Game 3: Everything is le Awesome

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,499
deep inside Guido territory
Ed Hillel said:
 
They can win 3 in a row, with 2 at home, should it come to that.
They COULD, but let's be real here.....our chances greatly increase with a win Thursday.  I'm not so confident it'll come as they are just not finishing their chances over a long period of time.  It took a miracle not to be down 0-3 for Christ sakes.  They've really got to get their shit together and start finishing in front of the net and not completely fucking up on defense.
 

Zenicity

New Member
Sep 23, 2012
33
Don't post that much, and usually don't get too heated during games.  Subban popping the net off with his shoulder so blatantly and the following no-call from the ref's had me screaming.  I just had to come here to vent.  Such total bullshit.  Hope they respond like they did in Game 2 of the Detroit series.  We need a good game like that.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,202
Here
RedOctober3829 said:
Wouldn't you rather not go back to boston down 1-3?  I thought so.  Win Thursday and it's a best of 3 and we have the home ice.  
 
Of course we'd rather they win, but they can win down 3-1.
 

RSN Diaspora

molests goats for comedy
SoSH Member
Jul 29, 2005
11,419
Washington, DC
RedOctober3829 said:
Wouldn't you rather not go back to boston down 1-3?  I thought so.  Win Thursday and it's a best of 3 and we have the home ice.  
 
Of course. That doesn't equal to "must win."
 

TSC

SoSH's Doug Neidermeyer
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2007
12,331
Between here and everywhere.
Andrew said:
 
Can someone with a better grasp on hockey explain to me why what Subban did was okay? It seems like the scumiest thing you can do that doesn't include hurting a player. Why not just have your goalie move the net every single time with only a few seconds left in the game if you lose the face-off? Even if they call a penalty it's not as big of a deal as forcing the other team to lose a few seconds AND have to win the face-off again.
 
Holy shit, the Canadiens are the biggest scum douchebags on the planet. 
 
It's not ok. It's supposed to be a penalty. But you know. Montreal. Refs. Etc.
 

TFP

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2007
20,391
Andrew said:
Can someone with a better grasp on hockey explain to me why what Subban did was okay? It seems like the scumiest thing you can do that doesn't include hurting a player. Why not just have your goalie move the net every single time with only a few seconds left in the game if you lose the face-off? Even if they call a penalty it's not as big of a deal as forcing the other team to lose a few seconds AND have to win the face-off again.
 
Holy shit, the Canadiens are the biggest scum douchebags on the planet.
It's not even remotely scummy and is actually a pretty fucking brilliant play. He sold it perfectly too. It sucks but it was well executed only thing that infuriated me is the delay in blowing it dead. It wasn't in the top 5 of non-calls in the last 5 mins.

Gotta be better on their chances and just cannot have the mental lapses defensively. Also need the first line to show up big time.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,614
Sorry, can't just turn it on and off, can't get involved in petty stuff (not an issue tonight, of course). I think we'd see a more consistent, full-game effort vs. a different team.
 

Obscure Name

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 29, 2006
26,696
Western Mass
Ed Hillel said:
They were set up as well as they could have been with 8 seconds left. Subban knocks the net off. That's pretty good strategy, they should change that rule to make it a penalty shot late in the game, maybe if the other net is empty. It's kind of like the intentional 12 men on the field.
 
They don't need to change the rule because the rule is it is a penalty shot.
 
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,202
Here
Obscure Name said:
 
They don't need to change the rule because the rule is it is a penalty shot.
 
 
I thought it was just a delay of game penalty?
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,546
Harry Hooper said:
Sorry, can't just turn it on and off, can't get involved in petty stuff (not an issue tonight, of course). I think we'd see a more consistent, full-game effort vs. a different team.
What does this have to do with respect?

Also, and people forget this all the fucking time, the other team is also trying to win.
 

AbbyNoho

broke her neck in costa rica
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
12,180
Northampton, Massachusetts
The Four Peters said:
It's not even remotely scummy and is actually a pretty fucking brilliant play. He sold it perfectly too. It sucks but it was well executed only thing that infuriated me is the delay in blowing it dead.

Gotta be better on their chances and just cannot have the mental lapses defensively. Also need the first line to show up big time.
 
Explain to me how it is not even remotely scummy, then. Your opponent is playing hockey and puts themselves into a last few seconds chance and you do something not related to hockey to stop them. My personal definition of scummy is exactly that. It's Arroyo getting you to ground out and then you slapping the ball out of his hand.
 
Your hockey knowledge is like 1,000x more than mine, so I cede to you if that's how it just is, but it sure seems like bullshit to me. 
 

