2023-24 Celtics

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,783
Last edited:

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,312
I mean, the picked on Kyrie a LOT too. Weird for Kidd to only call out Luka. We were there with season-ticket holders and they couldn’t stop talking about how frustrated they are with Luka’s empty triple doubles. They say he misses Finney-Smith.
 

Everetts Dinosaurs

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
227
I've watched enough of Luka to agree that there is an effort problem, but honestly that doesn't explain enough of it for me. There's something more fundamentally wrong there.

Is there a version of athleticism that works for offense but not on defense? If so, that's Luka's athleticism. On offense he's coordinated, incredibly consistent mechanically (ultimately at the heart of good shooting, not unlike a starting pitcher), instinctual, and processes the defender's action at an incredibly fast rate. On defense, none of those things really translate, right?
 

Moosey

Mooseyed Farvin
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
4,228
CT
I've watched enough of Luka to agree that there is an effort problem, but honestly that doesn't explain enough of it for me. There's something more fundamentally wrong there.

Is there a version of athleticism that works for offense but not on defense? If so, that's Luka's athleticism. On offense he's coordinated, incredibly consistent mechanically (ultimately at the heart of good shooting, not unlike a starting pitcher), instinctual, and processes the defender's action at an incredibly fast rate. On defense, none of those things really translate, right?
I think the term you are looking for is disinterest.

He could be a lot better than horrible for a lot of the reasons you mention on offense.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,416
The other difference, beyond effort, is that you can choose to play slower on offense and you know where you are going to go next....but on defense, you have to react. I don't think he is all that fast-twitch a guy to begin with, and that only gets worse with the lack of attention/effort. But he's never going to be any good defensively, I do not believe.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,562
Hingham, MA
I've watched enough of Luka to agree that there is an effort problem, but honestly that doesn't explain enough of it for me. There's something more fundamentally wrong there.

Is there a version of athleticism that works for offense but not on defense? If so, that's Luka's athleticism. On offense he's coordinated, incredibly consistent mechanically (ultimately at the heart of good shooting, not unlike a starting pitcher), instinctual, and processes the defender's action at an incredibly fast rate. On defense, none of those things really translate, right?
I think the term you are looking for is disinterest.

He could be a lot better than horrible for a lot of the reasons you mention on offense.
The other difference, beyond effort, is that you can choose to play slower on offense and you know where you are going to go next....but on defense, you have to react. I don't think he is all that fast-twitch a guy to begin with, and that only gets worse with the lack of attention/effort. But he's never going to be any good defensively, I do not believe.
Also, he’s out of shape. And way worse than Embiid.
 

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,312
Also, he’s out of shape. And way worse than Embiid.
This is the truth. Watching Pritch guard him was so funny because it was like watching a 45-year-old dude at the Y get exasperated that the new high schooler who just showed up is a try-hard. He should be relatively unstoppable one-on-one, but he gets too tired to body guys into the paint later in the game.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,387
Luka has no twitch to his game on the defensive end. He can body guys if they try posting, but in space? He’s toast.
Exactly. He’s unique in that he plays two traditionally different positions on each end of the floor which makes matchups tricky. He’s not a good perimeter defender in space….as a 6-10 defensive 4 he really shouldn’t be.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,254
This is the truth. Watching Pritch guard him was so funny because it was like watching a 45-year-old dude at the Y get exasperated that the new high schooler who just showed up is a try-hard. He should be relatively unstoppable one-on-one, but he gets too tired to body guys into the paint later in the game.
PP is strong and pretty quick laterally, and he's learning how to use that strength in the Lowry/FVV tradition of 6-1 guards who still get it done on D, because they know how to get up into guys. We've seen this more and more from him this year, and it's a big reason Joe is moving PP up in the rotation, ahead of Hauser when it counts in games.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,254
Bored, so I'm re-watching the last 5 minutes of Celtics-Nuggets: the Celtics' offense was actually really good down the stretch, and they just had some incredibly bad luck.

