“Because I’m feelin’ it, the ball will be placed at the spot of the foul.”Fucking even penalty announcements suck. By rule.
You could have a buzzer on the ref’s hip or something. If we want the rule to be 40 seconds “give or take,” I guess that’s ok, but if we are settling for that because it’s hard to officiate, we could fix that if we cared to.Delay of game is called the same way at every level of the sport, including youth and high-school ball where the play clock is kept on the field — the official in charge of the call watches the clock until it hits zero, then checks to see if the ball has been snapped, then throws a flag if it hasn’t been. I don’t think we need to change that just because there are over a dozen cameras filming NFL games in HD, such that those of us at home can tell when the ball is snapped a quarter second late.
Too soon.I think that means Alabama gets in instead.
Guess those rule changes aren't doing much. More practice time by Olines would probably have a better effect.Lawrence
Burrow
Cousins
Rodgers
Watson
Richardson
Jones
Fields
25% of starters missing significant time.
Who am I missing?
Pickett will probably miss some weeksLawrence
Burrow
Cousins
Rodgers
Watson
Richardson
Jones
Fields
25% of starters missing significant time.
Who am I missing?
We aren’t settling. We’re doing what we’ve always done, because to do otherwise would make the game worse. No one wants more flags. And it would be ironic to delay the game so we can call more delay-of-game penalties.You could have a buzzer on the ref’s hip or something. If we want the rule to be 40 seconds “give or take,” I guess that’s ok, but if we are settling for that because it’s hard to officiate, we could fix that if we cared to.
They apparently think Browning can march them into FG range in 25 seconds.Why would the Bengals call timeout?
I’m not swayed. The NFL has taken an objective event and made it subjective (I’m not sure why the NFL needs to worry about how lower levels of football enforce the rule). I think simply enforcing the letter of the law is very low-hanging fruit, to the point that nice, ripe apples are lying all over the ground under the tree.Delay of game is called the same way at every level of the sport, including youth and high-school ball where the play clock is kept on the field — the official in charge of the call watches the clock until it hits zero, then checks to see if the ball has been snapped, then throws a flag if it hasn’t been. I don’t think we need to change that just because there are over a dozen cameras filming NFL games in HD, such that those of us at home can tell when the ball is snapped a quarter second late.
Thanks for this. I’ll sleep well tonightTime gets us all eventually.
I’m just not getting it. I view the play clock as like a shot clock, not just a keep the game moving device.We aren’t settling. We’re doing what we’ve always done, because to do otherwise would make the game worse. No one wants more flags. And it would be ironic to delay the game so we can call more delay-of-game penalties.
Team Fred on this issue.I’m not swayed. The NFL has taken an objective event and made it subjective (I’m not sure why the NFL needs to worry about how lower levels of football enforce the rule). I think simply enforcing the letter of the law is very low-hanging fruit, to the point that nice, ripe apples are lying all over the ground under the tree.
It’s a nice little distraction, this discussion, until it decides a critical game. It will give the Pat McAfees something to talk about for a couple of days. Then they’ll seek to fix it. That’s how we do it.
This is barely related but I have always wondered why you can still score after the clock hits zero in basketball and football but not hockey.I’m just not getting it. I view the play clock as like a shot clock, not just a keep the game moving device.
I’m a soccer fan, so I can live with clocks being advisory. But when you have a clock in U.S. sports, you generally have a clock. I mean I don’t feel strongly, but I like rules. The neighborhood play was always the way it was done, until technology and review made it better.
Again don’t feel strongly and enjoy the discussion.
Never really thought about that.This is barely related but I have always wondered why you can still score after the clock hits zero in basketball and football but not hockey.
In practice, it will never be called much differently on the field than it is now. Maybe you could make it a point of emphasis to look up quickly when the clock hits zero, but it’s not possible to look at the ball and the play clock simultaneously.I’m just not getting it. I view the play clock as like a shot clock, not just a keep the game moving device.
I’m a soccer fan, so I can live with clocks being advisory. But when you have a clock in U.S. sports, you generally have a clock. I mean I don’t feel strongly, but I like rules. The neighborhood play was always the way it was done, until technology and review made it better.
Again don’t feel strongly and enjoy the discussion.
JobbedDidn't even look like a hold to me. The defender just fell down.