2023-24 Celtics

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,535
Santa Monica
CJM is a lot better this year than last. He has learned or shown an ability to adapt and it shows. But he was a fucking disaster last year, and IMO the Celts at a minimum would have played in the Finals with a moderately competent NBA coach/staff. But inexperience was a factor beyond CJM control.

I want to believe CJM is the guy, but it is for me, too early to say that with any real conviction as many of the late and close challenges appear to still exist and end in Ls for a team that is supremely talented and plays close to .800 ball.
Joe had a coaching staff with one foot out the door (the lead Asst left in the middle of the season). I'm pretty sure the staff was PO'd that their guy was publicly fired (A few of the players weren't happy either). The coaching staff immediately quit this summer once IME got another job for a rebuilder rather than stay with a championship contender.

Saying Joe was a fucking disaster last year doesn't seem fair to a guy that took the team to G7 in the ECF under difficult circumstances.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,500
Lynn
People underrate how much losing Stoudamire hurt during last season. They were already short on the bench, coaches were stretched thin, and Joe was trying to learn on the job.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,535
Santa Monica
Not to single one poster out bc it’s many….but did anyone ever doubt that PP’s effort level during the reg season would result in ok/solid defense? You guys are missing the big picture when the playoffs are here and PP’s effort level is no longer a difference bc everyone is playing those games at a high level of effort/intensity. That’s when he’s had his issues being on the floor. He’s always been fine in the reg season.
It would be fantastic if PP's value increases enough to help Brad go get Alex Caruso.

If not, PP can give Boston ~10 quality mpg in the playoffs against 2nd unit players (Alpha hunters off the floor).

BUT I'm going to keep an open mind with PP. Kyrie & Luka certainly didn't abuse him.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Suspended
Feb 12, 2003
24,895
where I was last at
Joe had a coaching staff with one foot out the door (the lead Asst left in the middle of the season). I'm pretty sure the staff was PO'd that their guy was publicly fired (A few of the players weren't happy either). The coaching staff immediately quit this summer once IME got another job for a rebuilder rather than stay with a championship contender.

Saying Joe was a fucking disaster last year doesn't seem fair to a guy that took the team to G7 in the ECF under difficult circumstances.
I've said on more than one occasion I was unduly harsh with CJM last year, given the circumstances, but it doesn't change my opinions that, the Celts needed a strong knowledgable voice to guide them, not someone taking a HC crash course, and with a more experienced HC the Celts would have likely played in the '23 Finals.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,594
It would be fantastic if PP's value increases enough to help Brad go get Alex Caruso.

If not, PP can give Boston ~10 quality mpg in the playoffs against 2nd unit players (Alpha hunters off the floor).

BUT I'm going to keep an open mind with PP. Kyrie & Luka certainly didn't abuse him.
Don’t get me wrong…..it’s not like we are running Scoot Henderson out there. He should be fine in short minutes but without any guard depth the last thing we want is for him to be extended into a 20+ min guy due to injury or what not. That’s why my get by the deadline is guard depth to give us some security.
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,264
Herndon, VA
Don’t get me wrong…..it’s not like we are running Scoot Henderson out there. He should be fine in short minutes but without any guard depth the last thing we want is for him to be extended into a 20+ min guy due to injury or what not. That’s why my get by the deadline is guard depth to give us some security.
I feel like we're better off getting a wing, mostly because if something happened to White or Jrue, you could move Brown over, and give more minutes to Hauser. Getting another wing for depth makes that easier.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,333
Not to single one poster out bc it’s many….but did anyone ever doubt that PP’s effort level during the reg season would result in ok/solid defense? You guys are missing the big picture when the playoffs are here and PP’s effort level is no longer a difference bc everyone is playing those games at a high level of effort/intensity. That’s when he’s had his issues being on the floor. He’s always been fine in the reg season.
Even in the playoffs he's probably not worse on defense than the 7th or 8th player on any other team's rotation. Not someone we want to count on for major minutes, but definitely playable for a few minutes to spell White/Holliday here and there.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,623
I feel like we're better off getting a wing, mostly because if something happened to White or Jrue, you could move Brown over, and give more minutes to Hauser. Getting another wing for depth makes that easier.
I agree with the idea but who is the wing that fits their TPE and is better than Brissett, or even Stevens? It’s a short short list
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,371
Imaginationland
I agree with the idea but who is the wing that fits their TPE and is better than Brissett, or even Stevens? It’s a short short list
Stevens is barely playing, I can't imagine it's that to find a guy capable of giving them better than 6 minutes a week. Brissett on the other hand has had his moments, lots of energy and the occasional open 3.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,623
I get the idea on Konchar—but look at his numbers this year and last: he’s no Brissett. So what’s the gain?

