Is he dirty in Germany because he’s English? I have on good authority he wasn’t considered dirty in England because he’s Englandish.Absolutely no reason to lead with the elbow out especially after the look....dirty play by Kane.
As someone who watches and roots against Real Madrid on a weekly basis, this is just what they do. They will sucker you in to pushing just a little bit more, not really giving up great chances, then they counter.City have largely been good but man is it terrifying when Madrid get it on the counter. Absolutely no way we don't concede again so have to hope we at least score another and can try to take care of it at home hopefully with a little more health
Yeah they seem comfortable to play the way the Prem teams who give us trouble do. Not trying to dominate possession and not bothered about having to defend a lot. Just do a job and then let the quality shine through when you throw numbers forwardAs someone who watches and roots against Real Madrid on a weekly basis, this is just what they do. They will sucker you in to pushing just a little bit more, not really giving up great chances, then they counter.
But Man City ain’t Betis…
It usually works for them. Not too many La Liga teams are scoring three golazos from outside the 18.Yeah they seem comfortable to play the way the Prem teams who give us trouble do. Not trying to dominate possession and not bothered about having to defend a lot. Just do a job and then let the quality shine through when you throw numbers forward
You can't trip a player but not be called for a foul because he was "looking for it" if that was the other way it would have been given.Saka is certainly looking for it, but that's still an obvious pen.
If you're referring to the 90+4' incident that i just saw on reddit then i would urge you to not go full liverpool fan here. That was a ridiculous diveNot giving that penalty is insane, the penalty given in the first half the player had no chance of shooting and was just sprinting in the box losing his balance when there was contact.
How that is any different beyond Saka had more control of the ball is beyond me.
If it's not a penalty it's a card...ref did not want to decide the game. Same reason he did not give a clear fouls at the top of the box 30 seconds earlier.If you're referring to the 90+4' incident that i just saw on reddit then i would urge you to not go full liverpool fan here. That was a ridiculous dive
If you're forced to choose it's definitely a card. I'm not sure why you're arguing for that but Saka absolutely dove take a step back and look at it is neutrallyIf it's not a penalty it's a card...ref did not want to decide the game. Same reason he did not give a clear fouls at the top of the box 30 seconds earlier.
Because if it's not a card it's a penalty, you can't say there isn't a foul (pen or simulation) there the ref has to make a call.If you're forced to choose it's definitely a card. I'm not sure why you're arguing for that but Saka absolutely dove take a step back and look at it is neutrally
If you're referring to the 90+4' incident that i just saw on reddit then i would urge you to not go full liverpool fan here. That was a ridiculous dive
I understand you're biased here lol, but this is nonsense. Neuer sticks his leg out and completely misses the ball blocking Saka’s path. In slow motion it looks like Saka trails his leg, but realistically it's difficult to get out of the way running at that speed. Like others have said, it's a 50/50 call.If you're forced to choose it's definitely a card. I'm not sure why you're arguing for that but Saka absolutely dove take a step back and look at it is neutrally
In this case I’m not biased. If anything I think I’d rather Arsenal win and have more matches to play. It’s not in any way a 50/50 and the saying “I’ve seen it given” is a fans way of acknowledging it’s probably not a penalty but you wish it had gone your way. Neuer plants his foot and doesn’t move it and Saka dives. He should have been carded. It was also dumb because he might have been able to score. There’s no need to act like this was anything but a diveI understand you're biased here lol, but this is nonsense. Neuer sticks his leg out and completely misses the ball blocking Saka’s path. In slow motion it looks like Saka trails his leg, but realistically it's difficult to get out of the way running at that speed. Like others have said, it's a 50/50 call.
BBCManager Thomas Tuchel revealed after the game that he felt his side should have been awarded another spot-kick.
It related to a bizarre incident in which he felt Gabriel handled the ball after an Arsenal goal-kick had been taken.
"The referee did not have the courage today to give us a deserved penalty, in a bit of a crazy and awkward situation," he said.
"What makes us really angry is the explanation on the field. He told our players that it's a kid's mistake and he will not give a penalty like this in a quarter-final."
I'm happy with this not being a penalty but I think your description is a little off.In this case I’m not biased. If anything I think I’d rather Arsenal win and have more matches to play. It’s not in any way a 50/50 and the saying “I’ve seen it given” is a fans way of acknowledging it’s probably not a penalty but you wish it had gone your way. Neuer plants his foot and doesn’t move it and Saka dives. He should have been carded. It was also dumb because he might have been able to score. There’s no need to act like this was anything but a dive