So....who is the new GM/head of baseball ops?

Status
Not open for further replies.

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,728
Dave Dombrowski took over a Tigers team that won 66 games the year before he got there. He then spent four years building them into a winner (oh huh, look at that: the same amount of time Bloom had with the Sox. . . ) and then kept them winners for the next 9 years. What a short-term thinking sell out!
In fairness in his first four years the Tigers record was 241-406 with a high water mark of 72-90 in his third year. In his fifth year the Tigers began winning. Boston is 269-268 in the last four seasons. If the Red Sox had played .373 ball the last four years people would be at the gates with flamethrowers and machetes.
 
Last edited:

Jeff Van GULLY

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
4,038
This will be Derek Falvey’s job if he wants it. Local guy, dream job. Has the ownership group’s actions over the past few years disillusioned him?

I think he would be a fantastic choice as well.
 

mikcou

Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2007
927
Boston
True, exactly which guys he would have traded is speculative, because we can't perform laboratory experiments in real life. But, he did trade away highly regarded prospects (e.g. were it not for injuries, Kopech and Moncada would look like big losses).

From what I read at the time, the Sox fired DD because he wanted to stay on the path of trading away prospects to "win now." I'm glad the Sox fired him when they did because to keep on winning he would have had to trade away prospects like Devers, Bogaerts, E-Rod, etc., which would have been the wrong way to go.
This idea that Moncada and Kopech being somehow big losses is a huge counterfactual. Moncada hasnt been good in years; maybe if he didnt have injuries, hed be better, but hes been a slightly above replacement player while on the field for years. It isnt just that hes missing time, its that he isnt good while hes on the field. Kopech has thrown 130 innings this year... and has similarily been terrible.

There is more going on then injuries here.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,464
This will be Derek Falvey’s job if he wants it. Local guy, dream job. Has the ownership group’s actions over the past few years disillusioned him?

I think he would be a fantastic choice as well.
Under contract with MIN through 2024
 

tdaignault

New Member
Jul 27, 2005
59
A vote here for Romero and Cora:

https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2023/09/alex-cora-red-sox-front-office-member-are-2-best-gm-candidates-smith.html

Personally I feel a lot better about Romero's experiences translating to a step up than Cora jumping into the front office.
- I hardly think Cora's serving as GM both for Criollos de Caguas and Team Puerto Rico in the 2017 WBC provide any indication he is prepared to run an MLB front office.
- I also don't feel you can compare moving from MLB manager to the GM slot to moving from NBA head coach to GM. An MLB GM has for more responsibilities than an NBA GM in terms of managing an entire organization with multiple minor league teams.
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,762
The Dombo narrative in this thread is bizarre. Minor league player development is 1 part acquisition 100 parts development. The robust player development team winnowed down under Dombrowski to a bottom third level in baseball. He completely ignored sports science when all the great teams in baseball were investing. When he left the Red Sox had 8 people in sports science and they now have 34, which rivals the dodgers and Astros. Under Bloom, Casas had his swing realigned to generate more power, Crawford's motion was rebalanced to create deception and Bello's entire arsenal was rebuilt. You cannot simply say Dombrowski acquired these guys therefore they would have been the same under his tutelage.

Dombrowski's problem wasn't just paying too much in trades it was an overall neglect of any modernization of his process. I actually think he's learned from that mistake as Sam Fuld apparently has a lot more pull and the Phillies are investing in the things he neglected here, but there's a reason there aren't' very many Dombrowski type baseball executives anymore. That process does not work to create sustainable success. His contracts for Eovadli, Sale, the opt outs for Bogaerts etc were all "NOW" signings with no eye on the future. It's not enough to say he built a champion therefore he got a bad deal. He did supplement a strong foundation and build the greatest red sox team any of us have ever seen. He also razed the organization's future to the ground to do it. Not just in trades, not just with contracts, not just with neglecting the player development process, but with a basic disregard for the future impact of all of those things.

