This is now: BB and the direction of the Patriots

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
I dunno. I guess I'm in the minority, but anytime articles are primarily citing undisclosed sources...I dunno. I don't always believe them.

Like, I completely understand why people don't want to risk putting their name out there. At the same time, they DO want to put whatever they're saying out to the public. Sometimes it's for the right reasons, but alot of times it's not.

And that says nothing about the fact that some of these quotes could just be straight made the fuck up. If "journalistic integrity" is the only thing I have to trust in an article, I might as well believe every person that testifies in court. After all, why would they lie under oath?

It's getting harder and harder to trust anything you see nowadays.

Edit - although, fwiw, Kyed does feel like one of the guys we can trust.
Basically every article is somebody's agenda, so it helps to go into it trying to figure out who. In this case, I would guess the sources are a combination of owner-side, some players, and likely some BoB staff. That's not to say it's not true, but rather it is going to lack nuance and fit a narrative. In this case the narrative is clearly "Bill needs to go, he screwed up" with a good bit of self-interest in making sure the blame all falls on Bill by guys giving the quotes.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,569
What the article indicates to me is that ownership no longer trusts BB completely to manage things. The hiring of MP was so out there (and it failed so badly), that ownership felt compelled to meddle. Once that happens, I think it's hard to determine where the new line is. It's also probably tiresome for Bill. His left nut knows more about football than both Krafts combined, so why would he take their advice? In his mind, he should be able to try something, correct it (or not), etc. I would imagine this is the first thing he discusses with Harris or whomever he works for next, if that happens. It's also been a staple of the Kraft-BB relationship for the duration of his tenure. It's not surprising that once that starts to erode, things fall apart. (And the win/loss record is obviously shining a light on all of it.)
 
Last edited:

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,966
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
You're pretty much never going to get anything juicy from inside any organization from named sources, unless they're no longer there, have an axe to grind and are talking in the past tense. This is just journalism. Of course someone's pushing an agenda, which is why you need to approach it with some caution, but those guys aren't making those quotes up.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,512
You're pretty much never going to get anything juicy from inside any organization from named sources, unless they're no longer there, have an axe to grind and are talking in the past tense. This is just journalism. Of course someone's pushing an agenda, which is why you need to approach it with some caution, but those guys aren't making those quotes up.
I agree. But its also why Im a little surprised to see the pushback on guys like Trent Brown. I know he hasn't endeared himself here, but he's been openly critical of the team, which is refreshing to see in any sport. Unfortunately, that just means people call him a cancer and say hes "addition by subtraction" ...it is what it is, I guess. People ask you to be yourself just so they can judge you for it.
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
2,790
South Dartmouth, MA
I dunno. I guess I'm in the minority, but anytime articles are primarily citing undisclosed sources...I dunno. I don't always believe them.

Like, I completely understand why people don't want to risk putting their name out there. At the same time, they DO want to put whatever they're saying out to the public. Sometimes it's for the right reasons, but alot of times it's not.

And that says nothing about the fact that some of these quotes could just be straight made the fuck up. If "journalistic integrity" is the only thing I have to trust in an article, I might as well believe every person that testifies in court. After all, why would they lie under oath?

It's getting harder and harder to trust anything you see nowadays.

Edit - although, fwiw, Kyed does feel like one of the guys we can trust.
To add, it's also easy to twist whatever truth there actually is in a quote to make it fit your narrative (Bill has to go) better. The convo in question between Bill and Bob could've gone:
Bob: What are we gonna do about offensive coaching next season?
Bill: Well, obviously we need to improve. But I think trying to grow it with Matt is the slightly better option than giving our offense and 3rd year QB a 3rd OC in 3 years.
Bob: I see your point, but still it was so bad...I want a change.
Bill: Ok.
In the hypothetical world where that convo happened, it's not really a story. But twist that into some single tweet/quote where it looks like they were at total odds with each other and we've got clicks!
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,734
The MP hate was always about this board's copium with Mac. Everyone really, really badly wanted to believe that they hadn't whiffed on a QB, and so everything from the line, to the receivers, to especially the scheme and the coaches had let him down and set him up to fail.

I don't want to say Patricia was a good OC, and I was happy to see him go, but he certainly became the whipping boy in an effort to shunt criticism away from Mac in 2022.

