I just listened to the Ringer NBA Show episode, and the same three guys (Verrier, Mahoney Lambre) who all picked Bucks or Nets to come out of the East a few weeks ago seemed
crestfallen about having to take the Celtics in the next series, in light of the Middleton injury. Almost all the discussion took place from the Bucks point of view— about what they need to do— and was couched in terms like "
hopefully, the Bucks can get enough offense out of such-and-such." One guy asked if they would take the Bucks if Middleton was playing and the other two perked up and said, "Hell yes!"
There was also an insane segment where Wos went on about how the Nets mistake was attacking the teeth of the C's defense, which (according to him) is Tatum, Brown and Smart's 1-on-1 defense. The Bucks, he opined, would have the advantage of instead attacking Horford, Grant Williams and TL 1-on-1, whom he framed as far weaker defenders.
It's one thing to pick against the Celtics; it's another to sound dismayed about having to take them, and I found myself wondering where this comes from (as I get a whiff of this across national media in general). I guess it's some combination of:
- Anchoring bias: since nobody thought the C's were much good until early 2022, it's hard to switch horses
- It's a star's league: tendency of fans and media to gravitate towards teams with perennial established MVP candidates
- Great team defense— the C's strongest suit— is harder for casual fans to rally around than elite offense