Anyway - I find the relitigating of the Dombrowski and Bloom tenures in this thread to be frustrating because there doesn't appear to be much middle ground. I realize I'm guilty of this as well. I think we'd all be better off realizing what our previous three Baseball Ops leaders did well, and where they were fatally flawed, and why none of them were the god Theo.

Whoever is next needs to have the pro player evaluation/leadership courage we enjoyed under Dombrowski and the commitment to organizational infrastructure/player development/amateur scouting of Chaim Bloom.

Is that person out there and available? Mike Hazen is that guy but I have a really hard time imagining him uprooting his kids given their personal circumstances but who knows.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,555
The Dombo narrative in this thread is bizarre. Minor league player development is 1 part acquisition 100 parts development. The robust player development team winnowed down under Dombrowski to a bottom third level in baseball. He completely ignored sports science when all the great teams in baseball were investing. When he left the Red Sox had 8 people in sports science and they now have 34, which rivals the dodgers and Astros. Under Bloom, Casas had his swing realigned to generate more power, Crawford's motion was rebalanced to create deception and Bello's entire arsenal was rebuilt. You cannot simply say Dombrowski acquired these guys therefore they would have been the same under his tutelage.

Dombrowski's problem wasn't just paying too much in trades it was an overall neglect of any modernization of his process. I actually think he's learned from that mistake as Sam Fuld apparently has a lot more pull and the Phillies are investing in the things he neglected here, but there's a reason there aren't' very many Dombrowski type baseball executives anymore. That process does not work to create sustainable success. His contracts for Eovadli, Sale, the opt outs for Bogaerts etc were all "NOW" signings with no eye on the future. It's not enough to say he built a champion therefore he got a bad deal. He did supplement a strong foundation and build the greatest red sox team any of us have ever seen. He also razed the organization's future to the ground to do it. Not just in trades, not just with contracts, not just with neglecting the player development process, but with a basic disregard for the future impact of all of those things.

Anyway - I find the relitigating of the Dombrowski and Bloom tenures in this thread to be frustrating because there doesn't appear to be much middle ground. I realize I'm guilty of this as well. I think we'd all be better off realizing what our previous three Baseball Ops leaders did well, and where they were fatally flawed, and why none of them were the god Theo.

Whoever is next needs to have the pro player evaluation/leadership courage we enjoyed under Dombrowski and the commitment to organizational infrastructure/player development/amateur scouting of Chaim Bloom.

Is that person out there and available? Mike Hazen is that guy but I have a really hard time imagining him uprooting his kids given their personal circumstances but who knows.
Theo put together great teams working under a very different system that Im sure he couldn’t recreate today. And he lost a little off his fastball towards the end- Crawford, Lugo, Gonzalez, not getting Beltre long term.
He did balance the farm development with the ML roster well IMO but his moves at the end led to a spiraling chaos during the Cherington years.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,476
I would put the truth at something like...

1) Cherington brought in a great wave of talent that was instrumental in the '18 title, & then went on a run of bad drafts.
2) Dombrowski traded away many highly regarded prospects in order to put the finishing touches on the '18 title team in a series of trades that worked out due to the title & injuries & the vagaries of prospects, & did not get off to a great start in terms of drafts & IFAs.
3) Bloom started with a massive gap in inherited cost-controlled talent that made competing in the period from '20-'22 much more challenging due to both the failings of the end of the BC era & the beginning of the DD era, & has built an impressive system - but failed to maximize the Major League team in '23 when the DD pipeline actually paid off to a decent extent.
I'd say a more accurate narrative is:

1) Theo Epstein had an historically productive draft and left a fully stocked farm system for Cherington.

2) Cherington wisely held onto those prospects, while using a canny FA strategy to win a 2013 WS title, then began to transition the Epstein wave of talent in. He had narrow-band success in drafting and acquiring young cost-controlled talent (Benintendi, Devers, E-Rod) but otherwise created a talent gap in the system. After 2013, his ML FA choices were questionable. At best.