Even now, you see people using language like "Mac broke", as if he was ever functional to begin with. There was a lot invested in believing he was going to be the guy.
Copium? Invested? Its not really that complicated. The fact that he didn't suck in 2021 might have had something to do with the fact that some people thought he wouldn't suck in 2022.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,420
The passage about how hard the team still competes, and how great Bill still is in the meeting room and with preparation, I think makes a case against letting him go. New ideas, energy, and personnel are definitely needed in both the FO and offensive coaching staff. I’m increasingly leaning towards the idea that Bill doesn’t necessarily have to relinquish final say/veto power for that to happen. I think/hope he’s still open minded enough to learn some new tricks.
The bolded is the crux of the issue: it's clear that BB doesn't want new ideas, energy, or personnel in the FO or offensive coaching staff. Even more so after seeing that he wanted to keep Patricia. The concept that he's going to stay on and we'll get all of the good parts of BB, but he'll also infuse his staff with new talent to minimize the bad parts of BB... that seems like a pipe dream.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,124
New York City
I dunno about that either, although obviously the results this year make it difficult to argue against.

It's never used as an excuse but man the team has been absolutely destroyed by injuries this year. DESTROYED. I can't remember a season with so many. 3 OLs out injured before the first game of the season. The bit about Calvin Anderson's "mysterious illness" was really weird and I don't know what the implication there was supposed to be.

The Malik Cunningham thing was silly, he's been inactive for Baltimore for every game too. He's just not that good.
The Browns have a third of their cap on IR and are on their fourth QB. Playoffs.

The Bills lost their two best defensive players. Playing for the division title.

The Pats’ problem isn’t the injuries. It’s the *starters* on offense all are worse than great and most are worse than good.
 

ragnarok725

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2003
6,424
Somerville MA
Copium? Invested? Its not really that complicated. The fact that he didn't suck in 2021 might have had something to do with the fact that some people thought he wouldn't suck in 2022.
His rookie year was his best year. But he wasn't good. He was average at best, and trending down over the course of the year, embarrassingly so after the Buffalo wind game. He threw some really bad INTs late in the season that were harbingers of things to come. Maybe because he snuck on to the Pro Bowl squad somehow, everyone expected him to take a leap in 2022 when I don't think there was a lot of evidence he was ready for that.

He was always a mediocre talent and he never took a leap. People wanted to blame that on the coaching in 2022. Was that reasonable? Sure, but I think there were far too many posts literally absolving Mac of any of his sins and putting it all on the coaching, which in retrospect was wishful thinking.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,342
You're pretty much never going to get anything juicy from inside any organization from named sources, unless they're no longer there, have an axe to grind and are talking in the past tense. This is just journalism. Of course someone's pushing an agenda, which is why you need to approach it with some caution, but those guys aren't making those quotes up.
Aren't we just a couple of weeks removed from sideline reporters admitting they make quotes up?

Anyway, that was posted mostly in jest. Sideline reports are designed to be content free, and I don't envision Kyed making up quotes. The biggest issue is that the quotes are taken without context. There's probably lots of explosions that happen inside NFL offices and locker rooms and coaches quarters every day. In A Football Life, Bill recalled Parcells yelling at him and Tom Coughlin that the game plans were all fucked up, and that was when the Giants were winning. Not saying there's no smoke or "nothing to see here"; just reinforcing the reality that there are a lot of agendas that are getting pushed.

I agree. But its also why Im a little surprised to see the pushback on guys like Trent Brown. I know he hasn't endeared himself here, but he's been openly critical of the team, which is refreshing to see in any sport. Unfortunately, that just means people call him a cancer and say hes "addition by subtraction" ...it is what it is, I guess. People ask you to be yourself just so they can judge you for it.
Brown did a soft holdout to get more money, and then decided he would practice and play when he wanted to. Unclear if the story about his telling everyone in the locker room that he was leaving is true, but if true that is a shitty thing to say in a locker room to players that are busting their ass so they don't get cut next week.

The Browns have a third of their cap on IR and are on their fourth QB. Playoffs.

The Bills lost their two best defensive players. Playing for the division title.

