talent.

Truly appreciate the insight.

@sezwho, agree totally. But you forgot to add “not even adding mid tier starters.” It has been literally all subtractions (Price, Eovaldi, Rodriguez) and no mid term additions with only one year deal dumpster diving. It’s dumbfounding for a baseball team to act that way.

They didn’t need to play at the top of the market, but they didn’t need to solely dumpster dive either.
 
Last edited:

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
Seems like that’s the price of doing business these days and I think you need to play ball at that number if you really think he’s a top of the rotation starter. Obviously we don’t really know how the FO views him but if they think he’s that guy and they want him, then I don’t see much of an option.
I don't necessarily disagree, but here's the thing that sticks in my brain...we're now discussing $35-$40M per year for 9-10 years for a guy who's yet to throw a single MLB pitch.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
His opt-out is confusing people, but assuming he stays healthy and opts out after the season, NY can add 1/36 and keep him, as negotiated in the original deal.

So he is on a 5/180 deal right now (years remaining) and will presumably be on a 5/180 deal with NY going into 2025 also, there's no uncertainty here really.
By "people" you may mean me, I've bungled this twice. OK, hope to keep it straight from here.
 

GPO Man

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
571
I don't necessarily disagree, but here's the thing that sticks in my brain...we're now discussing $35-$40M per year for 9-10 years for a guy who's yet to throw a single MLB pitch.
While true, his numbers in Japan and stuff translate well to MLB. In other words, his bust rate is pretty low.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,474
The best/biggest teams in MLB wouldn't universally be in on him if they didn't all think he was real.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,370
While true, his numbers in Japan and stuff translate well to MLB. In other words, his bust rate is pretty low.
They said the same about Contreras and Matsuzaka. Who were solid enough pitchers. Giving any pitcher a 10+ year deal is really risky, and this org has been incredibly risk averse for quite awhile now. May be the right path to take- but it also results in rarely making moves of any significance.
 

GPO Man

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
571
They said the same about Contreras and Matsuzaka. Who were solid enough pitchers. Giving any pitcher a 10+ year deal is really risky, and this org has been incredibly risk averse for quite awhile now. May be the right path to take- but it also results in rarely making moves of any significance.
A contract of this magnitude definitely carries some risk, but like someone mentioned, it’s the cost of doing business. They can afford Yamamoto and still not be financially strapped. They have to spend money on the right players.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,474
Talent evaluation now is also in a completely different universe from where it was 21 and 17 years ago.
 

BornToRun

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2011
17,550
I don't necessarily disagree, but here's the thing that sticks in my brain...we're now discussing $35-$40M per year for 9-10 years for a guy who's yet to throw a single MLB pitch.
You’re absolutely right. Shit’s ridiculous but it seems like that’s how things work now so I think we’ve got to adjust if we’re ever gonna compete for top of the line free agents again. I’m not super excited at that level of risk myself but that’s where we are.

Not to mention that guys with Yamamoto’s potential generally don’t hit the market before they’re bordering, or on, the wrong side of 30. “10 years” and “pitcher” is scary as hell but he’s far younger than most arms who see huge pay days.
 

Mike473

New Member
Jul 31, 2006
90
We are complaining that the Sox may not top 9/$304? I don’t recall anyone suggesting such a deal even two weeks ago. I get that circumstances change, but come on now…
To be fair, it's not mutually exclusive for both Morosi and the others to be right.

The Red Sox probably are "heavily invested" in landing Yamamoto. I'd be willing to be at some point we hear that he was offered the largest deal in team history. That would certainly imply that they're heavily invested in him, and that he is their top priority.


Also, it very conceivably might not matter. Because others could be hearing that the Red Sox plan to make him an enormous offer and (like Senga) that he wants to go to a team that (at least in the eyes of MLB free agents and players in the game) is much closer to contending, so he isn't interested in the Red Sox offer because others are "close enough" in terms of value.