3) Dombrowski traded away what ultimately proved to be meh major league talent (if at all) for astoundingly productive veterans, cumulating in the 2018 WS title. He didn't get off to a great start in minor-league class building for the first year, but ultimately acquired a far greater number of useful MiL prospects than Cherington did, restocking the lower minors. By the end of his tenure, he had a top-heavy and expensive team (due to extensions), which also suffered from the Cherington talent-gap.

4) Bloom inherited a MiL system which was lower-minors propsect heavy. He productively restocked the minors through drafting, IFAs, and conservative trades. His ML FA signings were generally good on an individual basis, but he fielded a series of flawed ML teams, which were sidelined by injuries and often lacked depth.
Seeing it lain out this way (either version, really) leads me to think that the lack of consistency and continuity may be the larger issue more than any one PBOs. But I guess that’s at odds with what I’ve said before which is that the PBOs is just the most visible part of a large system and isn’t necessarily the sole person responsible for everything the way we here discuss it.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,904
Miami (oh, Miami!)
The Dombo narrative in this thread is bizarre. Minor league player development is 1 part acquisition 100 parts development. The robust player development team winnowed down under Dombrowski to a bottom third level in baseball.
OK, let's take this as a thesis, not a narrative. "DD winnowed down a robust player development team." If so, and if development is far more important than drafted talent, we'd expect to see successful development of just about any draftees under the Cherington regime.

So, under Cherington, what evidence do we have of the players he drafted benefitting from three years under the robust player development team?

https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?team_ID=BOS&year_ID=2012&draft_type=junreg&query_type=franch_year

How about these guys?

https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?team_ID=BOS&year_ID=2013&draft_type=junreg&query_type=franch_year

Or these guys?

https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?team_ID=BOS&year_ID=2014&draft_type=junreg&query_type=franch_year

Assuming a single year of "good" development was enough to radically change Casas' trajectory for the better, shouldn't we see the same here - good Cherington years, bad Dombrowski years, good Bloom years?

But here's evidence of the exact opposite of that pattern from the 2014 class:

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=ockime000jos

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=chavis000mic
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,762
OK, let's take this as a thesis, not a narrative. "DD winnowed down a robust player development team." If so, and if development is far more important than drafted talent, we'd expect to see successful development of just about any draftees under the Cherington regime.

So, under Cherington, what evidence do we have of the players he drafted benefitting from three years under the robust player development team?

https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?team_ID=BOS&year_ID=2012&draft_type=junreg&query_type=franch_year

How about these guys?

https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?team_ID=BOS&year_ID=2013&draft_type=junreg&query_type=franch_year

Or these guys?

https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?team_ID=BOS&year_ID=2014&draft_type=junreg&query_type=franch_year

Assuming a single year of "good" development was enough to radically change Casas' trajectory for the better, shouldn't we see the same here - good Cherington years, bad Dombrowski years, good Bloom years?

But here's evidence of the exact opposite of that pattern from the 2014 class:

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=ockime000jos

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=chavis000mic
I didn't say a single thing about Cherington.
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,762
You said Dombrowski winnowed down what Cherington left him.
That's a factual statement. Their sports science staff dropped by 50% under Dombrowski and they lost and didn't replace instructors all over the minor league system. Brian Abraham has spoken on the rebuilding of the minor league instruction infrastructure a multitude of times. The implication that "Cherington was doing it right and Dombrowski was doing it wrong" is not even close to the point I was making. The point was that there was a serious lack of investment in the infrastructure under Dombrowski that was built by Theo and then Cherington, that needed to be overhauled under Bloom. You can't look at players like Bello who were acquired when they were 16 years old and just blindly say "Dombrowski did that" when significant steps needed to be made in that players development to get him where he is today. That's not to discount his ability to identify players but to speak to the fact that he did a poor job on this part of his job description. There is no way you can look at the players who were overseas or in the lower minors when he left and say they would be the same players today without the last regime's investment. I don't know how anyone could argue that.

