Watch for a new episode of The Dynasty to be made blaming everything in the report card on Bill.
Completely agree. If I'm paying a guy millions of dollars to play, I want everything about him to be peak - nutrition, training, lifting, etc.Funny thing is... you should want as much control over what your guys eat. Why chance them eating poorly when you can provide them a meal for not much money that is in keeping with what you want your guy eating.
I live in Eugene now, and the Ducks football facilities are the most impressive thing I’ve seen at any level.It could be the actual size of the gym itself. There’s only so much room to work with at Gillette, and some of these college facilities at the big state schools are massive.
The nutrition aspect of athletics is so important that all teams should want to do whatever they can do to get the players the food they need to be able to play their best. That's why every major college and pro teams have a training table that provides nutrition-based meals that can also be tailored to each player's needs.Funny thing is... you should want as much control over what your guys eat. Why chance them eating poorly when you can provide them a meal for not much money that is in keeping with what you want your guy eating.
Sometimes at work, I see some other team eating a catered lunch. I feel jealous and sad when that happens.The Revs were always notoriously cheap, Kraft had the rep as being one of the guys most opposed to the increased spending that newer owners pushed for.
https://nesn.com/2023/08/pete-carroll-shares-wild-story-about-robert-kraft-bologna-sandwiches/That situation from the start was a little challenging,” Carroll told Richard Sherman on the “Richard Sherman Podcast” on Tuesday. “We did everything first class in San Francisco. I mean, top drawer, treated the players great. It was a clear philosophy that I was bringing, I was excited to unveil. We’re having a minicamp, and I’m just checking the setup of it, how it’s organized.
I’m figuring into the menu for the players on that weekend. And Kraft comes to me and says, ‘Well, you know, we’re not gonna feed them like that. We give them bologna sandwiches, and chips and stuff like that.’ It hit me just as clear as a bell. I thought, ‘I’m in deep trouble. I mean, if I can’t even feed them the way I wanna feed them, what’s gonna come …’ I mean, he didn’t know what he was asking for at the time. We didn’t cover bologna sandwich stuff in interviews.
I know this is a separate topic, but I can't believe (unless I am wrong) that no MLB club does all the nutritional/meals for its minor league players. There HAS to be a way a the first team to do so gets some major advantage and benefits from it. A quick google search says that MiLB players get $25.00 per diem on the road only for meals. That is pathetic.Funny thing is... you should want as much control over what your guys eat. Why chance them eating poorly when you can provide them a meal for not much money that is in keeping with what you want your guy eating.
Keep in mind that the Carroll era was before the Patriots became the money making machine that they are now. Kraft might even have been still in the red after buying the team.
I’m confused by this, though, bc I’ve always heard the Patriots DO provide all the meals and have nutritionists on staff, and have always advocated for this kind of thing because it keeps the players in the facility all day, etc…
They do, that's why they scored decently in that area. People were mentioning it about other teams (for example the Bengals got hit hard last year on food and added availability for 3 meals a day) not the Patriots.I’m confused by this, though, bc I’ve always heard the Patriots DO provide all the meals and have nutritionists on staff, and have always advocated for this kind of thing because it keeps the players in the facility all day, etc…
If that's not A-plus what is?They do, that's why they scored decently in that area. People were mentioning it about other teams (for example the Bengals got hit hard last year on food and added availability for 3 meals a day) not the Patriots.
All the teams that do that, have better facilities, better road meals, players think the chefs are better, etc. Personalized meals 3 times a day based on nutritionist input is pretty common around the league.If that's not A-plus what is?
I think this is a smart approach, don't worry about anything in the B range or probably even the C range, you're just looking for the Ds and FsAll the teams that do that, have better facilities, better road meals, players think the chefs are better, etc. Personalized meals 3 times a day based on nutritionist input is pretty common around the league.
I think with most of this stuff in the survey, you're mostly looking for the bottom scores then the comments to see teams really slacking, otherwise it's going to fluctuate by how happy players are overall, etc. Hard to truly compare whether guy in NE saying he rates the food a 7/10 in taste is actually worse than the guy in MIA who rates it a 8/10. It's the ones who are getting Fs for not providing the expected level of nutrition/food planning/availability that you're looking for.
Of course, it’s a noisy sample - but I think it’s best understood as a directional indicator of player satisfaction. Comparing different teams within categories based on grades, with the possible exception of outlier grades, is generally gonna be a fruitless exercise.Kurt Warner made a good point on this on the radio this morning. How many of these guys giving grades have a frame of reference to make comparisons for different teams? No one knows all 32.
It's the inmates that switch prisons that the other inmates listen to comparing grub, guards, bedding etc. So at the end of the day I think the comparisons are fair.Kurt Warner made a good point on this on the radio this morning. How many of these guys giving grades have a frame of reference to make comparisons for different teams? No one knows all 32.