I’m up for wing depth for reasons others have mentioned by Brissett is better than anyone I can see being available. Caruso is not realistic for Celts (thrilled to be proven wrong). If they get Konchar for a second? Great depth..:but he’s no upgrade.

I don’t think Stevens is much…but he’s no worse than Konchar and other, just different
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,971
I get the idea on Konchar—but look at his numbers this year and last: he’s no Brissett. So what’s the gain?

I’m up for wing depth for reasons others have mentioned by Brissett is better than anyone I can see being available. Caruso is not realistic for Celts (thrilled to be proven wrong). If they get Konchar for a second? Great depth..:but he’s no upgrade.

I don’t think Stevens is much…but he’s no worse than Konchar and other, just different
Konchar is a better shooter than those two and grades out as a better overall player. My guess at the thought process is that he is an all around upgrade on either for 5-10 minutes per playoff game who offers some ability to hit open looks.

Imo, Konchar is a Brad type player in that like a Brad-guy they may not be great but they are dependable. They know where to go and if they get beaten its legitimate.

Assuming it wouldn't create a chemistry issue - and I think the core wants as much skill on the bench as possible, a Konchar pickup at the expense of either of these guys would be fine with me. And I like Brissett a lot.

Also, apologies because I know these irk some folks but it illustrates my point.

77119
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,264
Herndon, VA
Because Konchar fits into the TPE, they don't even have to trade anyone if they don't want to. Frankly, it strikes me as a better use of the roster spot than signing Queta to the 15th spot. And because Konchar is signed for another three years beyond this, if Brad really likes him and wants to buy low, why not take him and see if he turns out to be another White?
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,508
I've said on more than one occasion I was unduly harsh with CJM last year, given the circumstances, but it doesn't change my opinions that, the Celts needed a strong knowledgable voice to guide them, not someone taking a HC crash course, and with a more experienced HC the Celts would have likely played in the '23 Finals.
You could have put Prime Auerbach out there. Tatum shot 23% from 3, Brown shot 16% from 3, and as a team they shot 30% from 3. In game 7, Tatum and Brown shot a combined 13-36 and 2-13 on 3's. Im not saying Joe was great, but at some point the players have to play.
 
Last edited:

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Suspended
Feb 12, 2003
24,895
where I was last at
You could have put Prime Auerbach out there. Tatum shot 23% from 3, Brown shot 16% from 3, and as a team they shot 30% from 3. In game 7, Tatum and Brown shot for a combined 13-36 and 2-13 on 3's. Im not saying Joe was great, but at some point the players have to play.
Perhaps a coach can have a contingency plan for when a team or players cant hit the ocean from a rowboat. Maybe try driving to the hoop, move the ball, use your superior skill and depth to create opportunities to suceed. CJM was in way over his head last year. And it was sort of obvious early on.
I can only hope he's a quick study. I like what I see so far, but some of the same problems vex this team.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,971
can anyone tell me what konchar does well? not doubting I just have never seen this guy in my life and the numbers.dont paint a picture.
This is the Hoopshype scouting report:

Stands 6-foot-4 but almost plays like a frontcourt player… Fantastic rebounder for his size… Averaged nearly nine rebounds in the G League… Good playmaker… Surprising athleticism… Tenacious driver of the basketball… Finishes over length and through contact… Poor outside shooter… Good ball-handler.
He's kind of a dollar store version of Derrick White. But like in the discount bins at that store - its just that he is kind of good at a lot of basic stuff like San Antonio White. I am not going to die on this comparison hills so no need to debate me. Its just the vibe he gives but I could be way off.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,635
San Francisco
This is the Hoopshype scouting report:



He's kind of a dollar store version of Derrick White. But like in the discount bins at that store - its just that he is kind of good at a lot of basic stuff like San Antonio White. I am not going to die on this comparison hills so no need to debate me. Its just the vibe he gives but I could be way off.
lol of course they hit the white guy with the "surprising athleticism"
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,654
around the way
Doesn't Kidd himself deserve a lot of the blame here? Why didn't he switch up what they were doing defensively? Where was the defensive help for an obviously outmatched Luka.
It's going to be a dilemma for any Celtics opponents this year. Sure, go ahead and double, and we have four guys on the court who will bury you from three. At some point you have to do it, but it really is a pick your poison thing.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,500
Lynn
While I don’t think Joe did well in that series, some people forget or ignore that Brogdon was too injured to contribute, nobody could hit threes, and the Heat had a massive fluke series from Vincent and Martin.

