How would the NFL censor Mortensen's tweet? That would've made for a worse story than what occurred.( . ) ( . ) and (_!_) said:Why why why why did the NFL allow Morts tweet that all 11 pounds were 2 lbs under become gospel? That one little fact would have
1 stopped a lot of this BS
2 given the weather theory legs much earlier in the week
And most importantly
3 NOT HAVE IMPACTED THEIR INVESTIGATION IN ANY POSSIBLE WAY
that god damn Tweet instantly become gospel and drove the shit out of this story. There is not a conceivable reason why the nfl did not at a minimum stop that misinformation as quickly as possible.
Nah, you're conflating stories a bit. He intercepted a Pats ball then noticed Pats playing with Colts balls later on in first half.swingin val said:Wasn't the ball that Jackson intercepted a Colts football?
EricFeczko said:How would the NFL censor Mortensen's tweet? That would've made for a worse story than what occurred.
If you meant that the NFL should've sent an immediate denial, perhaps Goodell wanted to determine whether it was true before denying it; it's not like the refs on the field and goodell communicate via telepathy.
EricFeczko said:How would the NFL censor Mortensen's tweet? That would've made for a worse story than what occurred.
If you meant that the NFL should've sent an immediate denial, perhaps Goodell wanted to determine whether it was true before denying it; it's not like the refs on the field and goodell communicate via telepathy.
Red(s)HawksFan said:
Except Mort's original tweet/report didn't say that all 11 were 2 PSI under. It said they were under-inflated by as much as 2 PSI. The possibility/probability that some of the under inflated balls were no where near 2 PSI light was always there in the original text. That people misinterpreted it, took the misinterpretation as gospel, and ran with it is the problem...and one that all of your points apply to just as well.
Unnamed sources are starting to backtrack. This, IMO, is the clearest indication that things are accelerating in the Patriots direction.Corsi said:
Peak Oil Can Boyd said:Unnamed sources are starting to backtrack. This, IMO, is the clearest indication that things are accelerating in the Patriots direction.
Yep. The backtracking has started. Closer to 1 PSI under than 2. That's a key detail.Peak Oil Can Boyd said:Unnamed sources are starting to backtrack. This, IMO, is the clearest indication that things are accelerating in the Patriots direction.
You mean like they did the day after the tweet?Infield Infidel said:
They could have said "we are investigating this matter, and media reports about the conditions of the footballs are inconclusive. We will relay our findings in due time."
I completely agree with the bolded. The NFL released a statement on the 21st and again on the 23rd, which stated as much.( . ) ( . ) and (_!_) said:
The NFL could have very easily released a statement or had a press conference level setting what they knew about the footballs. Or they could have been more sly and leaked out something to Mortensen. I doubt for a second he would have run with whatever they leaked, it's what guys like him do. The leak approach would not have been as effective, but I firmly believe a lot of this story was built on that one tweet/piece of information. The NFL made zero effort to control the message.
More likely the individual reporters claiming that the pats cheated are realizing that they don't have a case, and so are trying to distance themselves from prior claims. They are doing so through misdirection by blaming the NFL.Kull said:
What's probably happening is we are hearing from different sources. People scrambling to distance themselves from what's likely to happen inside league offices when the full story of this incredible cock-up finally sees the light of day.
Yup. The Bill Nye story is flooding Facebook. It's hard to believe he would be so irresponsible. Used to love him for his attempts to make understanding science fun and practical, now have lost a ton of respect for him.The Gray Eagle said:So the second highest trending story on my Facebook feed is now how Bill Nye "refutes" Bill Belichick's explanation. It's also the top headline on my Yahoo fantasy sports page.
Get ready for all the sports media people who look ignorant now to move on to "it is an important story because the Patriots have a long pattern of cheating and a culture of cheating." That is going to be the response on why they were all hollering so much about this story that is nothing and has always been nothing. Of course, the Seahawks have a longer and more recent pattern of cheating and have more of a "culture of cheating." But that doesn't matter, because so many people want to believe the Patriots cheated and always cheat. And people aren't sick of Seattle yet, but everyone who isn't a Pats fan is sick of the Patriots.