The possessions prior to the final one were:
- Tatum blocked by the rim on a shot he makes > 90% of the time
- wide, wide open Horford pick-and-pop 3
- uncontested FT-line fadeaway for Tatum
- Jaylen gets fouled, misses both FTs
- open Jaylen 3 off the OReb, missed
- open DWhite 3 off another OReb, missed
- Tatum dunk
- open DWhite corner 3, missed
- KP called for loose ball foul on rebound
- Tatum missed transition layup

Literally every possession was a quality look, from all 3 scoring levels, with very varied offense.

The talking head takes about Celtics late-game problems, or how Denver's defense stepped up in crunchtime, are complete garbage and results-oriented. The Celtics ran great offense, got good, diverse looks, and missed ~all of them.
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,104
Bored, so I'm re-watching the last 5 minutes of Celtics-Nuggets: the Celtics' offense was actually really good down the stretch, and they just had some incredibly bad luck.

The possessions prior to the final one were:
- Tatum blocked by the rim on a shot he makes > 90% of the time
- wide, wide open Horford pick-and-pop 3
- uncontested FT-line fadeaway for Tatum
- Jaylen gets fouled, misses both FTs
- open Jaylen 3 off the OReb, missed
- open DWhite 3 off another OReb, missed
- Tatum dunk
- open DWhite corner 3, missed
- KP called for loose ball foul on rebound
- Tatum missed transition layup

Literally every possession was a quality look, from all 3 scoring levels, with very varied offense.

The talking head takes about Celtics late-game problems, or how Denver's defense stepped up in crunchtime, are complete garbage and results-oriented. The Celtics ran great offense, got good, diverse looks, and missed ~all of them.
Not sure Tatum's missed transition layup was a great look, given that he was going 1-on-3 and didn't really have possession of the ball as he neared the hoop. There was also his final shot, which he later admitted he rushed.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,393
Santa Monica
Bored, so I'm re-watching the last 5 minutes of Celtics-Nuggets: the Celtics' offense was actually really good down the stretch, and they just had some incredibly bad luck.

The possessions prior to the final one were:
- Tatum blocked by the rim on a shot he makes > 90% of the time
- wide, wide open Horford pick-and-pop 3
- uncontested FT-line fadeaway for Tatum
- Jaylen gets fouled, misses both FTs
- open Jaylen 3 off the OReb, missed
- open DWhite 3 off another OReb, missed
- Tatum dunk
- open DWhite corner 3, missed
- KP called for loose ball foul on rebound
- Tatum missed transition layup

Literally every possession was a quality look, from all 3 scoring levels, with very varied offense.

The talking head takes about Celtics late-game problems, or how Denver's defense stepped up in crunchtime, are complete garbage and results-oriented. The Celtics ran great offense, got good, diverse looks, and missed ~all of them.
that's fair

A KP post at the nail would be nice option in late/close (since it's by far the highest % shot the Celtics own).
He also can easily look over defenders when they double & deliver a
1. Catch & shoot Corner3 to Jrue (59.5%) or White (46.4%)
2. Catch & shoot 3 for Tatum (44.3%)
3. Brown cutting to the rim

They didn't run that once the last 5 minutes.
KP admits he wasn't aggressive enough. I expect CJM will look to run that more often in late/tight.

Live & learn
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,555
around the way
PP is strong and pretty quick laterally, and he's learning how to use that strength in the Lowry/FVV tradition of 6-1 guards who still get it done on D, because they know how to get up into guys. We've seen this more and more from him this year, and it's a big reason Joe is moving PP up in the rotation, ahead of Hauser when it counts in games.
Facts. And honestly it's the most surprising thing of the season so far to me, and that's saying something. PP has improved his defense materially (seems due to some athleticism gains) and his vision has improved as well (game is slowing down for him). I'm super glad that we locked him up.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,254
Not sure Tatum's missed transition layup was a great look, given that he was going 1-on-3 and didn't really have possession of the ball as he neared the hoop. There was also his final shot, which he later admitted he rushed.
I explicitly left out the end of the game stuff since a) everyone agrees it wasn't great b) 85% of the time, they don't need that shot to tie, with the looks they were getting.

that's fair

A KP post at the nail would be nice option in late/close (since it's by far the highest % shot the Celtics own).
He also can easily look over defenders when they double & deliver a
1. Catch & shoot Corner3 to Jrue (59.5%) or White (46.4%)
2. Catch & shoot 3 for Tatum (44.3%)
3. Brown cutting to the rim

They didn't run that once the last 5 minutes.
KP admits he wasn't aggressive enough. I expect CJM will look to run that more often in late/tight.