Sidebar, Tatum spraining his ankle and them losing game 7 really ruined what was looking like an epic series for him lol. Even with the 23% from three, he was averaging 27/10/6 on a 60% TS (which is insane) through 6 games, and regularly punked Butler on both ends. And this was their net rating with him off the court in the series

77120
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,654
around the way
My brother in law, who is a pretty big C's fan and generally pretty level headed, more or less only listens to Simmons takes on the team and it's infuriating. He's a super busy guy and doesn't have a ton of time to watch them, so he completely buys into the narratives that Joe isn't good enough, the bench isn't good enough, crunch time isn't good enough, etc. He's convinced this team has multiple problems that are going to doom this team in the playoffs. While anything could of course happen, I feel almost the complete 180. I have confidence in Joe. I have confidence in the bench. And I have confidence in the crunch time offense. I think this team is going to roll to a title (by which I mean, they'll still lose a handful of playoff games, but I don't expect them to face a single elimination game).
It's sad what has happened to Bill. Still an interesting guy with some interesting takes, but man has he lost his anchor. Moving to LA does that shit to people.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,594
Perhaps a coach can have a contingency plan for when a team or players cant hit the ocean from a rowboat. Maybe try driving to the hoop, move the ball, use your superior skill and depth to create opportunities to suceed. CJM was in way over his head last year. And it was sort of obvious early on.
I can only hope he's a quick study. I like what I see so far, but some of the same problems vex this team.
Wait you’re serious? You want a coach to have a contingency plan to every starter on the floor missing everything….then suggest not taking natural shots in the flow of the offense and forcing other, worse shots?
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,846
Saint Paul, MN
can anyone tell me what konchar does well? not doubting I just have never seen this guy in my life and the numbers.dont paint a picture.
Aren't we all completely unimpressed with Stevens, Brissett, Svi, Banton crew? Yea, they are the 11th+ guys on the roster, but there are times when those guys play important minutes. Probably not in the playoffs, but certain regular season games are meaningful. No idea if Konchar offers anything more, but someone like him would be worth taking a flyer on
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,635
San Francisco
Aren't we all completely unimpressed with Stevens, Brissett, Svi, Banton crew? Yea, they are the 11th+ guys on the roster, but there are times when those guys play important minutes. Probably not in the playoffs, but certain regular season games are meaningful. No idea if Konchar offers anything more, but someone like him would be worth taking a flyer on
I like brissett, I could see him playing playoff minutes in situations where they need some energy.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Suspended
Feb 12, 2003
24,895
where I was last at
Wait you’re serious? You want a coach to have a contingency plan to every starter on the floor missing everything….then suggest not taking natural shots in the flow of the offense and forcing other, worse shots?
Really? Thats the way you read that?

Are you familiar with the idea of being open to different approaches to address a problem?

Oh well.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,594
I like brissett, I could see him playing playoff minutes in situations where they need some energy.
Yeah I don’t think anyone in that role with the other 4 on the floor are necessarily going to impress. The nature of their role is doing the dirty work so that the big guns don’t have to get worn down by them.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,594
Really? Thats the way you read that?

Are you familiar with the idea of being open to different approaches to address a problem?

Oh well.
Not a fan of panic moves within a singular game by taking lower pct shots simply bc your normal ones aren’t going down on that particular night.
 

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,384
This season:

Oshae per 36: 12.6/9.1/1.9 on 46/30/68
Konchar per 36: 6.6/8/3.3 on 36/29/75
Banton per 36: 13/8.2/2.7 on 43/17/78 (he really can't shoot the 3-ball at all, but he can get to the rack)

Seems like a wash, at best, and Oshae is currently a vibe king on the Celtics bench, doing media hits, goofing on Abby hits, etc. That just about exactly what you want out of the 10th man.

By minutes played, it's currently:

Tatum
Brown
Jrue
White
Al
KP
Hauser
PP
Luke
Oshae
Queta
Svi
Banton
Lamar

Maybe Oshae's 9. If we got Konchar, maybe he's 9. But maybe he's 11/12. I'm not sure Konchar is better than Drew Peterson.