I am not a Pats fan, and if they got busted for blatantly cheating I would probably just laugh and say "serves 'em right." But this whole story is not that and has never been that, it has always been total BS. It shows what a joke the NFL is and the American media is. And how dumb most of the American public is.
EricFeczko said:More likely the individual reporters claiming evidence of tampering are realizing that they don't have a case, and so are trying to distance themselves from prior claims.
That quote does not address the media reports. That's the issue. They don't have to say whether it's true or not, just that the condition of the footballs is inconclusive until their investigation is over. Instead, everyone jumps to the conclusions the media has reported. By not addressing the media reports, it allows others to run away with the story.EricFeczko said:
You know what. You are right. This is media people making up an entirely new narrative in order to distance themselves from their previous, also made-up, narrative.Kull said:
No. What's happening now is we are hearing not only a different story, but new, previously unreleased details:
- There was a sting
- It was headed by a former Jet (one who apparently is not viewed as impartial by the Patriots)
- The actual PSI deltas for 10 balls were substantially lower than the one ball that had the 2 PSI delta
- The ball with the largest delta was handled by Colts personnel
That's not "media people distancing themselves", its an entirely new narrative.
PBDWake said:If any of this new wave of info is accurate, can we safely assume that Mike Kensil is Mort's "league source"? A known Patriot "agitator", who spearheaded this whole sting, and the person in prime position to both leak to Mort and make it sound like it's the worst possible scenario? And if you're Mort, and this is true, and you were used, either by someone with an axe to grind, or as a way to exert leverage, can you afford to burn your source here?
Corsi said:
Tom E. Curran @tomecurran 2m2 minutes ago
If we spent a week on a leak about leaks that proves to have been wrong and NFL just stood w/arms folded and watched (1 of 2)
Tom E. Curran @tomecurran 43s43 seconds ago
While a member franchise was dismembered before SB the level of corruption and lack of integrity means a fumigation is necessary.
EricFeczko said:You know what. You are right. This is media people making up an entirely new narrative in order to distance themselves from their previous, also made-up, narrative.
https://twitter.com/mortreport/status/557748673208401921Red(s)HawksFan said:
Except Mort's original tweet/report didn't say that all 11 were 2 PSI under. It said they were under-inflated by as much as 2 PSI. The possibility/probability that some of the under inflated balls were no where near 2 PSI light was always there in the original text. That people misinterpreted it, took the misinterpretation as gospel, and ran with it is the problem...and one that all of your points apply to just as well.
Corsi said:
Tom E. Curran @tomecurran 2m2 minutes ago
If we spent a week on a leak about leaks that proves to have been wrong and NFL just stood w/arms folded and watched (1 of 2)
Tom E. Curran @tomecurran 43s43 seconds ago
While a member franchise was dismembered before SB the level of corruption and lack of integrity means a fumigation is necessary.
Jed Zeppelin said:It finally seems like we may be reaching the point where everyone realizes that enthusiastically watching the Prime Minister shag a pig is no longer fun but rather a poignant commentary on the sad and twisted avenues of modern entertainment.
AardsmaToZupcic said:https://twitter.com/mortreport/status/557748673208401921
It reads that 11 were 2 pounds under, not as much as 2 pounds other.
kartvelo said:Yup. The Bill Nye story is flooding Facebook. It's hard to believe he would be so irresponsible. Used to love him for his attempts to make understanding science fun and practical, now have lost a ton of respect for him.
Like they did on the 23rd, when the story blew up after the quote?Infield Infidel said:That quote does not address the media reports. That's the issue. They don't have to say whether it's true or not, just that the condition of the footballs is inconclusive until their investigation is over. Instead, everyone jumps to the conclusions the media has reported. By not addressing the media reports, it allows others to run away with the story.
Yes. This is exactly what I'm saying (well, he pulled it from thinner air ). Furthermore, he's probably protected since these are blog posts under PFT's "rumor mill", which means unsubstantiated reporting is not only permissible, but encouraged.Kull said:
Are you saying Florio pulled all of that out of thin air? As bogus as most of the media coverage has been to this point, it was based on leaks from the NFL office. His was not?
EricFeczko said:Like they did on the 23rd, when the story blew up after the quote?
You are right, the NFL should be clairvoyant, read the tea leaves, and predict that the tweet will erupt in a cacophany of media horse-plop.
