2015 Michigan Football: Getting Real Real, Real Fast

Status
Not open for further replies.

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,983
Hingham, MA
Average Reds said:
 
My understanding is that Brady Hoke is a really good guy.
 
That is fair, and ultimately we root for the laundry. And I'm not even saying I don't think Harbaugh is a good guy. I just don't like him. Not all that different from Bobby V taking over the Sox job. Obviously Bobby V bombed big time but I wasn't exactly rooting all in for him from the beginning.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,444
Southwestern CT
Snarky reply aside (And thanks for being understanding) I get what you are saying about Harbaugh.  He's a bit intense and tends to burn people out.  But that's a risk I'm willing to take right now.
 
Here's what I care about:  Harbaugh is a proven motivator of talent.  Michigan has had talent.  What they have not had is results.  If Harbaugh ends up being a short-term turnaround specialist who yields to someone better suited for the long run, that works for me.  If he ends up being like Red Berenson (or Bo, for matter) and becoming an institution, that works too.
 
In the context of Michigan, I'm more upset that he's Tom Crean's brother in-law than anything else.  So I'm rooting for Joani to wake up and divorce the schmuck.
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
Average Reds said:
In the context of Michigan, I'm more upset that he's Tom Crean's brother in-law than anything else.  So I'm rooting for Joani to wake up and divorce the schmuck.
HAHA - this is exactly where I'm at.
 
I love Jim. I have a less rosey opinion of John, but John isn't coaching Michigan.
 

Zososoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2009
9,259
South of North
Yeah I don't like the Harbaughs unconditionally or anything (more specifically referring to John), but I'm thrilled to have Jim as UM's coach. He doesn't seem like he will sacrifice anything in terms of academic standards (at least not on the face of things) and he WILL get results, I don't think that's in question.
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
Michigan picked up the commitment of Kiante Enis, an athlete out of Indiana. He's currently a 3-star prospect, but is supposed to have some great speed. They say he can play RB, slot, or DB at the next level.
 
Yesterday was also the first day of the Summer Swarm Camps that have been driving the SEC crazy. Baumgardner had a good write up. They're in Pratville, Alabama today.
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
Dick Pole Upside said:
I recommend that Coach keeps his shirt on.
Nah, I'm fine with Harbaugh breaking the internet on a daily basis.
 
After Enis, Michigan picked up the commitment of All Purpose Back, Chris Evans. Then, in Alabama, Harbaugh got Dytarious Jackson, another product of the Pratville pipeline. The Swarm Camp tour has done wonders to drum up interest. The class, right now, isn't glamorous from a star perspective, but Harbaugh is picking up a lot of guys that have power and speed. Furthermore, there is a lot of interest amongst blue chip players and I think that it's a matter of time before Michigan picks up some of these guys. One of the main factors is that those players tend to pick schools later in the cycle.
 

Zososoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2009
9,259
South of North
The staff is dishing out these offers based on in-person performances, but it's undeniable that these are not highly-touted recruits. This could be a case of the staff being ahead of the curve and stars are not the end all be all for results (the Hoke years provide ample evidence of that), but a correlation has been shown between recruiting ratings and results. I trust Jimmy and Co. to coach em up and outcoach the other side more often than not, but I'm surprised that they haven't gone after more heralded recruits.
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
Zososoxfan said:
The staff is dishing out these offers based on in-person performances, but it's undeniable that these are not highly-touted recruits. This could be a case of the staff being ahead of the curve and stars are not the end all be all for results (the Hoke years provide ample evidence of that), but a correlation has been shown between recruiting ratings and results. I trust Jimmy and Co. to coach em up and outcoach the other side more often than not, but I'm surprised that they haven't gone after more heralded recruits.
They are going after more touted recruits. The fact is that those recruits have longer timelines. I don't think they've really "missed" on any big recruits so far. With this camp system, I don't see any problem with Harbaugh snagging the guys that he likes, regardless of the rankings. Harbaugh is a competitive guy and he wants to win. I don't think that he's going to mess around offering "lower" ranked recruits. Also, keep in mind, that these rankings aren't final. Furthermore, it seems like a lot of these kids are from under-exposed programs. There is less evaluation at these schools and less talk about those kids. I'm not arguing for them to be rated higher or anything. I actually have no idea what to expect (this is pretty much the case for anyone that isn't a top top recruit to be honest).
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,076
The Granite State
I have to think Viramontes will be moved off of QB (to Safety?).  Harbaugh has recruited Gentry, Malzone (sort of), and Peters, three pass-first QBs.  Can't see him breaking the mold with this kid, but who knows. 
 
