Does Size Matter? Batting Cages and Baseball

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
Why Michael Couldn't Hit, and Other Tales of the Neurology of Sports http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Couldnt-Other-Neurology-Sports/dp/0716730014
 
This is pretty good book. It states that besides being a basketball player Jordan was just too tall to hit. The book notes that there are a lot of good hitters at 6-3, including the best ever. There are fewer, but still some at 6-4. After 6-4 it is basically Dave Winflield and some power guys that struck out a ton. Basally above 6-4 guys can't hit. It is finy that there is not a single guy above 6-4 on that list, but it fits the trend.
 
And of course listed height of athletes is less reliable than milage on use car ad. But guys don't generally lie about being shorter.
 
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,274
reggiecleveland said:
 


Why Michael Couldn't Hit, and Other Tales of the Neurology of Sports http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Couldnt-Other-Neurology-Sports/dp/0716730014
 
This is pretty good book. It states that besides being a basketball player Jordan was just too tall to hit. The book notes that there are a lot of good hitters at 6-3, including the best ever. There are fewer, but still some at 6-4. After 6-4 it is basically Dave Winflield and some power guys that struck out a ton. Basally above 6-4 guys can't hit. It is finy that there is not a single guy above 6-4 on that list, but it fits the trend.
 
And of course listed height of athletes is less reliable than milage on use car ad. But guys don't generally lie about being shorter.
 



 
 
 I would imagine that guys who are tall and good enough to major league players are overwhelmingly drawn to basketball.
 
M

MentalDisabldLst

Guest
Completely different skillsets though.  To have a shot in pro sports, you have to commit to something like baseball so early, and do it so immersively while growing up, that people usually just pick their passion and see how far they can get in it.  By the time you reach an age where you know your adult height and weight and may realistically have a shot at going bigtime in basketball or football, your window to do something in baseball has likely already passed you by; people don't just pick up baseball in, say, high school and make the majors.  Jeff Samardzija and Bo Jackson are the only exceptions I can think of, people who really had an option between high-level baseball and another sport.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,121
MentalDisabldLst said:
Completely different skillsets though.  To have a shot in pro sports, you have to commit to something like baseball so early, and do it so immersively while growing up, that people usually just pick their passion and see how far they can get in it.  By the time you reach an age where you know your adult height and weight and may realistically have a shot at going bigtime in basketball or football, your window to do something in baseball has likely already passed you by; people don't just pick up baseball in, say, high school and make the majors.  Jeff Samardzija and Bo Jackson are the only exceptions I can think of, people who really had an option between high-level baseball and another sport.
 
The list is longer than you think.
 
Notables include Ferguson Jenkins, Robin Roberts, Frank Thomas, Danny Ainge, Kenny Lofton, Steve Garvey, Darin Erstad, Mark DeRosa, and Brian Jordan.
 
The numbers may have dwindled in the past 15-20 years, but that's probably due to greater specialization among young athletes in general, as opposed to the peculiar demands of baseball. 
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,776
reggiecleveland said:
 


Why Michael Couldn't Hit, and Other Tales of the Neurology of Sports http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Couldnt-Other-Neurology-Sports/dp/0716730014
 
This is pretty good book. It states that besides being a basketball player Jordan was just too tall to hit. The book notes that there are a lot of good hitters at 6-3, including the best ever. There are fewer, but still some at 6-4. After 6-4 it is basically Dave Winflield and some power guys that struck out a ton. Basally above 6-4 guys can't hit. It is finy that there is not a single guy above 6-4 on that list, but it fits the trend.
 
And of course listed height of athletes is less reliable than milage on use car ad. But guys don't generally lie about being shorter.
 



 
Jeter?
 
 
maufman said:
 
The list is longer than you think.
 
Notables include Ferguson Jenkins, Robin Roberts, Frank Thomas, Danny Ainge, Kenny Lofton, Steve Garvey, Darin Erstad, Mark DeRosa, and Brian Jordan.
 
The numbers may have dwindled in the past 15-20 years, but that's probably due to greater specialization among young athletes in general, as opposed to the peculiar demands of baseball. 
 