So (yes, I know, NIgthengale, but) could be hearing that if he's getting offered roughly 10/$350m from the Red Sox, 10/$340m from the Yankees; 10/$330m from the Dodgers and 10/$360m from the Mets, he's most likely to either go to the pure highest bidder OR choose a team that is better set up at the MLB level for the next 4 years or so. (https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/columnist/bob-nightengale/2023/12/10/shohei-ohtani-rumors-free-agent-mlb-reporters/71867634007/)

That could easily be seen as 1) the Red Sox are making him THEIR priority but 2) he really has no interest in picking the Red Sox, thus they aren't a "finalist". Not at all mutually exclusive, nor unreasonable. Objectively, it's what I think probably is most likely taking place presently.
If the Red Sox top priority is a player that has no in interest playing for the franchise, I have to wonder what exactly is going on in the front office. I have to believe Yamamoto is open to Boston or Henry will look like a fool no matter how the spin doctors try to spin it. As was mentioned in a prior comment, the Red Sox have fallen to a point where they are competing with American soccer in the hierarchy of New England sports. They need Yamamoto for more reasons than one. I am hopeful it gets done.

I have a lot of respect for those favoring the roster building philosophy. But, if they head into 2024 with minimal changes and things get out to a bad start, it is going to be entertaining at Fenway for all the wrong reasons. In addition, the front office saying they were in on all the top players but just missed is not going to go over well. In fact, they might be 100% on the up and up, but people simply don't believe them anymore and assume Henry doesn't care. It is amazing that it has come to that, but it has for sure. I don't think Henry doesn't care. I just think the Bloom strategy just failed and left them flatfooted and and shocked at how the market has changed on them.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
You’re absolutely right. Shit’s ridiculous but it seems like that’s how things work now so I think we’ve got to adjust if we’re ever gonna compete for top of the line free agents again. I’m not super excited at that level of risk myself but that’s where we are.

Not to mention that guys with Yamamoto’s potential generally don’t hit the market before they’re bordering, or on, the wrong side of 30. “10 years” and “pitcher” is scary as hell but he’s far younger than most arms who see huge pay days.
OK, but here are the top 10 pitchers by bWAR this year: Cole, Snell, Webb, Gray, Bradish, Senga, Gallen, Wheeler, Montgomery, Luzardo. Of those ten, only Cole, Senga and Wheeler were acquired in competitive free agent markets. Webb, Bradish and Gallen are all guys who passed through 2-3 draft rounds before someone bothered to pick them. Snell, Gray and Monty were all nice trade pickups, and Luzardo was an out of nowhere late bloomer. Pitching is just so incredibly fickle. A flashy free agent is nice but it usually isn't the way to go.
I have a lot of respect for those favoring the roster building philosophy. But, if they head into 2024 with minimal changes and things get out to a bad start, it is going to be entertaining at Fenway for all the wrong reasons. In addition, the front office saying they were in on all the top players but just missed is not going to go over well. In fact, they might be 100% on the up and up, but people simply don't believe them anymore and assume Henry doesn't care. It is amazing that it has come to that, but it has for sure. I don't think Henry doesn't care. I just think the Bloom strategy just failed and left them flatfooted and and shocked at how the market has changed on them.
Weren't people excited in 2021? I sure was, very cool team. I don't think the world is all that different; IMO the Sox are just in a more difficult, unpleasant stage of the rebuild and a certain class of Sox fans are incredibly impatient. Bloom may or may not have bungled some potential trades, depending on what you decide to take at face value, but as soon as they can build up a rotation again, the public conversation (to the extent people actually care about it) will change.
 
Last edited:

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,674
The best/biggest teams in MLB wouldn't universally be in on him if they didn't all think he was real.
I think that this is a terrific point when it comes to wondering whether Yamamoto is worth it. If LA, both NY teams, SF, Toronto, Philly and Boston want this guy, he must be pretty good.