McKeon allegedly has one of the faster 40 times around for a TE, but he'll need to pack on 25-30lbs, so we'll see how well that holds up.
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
Zososoxfan said:
The staff is dishing out these offers based on in-person performances, but it's undeniable that these are not highly-touted recruits. This could be a case of the staff being ahead of the curve and stars are not the end all be all for results (the Hoke years provide ample evidence of that), but a correlation has been shown between recruiting ratings and results. I trust Jimmy and Co. to coach em up and outcoach the other side more often than not, but I'm surprised that they haven't gone after more heralded recruits.
You wanted highly touted recruits? Here you go. Ben Bredeson.
 

Zososoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2009
9,259
South of North
sachmoney said:
You wanted highly touted recruits? Here you go. Ben Bredeson.
 
Yup, my crow is delicious thank you. Very excited to have another bumper crop of top OL recruits come thru (even moreso this time around since I don't think Jim and Co. will bungle this). In fact, I expect our current OL to maul next year because they were highly rated recruits and now we have the coaching acumen to match.
 
But, this kind of reinforces my point, which is if Michigan is landing these consensus high-quality recruits, what was that run on unranked and 3-star prospects about.
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,076
The Granite State
Zososoxfan said:
But, this kind of reinforces my point, which is if Michigan is landing these consensus high-quality recruits, what was that run on unranked and 3-star prospects about.
To use Red Sox prospect-speak, Harbaugh and his staff have received commitments from a lot of "toolsy" athletes that will bring speed and versatility to the roster moving forward. A few will show high ceilings, but these kids are an injection of athleticism.

Harbaugh will reserve the last half dozen or so slots for playmakers and difference makers.
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
And don't be surprised if some of these kids reconsider their commitments. I'm not talking about them getting pushed out, but rather, a lot of these kids haven't visited campus yet and may change their minds. As I said before, some of these kids haven't gotten a real look from other college coaches and recruiting sites. They may receive offers from programs closer to home that may make them reconsider. It's not a guarantee, but it's something that shouldn't be a surprise either. 
 
Again, I don't have a problem with Harbaugh bringing some of these guys in if they're bringing things like athleticism, speed, grit, determination, work ethic...the program needs more of that. With kids committing virtually every day, I can't say that I'm not concerned about scholarship numbers and getting some of the "higher end" guys that are high on Michigan.
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
SoxJox said:
I wouldn't be at all surprised if 4* CB Lavert Hill (from Deeetroieeet) de-commits from Penn State and winds up at UM.
Yeah, I was going to say when you posted Penn State's commits that Lavert Hill will probably flip. I didn't want to be a wet blanket. His brother Delano is already at Michigan. Plus, Harbaugh.
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
Devery Hamilton, a OT out of Gilman, MD (same HS as Henry Poggi), committed. He projects as an left tackle, but is a bit of a project. General consensus is that he has very good athleticism for a guy his size. This has been a theme amongst Harbaugh recruits (the athleticism). Hamilton is the 19th commit.
 

WayBackVazquez

white knight against high school nookie
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2006
8,294
Los Angeles
On a plane, so I can't link right now, but Ron Johnson, a 4* DE has committed, also. This class is going to be fine, fine, fine.
 

WayBackVazquez

white knight against high school nookie
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2006
8,294
Los Angeles
Yeah, I saw that. Seems like sour grapes on the way out. They weren't going to let him play either way, he was going to get to keep his scholarship either way, and ultimately they're letting him transfer.
 

SoxJox

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2003
7,184
Rock > SoxJox < Hard Place
Ahem...you might be chagrined to learn that Phil Knight likely will be replaced by Mark Parker - a Penn State alumnus.  Of course, Parker has been President and CEO since 2006, so it's not like a cold slap.
 
And...
 
 
 
Despite the influential recommendation from Knight, Parker will still have to maneuver the governance regulations in place for selecting someone as important as a new chairman. Though the current chairman believes Parker is the best choice for the position, Nike’s Board of Directors will have the final say when the new chairman is officially selected sometime in 2016.
 
So it's not a lock.
 

WayBackVazquez

white knight against high school nookie
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2006
8,294
Los Angeles
Why would we be chagrined? Why would we care? What does where Nike's next chairman went to college have to do with anything? Why does your post belong in this thread, as opposed to the PSU thread, or maybe a Nike thread? 
 