Dick Groat was NCAA POY in basketball in 1952 and NL MVP in 1960.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,274
MentalDisabldLst said:
Completely different skillsets though.  To have a shot in pro sports, you have to commit to something like baseball so early, and do it so immersively while growing up, that people usually just pick their passion and see how far they can get in it.  By the time you reach an age where you know your adult height and weight and may realistically have a shot at going bigtime in basketball or football, your window to do something in baseball has likely already passed you by; people don't just pick up baseball in, say, high school and make the majors.  Jeff Samardzija and Bo Jackson are the only exceptions I can think of, people who really had an option between high-level baseball and another sport.
But I'm not talking about ditching basketball for baseball, it's the other way around. Most people who are going to be 6'6" or higher are already the tallest kid in school or close to it by middle school, which is plenty of time to develop in basketball, and they will inevitably be steered that way. So very few tall people end up dedicating themselves to baseball.
 

Fred not Lynn

Dick Button Jr.
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
5,263
Alberta
In defense of Jordan; He hit above the Mendoza line in a full season at AA, and over .250 in the AZ Fall League. That's not exactly "not hitting". That's mediocre or so hitting against legitimate professional pitching, and really, in baseball's big picture nothing to be ashamed of.
 

mt8thsw9th

anti-SoSHal
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
17,121
Brooklyn
Fred not Lynn said:
In defense of Jordan; He hit above the Mendoza line in a full season at AA, and over .250 in the AZ Fall League. That's not exactly "not hitting". That's mediocre or so hitting against legitimate professional pitching, and really, in baseball's big picture nothing to be ashamed of.
 
I'd imagine if you put the average American male (who played any level of organized sports) up to bat against a pitching machine throwing in the high 80s, with no breaking pitches or offspeed pitches, they'd struggle to even hit the Mendoza line. That is even if it was adjusted to measure balls just put into play as hits, never mind getting batted balls past defenders. 
 

Ramon AC

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 19, 2002
3,248
What?
mt8thsw9th said:
I'd imagine if you put the average American male (who played any level of organized sports) up to bat against a pitching machine throwing in the high 80s, with no breaking pitches or offspeed pitches, they'd struggle to even hit the Mendoza line. That is even if it was adjusted to measure balls just put into play as hits, never mind getting batted balls past defenders.
Were I to face a challenge like this I'd be so nervous I'd need an antacid to calm my stomach.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,150
Concord, NH
mt8thsw9th said:
 
I'd imagine if you put the average American male (who played any level of organized sports) up to bat against a pitching machine throwing in the high 80s, with no breaking pitches or offspeed pitches, they'd struggle to even hit the Mendoza line. That is even if it was adjusted to measure balls just put into play as hits, never mind getting batted balls past defenders. 
 
I know that's hyperbole, but you had me right up until the last line. I haven't played baseball since little league and I sucked then, too. Every once in a while I'll go to the batting cages to blow off a little steam. The fast ball cages are listed as 85 mph and I put at least 80% of them in fair territory. Now, ask me to run to first base before someone fields it and throws me out and you're totally right.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,596
Somewhere
I think the "average american male" in this scenario -- let's say an active beer league softballer -- might be lucky to hit .050 in low A ball.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,274
drbretto said:
 
I know that's hyperbole, but you had me right up until the last line. I haven't played baseball since little league and I sucked then, too. Every once in a while I'll go to the batting cages to blow off a little steam. The fast ball cages are listed as 85 mph and I put at least 80% of them in fair territory. Now, ask me to run to first base before someone fields it and throws me out and you're totally right.
 
I'm a 40-something with average-at-best athleticism and I can hit the fast cages too.  Takes about 10 swing and misses to find my groove but by the second run through I'm spraying them pretty well.  Because I can do it, I assume it's not all that impressive, and adding curveballs and  offspeeds to the equation makes all the difference.  Plus I'll bet those batting cage speeds are exaggerated.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,429
Philadelphia
moondog80 said:
 
I'm a 40-something with average-at-best athleticism and I can hit the fast cages too.  Takes about 10 swing and misses to find my groove but by the second run through I'm spraying them pretty well.  Because I can do it, I assume it's not all that impressive, and adding curveballs and  offspeeds to the equation makes all the difference.  Plus I'll bet those batting cage speeds are exaggerated.
 