Folks aren’t usually that wrong about something.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
They said the same about Contreras and Matsuzaka. Who were solid enough pitchers. Giving any pitcher a 10+ year deal is really risky, and this org has been incredibly risk averse for quite awhile now. May be the right path to take- but it also results in rarely making moves of any significance.
Now that we’ve had so many pitchers leave Japan for America, I think there is a better understanding of what things to look for. One key statistic has been HR/ 9 innings. Japanese pitchers who have been elite with this have done far better than those that haven’t been.
Matsuzaka was pretty mediocre in this regard as his .7 HR per 9 innings is a pretty high rate for an elite Japanese pitcher. Kikuchi also had a rate of .7 in Japan. Yamamoto has the lowest rate of any pitcher who has ever attempted this transition: a ridiculous .1 per 9 innings.
 

GPO Man

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
571
I think that this is a terrific point when it comes to wondering whether Yamamoto is worth it. If LA, both NY teams, SF, Toronto, Philly and Boston want this guy, he must be pretty good.

Folks aren’t usually that wrong about something.
And I think Breslow has a pretty good idea of Yamamoto’s worth, especially looking at the Sox from a prospective outside the organization with a keen eye for pitching. What remains to be seen if Henry & Co. are truly going to give Breslow the financial resources he needs to cook.
 

PedroisGod

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2002
1,437
The Hammer, Canada
OK, but here are the top 10 pitchers by bWAR this year: Cole, Snell, Webb, Gray, Bradish, Senga, Gallen, Wheeler, Montgomery, Luzardo. Of those ten, only Cole, Senga and Wheeler were acquired in competitive free agent markets. Webb, Bradish and Gallen are all guys who passed through 2-3 draft rounds before someone bothered to pick them. Snell, Gray and Monty were all nice trade pickups, and Luzardo was an out of nowhere late bloomer. Pitching is just so incredibly fickle. A flashy free agent is nice but it usually isn't the way to go.
I agree with the overall point, and in general, I think that is the main benefit of the Breslow hire. I trust that at some point he and Bailey will be able to get more out of pitchers without having to pay top dollar, but that's going to take time, and in the meantime, the rotation has a ton of holes to fill.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,984
OK, but here are the top 10 pitchers by bWAR this year: Cole, Snell, Webb, Gray, Bradish, Senga, Gallen, Wheeler, Montgomery, Luzardo. Of those ten, only Cole, Senga and Wheeler were acquired in competitive free agent markets. Webb, Bradish and Gallen are all guys who passed through 2-3 draft rounds before someone bothered to pick them. Snell, Gray and Monty were all nice trade pickups, and Luzardo was an out of nowhere late bloomer. Pitching is just so incredibly fickle. A flashy free agent is nice but it usually isn't the way to go.
But Yamamoto's situation is not comparable to a free agent pitcher signing. That's why he's going to get an insane contract. The whole issue with free agency is that you're overpaying someone with few if any prime years left because that's just how the MLB pre-arb/arb structure works out. No pitcher would hit FA at that age unless they broke into the big leagues at like age 19.

Yamamoto was posted at age 25. He's a full year younger than one of the guys on your top 10 bWAR list, Jesus Luzardo (26), who won't hit free agency until after the 2026 season. And he's three years younger than Zac Gallen, who won't hit free agency until after 2025.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
16,932
They said the same about Contreras and Matsuzaka. Who were solid enough pitchers. Giving any pitcher a 10+ year deal is really risky, and this org has been incredibly risk averse for quite awhile now. May be the right path to take- but it also results in rarely making moves of any significance.
I'm all ready to break a window and a door and a chair if Yamamoto signs with the Yankees.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,303
But Yamamoto's situation is not comparable to a free agent pitcher signing. That's why he's going to get an insane contract. The whole issue with free agency is that you're overpaying someone with few if any prime years left because that's just how the MLB pre-arb/arb structure works out. No pitcher would hit FA at that age unless they broke into the big leagues at like age 19.
I get that he's unique in that way. It's a valid point. But he's also unique in that he has never thrown one pitch in MLB. I don't know how to square those two things. He's also small, the kind of frame that doesn't always age well. Steamer projects him as having the 22nd highest WAR for pitchers in MLB next year (behind Blake Snell and Jordan Montgomery, barely ahead of Eduardo Rodriguez), I dunno. If they sign him I'll be all in hoping that it works out (and likely, convincing myself that it will). But my instinct is that it's too much unknown to make that kinds of a long term risk.