I can't imagine a scenario where the Jets GM/QB would allow the Patriots to outbid him for Davante Adams if he were available.In this Andy Hart explains how a potential Davante Adams trade could go down and it makes me want to weep. THAT would be a hell of a move. Getting a supposedly washed up former NFC North WR from the Raiders has a nice ring to it too.
https://www.youtube.com/live/g5mWI7i5PDs?si=Cc5i5b2xmNPcF-ew
Is there anyone worse than Fitzy and Hart? They're ok in small doses but they're intolerable for any 20+ minute period of time on the Rich Keefe show. If they were on Keefe's show 1-2 hours a week it'd be ok, but they're brutal for more than an hour.In this Andy Hart explains how a potential Davante Adams trade could go down and it makes me want to weep. THAT would be a hell of a move. Getting a supposedly washed up former NFC North WR from the Raiders has a nice ring to it too.
https://www.youtube.com/live/g5mWI7i5PDs?si=Cc5i5b2xmNPcF-ew
I also can't imagine a scenario where the Patriots trade a 1st plus for the age 32/33/34 seasons of a WR who they have to pay almost 90M for those 3 years. It makes zero sense.I can't imagine a scenario where the Jets GM/QB would allow the Patriots to outbid him for Davante Adams if he were available.
That would make it sweeter.I can't imagine a scenario where the Jets GM/QB would allow the Patriots to outbid him for Davante Adams if he were available.
I don't mind Fitzy and I usually can't stand Hart but I liked the Adams angle and thought it made sense. The other guy is a dipshit.Is there anyone worse than Fitzy and Hart? They're ok in small doses but they're intolerable for any 20+ minute period of time on the Rich Keefe show. If they were on Keefe's show 1-2 hours a week it'd be ok, but they're brutal for more than an hour.
If Evans is worth 2/52 then Davante is worth 3/90. I make that deal for next years first in a heartbeat.I also can't imagine a scenario where the Patriots trade a 1st plus for the age 32/33/34 seasons of a WR who they have to pay almost 90M for those 3 years. It makes zero sense.
I mean... he's not worth that to the Patriots at the cost of what is likely to be a 1st and a 2nd minimum. Why would you add a player that age to a team with a rookie QB and just holes all over the offense? Especially given there were some indications of decline already last year. Very very few WRs are effective into their 32, 33, 34 seasons.That would make it sweeter.
I don't mind Fitzy and I usually can't stand Hart but I liked the Adams angle and thought it made sense. The other guy is a dipshit.
If Evans is worth 2/52 then Davante is worth 3/90. I make that deal for next years first in a heartbeat.
Without actually hearing it, but based on your recap, that'a a real pro answer.Matthew Judon is on Good Morning Football today. Answering lots of questions re: BB, Coach Mayo, Free agency, the draft, Mac Jones and more. On Mac he said he felt he could make it back to being what he was in his first season, but was open to whatever leadership would do (so what you might expect a player to say to avoid any needless controversies re: Mac. He praised BB, is excited for the new staff, sold New England to Free Agents, he pushed for Calvin Ridley and wanted to add a RB Josh Jacobs among others.
The indications of decline are due to the QBs he’s had and the offenses he’s been a part of. I have less than zero doubt that Davante Adams would be a rookie QBs best friend. “Hey kid, throw me the ball, I’ll be open.” Instantly adds some credibility to the passing game. Adam’s still is an elite WR who is going to give you top 25 productivity numbers for the next 3 years. Next years first round pick may give you that in Adams last year if you’re lucky. I understand the over 32 angle and appreciate the research you did but this is no doubt hall of fame level talent. I’m betting on him having something to prove.I mean... he's not worth that to the Patriots at the cost of what is likely to be a 1st and a 2nd minimum. Why would you add a player that age to a team with a rookie QB and just holes all over the offense? Especially given there were some indications of decline already last year. Very very few WRs are effective into their 32, 33, 34 seasons.
Last year the most productive WR age 32 or older was Adam Thielen (1000 yards 59 per game), the year before it was.... Adam Thielen (716 yards 42 per game), 2021 it was AJ Green (850 yards, 53 a game), 2020 was Antonio Brown (500 yards 60 per game), 2019 was Edelman (1100 yards 70 per game), 2018 was DeSean Jackson (775 yards, 65 per game). These are all either 32 or 33 btw, last guy to have a good age 34 season was Fitz 7 years ago.
Adams was an elite WR, he's still a very good one, but the nature of WRs is that they tend to cliff hard in the beginning of their 30s. You don't trade for one and pay him unless you think you're 1 piece away from a SB. You're more likely to draft an impactful WR with that 1st than get good value out of Adams.