Caruso's playing 26 mins a game. He's played 2 minutes fewer than Horford this season. He probably cuts Hauser and Pritch's minutes each in half as the 7th man?
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,371
Imaginationland
While I don’t think Joe did well in that series, some people forget or ignore that Brogdon was too injured to contribute, nobody could hit threes, and the Heat had a massive fluke series from Vincent and Martin.

Sidebar, Tatum spraining his ankle and them losing game 7 really ruined what was looking like an epic series for him lol. Even with the 23% from three, he was averaging 27/10/6 on a 60% TS (which is insane) through 6 games, and regularly punked Butler on both ends. And this was their net rating with him off the court in the series
The Brogdon injury us a lot bigger than people remember. He wasn't just a bench guy that we don't miss this year (because of improvement from White and the upgrade of Smart to Holiday), he was the Celtics 3rd leading scorer. After Tatum and Brown, he was the only player that was consistently able to create his own shot all year. Tatum sprained his ankle, Brogdon had been useless all series because of his game 1 arm injury, and Brown was just vomiting turnovers every other possession. There's plenty to pick on leading up to that moment, but it's hard to pin anything that happened in game 7 on Joe, going crazy from 3 (or at least better than 21%) was their only realistic option. This will never not piss me off:

Celtics 2023 3p%: .377
Heat 2023 3p%: .344

Celtics 2023 ECF 3p%: .303 (74 points worse than the regular season)
Heat 2023 ECF 3p%: .434 (90 points better than the regular season)

It's never quite so simple as that, but what a fucking gut punch.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Suspended
Feb 12, 2003
24,895
where I was last at
Not a fan of panic moves within a singular game by taking lower pct shots simply bc your normal ones aren’t going down on that particular night.
I'm not a fan of panic moves either, nor did I suggest that,, but I am open to trying a different approaches or having different approaches available, if the old tried and true is not working, particularly in series as opposed to 1 tough night in Brooklyn.
 

SteveF

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,084
The argument in favor of Konchar is simply he's bigger than Pritchard and can get around screens better than Hauser. He also fits into the trade exception. The guy is probably playing 18 minutes a playoff series max.

I watched every 3 point shot Konchar has taken this year, almost all catch and shoot, and he's missing all over the fucking place. From every spot and in every direction -- long, short, left, right. He would not get guarded in a playoff series. So it becomes a question of what you want to watch more -- Konchar missing shots or Pritchard getting torched on defense because he can't effectively rearview contest, or he's being posted up/shot over by some wing player.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,594
I'm not a fan of panic moves either, nor did I suggest that,, but I am open to trying a different approaches or having different approaches available, if the old tried and true is not working, particularly in series as opposed to 1 tough night in Brooklyn.
If you’re changing your approach based on the results of what, several dozen possessions, to go outside of your natural flow….that is the very definition of a panic move.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Suspended
Feb 12, 2003
24,895
where I was last at
If you’re changing your approach based on the results of what, several dozen possessions, to go outside of your natural flow….that is the very definition of a panic move.
Heh. Why do you frame this as 3 minute exercise, when it is a longer term approach to problem solving.

I think having one approach and being wedded to that one approach in a dynamic environment is the panic move. Successful organizations adapt to the evolving environment or they will be short lived organizations.

But you are certainly free to promote whatever approach you feel comfortable with, as will I. And I prefer adaptability.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,635
San Francisco
Heh. Why do you frame this as 3 minute exercise, when it is a longer term approach to problem solving.

I think having one approach and being wedded to that one approach in a dynamic environment is the panic move. Successful organizations adapt to the evolving environment or they will be short lived organizations.

But you are certainly free to promote whatever approach you feel comfortable with, as will I. And I prefer adaptability.
Depends what you mean by approach. I think searching for the best shot given what the defense is doing is the best approach, and you don't deviate from that even if the results don't look good for a little bit. That approach might lead to lots of threes or lots of posting up depending on lots of factors.

What would you suggest a team do if they were playing say the Budenholzer era Bucks where they would happily concede 3s in exchange for shutting down the rim?
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,264
Herndon, VA
Are you familiar with the idea of being open to different approaches to address a problem?