Yeah, this.  Most cages have a fast setting from 70-80.  Maybe drbretto's is a legit 85 but I wouldn't be surprised if its listed that way but actually somewhat slower. 
 

czar

fanboy
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
4,317
Ann Arbor
Last year I played last year in a competitive wood bat league (25-40 y/o) with a few ex-minor league/D-I guys who worked in the high-80's.

Even ignoring the fact that hitting in a game situation is world's different from spending 30 pitches in a row timing up a batting cage, there is also a huge difference between "making contact" and "making USABLE contact."

Pretty much every ball I put in play against someone working up near 90, my first instinct was "sweet, look at me make contact!" Then it was immediately followed with "hey, it's a slow roller that might not even reach the SS." And that was when I was pretty sure a fastball was coming -- it doesn't include the times where I thought fastball and corkscrewed myself into the ground on a good bender (but not in an endearing Dustin Pedroia way). Everyone says BABIP regresses, but I can guarantee that against big league fielders *maybe* 10% of the balls I put in play would go as hits. Maybe.

I think comparing the average male's ability to a professional (or even semi-professional) ballplayer is a fool's errand.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
czar said:
I think comparing the average male's ability to a professional (or even semi-professional) ballplayer is a fool's errand.
 
Most major league pitchers were really good hitters in high school. Some even in college. Most of them would slaughter most average males in a BP contest.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,150
Concord, NH
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:
 
Yeah, this.  Most cages have a fast setting from 70-80.  Maybe drbretto's is a legit 85 but I wouldn't be surprised if its listed that way but actually somewhat slower. 
 
Doubt it's any different. That's why i added the words "listed at". I suspect it's just a sign saying 85 MPH just to let people think they're hitting major league fastballs. Though, I did once try to reach out to catch their 55 MPH slow pitch and it sure felt like it was at least 55. It left a baseball shaped bruise on my hand for days.
 
But my point was that the pitching machine ball WANTS to be hit, while a ball pitched by a human person doesn't. It really wasn't meant to spark any kind of legitimate debate on the main board.
 

CSteinhardt

"Steiny"
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
3,202
Cambridge
mt8thsw9th said:
 
I'd imagine if you put the average American male (who played any level of organized sports) up to bat against a pitching machine throwing in the high 80s, with no breaking pitches or offspeed pitches, they'd struggle to even hit the Mendoza line. That is even if it was adjusted to measure balls just put into play as hits, never mind getting batted balls past defenders. 
 
There's a batting cage on top of Yodobashi in Akihabara that goes up to 160 km/h (99 mph), rubber ball rather than baseball, with a couple of options for movement.  I didn't have that much trouble getting the timing down to hit hard line drives off a straight fastball.  About 10% of the balls would hit something coming out of the chute and would be more like 90 mph with a bit of sink, and after being geared up to hit 99 mph, I wouldn't be anywhere close to touching them.  They also had the option to throw sinkers, sliders and curves, and I found it almost impossible to hit 160 km/h with a fair bit of movement, even knowing what to expect, except for the sliders, where I'd often make weak contact but couldn't square them up.  
 

TigerBlood

Banned
Mar 10, 2011
330
ALiveH said:
I think the real test of the "tall guys can't hit" theory is to plot the height distribution of MLB players against the height distribution of American males. 
 
Less than 1% of American males 20-40 is 6'5" or taller.  Is there any reason to expect a higher percentage of tall guys among MLB hitters?
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0209.pdf
Athletics in general tend to attract larger people. Strength and size correlate pretty well, especially in teenagers when their interests are being directed towards or away from sports by their ability.
 

ALiveH

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,104
True, there are conflating factors.  Among the most popular American sports, basketball & football (and baseball pitchers) might disproportionately attract bigger kids where it more directly correlates.  Baseball hitting is more a hand-eye coordination & skill-based endeavor (like golf), so it might attract the athletically minded kids who don't have size or who have great hand-eye coordination.  On my Little League team, we had one kid who was a shrimp but he had freakishly good hand-eye coordination so he was a star, spraying line drives everywhere, even against the huge 6-footer who could throw 85 mph as a 12 year old.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I don't see mention of 6' 7" Frank Howard in this thread.  Sure, he struck out alot, but most power hitters strike out alot.
 
Joe Mauer is 6'5".  Neither a strikeout guy nor a real power guy, but he sure can hit.
 