Let's be honest here. We are blaming the NFL for the fact that the media ran away with an unverified story? Shouldn't we be blaming the media for running away with an unverified story? Shouldn't we also realize that we are blaming the NFL because it detracts from what an incompetent group of "journalists" did?
Yes. This is exactly what I'm saying. Furthermore, he's probably protected since these are blog posts under PFT's "rumor mill", which means unsubstantiated reporting is not only permissible, but encouraged.
AardsmaToZupcic said:https://twitter.com/mortreport/status/557748673208401921
It reads that 11 were 2 pounds under, not as much as 2 pounds other.
Wow. Has the worm turned?Corsi said:<p><span style="color:rgb(41,47,51);"><span style='font-family: Helvetica Neue'>
Tom E. Curran @tomecurran 2m2
link to tweet minutes ago
If we spent a week on a leak about leaks that proves to have been wrong and NFL just stood w/arms folded and watched (1 of 2)<span style="color:rgb(41,47,51);"><span style='font-family: Helvetica Neue'>
Tom E. Curran @tomecurran 43s43
link to tweet seconds ago
While a member franchise was dismembered before SB the level of corruption and lack of integrity means a fumigation is necessary.
EricFeczko said:Like they did on the 23rd, when the story blew up after the quote?
You are right, the NFL should be clairvoyant, read the tea leaves, and predict that the tweet will erupt in a cacophany of media horse-plop.
Let's be honest here. We are blaming the NFL for the fact that the media ran away with an unverified story? Shouldn't we be blaming the media for running away with an unverified story? Shouldn't we also realize that we are blaming the NFL because it detracts from what an incompetent group of "journalists" did?
Yes. This is exactly what I'm saying (well, he pulled it from air that is considerably thicker, but whatever). Furthermore, he's probably protected since these are blog posts under PFT's "rumor mill", which means unsubstantiated reporting is not only permissible, but encouraged.
Fucking awesome.SemperFidelisSox said:So Deflategate turned into the Bay of Pigskins.
outstanding.SemperFidelisSox said:So Deflategate turned into the Bay of Pigskins.
EricFeczko said:Like they did on the 23rd, when the story blew up after the quote?
You are right, the NFL should be clairvoyant, read the tea leaves, and predict that the tweet will erupt in a cacophany of media horse-plop.
Let's be honest here. We are blaming the NFL for the fact that the media ran away with an unverified story? Shouldn't we be blaming the media for running away with an unverified story? Shouldn't we also realize that we are blaming the NFL because it detracts from what an incompetent group of "journalists" did?
Well now you are assuming who Morts source is, we don't know who told Mort that.Kull said:
With all due respect, you are missing the real story here. The original media firestorm was CAUSED by the deliberate transmission of incorrect information ("11 balls 2 PSI under spec") to the media, probably by an individual allegedly known to have an anti-Patriots axe to grind. The NFL then exacerbated the problem by failing to correct what was apparently a flat out lie.
This is going to blow up in a BIG way, and the League offices will be the justifiable target.
You are getting this from the same author who claimed that the manuever used by the pats in the ravens game was illegal, that belichick knowingly deflated balls, that Harbaugh notified the colts about deflation after the ravens-pats game, and that the NFL planned a sting with the refs during the AFC game.Kull said:
With all due respect, you are missing the real story here. The original media firestorm was CAUSED by the deliberate transmission of incorrect information ("11 balls 2 PSI under spec") to the media by an individual allegedly known to have an anti-Patriots axe to grind. The NFL then exacerbated the problem by failing to correct what was apparently a flat out lie.
This is going to blow up in a BIG way, and the League offices will be the justifiable target.
Curran has been fair throughout. Ignore that Bill yelled at him, he's a white lister.ivanvamp said:Wow. Has the worm turned?
Not soon enough. With the Super Bowl Week officially starting tomorrow, this needs to be dealt with brutally and quickly.Byrdbrain said:Well now you are assuming who Morts source is, we don't know who told Mort that.
I just don't buy this whole sting angle, it just makes no sense to me.
The good news is this fake controversy is imploding, lets just sit back and watch it.
Edit: Why are typos only visible after posting?