Oh well.
You mean, you want the first year coach, unexpectedly last-minute with a staff geared towards the -previous coach-'s philosophy, whose assistant coach took off midseason, to... what, do a whole new plan, when said plan was basically "good plan, good process, just missed shots/opposing player having the series of his life?"

I mean, if you're gonna say he should be "open to new ideas", then you should realize that a) most options being offered to him fit -Ime's style of play, and were hardly new ideas, b) were considerably less varied because he had less than the normal amount of coaching assistants, meaning less people doing more work to drill and practice plans for the players, and c) shooting variance was way, way, way off the charts for that series.

I'd also note that Joe was promoted to head coach -a week before training camp-, which meant basically they were prepares to go into the season with Ime's plans and schemes. Having to adjust those to Joe's plans was going to require a staff actually in tune with Joe's style -and- time to work them through.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Suspended
Feb 12, 2003
24,895
where I was last at
Depends what you mean by approach. I think searching for the best shot given what the defense is doing is the best approach, and you don't deviate from that even if the results don't look good for a little bit. That approach might lead to lots of threes or lots of posting up depending on lots of factors.

What would you suggest a team do if they were playing say the Budenholzer era Bucks where they would happily concede 3s in exchange for shutting down the rim?
Depends on the score and game situation. You know the environment. But all things being equal, and they never are, if the open 3 is there, it's probably the best choice. But maybe there are times you want to challenge a foul plagued Lopez etc with a drive.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,635
San Francisco
Depends on the score and game situation. You know the environment. But all things being equal, and they never are, if the open 3 is there, it's probably the best choice. But maybe there are times you want to challenge a foul plagued Lopez etc with a drive.
The process is the thing to emphasize though. Attacking Lopez is an emphasis on process which is not the original suggestion, which was "shoot less 3s". Like, say we attack Lopez and the defense collapses... leading to an open 3. You take that. Telling guys what the outcome should be is just going to break flow and the natural rhythm of how the game works.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,535
Santa Monica
Perhaps a coach can have a contingency plan for when a team or players cant hit the ocean from a rowboat. Maybe try driving to the hoop, move the ball, use your superior skill and depth to create opportunities to suceed. CJM was in way over his head last year. And it was sort of obvious early on.
I can only hope he's a quick study. I like what I see so far, but some of the same problems vex this team.
So far, so good this season:
1. Brad massively upgraded the on-court talent
2. They built an experienced coaching staff.
3. Joe was given an offseason to plan.

The team is posting more (with success), so the media narrative that they are strictly reliant on 3pt variance is false. Scoring or passing out of the post is very effective in a slowed-down, half-court, rock fight you see in the playoffs (the Contingency Plan you probably want).

Defensively, they have experimented with different zones, full-court presses, & cross-matched on D numerous times (ie. Jrue on Embiid). They are not wedded to going small or playing 2BIGZ, Joe has them doing both.

Joe's pairings/rotations have been next to flawless. They have the #3 rated offense + #2 rated defense leading to the best Net Rating in the NBA....Players are being load-managed, no major injuries, the team has the best record, and most of our major competitors have serious flaws...All is well
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,572
The Brogdon injury us a lot bigger than people remember. He wasn't just a bench guy that we don't miss this year (because of improvement from White and the upgrade of Smart to Holiday), he was the Celtics 3rd leading scorer. After Tatum and Brown, he was the only player that was consistently able to create his own shot all year.
Yes, and this is true for the whole roster. People thought of it as "the team that just went to the Finals", but
- Smart was nowhere near DPOY Smart
- TL wasn't remotely the same guy
- White was still improving (this one was somewhat on the coaching staff for not getting him more opportunity sooner)

They were a good team, but that Smart+TL defensive combo was what really put them head and shoulders above in 2022. Without that, they were just another member of a crowded contender field.

Joe had his issues last year, but not enough people will remember that he coached his ass off in games 4-6 against Miami to force that game 7. For all the arguments here about not trying stuff, the team really did do a lot of different things defensively, and had the Heat very much on the ropes until the Tatum thing happened.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,572
Has his defensive ratings with similar players aside from Porzingis shown a leap from last year's with a similar cast?
You can't really look at last year for him, since Joe ~never played him. He's already played 50% more minutes this year, and far more of them are with real lineups.