Matt Wieters is 6'5", and does K alot, but is a good hitter.  Remember:  Strikeouts are GOOD!  
 
I'd take 6'6" Giancarlo Stanton on my team, even with all the K's
 
Wellesley's own Nate Freiman is 6'8" (but he might not be much of a hitter)
 

charlieoscar

Member
Sep 28, 2014
1,339
Based on my forays to the Sox minor league spring training complex in Ft. Myers in the '90s, I developed my own rule-of-thumb on player heights...any player who is actually 5'11" will list himself as 6', which means that any 6-footer has to be taller, and so on. Anyone who lists himself as 5'9" is probably closer to 5'6"; 5'6" is probably closer to 5'3". I stood next to a player in spikes who was listed as 6'4" (my height) and my eyes were nearly level with the button on top of his cap.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
Can you guys read. Jeter and Junior are not 6-5 or even 6-4. My point was guys over 6-4 that can hit are almost nonexistent.
 
I can't look at the stats. But look at the guys 6-5 and up compared to 6-3, or 6-4. I would bet at 6-3 there are at least 4 times more good hitters than all the guys 6-5 and up. I mean Jeter was 6-3,. Junior was 6-3, Ted was 6-3, Babe was 6-2.. I mean does anybody have access to a site where you could look this up.
 
AT the time the guy wrote the book the only .300 hitter over 6-4 was Winfield.
 
SO what do three guys prove Lose? That is the ultimate small sample.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
It proves that there aren't many tall major leaguers, due to normal height distributions, so the number of good hitting tall guys is gonna be low.  But that being talle <> can't hit.
 
Just check out Masterson's game on Thursday.
 
Edit:  And I listed 4.  Not three.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
Why so many great hitters at 6'3 then? Freeman is just a big guy not a great hitter. You take a shot at this idea in the small sample thread then give 4 names, one nowhere near a elite hitter.

Look at the number of 6'5 plus guys on olines. The numbers don't fall off a map after 6'4. The numbers in hitting are more drastic than the distribution curve.

Lose if your argument is population distribution are you saying the ratio of guys over 6'4 is the same in pitching?
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
Not just height matters, but the length of your limbs and other biomechanical details. I wouldn't be surprised if good contact hitters tend to have shorter, more muscular arms to generate high torque.

In the NFL this has been discussed in relation to Kaepernick, and how he's not an ideal scrambler because his legs are too long for his height and he's a "strider".

Same with swimming and Phelps - being tall is generally an advantage for swimmers but at a fixed height, it's better to have a long torso and short legs.
(Google "Kaepernick strider" and "Phelps torso" for discussion)
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
I dug out the book. The author points out that the height of the elite hitters has only slightly increased since the 40a and 50s, while the heights of pitchers, basketball players, and football players has incresed greatly. Baseball hitters are actually smaller compared to the average person than in 1950. Almost all the great al round hitters are over 6-0. In Hornsby's time 5-11 was big.
 
Look at the power players in other sports from the past they would be way too small to play today. Looking at the OPS all time leaders. Sure a threshold above 6-3 has been crossed by Mac,Thome, Cabrera, But are any of the old guys too small to play today? Mantle and Manny were the same size. Pujols and Greenburg, Ted, were all 6-3.
 
Babe 6-2
Ted 6-3
Gehrig 6-0
Bonds 6-1
Foxx 6-0
Greenburg 6-3
Hornsby 5-11
Manny 5-11 ( I stood beside Manny he is maybe 5-11)
Pujols 6-3
Big Mac 6-5
Mantle 5-11
"Call me the greatest living player or I won't come to the event" 6-2
Musial 6-0
Big Hurt 6-5
Larry Walker 6-2
Cabrebra 6-4
Mize 6-2
 
If you look at pitching it is similar, though the difference is actually less. other than the Big Unit, elite guys are of similar size.
 
