(Approaching the) Trade Deadline Thread

The B’s Knees

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
Aug 1, 2006
256
Grab him now, toss him on LTIR and tell him see you in April, and then do something else with the space?
If a team was thinking along these lines, I assume they would be more apt to take on Kane's full salary and hence lower the cost of acquiring him?

The problem for the B's is they'd have to give something to get Kane, and then give up something else again to take advantage of the additional cap space.
That cupboard is already quite sparse.

But if we're in, why not go all in? :)
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,762
It’s not a bad trade for the rangers but Drury appears out of his depth. Tank is not very good anymore, especially at 5v5, where the rangers struggle most. They are middling at gf 5v5 and have been fortunate to be mediocre. Tank does very little to help that. We will see, I guess, but this feels like a team with a poorly constructed roster that has little chance at a cup giving up assets for a player that doesn’t solve any real immediate problems.
 

NYCSox

chris hansen of goats
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 19, 2004
10,527
Some fancy town in CT
It’s not a bad trade for the rangers but Drury appears out of his depth. Tank is not very good anymore, especially at 5v5, where the rangers struggle most. They are middling at gf 5v5 and have been fortunate to be mediocre. Tank does very little to help that. We will see, I guess, but this feels like a team with a poorly constructed roster that has little chance at a cup giving up assets for a player that doesn’t solve any real immediate problems.
But did they really give up anything besides a pick that's probably somewhere in the early to mid 20s? It's a deep draft so it could certainly hit. But Blais and that D man non-prospect are nullities.
 

katnado

New Member
Aug 14, 2016
1,627
Alaska
It’s not a bad trade for the rangers but Drury appears out of his depth. Tank is not very good anymore, especially at 5v5, where the rangers struggle most. They are middling at gf 5v5 and have been fortunate to be mediocre. Tank does very little to help that. We will see, I guess, but this feels like a team with a poorly constructed roster that has little chance at a cup giving up assets for a player that doesn’t solve any real immediate problems.
Skinner looks to be a JAG, and Blais isn't anything but a depth guy, extra forward on a contending team. As was covered they basically gave up a mid 20's pick and a 4th/3rd round lottery ticket. So Rangers really didn't give up anything that matters for the hope Tank can rebound and recapture some past magic for them in a playoff run. From the Rangers side it's a good trade, Blues had little option with his NTC and they really got nothing in return.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,319
306, row 14
But did they really give up anything besides a pick that's probably somewhere in the early to mid 20s? It's a deep draft so it could certainly hit. But Blais and that D man non-prospect are nullities.
I think you are over estimating the market for rentals. Historically, rentals do not get a 1st plus good prospects or NHL players. Especially when the player leaving has trade protection. Usually these types of trades are a 1st round pick and a B/C prospect or a lower pick and a better prospect. They don't usually get both. Taylor Hall is somewhat of a comparable and he brought the Sabres a 2nd and Anders Bjork. Claude Giroux last year got Philadelphia a 2024 1st and Owen Tippett (who has turned out to be decent but at the time was thought of as a bust). Going back a little bit, Mark Stone (probably the best player of all the guys I've listed) went for a 2nd and Erik Brannstrom (at the time a top 25ish prospect in hockey).

Getting the 1st and 3rd was a nice bit of business for St. Louis, in my opinion. Blais and Skinner are junk but their inclusion in the deal was likely to make everything work cap and contract wise. The Rangers are probably the ones who overpaid slightly in the deal but from their perpspective they had 2 first round picks projected to be around the same point of the draft so they can afford to burn one. It's probably an overpay for Tarasenko given his current decline, but my guess is they like his finishing and think he'll get a boost playing with Artemi Panarin feeding him the puck.
 

NYCSox

chris hansen of goats
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 19, 2004
10,527
Some fancy town in CT
I think you are over estimating the market for rentals. Historically, rentals do not get a 1st plus good prospects or NHL players. Especially when the player leaving has trade protection. Usually these types of trades are a 1st round pick and a B/C prospect or a lower pick and a better prospect. They don't usually get both. Taylor Hall is somewhat of a comparable and he brought the Sabres a 2nd and Anders Bjork. Claude Giroux last year got Philadelphia a 2024 1st and Owen Tippett (who has turned out to be decent but at the time was thought of as a bust). Going back a little bit, Mark Stone (probably the best player of all the guys I've listed) went for a 2nd and Erik Brannstrom (at the time a top 25ish prospect in hockey).

Getting the 1st and 3rd was a nice bit of business for St. Louis, in my opinion. Blais and Skinner are junk but their inclusion in the deal was likely to make everything work cap and contract wise. The Rangers are probably the ones who overpaid slightly in the deal but from their perpspective they had 2 first round picks projected to be around the same point of the draft so they can afford to burn one. It's probably an overpay for Tarasenko given his current decline, but my guess is they like his finishing and think he'll get a boost playing with Artemi Panarin feeding him the puck.
That's fair. I also probably didn't appreciate how much Tarasenko has declined.

