#DFG: Canceling the Noise

Is there any level of suspension that you would advise Tom to accept?


  • Total voters
    208

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,839
Oregon
Kenny F'ing Powers said:
I hope folks are getting ready to be disappointed. The league has always shown that they are more concerned with feeding the frenzied sharks than making the right decision.
 
Too soon?
 

DegenerateSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 11, 2006
2,071
Flagstaff, AZ
soxhop411 said:
If what the patriots did was SOOOOOO BAD!!!
why have no current QB's came out and condemned the pats? Why are they all silent? 
 
 
could it be... that EVERYONE DOES IT?!!??!
That, and they're probably fuming that they can't do it anymore. What was simply a matter of personal comfort (even if it had little or no effect on the game) for group of guys who are probably as anal about stuff like this as Brady is now a BFD.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Forgive the political reference, but we've basically lost our collective mind since a President was impeached for lying about a hummer from a chubby intern. That's a long time ago now, 17 years. all the political craziness has its counterpart in sports, especially the NFL.

An interesting book is ready to be written about the role in this of the internet, cable and now social media.
 

wilked

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,101
I did a quick report for all suspensions of players > 2 games for the last 5 years.  Those are in yellow
 
Here's the reasons they were suspended.  
 
It's up to you to judge if 'more probably then not that Tom Brady was generally aware' falls in line with these
 
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,633
deep inside Guido territory
Kenny F'ing Powers said:
I hope folks are getting ready to be disappointed. The league has always shown that they are more concerned with feeding the frenzied sharks than making the right decision.
As much as I don't want it to happen Kenny, the mob mentality will get what it wants and that's a Brady suspension.  People have been waiting for years to bring this organization down.  The only thing the Pats can do is just keep on winning.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,725
DegenerateSoxFan said:
That, and they're probably fuming that they can't do it anymore. What was simply a matter of personal comfort (even if it had little or no effect on the game) for group of guys who are probably as anal about stuff like this as Brady is now a BFD.
I said this about 250 pages back, that the Colts and Ravens better be prepared for what's coming because all opposing QBs are going to want to humiliate them for this crybaby bullshit that will basically lead to the league taking sole control of the balls from now on.
 

wilked

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,101
I posted in the 'predict the punishment' thread but I hope this clears everyone's heads..  
 
All NFL player suspensions for the last 5 years, with those > 2 games highlighted.  For those predicting 4 games try and reconcile it with the below
 
Edit to add: updated to correct Hardy and Brent being 10 games, not 1
 
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,718
wilked said:
I did a quick report for all suspensions of players > 2 games for the last 5 years.  Those are in yellow
 
Here's the reasons they were suspended.  
 
It's up to you to judge if 'more probably then not that Tom Brady was generally aware' falls in line with these
 
 
Great work on finding this.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,277
Injury report when Brady is allowed to play again:
 
 
More Probable than not: Brady
 

Stevie1der

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 6, 2009
1,073
Morrisville, NC
I know it'll never happen, but if Brady is suspended for multiple games, my wish would be for an organization-wide moratorium on acknowledging or celebrating the Super Bowl championship until his first home game back.
 

SeanBerry

Knows about the CBA.
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,599
Section 519
This thread has made for some strange reading.
 
Many of you are convinced that is something every QB does and Brady was just the unlucky guy that got caught.
 
But then many others of you are convinced that Brady did nothing wrong and the refs fucked up the PSI count.
 
I've even seen others here that say that the ballboys are at fault and Brady didn't order them to do anything.
 
We also have drleather2001 screaming every 5th post at anyone who will listen how the whole world has it against the Pats! 
 
Yet everyone is just talking at each other. No one really cares if anyone is right or wrong AS LONG as Brady doesn't get punished.
 
People also very badly want Brady to throw magical "F-U TD's!!!!!". I guess writing Fuck You would be too much aggression for a guy as classy as Tom Brady?
 
Finally, we even have total nonsense that comes from no logical standpoint at all but once again... no one seems to care.
 
joe dokes said:
 
Brady really only cares about the respect from BB, Kraft and his teammates, everyone of whom would run through Hell wearing a gasoline suit for him.
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,232
SeanBerry said:
 
Many of you are convinced that is something every QB does and Brady was just the unlucky guy that got caught.
 
I got no beef with anything else you wrote, but given how many QBs came out back in the winter and what Phil Simms reiterated this week on the radio, why is this even in question? All QBs worth shit probably care very much how the ball feels and to what level it is inflated. Brady might be a cheating cheater and want his balls at 9.5 and slathered in baby tears, but there still isn't any proof of that in the report or elsewhere. 
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,725
Go easy on the poor bastard, he lives and breathes Jets football. It's not a happy existence.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,725
JimBoSox9 said:
He did, however, forget to include the slice of folks sniping from the sidelines without adding any content
Of course, Jets get their best shots in from the sideline, they just don't like talking about it.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,508
SeanBerry said:
This thread has made for some strange reading.
 
Many of you are convinced that is something every QB does and Brady was just the unlucky guy that got caught.
 
But then many others of you are convinced that Brady did nothing wrong and the refs fucked up the PSI count.
 
I've even seen others here that say that the ballboys are at fault and Brady didn't order them to do anything.
 
We also have drleather2001 screaming every 5th post at anyone who will listen how the whole world has it against the Pats! 
 
Yet everyone is just talking at each other. No one really cares if anyone is right or wrong AS LONG as Brady doesn't get punished.
 