Live & learn
I.....guess? This seems really, really results-oriented. It's not like they were just jacking lazy 3s. It's exactly what everyone here wants from a team with this talent: diverse offense leading to good looks from all levels of the floor, without being predictable in a way other teams can lock in on. But, because they missed all those shots, everyone in national media is hyperventilating about Celtics late-game offense. It's all so tiresome.

Re KP in the post: they ran that right before the possessions I listed. He missed a jumper over Reggie Jackson. It was a totally fine shot, and it's nice to go back there some, but most of the stuff the Cs were getting was better.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,254
Facts. And honestly it's the most surprising thing of the season so far to me, and that's saying something. PP has improved his defense materially (seems due to some athleticism gains) and his vision has improved as well (game is slowing down for him). I'm super glad that we locked him up.
To play devils' advocate to myself: every PP lineup is somewhat worse on defense than the Cs base lineups. They score well, but it's always 112-115 drtg as opposed to ~110.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,426
San Francisco
there's limits these days to how much you can produce the exact kind of shit you want, e.g. a KP postup since the game is so much of flowing and reacting to what the defense gives. the focus imo should be generating a good shot, which they managed to do. maybe they should be going through KP more but it feels like picking nits if they're managing to get good shots with whatever process they were going to
 

The Raccoon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2018
947
Germany
Bored, so I'm re-watching the last 5 minutes of Celtics-Nuggets: the Celtics' offense was actually really good down the stretch, and they just had some incredibly bad luck.

The possessions prior to the final one were:
- Tatum blocked by the rim on a shot he makes > 90% of the time
- wide, wide open Horford pick-and-pop 3
- uncontested FT-line fadeaway for Tatum
- Jaylen gets fouled, misses both FTs
- open Jaylen 3 off the OReb, missed
- open DWhite 3 off another OReb, missed
- Tatum dunk
- open DWhite corner 3, missed
- KP called for loose ball foul on rebound
- Tatum missed transition layup

Literally every possession was a quality look, from all 3 scoring levels, with very varied offense.

The talking head takes about Celtics late-game problems, or how Denver's defense stepped up in crunchtime, are complete garbage and results-oriented. The Celtics ran great offense, got good, diverse looks, and missed ~all of them.
All nice and well, but if Bill Simmons father tells me on the BS podcast that the Celtics stopped sharing the ball in crunch time and only jacked up contested threes (paraphrasing), I have to ignore your facts.
Because his analysis would most certainly be the same if 1-2 of those shots above had scored and the Celtics had won a close game - he's Bill Simmons dad after all, which you are not!

Back to reality: That podcast today was really bad!
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,254
All nice and well, but if Bill Simmons father tells me on the BS podcast that the Celtics stopped sharing the ball in crunch time and only jacked up contested threes (paraphrasing), I have to ignore your facts.
Because his analysis would most certainly be the same if 1-2 of those shots above had scored and the Celtics had won a close game - he's Bill Simmons dad after all, which you are not!

Back to reality: That podcast today was really bad!
And I wasn't even thinking of Simmons!

The usually good pods, like Dunker's Spot and JJ, were pretty bad on this one. No one admitted that the Celtics worked Denver down the stretch, got what they wanted against a locked-in D, and missed the shots. And then they kept working, got offensive rebounds and missed those shots too!