The way that pops out in the numbers is that the team scores when he's on the floor this year (123 ortg). Last year, it was more like 110, and that's almost certainly due to playing now in optimized lineups, with better players around him, in more meaningful minutes.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,333
Yes, and this is true for the whole roster. People thought of it as "the team that just went to the Finals", but
- Smart was nowhere near DPOY Smart
- TL wasn't remotely the same guy
- White was still improving (this one was somewhat on the coaching staff for not getting him more opportunity sooner)

They were a good team, but that Smart+TL defensive combo was what really put them head and shoulders above in 2022. Without that, they were just another member of a crowded contender field.

Joe had his issues last year, but not enough people will remember that he coached his ass off in games 4-6 against Miami to force that game 7. For all the arguments here about not trying stuff, the team really did do a lot of different things defensively, and had the Heat very much on the ropes until the Tatum thing happened.
There was indeed a roster issue last season, which got exposed when Tatum and Brown went cold from 3 while Brogdon was ineffective due to a significant injury. I do fault Mazzulla for perhaps not adapting to Miami's zone as quickly as he should have, and the Celtics struggles in seeking out mismatches with some of Miami's weaker defenders in Vincent, Robinson, Strus, and Lowry. But the Brogdon injury hurt that aspect as well.

Denver likely beats them handily in the Finals last year anyway. Relying on Marcus Smart as the 3rd banana was holding this roster back, and kudos for Stevens for recognizing it was time to move on while Smart still had trade value.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,837
Yes, and this is true for the whole roster. People thought of it as "the team that just went to the Finals", but
- Smart was nowhere near DPOY Smart
- TL wasn't remotely the same guy
- White was still improving (this one was somewhat on the coaching staff for not getting him more opportunity sooner)

They were a good team, but that Smart+TL defensive combo was what really put them head and shoulders above in 2022. Without that, they were just another member of a crowded contender field.

Joe had his issues last year, but not enough people will remember that he coached his ass off in games 4-6 against Miami to force that game 7. For all the arguments here about not trying stuff, the team really did do a lot of different things defensively, and had the Heat very much on the ropes until the Tatum thing happened.
I'm not a Joe defender or a Joe hater. I agree with you he was awesome 4-6 in Miami. Other than that, I thought he was fairly mediocre.

However, the bolded is the big difference to me. While Smart took a dip, I think he was still a good player overall. Healthy TimeLord was such a difference maker and unlocked so many things for the Celtics. I don't think we saw that player last year and, sadly, I doubt we ever see him again.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
12,019
You mean, you want the first year coach, unexpectedly last-minute with a staff geared towards the -previous coach-'s philosophy, whose assistant coach took off midseason, to... what, do a whole new plan, when said plan was basically "good plan, good process, just missed shots/opposing player having the series of his life?"

I mean, if you're gonna say he should be "open to new ideas", then you should realize that a) most options being offered to him fit -Ime's style of play, and were hardly new ideas, b) were considerably less varied because he had less than the normal amount of coaching assistants, meaning less people doing more work to drill and practice plans for the players, and c) shooting variance was way, way, way off the charts for that series.

I'd also note that Joe was promoted to head coach -a week before training camp-, which meant basically they were prepares to go into the season with Ime's plans and schemes. Having to adjust those to Joe's plans was going to require a staff actually in tune with Joe's style -and- time to work them through.
And despite that he got to game 7 of the ECF where his best player sprained his ankle minutes into the game and his sixth man was so injured he couldn’t shoot..

At some point the circumstances/context matters.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
31,011
There was indeed a roster issue last season, which got exposed when Tatum and Brown went cold from 3 while Brogdon was ineffective due to a significant injury. I do fault Mazzulla for perhaps not adapting to Miami's zone as quickly as he should have, and the Celtics struggles in seeking out mismatches with some of Miami's weaker defenders in Vincent, Robinson, Strus, and Lowry. But the Brogdon injury hurt that aspect as well.

Denver likely beats them handily in the Finals last year anyway. Relying on Marcus Smart as the 3rd banana was holding this roster back, and kudos for Stevens for recognizing it was time to move on while Smart still had trade value.
I'm not sure it was a roster issue as much as a health issue - best player gets hurt; best shooter by percentages gets hurt; most versatile big man never fully recovered from off-season surgery. Agree with all who posted that Brogdon would have made a real difference if he could shoot - he was getting wide open looks in G7 when he played and he couldn't knock them down because of his injury.