People also very badly want Brady to throw magical "F-U TD's!!!!!". I guess writing Fuck You would be too much aggression for a guy as classy as Tom Brady?
 
Finally, we even have total nonsense that comes from no logical standpoint at all but once again... no one seems to care.
 
 
So, some people think one thing, some think something else, and people don't want the starting QB for their team punished without actual evidence?
 
You fucking nailed it, champ.
 

ALiveH

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,105
I would advise him / his representatives to discredit the Wells report.
 
All the world understands is a 5-second sound bite.  So i'd state the case as simply as possible.
 
"Five referees working together needed 600 seconds to test all the Patriots footballs at halftime, yet Wells believes that one person took 12 footballs out of a duffel bag, deflated all 12 and put them back in the duffle bag all in 100 seconds in a bathroom stall."  That's the sound bite they should hammer home on every media outlet.  All the other more science problems with the Wells report can be expounded on in more length.
 
Obviously, Belichick should use this as motivational fodder to get his players to run through brick walls from him.  And, they should run up the score on every opponent at every opportunity, e.g., using trick plays while up 30 in the 4th.  Also he should run plays directly towards the Colts coaches on the sidelines when possible.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,469
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Really can't see a suspension. If Brady gets a game or two he will most certainly appeal and (one supposes) an arbitrator will have to brought in and any arbitrator worth his salt would laugh the NFL's "evidence" out of court.
 
So - a fine - large enough to be noticed and small enough  to avoid an appeal would seem to be in everyone's best interest.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,725
Kenny F'ing Powers said:
So, some people think one thing, some think something else, and people don't want the starting QB for their team punished without actual evidence?
 
You fucking nailed it, champ.
C'mon, give the guy a break, this is one of the franchise highlights he has to root for...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAQnJdOniCk
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,565

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,718
BCsMightyJoeYoung said:
Really can't see a suspension. If Brady gets a game or two he will most certainly appeal and (one supposes) an arbitrator will have to brought in and any arbitrator worth his salt would laugh the NFL's "evidence" out of court.
 
So - a fine - large enough to be noticed and small enough  to avoid an appeal would seem to be in everyone's best interest.
 
It would be bad for business for a lengthy suspension especially when the networks NBC, CBS and FOX will be upset. They need Brady to bring ratings for games.
 

SeanBerry

Knows about the CBA.
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,599
Section 519
The Jets stuff is wildly creative. Very 1918...good stuff. 
 
But if many of you folks in the small section of people that think Brady is innocent can't even agree how he's innocent... that just doesn't lend a ton of substance towards that point.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,565
jsinger121 said:
 
It would be bad for business for a lengthy suspension especially when the networks NBC, CBS and FOX will be upset. They need Brady to bring ratings for games.
 
You don't think people will watch games where the Pats are trying to win without Brady?  If it's a two-game suspension, I'll bet they get bigger ratings for the first game without him and the first "return" game than they would otherwise.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,370
SeanBerry said:
The Jets stuff is wildly creative. Very 1918...good stuff. 
 
But if many of you folks in the small section of people that think Brady is innocent can't even agree how he's innocent... that just doesn't lend a ton of substance towards that point.
 
Or, it shows how many possible ways the evidence against him is flimsy, whereas there's only one possible there - not very well substantiated - that shows he's 'guilty'.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
1. Get Gee off the road; points have been made.

2. Wrap yourself in the players' union.

3. Relatedly, make sure Kessler is on your team, even if you want to add lawyers of your own. He's good and has beaten the League at this before.

4. If penalized, scorched earth approach at the hearing.

5. Try your case inside the hearing room rather than outside. Insist to the hearing officer that the NFL does likewise. If it doesn't, make the League look bad.

6. Make the best possible case you can on why your phone does not matter. Ultimately that will probably decide whether you sit or not.
 

Gambler7

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2003
3,755
But if many of you folks in the small section of people that think Brady is innocent can't even agree how he's innocent... that just doesn't lend a ton of substance towards that point.
 
Hmmm, sounds like the reverse of the Wells report. If several attorneys hired to investigate all agree it is more than probable (50.1%) that Brady was generally aware of this, but can't explain exactly how or why he is guilty after 3 months of investigating...that just doesn't lend a ton of substance towards that point. 
 

lithos2003

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
361
SeanBerry said:
The Jets stuff is wildly creative. Very 1918...good stuff. 
 
But if many of you folks in the small section of people that think Brady is innocent can't even agree how he's innocent... that just doesn't lend a ton of substance towards that point.
 
I think it helps prove the point, honestly.  If all of these plausible explanations show Brady as being innocent and none are explored in the Wells report, then the question is why not?  It's really not hard to see how this report can be construed as a hack job to railroad Brady is it?  Take off your "I'm a Jets fan" glasses for a minute :q:
 

hbk72777

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
1,945
DrewDawg said:
 
Per people like Jimmy Johnson, the Pats did the same shit other teams did. They got caught.
 
 
It's only cheating if you get caught (pre nutjob Jesse Ventura)
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
SeanBerry said:
The Jets stuff is wildly creative. Very 1918...good stuff. 
 
But if many of you folks in the small section of people that think Brady is innocent can't even agree how he's innocent... that just doesn't lend a ton of substance towards that point.
So your point is that people who think Tom is innocent are not Stepford Bradys.  Compelling!  And that somehow that in itself doesn't "lend substance" to the point.
 
Meaning that if they all agreed, the point would be more substantive or powerful.
 
I get that this is a glorious day (or week) for you but unlike the many fans of other teams who have joined the discussion, you have the distinction of twice adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.
 
Bravo.