It was the XKCD "weighted random number generator" bit at its worst.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,555
around the way
To play devils' advocate to myself: every PP lineup is somewhat worse on defense than the Cs base lineups. They score well, but it's always 112-115 drtg as opposed to ~110.
I've noticed that the defense lags a bit when he's in, but more of an off-ball problem IMO. His length is still a problem there (probably awareness too, but not sure). But being less of a liability on-ball is a leap and makes him more playable.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,820
Not sure Tatum's missed transition layup was a great look, given that he was going 1-on-3 and didn't really have possession of the ball as he neared the hoop. There was also his final shot, which he later admitted he rushed.
I dunno. It's an airball right to JT; he pushes the ball with only Jokic on his hip (interesting that Jokic can stay with him even with JT dribbing for about 1/2 a court length) but it's really just JT on (I believe to be) KCP and he eventually gets past him.

At this point (see pic below), I have to think JT would score 9 times out of ten. It's just this time he lost the handle - and he still almost put the ball in. I think JT made the correct decision here; just didn't work out.

77101

View: https://twitter.com/ClutchPoints/status/1748539488895439015
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,254
I've noticed that the defense lags a bit when he's in, but more of an off-ball problem IMO. His length is still a problem there (probably awareness too, but not sure). But being less of a liability on-ball is a leap and makes him more playable.
The length thing is right-on. I had a guess as to who he'd pair really bad with, and I checked the stats and was right:

Kristaps Porzingis.

PP lineups without Porzingis are great defensively in a large sample: 111.0 in 728 (!) minutes.

With KP? PP lineups give up almost 119.85.

I think it's because, with KP, you have to play drop, and teams can target PP by having his man handle in the PnR, where PP can't contest from behind.

If you play PP with Horford, or the Tatum-at-center lineups they've used, you can switch everything, and then PP's ability to stay in front of his man becomes an asset. PP+Horford lineups are great defensively (105) and +17 overall.

Obviously Joe Mazzulla and co. have thought about this more than I ever will, and that's probably why we're starting to see them experiment with stuff like Tatum at the 5, alongside PP.
 

JCizzle

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2006
20,683
I dunno. It's an airball right to JT; he pushes the ball with only Jokic on his hip (interesting that Jokic can stay with him even with JT dribbing for about 1/2 a court length) but it's really just JT on (I believe to be) KCP and he eventually gets past him.

At this point (see pic below), I have to think JT would score 9 times out of ten. It's just this time he lost the handle - and he still almost put the ball in. I think JT made the correct decision here; just didn't work out.

View attachment 77101

View: https://twitter.com/ClutchPoints/status/1748539488895439015
When they showed the other angle of that play from under the basket with a direct line of sight, I thought you could clearly see him get hit on the wrist to lose control. I don’t want to say that for sure though, just my recollection.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,568
Maine
PP is defensively challanged....I am NOT saying he isnt. But real time ......there were a handful of possessions in the Dallas game where he (SEEMED like He) was very effective agains Luka. SSS and all that but I did find it interesting. Wherever the fancy "PPVsLUKA ISO" stats are will now be posted and i will be proven wrong. :)
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,254
PP is defensively challanged....I am NOT saying he isnt. But real time ......there were a handful of possessions in the Dallas game where he (SEEMED like He) was very effective agains Luka. SSS and all that but I did find it interesting. Wherever the fancy "PPVsLUKA ISO" stats are will now be posted and i will be proven wrong. :)
He held up well against Luka. As I posted above, he is a playable defender as long as he doesn't have to contest over screens, and if the other team doesn't have a guy who can take him down low and shoot over him. The latter is harder than it sounds, as Luka found out, because PP is pretty strong.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,393
Santa Monica
I.....guess? This seems really, really results-oriented. It's not like they were just jacking lazy 3s. It's exactly what everyone here wants from a team with this talent: diverse offense leading to good looks from all levels of the floor, without being predictable in a way other teams can lock in on. But, because they missed all those shots, everyone in national media is hyperventilating about Celtics late-game offense. It's all so tiresome.
This team grows/learns from a tight Denver game much more than a blowout, which is all that matters during the regular season. Winning is nicer, but couldn't care less about a January loss.