The Pats’ problem isn’t the injuries. It’s the *starters* on offense all are worse than great and most are worse than good.
Sometimes more than one thing can be true. Offense lacks talent, but the OL injuries were also a problem that exacerbated the team's struggles.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,324
from the wilds of western ma
The bolded is the crux of the issue: it's clear that BB doesn't want new ideas, energy, or personnel in the FO or offensive coaching staff. Even more so after seeing that he wanted to keep Patricia. The concept that he's going to stay on and we'll get all of the good parts of BB, but he'll also infuse his staff with new talent to minimize the bad parts of BB... that seems like a pipe dream.
Clear to who? Decisions that didn’t work out(Patricia) don’t necessarily indicate that he’s completely resistant to new ideas. He’s competitive, wants to win, seems to still want to do the job, and has embraced changes in the game throughout his career. I don’t think it’s nearly as much of a reach as you do.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,040
Deep inside Muppet Labs
The Browns have a third of their cap on IR and are on their fourth QB. Playoffs.

The Bills lost their two best defensive players. Playing for the division title.

The Pats’ problem isn’t the injuries. It’s the *starters* on offense all are worse than great and most are worse than good.
The Browns and the Bills have much better QBs than the Patriots do. While that's an oversimplification, it's also IMO the reason. When you lose games 10-7, 10-6, and 6-0, complete with abhorrent performances by the QB, that more or less sums up the issue. Most of us agree that the defense this year has been very good. But Mac cost them at least three very winnable games.

It's a sign of how bad Mac has turned out to be that Flacco has outperformed him after coming off his couch.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,470
Clear to who? Decisions that didn’t work out(Patricia) don’t necessarily indicate that he’s completely resistant to new ideas. He’s competitive, wants to win, seems to still want to do the job, and has embraced changes in the game throughout his career. I think it’s nearly as much of a reach as you do.
Well, from the article it sounds like Klemm’s new ideas / philosophy, for one, were pretty much completely ignored.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,040
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Clear to who? Decisions that didn’t work out(Patricia) don’t necessarily indicate that he’s completely resistant to new ideas. He’s competitive, wants to win, seems to still want to do the job, and has embraced changes in the game throughout his career. I think it’s nearly as much of a reach as you do.
It's odd to claim BB is resistant to new ideas literally one year after naming a lifelong DC as his OC.

I think a lot of coaches are stuck. If they do the usual, they get killed for being uncreative. If they do something unusual and it doesn't work, they get killed for going off track.

As always it all comes down to how much the media likes a coach. Mike McDaniel is still a darling and he's the guy who had his 3rd string QB throw 45 passes in a playoff game that was easily winnable with a better game plan.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,124
New York City
Sometimes more than one thing can be true. Offense lacks talent, but the OL injuries were also a problem that exacerbated the team's struggles.
Browns lost Jack Conklin, (2 time first team all pro) his replacement Dawand Jones, and Jedrick Willis on the OL this year. Other guys in spots, too.

They are playing their 4th string QB. They lost their best player by a mile, Nick Chubb, in week 2. They lost their 60 million dollar QB for half the season. They have played PJ Walker and DTR in multiple games this season. Neither is better than Mac.

Browns are 4th in the AFC in points scored.

You can’t do the injury game because literally every team is injured.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,040
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Browns lost Jack Conklin, (2 time first team all pro) his replacement Dawand Jones, and Jedrick Willis on the OL this year. Other guys in spots, too.

They are playing their 4th string QB. They lost their best player by a mile, Nick Chubb, in week 2. They lost their 60 million dollar QB for half the season. They have played PJ Walker and DTR in multiple games this season. Neither is better than Mac.

Browns are 4th in the AFC in points scored.

You can’t do the injury game because literally every team is injured.
Losing Watson was a benefit to them because he was terrible anyway.

Every team is injured. It's probably fair to say that the Pats in particular have been very badly hurt by injuries.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,124
New York City
The Browns and the Bills have much better QBs than the Patriots do. While that's an oversimplification, it's also IMO the reason. When you lose games 10-7, 10-6, and 6-0, complete with abhorrent performances by the QB, that more or less sums up the issue. Most of us agree that the defense this year has been very good. But Mac cost them at least three very winnable games.

It's a sign of how bad Mac has turned out to be that Flacco has outperformed him after coming off his couch.
To be fair, Flacco has outperformed everyone but Purdy and Lamar in the last 5 weeks.

But still, Flacco was on his couch and the Pats rolled out Mac week after week. Minnesota lost a QB and tried things. Cleveland lost multiple QBs and tried things.