I just don't see the value. Like Tyron Smith... absolutely helps your QB just costs money, no long term negatives... a WR you trade premium draft assets for so your QB can complete a few more passes on your 6 win team, at the expense of real long term talent.... gross.The indications of decline are due to the QBs he’s had and the offenses he’s been a part of. I have less than zero doubt that Davante Adams would be a rookie QBs best friend. “Hey kid, throw me the ball, I’ll be open.” Instantly adds some credibility to the passing game. Adam’s still is an elite WR who is going to give you top 25 productivity numbers for the next 3 years. Next years first round pick may give you that in Adams last year if you’re lucky. I understand the over 32 angle and appreciate the research you did but this is no doubt hall of fame level talent. I’m betting on him having something to prove.
The value is undeniable. I take proven talent over the hopes and dreams of the draft 100 times out of 100. I understand there are people who hold a lot of perceived value to the draft picks because of the what ifs. Having a stud WR on a rookie contract for 4-5 years would be amazing. Hoping you end up in a position to draft one while you could have had stud receiver production already is a gamble.I just don't see the value. Like Tyron Smith... absolutely helps your QB just costs money, no long term negatives... a WR you trade premium draft assets for so your QB can complete a few more passes on your 6 win team, at the expense of real long term talent.... gross.
If Adams were a FA... sure I'd consider it, I'd probably still have reservations about his cap hits, but trading 1sts from bad teams for aging talent that doesn't change your outlook much..... that's what the worst teams in the league do, and it's why they stay the worst teams in the league. If you're trading 1sts for a WR... target somebody you can have for 4-5 years in their prime (Jefferson?). Or better yet, target guys with lesser pick demands (Jeudy, Sutton, etc.).
He did play 5 games with NE and picked off Josh Allen...Sorry but who is Alex Austin? Is he the CB who played well at the end of the year?
Ok yeah I thought he did a nice job.He did play 5 games with NE and picked off Josh Allen...
Developmental corner that played pretty well.
The Pats should perversely be selling the "BB stunted his development" angle. I don't think it's true but maybe someone bites. If they can get a 4th or 5th for him that's miraculous.EDIT: "According to NFL Media's Ian Rapoport, the Patriots "appear open to trading" their 2021 first-round quarterback this offseason. Teams across the league have reportedly been calling New England to inquire about Jones."
EDIT: "A recent report from the Boston Herald revealed that league executives believe Jones' trade value is a fifth- or sixth-round draft pick."
On the one hand, this level of comp for Mac seems like a gift. On the other, there's an argument to be made that, if you cross your fingers and squint really hard, he should be valued higher than that. Yes, obviously he’s become a total disaster, but a fresh start, an understanding of how BB and the staff bungled his development…who knows? I’d think SF, who was initially rumored (FWIW) to be thinking of drafting Mac at #3 overall, might pony up a 4th for him. There’s definitely value there, especially in their current QB-as-point-guard system. Surround Mac with an OL and all their weapons, who’s to say he couldn’t be as good if not better than Brock Purdy? (Answer: I am. I am to say. But still.)
https://www.nbcsportsboston.com/nfl/new-england-patriots/report-teams-calling-patriots-about-potential-mac-jones-trade/593860/?partner=yahoo
Yes, I would have guessed that we were in conditional pick territory.The Pats should perversely be selling the "BB stunted his development" angle. I don't think it's true but maybe someone bites. If they can get a 4th or 5th for him that's miraculous.
It's realistic. Look it how bad most of the QBs picked after round 2 end up being. I don't think the argument even needs to be BB stunted his development. He had a very good rookie year. The argument is he was already developed and the Patriots ruined him. It's a sentiment shared by a lot of people, including Tom Curran.The Pats should perversely be selling the "BB stunted his development" angle. I don't think it's true but maybe someone bites. If they can get a 4th or 5th for him that's miraculous.
This was funny -EDIT: "According to NFL Media's Ian Rapoport, the Patriots "appear open to trading" their 2021 first-round quarterback this offseason. Teams across the league have reportedly been calling New England to inquire about Jones."
EDIT: "A recent report from the Boston Herald revealed that league executives believe Jones' trade value is a fifth- or sixth-round draft pick."
On the one hand, this level of comp for Mac seems like a gift. On the other, there's an argument to be made that, if you cross your fingers and squint really hard, he should be valued higher than that. Yes, obviously he’s become a total disaster, but a fresh start, an understanding of how BB and the staff bungled his development…who knows? I’d think SF, who was initially rumored (FWIW) to be thinking of drafting Mac at #3 overall, might pony up a 4th for him. There’s definitely value there, especially in their current QB-as-point-guard system. Surround Mac with an OL and all their weapons, who’s to say he couldn’t be as good if not better than Brock Purdy? (Answer: I am. I am to say. But still.)
https://www.nbcsportsboston.com/nfl/new-england-patriots/report-teams-calling-patriots-about-potential-mac-jones-trade/593860/?partner=yahoo
Part of it too, is he's on the last year of his rookie deal. If he had two years left instead of one, the return would likely be higher. In this case, I think a 5th is realistic.I think I would staple a 5th to him if necessary. Thankfully they can just cut him. I'll be stunned if they get as high as a 5th and and absolutely amazed if they get a 4th.