Crapron.jsinger121 said:Take a shot at them Caron. I could care less if you sit for it.
They COULD, but let's be real here.....our chances greatly increase with a win Thursday. I'm not so confident it'll come as they are just not finishing their chances over a long period of time. It took a miracle not to be down 0-3 for Christ sakes. They've really got to get their shit together and start finishing in front of the net and not completely fucking up on defense.Ed Hillel said:
They can win 3 in a row, with 2 at home, should it come to that.
RedOctober3829 said:Wouldn't you rather not go back to boston down 1-3? I thought so. Win Thursday and it's a best of 3 and we have the home ice.
RedOctober3829 said:Wouldn't you rather not go back to boston down 1-3? I thought so. Win Thursday and it's a best of 3 and we have the home ice.
Of course I do. If they lose Game 4, I don't think they're winning the series so to me yes it is must win.TheShynessClinic said:
Do you know what "must win" means.
Because what you're describing isn't must win. It's "it'd be a preferable course of action to win."
Andrew said:
Can someone with a better grasp on hockey explain to me why what Subban did was okay? It seems like the scumiest thing you can do that doesn't include hurting a player. Why not just have your goalie move the net every single time with only a few seconds left in the game if you lose the face-off? Even if they call a penalty it's not as big of a deal as forcing the other team to lose a few seconds AND have to win the face-off again.
Holy shit, the Canadiens are the biggest scum douchebags on the planet.
RedOctober3829 said:Of course I do. If they lose Game 4, I don't think they're winning the series so to me yes it is must win.
It's not even remotely scummy and is actually a pretty fucking brilliant play. He sold it perfectly too. It sucks but it was well executed only thing that infuriated me is the delay in blowing it dead. It wasn't in the top 5 of non-calls in the last 5 mins.Andrew said:Can someone with a better grasp on hockey explain to me why what Subban did was okay? It seems like the scumiest thing you can do that doesn't include hurting a player. Why not just have your goalie move the net every single time with only a few seconds left in the game if you lose the face-off? Even if they call a penalty it's not as big of a deal as forcing the other team to lose a few seconds AND have to win the face-off again.
Holy shit, the Canadiens are the biggest scum douchebags on the planet.
Ed Hillel said:They were set up as well as they could have been with 8 seconds left. Subban knocks the net off. That's pretty good strategy, they should change that rule to make it a penalty shot late in the game, maybe if the other net is empty. It's kind of like the intentional 12 men on the field.
I'm just being honest. They need to be better than this and I think we can all agree on that.TheShynessClinic said:
Well that's why you're a nancy. And I'm not a nancy.
Nancy.
Obscure Name said:
They don't need to change the rule because the rule is it is a penalty shot.
What does this have to do with respect?Harry Hooper said:Sorry, can't just turn it on and off, can't get involved in petty stuff (not an issue tonight, of course). I think we'd see a more consistent, full-game effort vs. a different team.
The Four Peters said:It's not even remotely scummy and is actually a pretty fucking brilliant play. He sold it perfectly too. It sucks but it was well executed only thing that infuriated me is the delay in blowing it dead.
Gotta be better on their chances and just cannot have the mental lapses defensively. Also need the first line to show up big time.
Harry Hooper said:B's just don't respect the Habs as an opponent enough.
Ed Hillel said:
I thought it was just a delay of game penalty?
If wiki is right its either a full 2 minute penalty or a penalty shot for the last player to shoot, so with 15 seconds left it would have been a penalty shot for whichever B was last to shoot (not sure if that's shot attempt shot on goal or whatever)Ed Hillel said:
I thought it was just a delay of game penalty?
If by reason of insufficient time in the regular playing time or by reason of penalties already imposed, the minor penalty assessed to a player for deliberately displacing his own goal post cannot be served in its entirety within the regular playing time of the game or at any time in overtime, a penalty shot shall be awarded against the offending team.
Myt1 said:Thursday is must get a blowjob from Lexi Belle night for me.
Overall, their play has been fine. They've controlled possession in all 3 games. The problems are:Harry Hooper said:Sorry, can't just turn it on and off, can't get involved in petty stuff (not an issue tonight, of course). I think we'd see a more consistent, full-game effort vs. a different team.