Chaim Bloom did this extremely well. They've quadrupled the staffing in sports science, including hiring multiple people from drive line for pitch shaping/development and their system's teaching/development infrastructure is now similar to other teams with elite player development systems. His fatal flaw was he lacked the courage to make a big move at the big league level.

Both execs were deeply flawed in their process, though I imagine Chaim's has more of an aspect of sustainability. I think we're better off to be rid of both of them as long as they can build a baseball ops department that can do both. Given their space between their commitments and the CBT, the core in place and the deep farm system, they have been set up to succeed. I just hope they hire the right person.
 

SoxVindaloo

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 20, 2003
982
Titletown of the Aughts
The Dombo narrative in this thread is bizarre. Minor league player development is 1 part acquisition 100 parts development. The robust player development team winnowed down under Dombrowski to a bottom third level in baseball. He completely ignored sports science when all the great teams in baseball were investing. When he left the Red Sox had 8 people in sports science and they now have 34, which rivals the dodgers and Astros. Under Bloom, Casas had his swing realigned to generate more power, Crawford's motion was rebalanced to create deception and Bello's entire arsenal was rebuilt. You cannot simply say Dombrowski acquired these guys therefore they would have been the same under his tutelage.

Dombrowski's problem wasn't just paying too much in trades it was an overall neglect of any modernization of his process. I actually think he's learned from that mistake as Sam Fuld apparently has a lot more pull and the Phillies are investing in the things he neglected here, but there's a reason there aren't' very many Dombrowski type baseball executives anymore. That process does not work to create sustainable success. His contracts for Eovadli, Sale, the opt outs for Bogaerts etc were all "NOW" signings with no eye on the future. It's not enough to say he built a champion therefore he got a bad deal. He did supplement a strong foundation and build the greatest red sox team any of us have ever seen. He also razed the organization's future to the ground to do it. Not just in trades, not just with contracts, not just with neglecting the player development process, but with a basic disregard for the future impact of all of those things.

Anyway - I find the relitigating of the Dombrowski and Bloom tenures in this thread to be frustrating because there doesn't appear to be much middle ground. I realize I'm guilty of this as well. I think we'd all be better off realizing what our previous three Baseball Ops leaders did well, and where they were fatally flawed, and why none of them were the god Theo.

Whoever is next needs to have the pro player evaluation/leadership courage we enjoyed under Dombrowski and the commitment to organizational infrastructure/player development/amateur scouting of Chaim Bloom.

Is that person out there and available? Mike Hazen is that guy but I have a really hard time imagining him uprooting his kids given their personal circumstances but who knows.
This is a great post. Dombrowski’s “blind spot” was no less damaging than Bloom’s long term but a lot harder to suss out for the average fan.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
People should not forget that Dombrowski hatched the plan to trade Mookie to the Dodgers, which was so appealing to ownership that finishing the deal became just short of a mandate.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
74,073
This will be Derek Falvey’s job if he wants it. Local guy, dream job. Has the ownership group’s actions over the past few years disillusioned him?

I think he would be a fantastic choice as well.
I’m not sure a Twins guy in the same division as the MFY is a good idea
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,839
Eddie Romero unofficial interim GM.

On Friday, manager Alex Cora revealed that Romero, who was with the team for its road trip to Toronto and Texas, is the de facto head man in charge of the roster. Romero, who has been with the Red Sox since 2006, when he was hired as an assistant in international and professional scouting, is also considered to be a candidate to replace Bloom.
View: https://twitter.com/ChrisCotillo/status/1705635731740275080
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,464
I really don' think that will matter if he wants it and the Red Sox want him.
The same exact thing just happened with David Stearns and the Mets, the Brewers didn’t give permission so he had to wait for his contract to expire.
 