The Pats and Jets? Didn’t try anything, just the same thing over and over. And they are the two worst offenses in the NFL.

It’s frustrating to throw away a season and I guess I am frustrated because other teams tried and the Pats just Macced.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,342
Well, from the article it sounds like Klemm’s new ideas / philosophy, for one, were pretty much completely ignored.
Except it didn't state or even imply who did the "ignoring". Was it Groh, with whom he supposedly had a shouting match? Bill O'Brien? Some of the veteran players? The rookies (unlikely)? Or Belichick himself? Or is the "ignoring" not a real thing, but instead the result of Klemm having to take a medical leave halfway through the season?
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,124
New York City
Losing Watson was a benefit to them because he was terrible anyway.

Every team is injured. It's probably fair to say that the Pats in particular have been very badly hurt by injuries.

As for PJ Walker and DTR, they are better than Mac simply because Mac is the worst QB in the NFL by a very long shot.
You didn’t watch DTR. This year, he was worse than anything.(could get better for him in the future because he’s fast and has a strong arm) PJ was not much better.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,040
Deep inside Muppet Labs
You didn’t watch DTR. This year, he was worse than anything.(could get better for him in the future because he’s fast and has a strong arm) PJ was not much better.
I deleted the sentence because I saw that at least with DTR it wasn't true.

My point remains about Mac though. With all the starters at the beginning of the year he has come in dead fucking last.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,342
Browns lost Jack Conklin, (2 time first team all pro) his replacement Dawand Jones, and Jedrick Willis on the OL this year. Other guys in spots, too.

They are playing their 4th string QB. They lost their best player by a mile, Nick Chubb, in week 2. They lost their 60 million dollar QB for half the season. They have played PJ Walker and DTR in multiple games this season. Neither is better than Mac.

Browns are 4th in the AFC in points scored.

You can’t do the injury game because literally every team is injured.
Agree to disagree; continuity is important when it comes to OL play, and the Pats had little of it this season. It was indeed a factor. Now, lack of quality depth was a roster management issue during the offseason, that bit them in the ass when play started. But the rookies got some playing time as a result, and Sow looks like a keeper going forward.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,040
Deep inside Muppet Labs
To be fair, Flacco has outperformed everyone but Purdy and Lamar in the last 5 weeks.

But still, Flacco was on his couch and the Pats rolled out Mac week after week. Minnesota lost a QB and tried things. Cleveland lost multiple QBs and tried things.

The Pats and Jets? Didn’t try anything, just the same thing over and over. And they are the two worst offenses in the NFL.

It’s frustrating to throw away a season and I guess I am frustrated because other teams tried and the Pats just Macced.
I think the Pats got into the middle of the season and decided once and for all is Mac could be The Guy, even as he and the team struggled. They gave him PLENTY of rope. I also think that's more or less a reasonable decision given he's on a rookie deal and in his 3rd year and they needed to know if he could figure things out.

Instead his last three games they scored 7,6, and 0 points. And finally BB said no mas.
 

Arroyoyo

New Member
Dec 13, 2021
842
Given the specificity of many of the stories shared in the article, I’m thinking one of the sources is JK or RK.

I read this - particularly given the timing - as “we’re getting ahead of story when it comes to why we’re parting with BB.”

This read to me like Bill’s gone. I’m guessing they have a trade to another team lined up.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,171
Hingham, MA
His rookie year was his best year. But he wasn't good. He was average at best, and trending down over the course of the year, embarrassingly so after the Buffalo wind game. He threw some really bad INTs late in the season that were harbingers of things to come. Maybe because he snuck on to the Pro Bowl squad somehow, everyone expected him to take a leap in 2022 when I don't think there was a lot of evidence he was ready for that.

He was always a mediocre talent and he never took a leap. People wanted to blame that on the coaching in 2022. Was that reasonable? Sure, but I think there were far too many posts literally absolving Mac of any of his sins and putting it all on the coaching, which in retrospect was wishful thinking.
I think this is revisionist history. Mac was not great down the stretch but he was by no means a disaster. I mean back in the day Tom Brady finished the year throwing 3 TDs vs 6 INT over his last 8 games and no one was too worried. Mac played horribly against Buffalo at home late 2021 but was more or less “meh” against Miami and in the playoff game, and great against an awful Jags team. No one foresaw his downfall coming.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
What the article indicates to me is that ownership no longer trusts BB completely to manage things. The hiring of MP was so out there (and it failed so badly), that ownership felt compelled to meddle. Once that happens, I think it's hard to determine where the new line is. It's also probably tiresome for Bill. His left nut knows more about football than both Krafts combined, so why would he take their advice? In his mind, he should be able to try something, correct it (or not), etc. I would imagine this is the first thing he discusses with Harris or whomever he works for next, if that happens. It's also been a staple of the Kraft-BB relationship for the duration of his tenure. It's not surprising that once that starts to erode, things fall apart. (And the win/loss record is obviously shining a light on all of it.)
So in hindsight.... did it?