Hope this is mentioned to Claude in the press conference.McBride11 said:Ya, Obscure, good call, didn't realize the under 2 minute caveat. Rule 63.5
If they called a penalty shot there I'm not sure the official lives to eat breakfast. That would have been awesome.NortheasternPJ said:If by reason of insufficient time in the regular playing time or by reason of penalties already imposed, the minor penalty assessed to a player for deliberately displacing his own goal post cannot be served in its entirety within the regular playing time of the game or at any time in overtime, a penalty shot shall be awarded against the offending team.
I like Subban a lot and this is really dumb.The Four Peters said:It's not even remotely scummy and is actually a pretty fucking brilliant play. He sold it perfectly too.
Is Corey Pooper better from his practice injury a few weeks ago? Put him in for Crapron and Shitzaros at the same time.BoSoxFink said:I have to take a crapon, literally actually
I feel this is the same reason calls weren't made against the Yankees in the 80s-90s and it makes just as much sense... I've stopped watching the nba... These penalty calls in the nhl are starting to get almost as predictable.patinorange said:If they called a penalty shot there I'm not sure the official lives to eat breakfast. That would have been awesome.
Darren Dreger @DarrenDreger 9m
Dale Weise says his chest pounding celebration was clearly a "shot at Boston." Also said 5 hole on breakaway is "his move".
It's a scummy play IMO and personifies why, as much as I want to appreciate Subban's talents, I never will at least until he walks from the Canadiens. And I'm all for subtle shit done by defensemen to gain an advantage.Andrew said:
Explain to me how it is not even remotely scummy, then. Your opponent is playing hockey and puts themselves into a last few seconds chance and you do something not related to hockey to stop them. My personal definition of scummy is exactly that. It's Arroyo getting you to ground out and then you slapping the ball out of his hand.
Your hockey knowledge is like 1,000x more than mine, so I cede to you if that's how it just is, but it sure seems like bullshit to me.
nailed itkenneycb said:It's a scummy play IMO and personifies why, as much as I want to appreciate Subban's talents, I never will at least until he walks from the Canadiens. And I'm all for subtle shit done by defensemen to gain an advantage.
He's an NHL defenseman. He knows exactly where he was, the time left and what he was doing. You don't just randomly run into the net when cutting off a wraparound. That's peewee and earlier shit.RedOctober3829 said:Guys, they obviously didn't rule that the net was pushed off on purpose. It certainly looked like it to us, but we are a little biased. Subban definitely made it look like it was just run into even though I think we all know it was on purpose.
We can say they are outplaying them all we want, but the scoreboard is all that matters. This series has come down to finishing chances when each team has the opportunities. Montreal is making the most of theirs and Boston is not. We can say "regression to the mean" or "they'll even out" as much as we want but we can't just expect it will happen. Our best players are not playing well and that needs to change. The KIL line has done nothing in 3 games. It's absolutely frustrating at this point. Can the series turn on a dime? Of course it can. It all starts with Thursday night.
I don't expect them to call the penalty there (though I don't doubt it was intentional), but I did expect them to add more than two seconds back. He hit it around 13-14 left, right? Can they go to replay or did they just pull ten seconds out of their ass?RedOctober3829 said:Guys, they obviously didn't rule that the net was pushed off on purpose. It certainly looked like it to us, but we are a little biased. Subban definitely made it look like it was just run into even though I think we all know it was on purpose.
patinorange said:If they called a penalty shot there I'm not sure the official lives to eat breakfast. That would have been awesome.
Of course I think we all know he did it on purpose. The refs just aren't going to call it in a situation like that in the playoffs. It sucks.kenneycb said:He's an NHL defenseman. He knows exactly where he was, the time left and what he was doing. You don't just randomly run into the net when cutting off a wraparound. That's peewee and earlier shit.
Seriously...how many times does that ever happen ever with nobody forcing him into the net??? It's so obvious it's almost comical except for it's Montreal where bull shit always happens... Which in my mind is unacceptable in this day and age, no? I mean it's almost stopped happening in Yankee stadium why not Montreal?kenneycb said:He's an NHL defenseman. He knows exactly where he was, the time left and what he was doing. You don't just randomly run into the net when cutting off a wraparound. That's peewee and earlier shit.