https://www.fangraphs.com/projections?pos=&stats=pit&type=steamer
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
But Yamamoto's situation is not comparable to a free agent pitcher signing. That's why he's going to get an insane contract. The whole issue with free agency is that you're overpaying someone with few if any prime years left because that's just how the MLB pre-arb/arb structure works out. No pitcher would hit FA at that age unless they broke into the big leagues at like age 19.

Yamamoto was posted at age 25. He's a full year younger than one of the guys on your top 10 bWAR list, Jesus Luzardo (26), who won't hit free agency until after the 2026 season. And he's three years younger than Zac Gallen, who won't hit free agency until after 2025.
Sure, I get all that, it's what you pay a premium for, although it's not that far off from Cole hitting the market at age 28 and getting essentially 10/$360. He's more like a typical free agent in the sense that he is subject to an open bidding war and teams have relatively little control over the eventual outcome, especially if they aren't the Yankees or Dodgers. But the Yankees and Dodgers don't have a lot of banners to show for their investments of late. Basically they lose almost every year to a team that had to get more creative with their rotation, and did. By no means is all hope lost if we don't sign the glittering prize.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,674
And I think Breslow has a pretty good idea of Yamamoto’s worth, especially looking at the Sox from a prospective outside the organization with a keen eye for pitching. What remains to be seen if Henry & Co. are truly going to give Breslow the financial resources he needs to cook.
Agreed with all this. I’m a little perplexed why the Braves or the Rangers aren’t involved in the bidding. Apparently they didn’t make the cut from the initial 13-team Zoom calls.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,034
Isle of Plum
Sure, I get all that, it's what you pay a premium for, although it's not that far off from Cole hitting the market at age 28 and getting essentially 10/$360. He's more like a typical free agent in the sense that he is subject to an open bidding war and teams have relatively little control over the eventual outcome, especially if they aren't the Yankees or Dodgers. But the Yankees and Dodgers don't have a lot of banners to show for their investments of late. Basically they lose almost every year to a team that had to get more creative with their rotation, and did. By no means is all hope lost if we don't sign the glittering prize.
But Breslow promised they were foot on the gas! The glittering prizes and endless compromises shatter the illusion of integrity.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,218
A flashy free agent is nice but it usually isn't the way to go.

Weren't people excited in 2021? I sure was, very cool team. I don't think the world is all that different; IMO the Sox are just in a more difficult, unpleasant stage of the rebuild and a certain class of Sox fans are incredibly impatient. Bloom may or may not have bungled some potential trades, depending on what you decide to take at face value, but as soon as they can build up a rotation again, the public conversation (to the extent people actually care about it) will change.
FWIW, there is another class of fan (or at least one fan in another class). Those who believe Bloom built “only” an average farm system (closer to 16 where MLB ranks them vs 3rd on FG) and while a good hitting core, that the MLB pitching and upper minors pitching is so atrocious on balance that waiting for the farm isn’t a tenable plan. Compounded with the fact that I think he misread the market and over estimated the ability to trade hitting prospects for MLB pitching. (I’m not saying he’s the only one to do this, for the record.)

As such, I think free agent pitching is quite literally the only option for the Red Sox. Well, assuming “continuing to miss the playoffs and fall further into irrelevancy within the game of baseball for another 5 years” isn’t an option they want to consider.