Wasn't great, but also, not that out of line with the ends of 2021 when good teams started keying on Mac's weaknesses. They won (and put up a ton of points) with mid-round slinghot armed Bailey Zappe. I think more than anything else, it was people's unrealistic hopes for Mac, and that Patricia was a former defensive coach that make people think it was a total failure.

LAst year the Patriots were 19th in Y/P, 19th in passing TDs, 23rd in TOV%, 23rd in score%, 22nd in Y/A rushing. Undoubtedly a step back from the previous year, but still more of a below average to bad offense than a truly terrible one.

This year they are: 29th in Y/P, 26th in passing TDs, 26th in TOV%, 32nd in score%, 25th in y/a rushing.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,420
Clear to who? Decisions that didn’t work out(Patricia) don’t necessarily indicate that he’s completely resistant to new ideas. He’s competitive, wants to win, seems to still want to do the job, and has embraced changes in the game throughout his career. I don’t think it’s nearly as much of a reach as you do.
BB's staff is primarily comprised of family members, previous BB coaches previous BB players, and children of croneys. When given the opportunity to hire outside voices - like when Josh left - he hired Matt Patricia and Joe Judge, previous coaches he worked with. When those guys were taken off OC duties, he had another chance and brought back BoB. When given the opportunity to hire an offensive line coach, he hired Adrian Klemm. Wide Receivers coach? Troy Brown can do it. Defensive coordinator? The best answer to that question is his son (obviously!) and his former MLB. I don't know how he could make it any clearer - he might be competitive, but he doesn't view new voices - especially strong ones - as a way to be more competitive.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,342
BB's staff is primarily comprised of family members, previous BB coaches previous BB players, and children of croneys. When given the opportunity to hire outside voices - like when Josh left - he hired Matt Patricia and Joe Judge, previous coaches he worked with. When those guys were taken off OC duties, he had another chance and brought back BoB. When given the opportunity to hire an offensive line coach, he hired Adrian Klemm. Wide Receivers coach? Troy Brown can do it. Defensive coordinator? The best answer to that question is his son (obviously!) and his former MLB. I don't know how he could make it any clearer - he might be competitive, but he doesn't view new voices - especially strong ones - as a way to be more competitive.
Most NFL coaching staffs consist of former players and family members and assistants with whom the head worked with before. Been like that since forever.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,239
Newton
Given the specificity of many of the stories shared in the article, I’m thinking one of the sources is JK or RK.

I read this - particularly given the timing - as “we’re getting ahead of story when it comes to why we’re parting with BB.”

This read to me like Bill’s gone. I’m guessing they have a trade to another team lined up.
Didn’t the Herald do a similar piece last year?
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,124
New York City
Most NFL coaching staffs consist of former players and family members and assistants with whom the head worked with before. Been like that since forever.
But the revolving door of the same guys coming and going isn’t the same.

There is nothing like the coaching staff of the Pats that resembles anything like the rest of the NFL. This is mostly due to the longevity of Bill but also because he’s the GM. There hasn’t been a new voice in over a decade. It’s the same guys. Over and over.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,947
New England. Not even close.

LAC has a 2 year rebuild, minimum. Their roster is bad and overpaid. At least the Pats are just bad. Plus better ownership. LAC is a joke. They have always been a joke and they will always be a joke.