Agreed, Boston got a bunch of good looks down the stretch. Then again, KP at the nail is a great option in the halfcourt. I'll be surprised if the team doesn't look to run it late/tight, BUT who knows I could end up being wrong.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
Was the song Luka written for this matchup? The Mavs teammates were aware of the violence committed upon Luka, but didn’t want to get involved.

I wish I had video editing skills. That song doesn’t have a lot of lyrics, but does contain the words “clumsy” and “cry.”
Doesn't Kidd himself deserve a lot of the blame here? Why didn't he switch up what they were doing defensively? Where was the defensive help for an obviously outmatched Luka.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
5,991
Cultural hub of the universe
The length thing is right-on. I had a guess as to who he'd pair really bad with, and I checked the stats and was right:

Kristaps Porzingis.

PP lineups without Porzingis are great defensively in a large sample: 111.0 in 728 (!) minutes.

With KP? PP lineups give up almost 119.85.

I think it's because, with KP, you have to play drop, and teams can target PP by having his man handle in the PnR, where PP can't contest from behind.

If you play PP with Horford, or the Tatum-at-center lineups they've used, you can switch everything, and then PP's ability to stay in front of his man becomes an asset. PP+Horford lineups are great defensively (105) and +17 overall.

Obviously Joe Mazzulla and co. have thought about this more than I ever will, and that's probably why we're starting to see them experiment with stuff like Tatum at the 5, alongside PP.
PP"s overall DRating is 109.1 (per NBA.com), which is pretty in line with the team number. Just behind Hauser and Tatum, just ahead of Brown, Holiday and Porzingis. Kornet and Queta are a little further off the back. His net rating is a stellar +11.8, 2nd only to White among the rotation players. Easy to say he's been a great part of the rotation this year, and I still think he's got some shooting upside left.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,685
All nice and well, but if Bill Simmons father tells me on the BS podcast that the Celtics stopped sharing the ball in crunch time and only jacked up contested threes (paraphrasing), I have to ignore your facts.
Because his analysis would most certainly be the same if 1-2 of those shots above had scored and the Celtics had won a close game - he's Bill Simmons dad after all, which you are not!

Back to reality: That podcast today was really bad!
Wait...I know the first paragraph is sarcasm but did this happen on a podcast today or recently?
 

The Raccoon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2018
947
Germany
Wait...I know the first paragraph is sarcasm but did this happen on a podcast today or recently?
Simmons released a pod today, where his father was on (at the end) and they discussed the "crunch time problems" of the Celtics and the Denver game was part of the discussion.
Also some slander on the coaching team ("the coaching team let the players do what they want").
I'm not relistening it but they must have been talking about a different Boston vs. Denver game than @lovegtm detailed earlier.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,254
Simmons released a pod today, where his father was on (at the end) and they discussed the "crunch time problems" of the Celtics and the Denver game was part of the discussion.
Also some slander on the coaching team ("the coaching team let the players do what they want").
I'm not relistening it but they must have been talking about a different Boston vs. Denver game than @lovegtm detailed earlier.
It's funny: when I started re-watching, I thought there would be some bad possessions before the final one. A lazy iso 3, a turnover, a really stagnant possession.

Nope, just basically perfect crunchtime offense for 5 straight minutes, against a locked-in defense, with no turnovers and a few offensive boards to boot.

The Dallas game actually had much worse offensive execution down the stretch.: Jaylen wasted a couple possessions by himself. But no one talks about that, because enough shots dropped and they won.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,387
PP>>>>>Luka or Kyrie defensively