SoxJox

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2003
7,184
Rock > SoxJox < Hard Place
WayBackVazquez said:
Why would we be chagrined? Why would we care? What does where Nike's next chairman went to college have to do with anything? Why does your post belong in this thread, as opposed to the PSU thread, or maybe a Nike thread? 
It was just a friendly poke. Sheesh.
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
I don't see the jab, Jox.
 
I'm very happy with this move. I do prefer Nike, though not to the extent that some people have shoe brand loyalty. Adidas didn't just go wrong with the hue of "maize." It was the basketball jerseys literally tearing during games. It was the ludicrous alternates. Was some of this propagated by our now former AD? Probably. It doesn't excuse the fact that the fan base and alumni were largely unhappy with Adidas.
 
To be honest, I was open to Under Armour too. Nike was my favorite. I'm glad that we're back with Nike.
 

SoxJox

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2003
7,184
Rock > SoxJox < Hard Place
My apologies then.  I generally come into the UM thread because it's a place for learning about a storied program's progress and to catch up on current Wolverine events.  I appreciate those that frequent here, including yourself and WBV.  Periodically, I like to contribute in [hopefully] meaningful and informed ways, too.  I'm not about taking a dump while visiting.
 
I honestly meant it in a friendly way. 
 

WayBackVazquez

white knight against high school nookie
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2006
8,294
Los Angeles
I wasn't really offended. Just seemed like a non sequitur.

Anyway, I've always been on the Nike bandwagon, for both the superficial and the (perceived) substantive benefits in recruiting and quality. It just seems like the right fit.
 

SoxJox

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2003
7,184
Rock > SoxJox < Hard Place
It's all good.
 
As you mention WBV, the benefits carry [not insignificant] superficial and perceived benefits.  But they can also can be very tangible and lucrative.  I didn't see in your linked article a $$ value for the new UM-Nike deal, but this article says UM hauled in $8.2/year in cash and equipment when they were with Adidas.  Penn State has gotten somewhere between $2M-3M/year  since joining forces with Nike in the early '90s.  Also citing the close relationship between Paterno and Knight, the article also mentions that $500K of Franklin 's $4.5M annual salary comes from Nike.  I wonder if similar terms are in play for Harbaugh.
 

SoxJox

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2003
7,184
Rock > SoxJox < Hard Place
I did find this article.  I'm imagining that the negotiations with Nike that prompted UM to move must have been something north of the 10-year $82-million deal with Adidas.  This will be BIG, no pun intended.
 
 
The value of Michigan's new deal with Nike won't be announced until later this month. But this chart shows what Big Ten schools made in 2014-15 with their individual apparel deals, according to the Portland Business Journal. Also listed are the top 10 deals nationally based on value during the 2014-15 academic year.
 
 
Big Ten
  • Michigan (Adidas) -- $8,200,000
  • Maryland (Under Armour) -- $4,300,000
  • Ohio State (Nike) -- $4,164,014
  • Nebraska (Adidas) -- $4,050,000
  • Indiana (Adidas) -- $3,795,000
  • Wisconsin (Adidas) -- $3,500,000
  • Purdue (Nike) -- $1,950,000
  • Iowa (Nike) -- $1,850,000
  • Michigan State (Nike) -- $1,600,000
  • Illinois (Nike) -- $1,525,000
Note: Data not available for Minnesota, Northwestern, Penn State and Rutgers.
 
 
Nationally
  • Michigan (Adidas) -- $8,200,000
  • UCLA (Adias) -- $7,500,000
  • Kansas (Adidas) -- $6,375,000
  • Louisville (Adidas) -- $5,680,000
  • Tennessee (Adidas) -- $5,500,000
  • Florida State (Nike) -- $4,400,000
  • Maryland (Under Armour) -- $4,300,000
  • Auburn (Under Armour) -- $4,300,000
  • LSU (Nike) -- $4,200,000
  • Ohio State (Nike) -- $4,164,014
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,808
Notre Dame's Under Armour deal signed in 2014 was supposedly the biggest at 10/90
 
I'm not sure why it isn't listed.
 

SoxJox

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2003
7,184
Rock > SoxJox < Hard Place
snowmanny said:
Notre Dame's Under Armour deal signed in 2014 was supposedly the biggest at 10/90
 
I'm not sure why it isn't listed.
I'm just guessing that it might be because the deal starts for the 2015-2016 academic year, which was outside the timeframe used to construct the list.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.