And it does seem like Herbert has the ball at the end of every game with a chance to win and he turns into Mac Jones. He's great but the results are actually not that great. Granted, a lot of that is because his offensive line are 5 turnstiles. Still, you need to see results eventually and he's 0-4 in his first four seasons. Made the playoffs as many times as Mac Jones, in one extra season, and lost a 27 point lead in it, too.
Rashawn Slater, Derwin James, Joey Bosa are all very good players. Jamaree Salyer and Zion Johnson have potential on the OL. Some hyperbole on this thread about just how bad the Chargers are. I think Brandon Staley was one of the worst coaches in football. I wouldn't be surprised at all if a good coach juiced up that team and they looked good next year
 

Silverdude2167

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 9, 2006
4,735
Amstredam
Given the specificity of many of the stories shared in the article, I’m thinking one of the sources is JK or RK.

I read this - particularly given the timing - as “we’re getting ahead of story when it comes to why we’re parting with BB.”

This read to me like Bill’s gone. I’m guessing they have a trade to another team lined up.
This is my read as well.

All these reports reak of the Krafts building a foundation for their decision. They could easily quash this and haven't, the silence is deafening.

There would be no harm in putting out a statement in support of Bill even if a decision on the future had not been made yet and yet nothing.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,947
It's odd to claim BB is resistant to new ideas literally one year after naming a lifelong DC as his OC.

I think a lot of coaches are stuck. If they do the usual, they get killed for being uncreative. If they do something unusual and it doesn't work, they get killed for going off track.

As always it all comes down to how much the media likes a coach. Mike McDaniel is still a darling and he's the guy who had his 3rd string QB throw 45 passes in a playoff game that was easily winnable with a better game plan.
Because Patricia is a Belichick guy that would presumably agree with BB's ideas on offense. I think you're mistaking what people are saying when they say "new ideas". It's meant to mean new voices outside of the Belichick "tree", especially on offense.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,342
There would be no harm in putting out a statement in support of Bill even if a decision on the future had not been made yet and yet nothing.
What has been mildly disappointing is we haven't even heard the infamous "kiss of death" style vote of confidence. I understand the argument that past accomplishments do not necessarily guarantee life tenure in the coaching and GM ranks of an NFL team (although people should use the same argument when it comes to Pete Carroll, but they don't for some reason). Kraft & Kraft certainly have the right to move on from Bill if they feel it's time. However, they sort of left him hung out to dry in front of the media this season, which is not fair as Belichick does deserve better.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,947
I'll be honest, it's pretty wild to me to read people retroactively sticking up for Patricia as an offensive coordinator. And the fact that Nick Sirriani just promoted him has nothing to do with anything...Sirriani promoted him to be a defensive coordinator, which is the side of the ball that Patricia made his bones on.

Sometimes there's a want to dig really deep into something where there isn't any need to. It was a weird hire from the jump and it didn't work. You don't have to parse it a million different ways to try and make it make sense, sometimes the initial smell test is all you need
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,472
Overland Park, KS
The Pats are the lowest-scoring team in football, the Panthers have scored more points. Besides Onwenu at RT, David Andrews at C, Pop at WR, and maybe Henry and Stevenson, the offensive roster blows. Mac was horrendous, Zappe isn't much better but this team needs pieces all over the offensive side of the ball. Do any of these players look like they are getting better? I think they need to overhaul the offensive coaching staff, use their top 100 picks all on offense, and back up the Brinks truck for Tee Higgins.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
I'll be honest, it's pretty wild to me to read people retroactively sticking up for Patricia as an offensive coordinator. And the fact that Nick Sirriani just promoted him has nothing to do with anything...Sirriani promoted him to be a defensive coordinator, which is the side of the ball that Patricia made his bones on.

Sometimes there's a want to dig really deep into something where there isn't any need to. It was a weird hire from the jump and it didn't work. You don't have to parse it a million different ways to try and make it make sense, sometimes the initial smell test is all you need
Was he officially promoted to DC by Siriani? I thought Dasai remained the DC, but Patricia took over the defensive play calling in game.

Which has certainly worked, LOL. They lost 20-17 to Seattle, beat the Giants 33-25 and lost to the fucking Cardinals at home 35-31 since the switch.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,947
Was he officially promoted to DC by Siriani? I thought Dasai remained the DC, but Patricia took over the defensive play calling in game.

Which has certainly worked, LOL. They lost 20-17 to Seattle, beat the Giants 33-25 and lost to the fucking Cardinals at home 35-31 since the switch.
Correct. I meant promoted in the sense that he is now the defensive play caller.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
I'll be honest, it's pretty wild to me to read people retroactively sticking up for Patricia as an offensive coordinator. And the fact that Nick Sirriani just promoted him has nothing to do with anything...Sirriani promoted him to be a defensive coordinator, which is the side of the ball that Patricia made his bones on.