Luka was pathetic the other night. Doesn’t give a shit.
Not to single one poster out bc it’s many….but did anyone ever doubt that PP’s effort level during the reg season would result in ok/solid defense? You guys are missing the big picture when the playoffs are here and PP’s effort level is no longer a difference bc everyone is playing those games at a high level of effort/intensity. That’s when he’s had his issues being on the floor. He’s always been fine in the reg season.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,416
Doesn't Kidd himself deserve a lot of the blame here? Why didn't he switch up what they were doing defensively? Where was the defensive help for an obviously outmatched Luka.
I believe a better coach would be doing more schematically to help Luka, but the practical problem anyone will have is that Celtics can play 5 out for long stretches and there's no one out there Luka can guard...while offensively, you must have Luka on the court. Kind of like when Celts had IT. Thus, all your options stink - Luka would be 'least bad' playing the Celts center, but that means Lively is stuck trying to guard Tatum (which is bad) and you lose your rim protection even more. So you leave Luka on Tatum or Brown and hope his length can help when they drive while not messing up the rest of your matchups. Which is what Kidd did, but Brown (in particular) just decided to shake Luka off and shoot mid-range and negate Luka's length. Time after time after time. Especially when he was matched up wtih Jaylen, who is just an ok passer, he probably should have shaded and doubled more than he did to help Doncic there, and if I were guessing the scheme was for guys to shade or bluff a double and they weren't consistent in doing it...which is why he said guys had to be more alert/attentive.
 
Last edited:

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,253
Herndon, VA
Obviously Joe Mazzulla and co. have thought about this more than I ever will, and that's probably why we're starting to see them experiment with stuff like Tatum at the 5, alongside PP.
Has his defensive ratings with similar players aside from Porzingis shown a leap from last year's with a similar cast?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,562
Hingham, MA
My brother in law, who is a pretty big C's fan and generally pretty level headed, more or less only listens to Simmons takes on the team and it's infuriating. He's a super busy guy and doesn't have a ton of time to watch them, so he completely buys into the narratives that Joe isn't good enough, the bench isn't good enough, crunch time isn't good enough, etc. He's convinced this team has multiple problems that are going to doom this team in the playoffs. While anything could of course happen, I feel almost the complete 180. I have confidence in Joe. I have confidence in the bench. And I have confidence in the crunch time offense. I think this team is going to roll to a title (by which I mean, they'll still lose a handful of playoff games, but I don't expect them to face a single elimination game).
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,247
Imaginationland
My brother in law, who is a pretty big C's fan and generally pretty level headed, more or less only listens to Simmons takes on the team and it's infuriating. He's a super busy guy and doesn't have a ton of time to watch them, so he completely buys into the narratives that Joe isn't good enough, the bench isn't good enough, crunch time isn't good enough, etc. He's convinced this team has multiple problems that are going to doom this team in the playoffs. While anything could of course happen, I feel almost the complete 180. I have confidence in Joe. I have confidence in the bench. And I have confidence in the crunch time offense. I think this team is going to roll to a title (by which I mean, they'll still lose a handful of playoff games, but I don't expect them to face a single elimination game).
The Celtics have been so close and fallen short enough times over the last few years that at this point, public perception has set in about Tatum and the Celtics. The only way it disappears is if they win a title. People said Jordan was too selfish to win after he fell short in multiple playoffs against Boston and Detroit, until he did. People said Lebron didn't have the right mentality after multiple 60 win Cavs teams missed the finals (followed by the loss to Dallas), until he did. I'm really confident about this years group, but even as the majority of the media will pick them as the betting favorite, there will be a LOT of negativity around Tatum and the team in general, and their crunch time offense in particular. Until they win, they are who they were in the past.