And jeez did the Bruins steal Hall.
 

jk333

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2009
4,337
Boston
And jeez did the Bruins steal Hall.
The circumstances really forced Buffalo.

Hall signed a 1 year deal with Buffalo because he wanted to win. There were a number of teams competing for him and so Buffalo agreed to a no movement contract clause.

With the Sabres out of the playoffs and Hall a free agent at years end, he was able to dictate the team he went to. There were rumors he wanted to sign with Boston that off season too. So Sweeney probably had a good feeling that a 2nd and not a 1st would get it done when push came to shove.
 

NYCSox

chris hansen of goats
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 19, 2004
10,527
Some fancy town in CT
I’d rather Rags have Tarasenko than Kane at the end of the day. Now if Canes get him then that’s a different story.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,319
306, row 14
I’d rather Rags have Tarasenko than Kane at the end of the day. Now if Canes get him then that’s a different story.
Kane doesn't feel like a Carolina type of player. My worry with them is Timo Meier, the real prize out there at the moment. Seems like Meier is going to end up with either the Hurricanes or Devils.

Also, who knows how narrow Kane's list will be if he chooses to go. The reports make it sound like if he does go the list will be 2 or 3 teams max, and the one definite just took themselves out of it.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,654
deep inside Guido territory
Kane doesn't feel like a Carolina type of player. My worry with them is Timo Meier, the real prize out there at the moment. Seems like Meier is going to end up with either the Hurricanes or Devils.

Also, who knows how narrow Kane's list will be if he chooses to go. The reports make it sound like if he does go the list will be 2 or 3 teams max, and the one definite just took themselves out of it.
Does anybody else get the feeling that Kane and Toews will just stay where they are?
 

TSC

SoSH's Doug Neidermeyer
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2007
12,402
Between here and everywhere.
Does anybody else get the feeling that Kane and Toews will just stay where they are?
I can see them staying put if they can’t go where they want.

They’ve got what, 3 Cups between them? I’m sure they’re happy to ride it out where they’re legends if they can’t go someplace they’re really excited about.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,511
Tarasenko isn’t wasting any time. Scores in his 2nd shift with NY.
Im not sure why everyone was so confident in his demise. Any year he's healthy and on the ice, he puts up 30+ goals. One nice hot streak and he can still do it again. Considering his low S% - which should normalize - I could see him being just as productive as always.

I mean, he'll never live up to what he could have / should have been, but he's still a great scorer.
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,762
Sure, I'm not really lamenting the cost. I don't believe this version of Tank is worthy of a haul anyway. I just don't think Drury has shown any ability to identify the actual problems with the rangers roster. He knows they need goal scoring but his priority is a RW who doesn't really generate offense at 5v5 anymore. They rangers forward group needs some serious help, in my opinion. They have a great goalie and an elite pp and that can help you go on a run for sure, but their forward group gets pumped at 5v5 and Tank hasn't really been good at generating 5v5 offense for a while now. He doesn't seem like someone they should have targeted. If they needed a top line RW, Timo Meier would have been a much better fit. I bet he ends up across the river for a team that's likely going to leave the Rangers in the dust for a generation if they can find some goaltending.
 

TSC

SoSH's Doug Neidermeyer
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2007
12,402
Between here and everywhere.
Depending on what goes out, if the Bruins suddenly have space in the bottom 6, I wouldn’t mind taking a flyer on Puljujarvi if he ends up on waivers.

He hasn’t lived up to expectations - but he’s defensively sound and could benefit from a change in scenery.
 

NYCSox

chris hansen of goats
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 19, 2004
10,527
Some fancy town in CT
Depending on what goes out, if the Bruins suddenly have space in the bottom 6, I wouldn’t mind taking a flyer on Puljujarvi if he ends up on waivers.

He hasn’t lived up to expectations - but he’s defensively sound and could benefit from a change in scenery.
In a vacuum absolutely. But I don't see how they can fit his $3M cap hit. And Oilers would be dumping him to clear space for Yamamoto so it's not like you can offer Smith straight up to get him.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,591

katnado

New Member
Aug 14, 2016
1,627
Alaska
I am 99.65 percent sure thats a fake tweet.
Not only does that have a link to nhl.com announcing the trade it was “tweeted” more than two hours ago.
Someone would have confirmed that if it was legit

also Byfield is currently playing in the game right now and was not scratched
Oh I'm not saying otherwise, seen it in a dozen other places as well. (Thats also Alaska time, so an hour ago) Kings official page has been deleting references to it as quickly as they pop up. I'm sure it was fake, but just interesting the Kings are deleting comments about it. Haha
 

Murby

New Member
Mar 16, 2006
2,050
Boston Metro
If that tweet proves true, the Bruins matching would be starting with Mason Lohrei & Fabian Lysell…ouch.