To me it is something beautiful about the game, that the best players have not changed so much that it is impossible to imagine them playing today. There is something about the particular set of skills that causes size to be a minimal advantage compared to other pro sports.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
Fuck I said the number drops sharply above 6'4, and guys with long careers above 6'5 are rare. The fact you can name single guys proves nothing. The graph of height about Mookie showed no guys over 6-4. I stated it us really hard for guys that tall to make it as hitters. Baseball hitters are shorter compared to the regular population historically than other sports. In 1920 the best hitters were around 6 feet huge camped to the average guy then. Now they are only slightly bigger on average. There is a point height hurts. I think Winfield is the only Hof hitter over 6'5. Who is there at 6-5? Big hurt? Lots at 6'3 but it drops off after that to a few guys which is why you dumasses can name them all.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I listed four guys, plus Freiman. Three contemporary and one from my youth. And other posters have contributed other names.

Why arent there more tall good hitters? Because there aren't that many tall people, and most tall kids go into basketball these days instead of baseball.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
There is big drop off after 6-3 though, and especially after 6-4. Are you saying the same applies to pitchers? My point was really good hitters. Part of your list is one guy that made the bigs lat i his career and was an average bat at 1b, hardly a deal breaker,
 
Anyway how do a few guys disprove the fact there are so few guys over 6-4 that can hit. The fact you guys can name them proves my point.
 
Again, Lose are you saying the number of pitchers over 6-4 is the same as hitters?
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
32,025
Alexandria, VA
There doesn't seem to be any particularly large dropoff at 6'5" other than the normal one from distribution.


Just for fun:
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
How many of those are pitchers?
 
How many were elite hitters?
 
None of that addresses what I said. There are fewer good hitters over 6-4 than normal distribution would dictate.
 
Even it they were not mostly pitchers it would prove my point even more. There are all these big guys, but none make the HOF but Big Hurt and Winfield.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
I looked this up using active rosters today.Of 70 players over 6-4, only 15 are non pitchers. There are more than twice as many hitters exactly 6-4 (32) than hitters of all heights over 6-4 (15) so 6-4 does appear to be a drop point in hitter distribution.
 
Also those distribution graphs show guys are 3 inches bigger on average than in the 20s, but the top OPS guys have changed only a bit, kinda proves my point.
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
32,025
Alexandria, VA
reggiecleveland said:
How many of those are pitchers?
 
How many were elite hitters?
 
None of that addresses what I said. There are fewer good hitters over 6-4 than normal distribution would dictate.
 
Here's the distribution for all MLB seasons since 1970 (good hitters = wOBA more than 1 standard deviation above average).  Again, there's nothing jumping out that says there's any special good-hitter 6'4" cliff.


 
EDIT: The first graph is ALL hitters, the second graph is just those hitters who are 1 stddev above average or more.  The third is the excellent hitters, who are 2 stddevs above average or more.
 
EDIT: Added the 2-standard-deviation graph as well ("excellent hitters").  Excellent hitters are a subset of good hitters--they're included in all 3 graphs.
 
EDIT: "Number of players" is misleading; it's the number of _seasons_ by players of a certain height.  A player who played 10 years will show up in the graphs multiple times, depending on his wOBA for any given year.  
 
Seasons with under 300 ABs are excluded.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
Isn't there? I don't see how that graph alters what I said. The great hitters are clustered around 6-3. There are tiny stair steps between 6 feet and 6-4 looks like maybe less than 10, then a drop of about 50 to 6-5. That isn't significant?
 
Are not the two big drops from the cluster of excellent hitters in the last graph when you go from 6 feet to 5-11, and 6-4 to 6-5?
 
Sadly looking at this makes Mookie seem all the more of a long shot. IS the entire left of the graph Pedroia and Joe Morgan?
 
Anyway the contention in the book, that there is something about the dimensions of the game that makes the idea l hitter 6 feet to 6-3 and each inch either way makes it harder.
 
The book was written in 96. I wonder if things are changing. How may of the 6-4 plus guys are post 96? I am guessing Big Mack, Dunn, Big Hurt,
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
32,025
Alexandria, VA
reggiecleveland said:
Isn't there? I don't see how that graph alters what I said. The great hitters are clustered around 6-3. There are tiny stair steps between 6 feet and 6-4 looks like maybe less than 10, then a drop of about 50 to 6-5. That isn't significant?
 