McBride11

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
22,195
Durham, NC
Ya, Obscure, good call, didn't realize the under 2 minute caveat. Rule 63.5
 
 
 
If by reason of insufficient time in the regular playing time or by reason of penalties already imposed, the minor penalty assessed to a player for deliberately displacing his own goal post cannot be served in its entirety within the regular playing time of the game or at any time in overtime, a penalty shot shall be awarded against the offending team.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,251
306, row 14
Harry Hooper said:
Sorry, can't just turn it on and off, can't get involved in petty stuff (not an issue tonight, of course). I think we'd see a more consistent, full-game effort vs. a different team.
Overall, their play has been fine. They've controlled possession in all 3 games. The problems are:
 
1. They can't get a lead. They can't be playing catch-up for 50 minutes a night, it wears you out and leaves you little room for error. 
2. Special teams. Not much of a factor tonight, but the Bruins are 0-fer on the PP and gave up 4 PP goals to Montreal in the first 2 games. 
3. Lack of finish. They're dominating possession, but can't score. 
4. Every Bruin mistake is winding up in the back of their net. They gave up very few scoring chances tonight, but Montreal went 2-2 on breakaways so the mistakes are getting magnified. 
 
The scale should tip towards the Bruins at some point. Problem is we're dealing with a small sample size where anything can happen. 
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,692
McBride11 said:
Ya, Obscure, good call, didn't realize the under 2 minute caveat. Rule 63.5
 
Hope this is mentioned to Claude in the press conference.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,389
If by reason of insufficient time in the regular playing time or by reason of penalties already imposed, the minor penalty assessed to a player for deliberately displacing his own goal post cannot be served in its entirety within the regular playing time of the game or at any time in overtime, a penalty shot shall be awarded against the offending team.
 

durandal1707

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2007
6,318
And the difference was the fucking cherrypicked goal.

I'm expecting a massive regression to the mean Thursday night.  The Bruins carry the play for the majority of the game, and have only been rewarded for it in the 3rd period.  Meanwhile Vanek hitting the crossbar tonight was about the only golden scoring chance the Habs didn't capitalize on, and Dale fucking Weise gets rewarded for not playing defense.  Fuck off.
 

patinorange

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 27, 2006
31,041
6 miles from Angel Stadium
NortheasternPJ said:
If by reason of insufficient time in the regular playing time or by reason of penalties already imposed, the minor penalty assessed to a player for deliberately displacing his own goal post cannot be served in its entirety within the regular playing time of the game or at any time in overtime, a penalty shot shall be awarded against the offending team.
If they called a penalty shot there I'm not sure the official lives to eat breakfast. That would have been awesome.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,637
02130
The Four Peters said:
It's not even remotely scummy and is actually a pretty fucking brilliant play. He sold it perfectly too. 
I like Subban a lot and this is really dumb.
 

catomatic

thinks gen turgidson is super mean!!!
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
3,420
Park Slope, Brooklyn
Moen hit was way late, puck was long gone. If Lucic is going to play this poorly the least he can do is tune up a Canadien or two. Those guys are obviously not getting called for anything and it's made them dangerously bold—they're playing just over the line and the refs will have no one to blame but themselves when someone—from either side—gets hurt by a cheap play. They're letting Montreal get away with a whole lot. The Subban net hijinks was really bad, and the non-call on Soderberg being held at the blue line was quite simply unacceptable at this level.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,874
patinorange said:
If they called a penalty shot there I'm not sure the official lives to eat breakfast. That would have been awesome.
I feel this is the same reason calls weren't made against the Yankees in the 80s-90s and it makes just as much sense... I've stopped watching the nba... These penalty calls in the nhl are starting to get almost as predictable.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,614
FTR, I expect the B's to win the next one 4-2, but generally not that close as Habs tally one late.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,499
deep inside Guido territory
Guys, they obviously didn't rule that the net was pushed off on purpose.  It certainly looked like it to us, but we are a little biased.  Subban definitely made it look like it was just run into even though I think we all know it was on purpose.
 
We can say they are outplaying them all we want, but the scoreboard is all that matters.  This series has come down to finishing chances when each team has the opportunities.  Montreal is making the most of theirs and Boston is not.  We can say "regression to the mean" or "they'll even out" as much as we want but we can't just expect it will happen.  Our best players are not playing well and that needs to change.  The KIL line has done nothing in 3 games.  It's absolutely frustrating at this point.  Can the series turn on a dime?  Of course it can.  It all starts with Thursday night.  
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,161
Tuukka's refugee camp
Andrew said:
 
Explain to me how it is not even remotely scummy, then. Your opponent is playing hockey and puts themselves into a last few seconds chance and you do something not related to hockey to stop them. My personal definition of scummy is exactly that. It's Arroyo getting you to ground out and then you slapping the ball out of his hand.
 
Your hockey knowledge is like 1,000x more than mine, so I cede to you if that's how it just is, but it sure seems like bullshit to me. 
It's a scummy play IMO and personifies why, as much as I want to appreciate Subban's talents, I never will at least until he walks from the Canadiens. And I'm all for subtle shit done by defensemen to gain an advantage.
 