Still, POBOBS upgraded the roster and they've been a joy to watch.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
31,011
My brother in law, who is a pretty big C's fan and generally pretty level headed, more or less only listens to Simmons takes on the team and it's infuriating. He's a super busy guy and doesn't have a ton of time to watch them, so he completely buys into the narratives that Joe isn't good enough, the bench isn't good enough, crunch time isn't good enough, etc. He's convinced this team has multiple problems that are going to doom this team in the playoffs. While anything could of course happen, I feel almost the complete 180. I have confidence in Joe. I have confidence in the bench. And I have confidence in the crunch time offense. I think this team is going to roll to a title (by which I mean, they'll still lose a handful of playoff games, but I don't expect them to face a single elimination game).
I think of this as a sports fan's defense mechanism - it's way easier to sit there and complain about a team and say how bad they are because if the team doesn't win the championship, the fan is vindicated and if they do win the championship, no one remembers how wrong the fan was in the first place.

The problem with this approach is that your BIL is probably so focused on the negatives that he misses some of the joy that the team brings on a day-to-day level because they are so f'ng good.

His loss. If I were you, when he goes on a rant, I'd just smile so as to say, "I know what you're doing."

lol of course they hit the white guy with the "surprising athleticism"
Konchar is apparently really fast - #1 in speed on the defensive end and #1 in ball screen navigation. I posted some stats in another thread - would love to take a flyer on him if MEM would give him up (I doubt they would): https://www.sonsofsamhorn.net/index.php?threads/nba-celtic-trade-rumors.41398/#post-5946514
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,077
Hingham, MA
I think of this as a sports fan's defense mechanism - it's way easier to sit there and complain about a team and say how bad they are because if the team doesn't win the championship, the fan is vindicated and if they do win the championship, no one remembers how wrong the fan was in the first place.

The problem with this approach is that your BIL is probably so focused on the negatives that he misses some of the joy that the team brings on a day-to-day level because they are so f'ng good.

His loss. If I were you, when he goes on a rant, I'd just smile so as to say, "I know what you're doing."
Yeah, he ends almost every exchange with "I really hope I'm wrong", and I think he's genuine when he says it. I think part of his issue is that he was also a HUGE Marcus guy. I don't think he can objectively see how much better they are with Jrue + KP. In his mind they swapped out 4 guys (Marcus, TL, Grant, Brogdon) for 2 (Jrue, KP), so by definition the bench is much worse. What he doesn't see is that White has continued to improve (and increase minutes), Hauser and Pritchard have both improved immensely, Jrue is flat out a better player than Marcus, probably at both ends of the court, Timelord was never going to be the same and the KP upgrade on the offensive end can't even be properly measured it is so ridiculous, KP's rim protection isn't that far off from TL's, etc. Add it all up and the ceiling is just so much higher.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
31,011
Yeah, he ends almost every exchange with "I really hope I'm wrong", and I think he's genuine when he says it. I think part of his issue is that he was also a HUGE Marcus guy. I don't think he can objectively see how much better they are with Jrue + KP. In his mind they swapped out 4 guys (Marcus, TL, Grant, Brogdon) for 2 (Jrue, KP), so by definition the bench is much worse. What he doesn't see is that White has continued to improve (and increase minutes), Hauser and Pritchard have both improved immensely, Jrue is flat out a better player than Marcus, probably at both ends of the court, Timelord was never going to be the same and the KP upgrade on the offensive end can't even be properly measured it is so ridiculous, KP's rim protection isn't that far off from TL's, etc. Add it all up and the ceiling is just so much higher.
You think Marcus is ever going to hit 59.1% of corner 3Ps in 1/2 a season? :cool:
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,371
Imaginationland
The bench is definitely worse, but that's fine because the starting (and closing) 5 is significantly stronger. It was a quantity for quality swap that undoubtedly raised the team's ceiling, because only 5 guys can be on the floor when it really matters.

Even though the bench has been downgraded, it's worth noting that it's more reliable - Hauser/Pritchard are significantly more available than the likes of Brogdon and TL.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,077
Hingham, MA
The bench is definitely worse, but that's fine because the starting (and closing) 5 is significantly stronger. It was a quantity for quality swap that undoubtedly raised the team's ceiling, because only 5 guys can be on the floor when it really matters.

Even though the bench has been downgraded, it's worth noting that it's more reliable - Hauser/Pritchard are significantly more available than the likes of Brogdon and TL.
On paper Brogdon was perfect, but whether it was injury or otherwise, he really didn't do much to move the needle in May.