OCD SS

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Theo put together great teams working under a very different system that Im sure he couldn’t recreate today. And he lost a little off his fastball towards the end- Crawford, Lugo, Gonzalez, not getting Beltre long term.
He did balance the farm development with the ML roster well IMO but his moves at the end led to a spiraling chaos during the Cherington years.
Of all the possible alternate realities it would be fun to rabbit hole, the one where the Sox don't develop a crazed fixation with AGon and then sign Beltre long term, keeping Youk at 1B until Rizzo can take over is my favorite.
 

OCD SS

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Thinking more generally, I think people are sort of missing the point when assigning the exact progression of the farm system to a particular GM who happened to be charge when the player was drafted (or traded for). The GM's the guy in charge, but ultimately the entire system scouts and identifies talent and then the player dev side of the system turns them into players. The Sox FO group has had a a good deal of consistency as the people working in this area have moved up in the org rather than on to other teams. Yes the GM kept them (and here I think Dombrowski doesn't get the credit he deserves for knowing who to trade and who to keep), but the GM wasn't the one drafting them. Bloom came in, but this group was humming along, so I'm optomistic that the the draft quality will continue.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,728
I mean literally everyone admits that he was good at knowing which prospects were untouchable. The problem was, literally, that the only minor league talent left in 2019 was in the FCL and DSL, which is why, four and a half years later, those guys are reaching AAA and the majors. The Dombrowski approach had run its course by 2019. Their payroll was tied up in injured pitchers and there was no minor league talent to trade in 2019 because it was all sub-A talent. The whys and wherefore are irrelevant. They needed to reset they luxury tax and lose one of their deadweight pitching contracts.

The same applies to Bloom, at the major league level his talent acquisition record had blemishes, and the last two seasons the Red Sox have struggled, and failed, to play .500 ball. So now he’s on the unemployment line. He was good at the draft/development part of the job, but that’s not enough.
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,699
I'm sure it was a bunch of things combined, but another that didn't help was the high profile visit of Cashman and other Yankee officials to Japan to see Yamamoto, that was Sept 9 and Bloom was fired Sept 14.

https://nypost.com/2023/09/09/yoshinobu-yamamoto-throws-no-hitter-with-brian-cashman-in-front-row/

It's pretty easy to imagine Henry seeing that and thinking 'hmm, if we really want to go after Yamamoto full throttle, maybe Chaim isn't the guy to be in charge for that?'.
Given the extensive work that the Red Sox organization did to lay the groundwork for the day they could negotiate with Masataka Yoshida, I think it's fair to assume that they have done at least an equal amount of preparation for Yamamoto's upcoming availability.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,904
Miami (oh, Miami!)
I mean literally everyone admits that he was good at knowing which prospects were untouchable. The problem was, literally, that the only minor league talent left in 2019 was in the FCL and DSL, which is why, four and a half years later, those guys are reaching AAA and the majors. The Dombrowski approach had run its course by 2019. Their payroll was tied up in injured pitchers and there was no minor league talent to trade in 2019 because it was all sub-A talent. The whys and wherefore are irrelevant. They needed to reset they luxury tax and lose one of their deadweight pitching contracts.
You cannot hold onto crap players indefinitely and think they're going to appreciate in value. They are in fact doing to depreciate in value. Take Devin Marrero for instance, a typical meh Cherington draft pick, lovingly nurtured in the Cherington Development Machine Creche that was later set afire by Dombrowski.

Marrero was traded for Josh Taylor, who was a useful piece. A year later, or two years later, what is the value of Devin Marrero? It's not going to be greater. So what is the point in holding onto him instead of selling high?


As a point of reference, this is it. These are all the trades. (Dombrowski is hired Aug 18, 2015.)

August 31, 2015
Traded Alejandro De Aza to the San Francisco Giants. Received Luis Ysla (minors).

November 13, 2015
Traded Logan Allen, Carlos Asuaje, Javy Guerra and Manuel Margot to the San Diego Padres. Received Craig Kimbrel.