BoSoxFink

Stripes
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
7,662
South Park
kenneycb said:
It's a scummy play IMO and personifies why, as much as I want to appreciate Subban's talents, I never will at least until he walks from the Canadiens. And I'm all for subtle shit done by defensemen to gain an advantage.
nailed it
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,161
Tuukka's refugee camp
RedOctober3829 said:
Guys, they obviously didn't rule that the net was pushed off on purpose.  It certainly looked like it to us, but we are a little biased.  Subban definitely made it look like it was just run into even though I think we all know it was on purpose.
 
We can say they are outplaying them all we want, but the scoreboard is all that matters.  This series has come down to finishing chances when each team has the opportunities.  Montreal is making the most of theirs and Boston is not.  We can say "regression to the mean" or "they'll even out" as much as we want but we can't just expect it will happen.  Our best players are not playing well and that needs to change.  The KIL line has done nothing in 3 games.  It's absolutely frustrating at this point.  Can the series turn on a dime?  Of course it can.  It all starts with Thursday night.  
He's an NHL defenseman. He knows exactly where he was, the time left and what he was doing. You don't just randomly run into the net when cutting off a wraparound. That's peewee and earlier shit.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,637
02130
RedOctober3829 said:
Guys, they obviously didn't rule that the net was pushed off on purpose.  It certainly looked like it to us, but we are a little biased.  Subban definitely made it look like it was just run into even though I think we all know it was on purpose.
 
I don't expect them to call the penalty there (though I don't doubt it was intentional), but I did expect them to add more than two seconds back. He hit it around 13-14 left, right? Can they go to replay or did they just pull ten seconds out of their ass?
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,167
Westwood MA
patinorange said:
If they called a penalty shot there I'm not sure the official lives to eat breakfast. That would have been awesome.
 
It would have taken king kong sized balls to call a penalty shot there and had the Bruins scored and gone on to win the game in overtime, those 20,000 Habs fans would have found that torch the kid skated around the rink with in the opening ceremony, beat the shit out of him, stole the torch and burned the arena and the city to the ground.
 
The Bruins haven't lost two in a row all year, they're not about to start now, I expect them to come out flying Thursday night and play like their season is on the line; get the fucking lead, keep it and win the game and go from there.
 
And I like Myt1's plan for Thursday; God's speed with that one, I'm pulling for you.....................
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,499
deep inside Guido territory
kenneycb said:
He's an NHL defenseman. He knows exactly where he was, the time left and what he was doing. You don't just randomly run into the net when cutting off a wraparound. That's peewee and earlier shit.
Of course I think we all know he did it on purpose.  The refs just aren't going to call it in a situation like that in the playoffs.  It sucks.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,161
Tuukka's refugee camp
Also, Tim Peel was the ref so if you think he's suddenly gaining balls or competency I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell to you. I did enjoy getting a couple of looks at the casino from the Habs fan rocking the anniversary prison unis after declaring typical Montreal a few times tonight.
 

Titoschew

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 28, 2006
3,283
Chip Woolley's Trailer
“@ESPNJoeyMac: Rask said he wasn't banging his stick on the ice when Subban's penalty was over.”

Sums it up through three games. Sharpness lacking in all facets of the game.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,874
kenneycb said:
He's an NHL defenseman. He knows exactly where he was, the time left and what he was doing. You don't just randomly run into the net when cutting off a wraparound. That's peewee and earlier shit.
Seriously...how many times does that ever happen ever with nobody forcing him into the net??? It's so obvious it's almost comical except for it's Montreal where bull shit always happens... Which in my mind is unacceptable in this day and age, no? I mean it's almost stopped happening in Yankee stadium why not Montreal?
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,251
306, row 14
Weird series so far. You could make a solid argument for either team being up 3-0 now. Bruins have won the possession battle in all 3 games and have outshot Montreal in all 3 games. But on the flip side, the Habs have capitalized on their chances, played the entire series from ahead, and if not for a flurry at the end of game 2, they could be up 3-0. 
 
I wouldn't do too much lineup tinkering between now and Thursday, but I still think the Lucic-Paille swap I posted earlier makes some sense. Give it a go, see what happens. The first line has been too erratic, give them a kick in the pants. Soderberg and Eriksson have been fantastic, I'd live to give them more of a scoring threat. Lucic should fit in well with them grinding along the boards, and perhaps he can take the net-front role that Loui's been playing. That'd free Loui up a bit to work his way in and out of space, and hopefully get him into more high-scoring areas. As for the Krejci line, perhaps Paille's wheels gets Iginla to move his feet a bit more. Iginla's board play has been pretty disappointing this series though so I'm not sure what kind of affect a shakeup would have on him. I have to think Iginla's hurt, he doesn't look like the same guy we saw in the regular season.