Not to single one poster out bc it’s many….but did anyone ever doubt that PP’s effort level during the reg season would result in ok/solid defense? You guys are missing the big picture when the playoffs are here and PP’s effort level is no longer a difference bc everyone is playing those games at a high level of effort/intensity. That’s when he’s had his issues being on the floor. He’s always been fine in the reg season.
I'm still pretty skeptical that we can count on Pritchard for real minutes in the playoffs, late in series in games that matter. It's not the end of the world if that ends up being the case - even if we don't bring anyone else in and even if none of the guys behind him step up, it's possible to succeed in the playoffs with a regular 7 man rotation. The Celtics almost did that last year (Grant was the 8th man, and he had 5 DNP-CDs).
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,562
Hingham, MA
The Celtics have been so close and fallen short enough times over the last few years that at this point, public perception has set in about Tatum and the Celtics. The only way it disappears is if they win a title. People said Jordan was too selfish to win after he fell short in multiple playoffs against Boston and Detroit, until he did. People said Lebron didn't have the right mentality after multiple 60 win Cavs teams missed the finals (followed by the loss to Dallas), until he did. I'm really confident about this years group, but even as the majority of the media will pick them as the betting favorite, there will be a LOT of negativity around Tatum and the team in general, and their crunch time offense in particular. Until they win, they are who they were in the past.
Completely agree, but it's weird how much he harps on Joe and PP especially. His issue isn't with Tatum. You need to watch the games to understand how much both have improved.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,387
The Celtics have been so close and fallen short enough times over the last few years that at this point, public perception has set in about Tatum and the Celtics. The only way it disappears is if they win a title. People said Jordan was too selfish to win after he fell short in multiple playoffs against Boston and Detroit, until he did. People said Lebron didn't have the right mentality after multiple 60 win Cavs teams missed the finals (followed by the loss to Dallas), until he did. I'm really confident about this years group, but even as the majority of the media will pick them as the betting favorite, there will be a LOT of negativity around Tatum and the team in general, and their crunch time offense in particular. Until they win, they are who they were in the past.



I'm still pretty skeptical that we can count on Pritchard for real minutes in the playoffs, late in series in games that matter. It's not the end of the world if that ends up being the case - even if we don't bring anyone else in and even if none of the guys behind him step up, it's possible to succeed in the playoffs with a regular 7 man rotation. The Celtics almost did that last year (Grant was the 8th man, and he had 5 DNP-CDs).
Yeah we are so strong with the Top-6 we really won't need a whole lot from 7 or 8 provided we are healthy. We could get by with some Brissett/Kornet/Stevens/Banton minutes for a handful of possessions should Hauser have trouble but we don't have anyone as PP insurance should we need some. The #1 priority prior to the deadline is to find this years Sam Cassell imo. I know this server may crash at the thought but if Lowry is bought out he's one of the candidates.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,416
Completely agree, but it's weird how much he harps on Joe and PP especially. His issue isn't with Tatum. You need to watch the games to understand how much both have improved.
I agree with that; I was with Simmons last year that CJM probably wasn't good enough--or at least not close enough to be good enough soon enough---for this team to win. And this year's play---not just the record, but the adjustments and tweaks in-game---have persuaded me I was wrong about that.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,734
My brother in law, who is a pretty big C's fan and generally pretty level headed, more or less only listens to Simmons takes on the team and it's infuriating. He's a super busy guy and doesn't have a ton of time to watch them, so he completely buys into the narratives that Joe isn't good enough, the bench isn't good enough, crunch time isn't good enough, etc. He's convinced this team has multiple problems that are going to doom this team in the playoffs. While anything could of course happen, I feel almost the complete 180. I have confidence in Joe. I have confidence in the bench. And I have confidence in the crunch time offense. I think this team is going to roll to a title (by which I mean, they'll still lose a handful of playoff games, but I don't expect them to face a single elimination game).
Once again - and its kind of unbelievable if you know Simmons origin story - he has become the exact sort of take-generator that he used to mock in his youth.

Simmons illustrates the problem with sports content which is that regardless of whether its warranted or not, people need to put takes out there. So you have all the blogs and pods analyzing regular season games like they are playoff contests when the teams clearly aren't going all out and you get stuff like Mazzulla criticism even when the team wins. Or you get these YT idiots with their sub 1k followers screaming and yelling or resorting to other gimmicks.

The mitigating factor is the growth of player and former player pods. Why listen to some 20 something rando breaking down hoops when you can get the perspective of those who actually did the thing?

There are exceptions all around, of course, and the former players etc will have the same problem - a constant need for content even if there isn't much to say - but they are far more interesting than someone who is just trying to stay relevant.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,562
Hingham, MA
I agree with that; I was with Simmons last year that CJM probably wasn't good enough--or at least not close enough to be good enough soon enough---for this team to win. And this year's play---not just the record, but the adjustments and tweaks in-game---have persuaded me I was wrong about that.
Totally with you. Joe was a liability last year. This year, he simply isn't.

