No they wouldn't have.Ed Hillel said:
If he hurt him, they may have given him 5.
lars10 said:Is it based on pure luck? Cause he's had little to do with four or five of the goals that were missed.
Better question: why haven't you started yet?IHateDaveKerpen said:I put it to you all - should I start drinking during the intermission?
Fresh sheet of clean ice for them to work with.mabrowndog said:The only good thing about that penalty is that it's broken up by the intermission.
I'm going to be fucking terrified of the opening 1:34 following the break.
No.IHateDaveKerpen said:I put it to you all - should I start drinking during the intermission?
TheShynessClinic said:No they wouldn't have.
That was nothing close to Cooke's. He wouldn't have been suspended even 1.
MiracleOfO2704 said:Better question: why haven't you started yet?
Bergs said:No.
You should've started 3 hours ago. Asshole.
The trick is to still be drunk when teaching...the students will love you.IHateDaveKerpen said:
I killed over half a case during game 1 against the Blackhawks last year. Teaching the morning afterward wasn't much fun.
So that's one no. Alright.
Oh you mean 5 minutes not 5 games? Eh. Still debatable.Ed Hillel said:
I know, but refs get affected by players writhing on the ground and getting carried off.
Al Zarilla said:Krejci looks flustrated says Milbury. I'm pretty frustrated too.
Al Zarilla said:Krejci looks flustrated says Milbury. I'm pretty frustrated too.
Donald Sterling was right not to want magic at the game.Manzivino said:50 to 29 shot advantage not including posts and pucks that danced across the goal line by magic.