Its not a good spot to be in, but I think it’s where they are.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,370
That’s exactly where I’m at @Big Papi's Mango Salsa. The system is improved but it’s too heavy and it’s really lacking in the pitching prospects needed to pull of any deal of significance. Lots of the types of guys that teams will take in Rule 5’s, fewer that teams will actually trade legit major leaguers for.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
Glasnow is an interesting example of the risks inherent in committing to young talent like Yamamoto. How much would he have been worth in an open bidding war at age 25? His talent is undeniable and from that perspective everyone would have been right who had high expectations. Then, in his age 25 season, he began the season looking like the second coming of Bob Gibson before an arm injury ended it early. He’s continued to be consistently amazing whenever he’s pitched since, but he’s never thrown more than 21 starts, and his career high in innings is only 120 with only one other season reaching 100.
So yeah, that’s the problem with long term contracts, even to talented young players. If Glasnow was in his fourth year of a 10 year/350 million dollar deal that would have been tough on the team that signed him. It’ll be fascinating to see what he gets in an extension from LA. You’d think you’d want to listen more to doctors than lawyers when choosing the length and value of the contract.
 
Last edited:

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,329
Glasnow is an interesting example of the risks inherent in committing to young talent like Yamamoto. How much would he have been worth in an open bidding war at age 25? His talent is undeniable and from that perspective everyone would have been right who had high expectations. Then, in his age 25 season, he began the season looking like the second coming of Bob Gibson before an arm injury ended it early. He’s continued to be consistently amazing whenever he’s pitched since, but he’s never thrown more than 21 starts, and his career high in innings is only 120 with only one other season reaching 100.
So yeah, that’s the problem with long term contracts, even to talented young players. If Glasnow was in his fourth year of a 10 year/350 million dollar deal that would have been tough on the team that signed him. It’ll be fascinating to see what he gets in an extension from LA. You’d think you’d want to listen more to doctors than lawyers when choosing the length and value of the contract.
I think the simple reality is that all pitchers are serious injury risks. TJ injuries have been so common that you basically expect them at some point. So, teams have to decide whether or not they are comfortable with those risks. When you have a steady flow of cheap and effective pitching, taking those risks is obviously much easier. Clearly, we don’t, which is why we’re in this bind.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
I think Yamamoto is worth it at more or less any cost but I don’t want to give Montgomery eight years. Genuinely would rather we tweak the pitch mix of Houck, Whitlock and/or Crawford or extend Pivetta at like 4/$40M or something.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
Posted this elsewhere too but one starting pitcher the Sox should outbid everyone on right now is Brandon Woodruff. Pay for his rehab year, go nuts. I’d him 4/$60M — quite a ridiculous amount for a pitcher who’s not gonna put on a uniform next year — or even 2/$40 if he’s dead set on testing FA after 2025.

If he comes back the same guy, he’s right in line with our prospect core hitting their stride. If he’s not, it’s only money, and we’re getting a new CBA in a few years anyway.
 

BornToRun

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2011
17,550
I think Yamamoto is worth it at more or less any cost but I don’t want to give Montgomery eight years. Genuinely would rather we tweak the pitch mix of Houck, Whitlock and/or Crawford or extend Pivetta at like 4/$40M or something.
If Pivetta would take 10 per, I’d do it in a heartbeat. That’s a low price to pay for stability considering he hasn’t been anything worse than serviceable over a full season since we got him. Not sure that does it these days, though.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,474
I think Yamamoto is worth it at more or less any cost but I don’t want to give Montgomery eight years. Genuinely would rather we tweak the pitch mix of Houck, Whitlock and/or Crawford or extend Pivetta at like 4/$40M or something.
WHO ARE YOU AND WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH CHAWSON
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,719
Yeah, I’m afraid @YTF has bingo here. Our ‘program’ has led to not drafting pitching high, not developing starting pitching successfully, and not making big FA investments (since Sale).

All of these are theoretically understandable in isolation, but together it looks like the FO may have picked the wrong year to decide to win.

C’mom Breslow show me sumthin’ ! Dump the prospects if you have to, we can always find someone half decent at any position…except SP.
The thing is all those cheap positional prospects give you the flexibility to sign someone like Yamamoto because you can fill all those roster spots with cost controlled players. If Anthony keeps going nuclear and Teel fulfills his destiny as an offensive asset and great defensive catcher, you potentially have two 5-6 win players making peanuts. That makes it much less risky to pay Y2K market rates.
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
931
Posted this elsewhere too but one starting pitcher the Sox should outbid everyone on right now is Brandon Woodruff. Pay for his rehab year, go nuts. I’d him 4/$60M — quite a ridiculous amount for a pitcher who’s not gonna put on a uniform next year — or even 2/$40 if he’s dead set on testing FA after 2025.