December 7, 2015
Traded Jonathan Aro and Wade Miley to the Seattle Mariners. Received Roenis Elías and Carson Smith.

July 7, 2016
Traded Wendell Rijo (minors) and Aaron Wilkerson to the Milwaukee Brewers. Received Aaron Hill and cash.

July 9, 2016
Traded Jose Almonte (minors) and Luis Alejandro Basabe (minors) to the Arizona Diamondbacks. Received Brad Ziegler.

July 14, 2016
Traded Anderson Espinoza to the San Diego Padres. Received Drew Pomeranz.

August 1, 2016
Traded Pat Light to the Minnesota Twins. Received Fernando Abad.

December 6, 2016
Traded Victor Diaz (minors), Luis Alexander Basabe, Michael Kopech and Yoán Moncada to the Chicago White Sox. Received Chris Sale.

Traded a player to be named later, Josh Pennington (minors), Mauricio Dubón and Travis Shaw to the Milwaukee Brewers. Received Tyler Thornburg.

December 20, 2016
Traded Clay Buchholz to the Philadelphia Phillies. Received Josh Tobias (minors).

July 26, 2017
Traded Shaun Anderson and Gregory Santos to the San Francisco Giants. Received Eduardo Núñez.

July 31, 2017
Traded Gerson Bautista, Jamie Callahan and Stephen Nogosek to the New York Mets. Received Addison Reed.

August 23, 2017
Traded Rafael Rincones (minors) to the Oakland Athletics. Received Rajai Davis.

March 24, 2018
Traded Deven Marrero to the Arizona Diamondbacks. Received a player to be named later. The Arizona Diamondbacks sent Josh Taylor (May 15, 2018) to the Boston Red Sox to complete the trade.

April 23, 2018
Traded Roenis Elías to the Seattle Mariners. Received a player to be named later. The Seattle Mariners sent Eric Filia (minors) (June 12, 2018) to the Boston Red Sox to complete the trade.

June 28, 2018
Traded Santiago Espinal to the Toronto Blue Jays. Received Steve Pearce and cash.

July 25, 2018
Traded Jalen Beeks to the Tampa Bay Rays. Received Nathan Eovaldi.

July 30, 2018
Traded Ty Buttrey and Williams Jerez to the Los Angeles Angels. Received Ian Kinsler and cash.

November 20, 2018
Traded Esteban Quiroz to the San Diego Padres. Received Colten Brewer.

April 19, 2019
Traded Blake Swihart and international bonus slot money to the Arizona Diamondbacks. Received Marcus Wilson.

July 13, 2019
Traded Elio Prado (minors) and Noelberth Romero (minors) to the Baltimore Orioles. Received Andrew Cashner and cash.
 

Benj4ever

New Member
Nov 21, 2022
373
This idea that Moncada and Kopech being somehow big losses is a huge counterfactual. Moncada hasnt been good in years; maybe if he didnt have injuries, hed be better, but hes been a slightly above replacement player while on the field for years. It isnt just that hes missing time, its that he isnt good while hes on the field. Kopech has thrown 130 innings this year... and has similarily been terrible.

There is more going on then injuries here.
Moncada has had 3 seasons where injuries limited him to 104 games or less, including this year, and you're trying to say injuries don't tell the story? Kopech missed 2 entire seasons, then was very good in 2021 and 2022, and you're making an argument based on one season? Sorry, I'm not impressed.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,931
Moncada has had 3 seasons where injuries limited him to 104 games or less, including this year, and you're trying to say injuries don't tell the story? Kopech missed 2 entire seasons, then was very good in 2021 and 2022, and you're making an argument based on one season? Sorry, I'm not impressed.
Your original argument was that Dombrowski made a bad trade because the players he traded, if they weren’t injured, would be really good.