I don’t know if I do that or not, but I wouldn’t blame Don either way here. I’m probably doing the deal. If you’re gonna swing, swing big. Have to think that Kings tweet is real.

One could make the argument if you’re unsure about giving up that much young talent: you do a deal here for Chychrun and then try to flip him to another team to recoup the assets lost down the road, especially if he looks great in your system. Though he has a modified no move clause that looks like it kicks in after the season, so that may damper return prospects.
 

katnado

New Member
Aug 14, 2016
1,627
Alaska
That Kings tweet is 100% not real.

The first person who posted it is a known fraud account.
Who posted it first? I've seen so many people post it at this point I don't know where it started. Like I said I didn't think it was real, was more just funny watching the Kings twitter delete tweets reposting it haha
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
21,114
As a King fan, Blake needs to be fired now so this does not go through.
I think the return to the Coyotes is going to make me happy that the B's didn't get him (and, sadly, likely make me think that they couldn't top the offer if they wanted to).
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,319
306, row 14
Sounds like the Coyotes are releasing info to try and bump up their return...
Kypreos is the only one who put a name out as part of a trade package. We'll see what happens, but Kypreos isn't particularly credible and the Kings worked fast to put that fire out. Kypreos used to be on the HNIC panel but was taken off several years ago. The more credible reports have just sort of done the who's in, who's out thing which no specifics.

The Kings have always made the most sense. They have a need for an LHD and are sitting on a top 10 prospect pool plus have a full complement of draft picks. They have 5-7 Lysell/Lohrei level prospects. If the Kings decide to take the plunge, the Bruins won't be able to match or beat them.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,173
Kypreos is the only one who put a name out as part of a trade package. We'll see what happens, but Kypreos isn't particularly credible and the Kings worked fast to put that fire out. Kypreos used to be on the HNIC panel but was taken off several years ago. The more credible reports have just sort of done the who's in, who's out thing which no specifics.

The Kings have always made the most sense. They have a need for an LHD and are sitting on a top 10 prospect pool plus have a full complement of draft picks. They have 5-7 Lysell/Lohrei level prospects. If the Kings decide to take the plunge, the Bruins won't be able to match or beat them.
Is Lohrei still considered a "top" prospect or has he lost a bit of value? I noticed his counting stats were down just a bit his soph season and thought it was curious he didn't make the hockeywriters top 100 list whereas Lysell came in at 32. Granted it is just one list and I did see Lohrei is a finalist for Hobey Baker just wondering what the consensus is on him as there isn't a lot of NHL prospect info out there.
https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-top-100-prospects-ranking/
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,319
306, row 14
No idea where to put him on a league wide top 100 list, but he's basically regarded by all prospect followers as the Bruins 2nd best prospect behind Lysell. His stock has pretty consistently risen from when he was drafted and the Bruins were laughed at for picking him. He'd probably be in the AHL right now if it wasn't for an injury at the end of last season. As such, he gets dinged a bit because he's a 22 year old sophmore.

The analytics folks are a lot higher on him than the eye test dudes. The counting stats are down but by all accounts his performance has improved from last year. There's a lot of things out of his control that go into the counting stats. Usage, quality of competition, qualitify of teamates, shooting percentages, etc.

View: https://twitter.com/IvanIvanlvan/status/1624080125321945088?s=20&t=5bpG6u_LciFXaBWZ_a7GSQ
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,173
Thanks for that, seems like a realistic comp could be a much bigger Grzelcyk?
Offensive skill set looks strong but those defensive metrics might give some teams pause especially for someone of his age/size. You can hope that with proper coaching/strength training his defensive game improves but those puck battle wins are concerning assuming they aren't a flawed metric to begin with.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,319
306, row 14
The Friedman/Marek Monday 32 Thoughts news pod is out

View: https://twitter.com/FriedgeHNIC/status/1625138597065105411?s=20&t=soex3sC7s92-sYtWf28cfA


Summarizing the Chychrun saga

Kings and Coyotes are or were close to a trade. If they do make a deal, it won't be Clarke or Byfield. Apparently the Clarke rumor was running rampant behind the scenes (must be where Kypreos heard it) but the Kings reached out to his agent to tell them he's not being moved. Thinks the teams hit a snag on a contract that needed to be moved. Not a primary piece of the deal but an ancillary one. The deal could still happen but scratching Chychrun also led other teams to re-engage in talks.

Some conflicting reports about if Chychrun will play for Arizona tonight. He did not participate in their morning skate. The Coyotes reporters are saying he is a game time decision; others are saying he's being sat for trade related reasons again.

Nashville guy:

View: https://twitter.com/AdamVingan/status/1625195061184024576?s=20&t=soex3sC7s92-sYtWf28cfA


Coyotes guy:

View: https://twitter.com/CraigSMorgan/status/1625195675729203205?s=20&t=soex3sC7s92-sYtWf28cfA