Edit: he called not one but two timeouts on the last possession vs. Denver. Ha!
Once again - and its kind of unbelievable if you know Simmons origin story - he has become the exact sort of take-generator that he used to mock in his youth.

Simmons illustrates the problem with sports content which is that regardless of whether its warranted or not, people need to put takes out there. So you have all the blogs and pods analyzing regular season games like they are playoff contests when the teams clearly aren't going all out and you get stuff like Mazzulla criticism even when the team wins. Or you get these YT idiots with their sub 1k followers screaming and yelling or resorting to other gimmicks.

The mitigating factor is the growth of player and former player pods. Why listen to some 20 something rando breaking down hoops when you can get the perspective of those who actually did the thing?

There are exceptions all around, of course, and the former players etc will have the same problem - a constant need for content even if there isn't much to say - but they are far more interesting than someone who is just trying to stay relevant.
Oh, for sure, and yes completely aware of Simmons origin story. I'll listen to JJ Redick all day over Simmons. I haven't actually consumed any Simmons content in over 10 years. He's become totally irrelevant to me. There was a time and place that he was the first voice I'd seek out when something major happened in Boston sports. He hasn't been that guy for like 15 years now for me. Longer? It's hard to even remember.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,387
Totally with you. Joe was a liability last year. This year, he simply isn't.
It was the coaching staff as a whole (Thanks Ime) that left a rookie HC, who shouldn’t have yet been a HC, to lead a championship contender with and entire bench of 2nd row assistants who were loyal to the previous coach. The kid literally had no chance. Seeing how The Adrian Griffin Experience has worked out I’d say that this is a feather in Joe’s hat for keeping that entire group together.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,562
Hingham, MA
It was the coaching staff as a whole (Thanks Ime) that left a rookie HC, who shouldn’t have yet been a HC, to lead a championship contender with and entire bench of 2nd row assistants who were loyal to the previous coach. The kid literally had no chance. Seeing how The Adrian Griffin Experience has worked out I’d say that this is a feather in Joe’s hat for keeping that entire group together.
Had the Griffin example in my head as I was typing. Completely agree.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,416
I actually still like Simmons a lot on NBA overall, and think he has a unique and very well-informed take overall on the league and many, many teams. Sure, there's plenty of Simmons-isms ("Ewing theory opportunity...") but he hangs credibly with Zach Lowe, who for my money is the best guy in the media.

But...

Simmons' Celtics takes have devolved to that of "WEEI caller" And his dad, whose passion for the team appears to greatly outstrip his knowledge, has wildly disproportionate impact on Bill's views of the team. It's kind of like when you're playing pickup and your team has the worst guy on the court and he drags everyone down, as Bill might say....
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,253
Herndon, VA
Yeah we are so strong with the Top-6 we really won't need a whole lot from 7 or 8 provided we are healthy. We could get by with some Brissett/Kornet/Stevens/Banton minutes for a handful of possessions should Hauser have trouble but we don't have anyone as PP insurance should we need some. The #1 priority prior to the deadline is to find this years Sam Cassell imo. I know this server may crash at the thought but if Lowry is bought out he's one of the candidates.
Lowry can't be brought in, as he made too much to be eligible as a buyout candidate for any second apron team. And there are a couple hardcapped first apron teams that can't sign him.

Most likely he'd be a Knick or a Sixer.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,387
Lowry can't be brought in, as he made too much to be eligible as a buyout candidate for any second apron team. And there are a couple hardcapped first apron teams that can't sign him.

Most likely he'd be a Knick or a Sixer.
Ah gotcha thanks. That’s the prototype for a deadline acquisition though imo….veteran combo guard who has played under the bright lights.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,823
where I was last at
CJM is a lot better this year than last. He has learned or shown an ability to adapt and it shows. But he was a fucking disaster last year, and IMO the Celts at a minimum would have played in the Finals with a moderately competent NBA coach/staff. But inexperience was a factor beyond CJM control.

I want to believe CJM is the guy, but it is for me, too early to say that with any real conviction as many of the late and close challenges appear to still exist and end in Ls for a team that is supremely talented and plays close to .800 ball.