Sometimes there's a want to dig really deep into something where there isn't any need to. It was a weird hire from the jump and it didn't work. You don't have to parse it a million different ways to try and make it make sense, sometimes the initial smell test is all you need
I'm not saying he was good, I'm saying that people treated it like he was the whole problem or he was so far below the worst other OCs.... he wasn't, he was just a regular bad OC, and the offense getting significantly worse after he left shows that. It was easy to say "he's a defensive coach, this is malpractice" but even then some noted that's not entirely true, he coached both sides early in his career and he was a head coach, where he was undoubtedly involved in offense quite a bit. I thought it was a dumb move, but their options were not great with Josh leaving after a lot of guys were settled, and taking his number 2 with him to be his OC.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,171
Hingham, MA
I'm not saying he was good, I'm saying that people treated it like he was the whole problem or he was so far below the worst other OCs.... he wasn't, he was just a regular bad OC, and the offense getting significantly worse after he left shows that.
I don’t think it shows anything TBH. Either direction.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
I don’t think it shows anything TBH. Either direction.
I do. Oh I'm not saying Patricia was better than BOB, but rather that it wasn't like you just slot in a new OC and MAGIC which a lot of people thought would happen. The talent this year isn't any worse than last... less healthy for sure, but same level generally, the injuries and regression on the QB made the team worse, which is what you'd expect. People liked to treat it like last year was rock bottom and that Patricia and company where just smearing feces on the walls.

If we had run the exact same offense last year, but Ivan Fears was the coach running it, nobody would treat it the way they did with Patricia.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,966
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I don’t think it shows anything TBH. Either direction.
It does show something. It shows the offensive coaching staff last year wasn't a historic catastrophe and personnel was more at fault for their performance than most people previously believed. I mean, just look at how BOB's hiring was received, I remember reading someone in this very board argue BOB would represent a bigger improvement for the 2023 Patriots than keeping Patricia as OC and replacing Mac Jones with prime Tom Brady would. In retrospect, we all vastly overestimated his impact in the offense's suckitude last year.
 

Zincman

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
441
New London
Most NFL coaching staffs consist of former players and family members and assistants with whom the head worked with before. Been like that since forever.
Absolutely correct and it sometimes obscures the fact that many of them are outstanding. Steve Belichick needs to go elsewhere to prove his coaching chops which are substantial but lost in the aura of his father.
 

Beomoose

is insoxicated
SoSH Member
May 28, 2006
21,506
Exiled
...and back up the Brinks truck for Tee Higgins.
Apologies for the snip, but this brings up something that's been kicking around in my head for a bit: with Bill and Brady both gone, no replacement franchise QB (pending the outcome of Draft Day) and (potentially) a first-time head coach, how appealing is NE as a FA destination ahead of next season? Sure, if Mayo puts together a stronger-than-expected campaign next season we start looking like a good option in 2025, but in '24? Is Kraft going to have to seriously overpay to lure in top-shelf talent?
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,966
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Apologies for the snip, but this brings up something that's been kicking around in my head for a bit: with Bill and Brady both gone, no replacement franchise QB (pending the outcome of Draft Day) and (potentially) a first-time head coach, how appealing is NE as a FA destination ahead of next season? Sure, if Mayo puts together a stronger-than-expected campaign next season we start looking like a good option in 2025, but in '24? Is Kraft going to have to seriously overpay to lure in top-shelf talent?
He's going to have to pay the most money, which is also how the Dynasty-era Patriots acquired high level FAs in their prime. They won't entice productive veterans near the end of their careers to come in for cheap as they once did, but the guys like Gilmore, Colvin and Adalius Thomas came in for big cash, and that's what they'll have to spend to get them now as well.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
Apologies for the snip, but this brings up something that's been kicking around in my head for a bit: with Bill and Brady both gone, no replacement franchise QB (pending the outcome of Draft Day) and (potentially) a first-time head coach, how appealing is NE as a FA destination ahead of next season? Sure, if Mayo puts together a stronger-than-expected campaign next season we start looking like a good option in 2025, but in '24? Is Kraft going to have to seriously overpay to lure in top-shelf talent?
Unless they are quite old top shelf talent generally goes wherever the money is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.