If he comes back the same guy, he’s right in line with our prospect core hitting their stride. If he’s not, it’s only money, and we’re getting a new CBA in a few years anyway.
I approve of this message. Sox need to find a way to leverage their financial advantages and they need to be creative if boatloads of money is not enough to win the free agent bidding wars. Sign Woodruff and give Paxton a two year deal while we're at it.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,330
Interesting that the deal appears to be contingent on Glasnow signing a long term extension. Paging Corbin Burnes.
Glasnow is from Santa Clarita, near Los Angeles.

Burnes is from Bakersfield, also in Southern California, so I doubt he'll be in any rush to sign long-term on the East Coast.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,370
The thing is all those cheap positional prospects give you the flexibility to sign someone like Yamamoto because you can fill all those roster spots with cost controlled players. If Anthony keeps going nuclear and Teel fulfills his destiny as an offensive asset and great defensive catcher, you potentially have two 5-6 win players making peanuts. That makes it much less risky to pay Y2K market rates.
But if YY is signing a 10-12 year deal, it may get harder to resign these young studs when they aren’t making peanuts and want to get paid.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,370
Apparently the Sox met with Eduardo Rodriguez but didn't make an offer.


https://nesn.com/2023/12/why-red-sox-reportedly-didnt-make-offer-to-eduardo-rodriguez/
It sounds to me like the Sox can’t do anything until YY signs. Guessing if they miss out on him, they move on to Montgomery or Snell; and try to get one of them and then someone cheaper (Manea or someone?). As it is now they can’t commit to a Lugo or E-Rod because signing one of them woildnt leave them enough budget for YY? Is that somewhat logical? Otherwise I can’t figure out why, if they need two starters, they can’t acquire the 2nd one before the first.
 

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,336
Agreed. Again, decisions haven't been made yet and the season doesn't start tomorrow, but imagine this same level of activity under Chaim instead of Breslow. This thread would be 4 times longer and full of all of us asking ownership to sell the team and the baseball ops team to be gutted.
What activity would you like to have seen by the Sox at this point in the off season beyond what you have already seen? Everyone paying attention when the season ended knew that Ohtani would go first to help establish the market, then Yamamoto, to be followed by everyone else. Such a progression is how baseball has always worked, only the names of the free agents change. Given that the Sox, MLB, the media, and this entire board all agree that the Sox needs are largely to be filled in the starting pitching market, what would you like the team to have done at this point that it hasn't already done?
Sox should be willing to go to $350 million plus.
I’m in all the way to $1.2 billion. Who says no?
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
FWIW, there is another class of fan (or at least one fan in another class). Those who believe Bloom built “only” an average farm system (closer to 16 where MLB ranks them vs 3rd on FG) and while a good hitting core, that the MLB pitching and upper minors pitching is so atrocious on balance that waiting for the farm isn’t a tenable plan. Compounded with the fact that I think he misread the market and over estimated the ability to trade hitting prospects for MLB pitching. (I’m not saying he’s the only one to do this, for the record.)

As such, I think free agent pitching is quite literally the only option for the Red Sox. Well, assuming “continuing to miss the playoffs and fall further into irrelevancy within the game of baseball for another 5 years” isn’t an option they want to consider.

Its not a good spot to be in, but I think it’s where they are.
That’s fine, I’m not a farm system expert, so I’m comfy saying that they have a solid top three and some big ceiling hitters further down, so if the pitching help doesn’t come from within, then they will have to trade position player talent to cover it. Or make big moves in free agency. Or a little of both. They are hardly out of options, particularly with a staff that was league average in a supposedly terrible year. The rotation needs help but it’s not a tear-down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.