 
No, there's nothing there that particularly indicates that being 6'5" is somehow bad at hitting, rather than just being generally rare.  There's a little noise, but it's essentially the same curve as the general population of MLB, and essentially what you'd expect from a normal distribution.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
I disagree. The normal distribution centers on 6 to 6-2. the 6-3, and 6-4 guys are over represented in great hitters, while the 6-6 guys and up are not. In just players the 6 foot guys are 4 times as many as 6-4 guys, but in the great hitters 6-4 is a bit ahead of 6 footers.
Obviously being bigger helps, but it diminishes rather quickly after 6-4.
 
There is another article I can't find. It may be more popular with this group it was called something like "Why does Pedro Martinez Throw harder than Randy Johnson?" that article also discussed the diminishing returns on height.
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
32,025
Alexandria, VA
reggiecleveland said:
I disagree. The normal distribution centers on 6 to 6-2. the 6-3, and 6-4 guys are over represented in great hitters, while the 6-6 guys and up are not. In just players the 6 foot guys are 4 times as many as 6-4 guys, but in the great hitters 6-4 is a bit ahead of 6 footers.
Obviously being bigger helps, but it diminishes rather quickly after 6-4.
 
 
I can't find any way to slice the numbers that supports you here.
 
To pull it out of graph form into simpler terms:  2.6% of the general MLB population's years are from players 6'5" or higher.  5.1% of the good hitters' years (1 std deviation above normal) and 7.0% of the excellent hitters' years (2 std deviations) are by players 6'5" or higher.   
 
I used 6'5" and up because that's what we'd been talking about before, but 6'6" and up are likewise over-represented in the good-hitting groups: just 0.83% of the general MLB population's years are from 6'6" or taller players, but it's 1.6% among both the good and excellent hitters.
 
 
(In fact, the 6'2" to 6'4" range is only about 27% bigger in the good-hitting cohort than the total population, while the 6'5"+ and 6'6"+ ranges are 90%+ bigger in the good-hitting cohort.  So statistically, being 6'5"+ is actually even more strongly linked to good/great hitters than being 6'2"-6'4" is--it's just that there aren't many 6'6" guys out there to begin with).
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,274
The person who would be a 6'5" major league hitter is likely both athletic and taller than most of his classmates at a young age. Basketball becomes his main sport. His athleticism is such that he's able to be the best kid on his high school baseball team while only playing the few months after his high school basketball ends and summer basketball begins, but with the other 9 months devoted to basketball where he never picks up a bat, he never gets to the next level in baseball.
 

charlieoscar

Member
Sep 28, 2014
1,339
reggiecleveland said:
...
There is another article I can't find. It may be more popular with this group it was called something like "Why does Pedro Martinez Throw harder than Randy Johnson?" that article also discussed the diminishing returns on height.
 
For the sake of simplicity, let us say that Randy Johnson was one foot taller than Pedro Martinez and that they were equally proportioned in arm and leg length. This suggests that Johnson's lead foot and fingers are closer to the plate on the release of the pitch than Martinez's. And again for the sake of simplicity, we will say one foot closer. If they both throw 95-mph pitches, whose will get to the batter first? Indeed, it we could work out the exact difference in release points, we would find that Johnson could throw a slower pitch that would arrive at the same time as a faster one from Martinez.
 
Of course, if Johnson takes a shorter step and throws directly overhand or side arm rather than three-quarter arm, the calculations might change.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,013
Saskatoon Canada
Can you not agree that baseball players have not gotten bigger at the same degree as other sports? There is diminishing return to height. Teams do not have 5 7 footers out there. The point about Pedro was that the force it took to get the units long arm moving fast enough to throw the ball in the 90s was so extreme few athletes, almost no athletes could do it. The advantage at getting close to the plate was considered immense and scouts were always looking for the next unit and favored tall guys.
 
In another htread there is a discussion that Fenway's seats  are too small for even he average guy to sit and enjoy a game.

To me it is like the first chapter on moneyball, despite the advantages of size and speed it is a skill game. The tall kid that finds he is not freakishly big enough to play d1 hoops can still bulk up and play tackle or maybe learn to throw 95, but it seems switching to be a hitter is harder.
 

Fred not Lynn

Dick Button Jr.
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
5,263
Alberta
Well, as much as Moneyball types talk the talk about skills and stats, they still run the 60 at every showcase and drool over the winners of that track meet.

And I think the crux of this thread is tall man Reggie explaining why he isn't a major league hitter...a few fewer inches, and he woulda been in the show for sure.