10/24- Sharks @ Bruins

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,252
306, row 14
Another undefeated team. Let’s give the Sharks their first loss.

Forwards are getting banged up, not sure what the lineup will look like. Foligno and Blidh are out, Smith is questionable. Studnicka is coming up, likely with Oscar Steen too.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,169
Cambridge, MA
Couple seats up on the exchange for 328 row 2, willing to sell the pair for $60

gone
 
Last edited:

McDrew

Set Adrift on Memory Bliss
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,075
Portland, OR
The sharks do not have an answer for the first line and the first 3 minutes and two goals have made that clear.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,717
Does anyone have any idea why this is blacked out in Chicago on NHLtv? This is some bullshit.
 

Gorton Fisherman

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 26, 2002
2,485
Port Orange, FL
Well FWIW, ESPN+ is not a terrible deal, 6.99/mo or 69.99 for a year, which is less than what the single-team NHL.tv package cost for a full season. Plus you get a lot more stuff besides hockey.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,717
Well FWIW, ESPN+ is not a terrible deal, 6.99/mo or 69.99 for a year, which is less than what the single-team NHL.tv package cost for a full season. Plus you get a lot more stuff besides hockey.
Yeah but now I have to set it up eleventy bazillion devices. Lol
 

ColdSoxPack

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
Jul 14, 2005
2,470
Simi Valley, CA
Well FWIW, ESPN+ is not a terrible deal, 6.99/mo or 69.99 for a year, which is less than what the single-team NHL.tv package cost for a full season. Plus you get a lot more stuff besides hockey.
I have a great internet package but the ESPN+ quality is below what I get from NESN on Directv. Anyone else think the stream is inferior?