No chance he'll answer that. "We're still reviewing the data, etc." will be the response to that.
The only chance you have to get an actual answer from him is to give him no way to wriggle out of it. Imagine it could go something like this:
MR: "Will you be releasing the results of the PSI studies done during this season – and if not, why not?"
RG: "Well, Mike, we study all kinds of data during the course of a year – some of which we release to the public and others which we simply use on an internal basis."
MR: "But in this case, you suspended the Super Bowl MVP and docked his team two draft picks over an alleged infraction – the science of which, to put it charitably, has been seriously questioned by the scientific community. Why wouldn't you release the data to prove them wrong?"
RG: "Well, Mike, I'd have to disagree with you there. We had Exponent and others in the scientific community weigh in on this and they came out solidly behind the conclusion we laid out in the report prepared by Ted Wells."
MR: "But Commissioner Goodell, with all due respect, MIT, AEI, the New York Times, all have said the science behind your conclusion was terribly flawed. Why wouldn't you want to set the record straight here?"
RG: "Well, if we feel we need to, we might, Mike. But there's a time and a place for everything – and when we feel that Dean and his team have had the chance to properly evaluate the data we have, we will make sure that a summary of any relevant findings is shared with the media and anyone else who is still interested in this matter. Next question."
Writing this out makes me realize that Reiss better ask this question before Volin does.