I have honestly never seen this argument made ever (in baseball or any sport)
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,464
Given the extensive work that the Red Sox organization did to lay the groundwork for the day they could negotiate with Masataka Yoshida, I think it's fair to assume that they have done at least an equal amount of preparation for Yamamoto's upcoming availability.
No one else wanted Yoshida really, everyone wants Yamamoto.
 

zenax

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2023
366

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,728
You cannot hold onto crap players indefinitely and think they're going to appreciate in value. They are in fact doing to depreciate in value. Take Devin Marrero for instance, a typical meh Cherington draft pick, lovingly nurtured in the Cherington Development Machine Creche that was later set afire by Dombrowski.
Literally no one is disputing that he kept the right players. Literally no one. You have to let this go. The job in 2019 had changed because there was nothing left to trade in 2019 and the Red Sox future was full of spiraling payroll and two injured pitchers collecting $60 million per year. Just saying, "Oh yeah, but what about the following DSL players‽‽‽ Huh‽‽‽ Huh‽‽‽" doesn't change the fact that when you're dealing DSL guys for major league talent you need to give up a shitload of them and you don't get superstars in exchange. The job changed and Dombrowski wasn't the right man for the job as it existed at the end of the 2019 season. Much like Bloom wasn't the right guy for the job facing the Red Sox today. Gawd do I hope the Bloomaphiles are less annoying and we don't need to be reading their diatribes in 2028.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,728
No one else wanted Yoshida really, everyone wants Yamamoto.
But Boston does have his former teammate. Which, all things being equal, likely gives them the edge (obviously there's always the chance that the Mets go full frontal Steve Cohen and roll out a 12/420 contract for Yamamoto, but until that happens...).
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,464
But Boston does have his former teammate. Which, all things being equal, likely gives them the edge (obviously there's always the chance that the Mets go full frontal Steve Cohen and roll out a 12/420 contract for Yamamoto, but until that happens...).
The Mets also have Senga, who may not be as personally close to Yamamoto as Yoshida but has the huge advantage of being a pitcher and not a position player, and he is also very eager to recruit:

https://nypost.com/2023/08/17/mets-kodai-senga-keen-to-recruit-japans-yoshinobu-yamamoto/
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,904
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Literally no one is disputing that he kept the right players. Literally no one. You have to let this go. The job in 2019 had changed because there was nothing left to trade in 2019 and the Red Sox future was full of spiraling payroll and two injured pitchers collecting $60 million per year. Just saying, "Oh yeah, but what about the following DSL players‽‽‽ Huh‽‽‽ Huh‽‽‽" doesn't change the fact that when you're dealing DSL guys for major league talent you need to give up a shitload of them and you don't get superstars in exchange. The job changed and Dombrowski wasn't the right man for the job as it existed at the end of the 2019 season. Much like Bloom wasn't the right guy for the job facing the Red Sox today. Gawd do I hope the Bloomaphiles are less annoying and we don't need to be reading their diatribes in 2028.
I have to let it go? Dude - these are the world's facts, not my own private imaginings. And it may be unfortunate for the position you've staked out that this isn't a simple situation, but it's not some kind of personal diatribe. The only reason I'm responding is because I'd rather look at the data and try to get an accurate take on what happened, than push some kind of narrative. For the life of me, I can't figure out why you are so fixated on your view of what happened that you can't adjust it, and can't seem to go a page without repeating it. Like literally - why do you care?

There was plenty left to trade in 2019, including several first round picks. Dombrowski traded off a bunch of crap Cherington acquisitions and farm drek for useful ML players. That drek did not have an infinate shelf-life, not was it getting better with age. It's not a wine cellar.

Now if you want to point out all of those trades didn't work, that's fine and fair, because not all of them did. Just the world's facts. But this idea that Dombrowski was somehow shoveling decent prospects out the door like a spendthrift is a lazy narrative.

If you want to argue a specific trade - say, that Stephen Nogosek was one prospect too many to trade for Anderson Reed, by all means have at it. You don't even have to (though you absolutely should at this point) propose what future value Stephen Nogosek would have had to the org, or what he might reasonably have been traded for. Because that's your thesis: Stephen Nogosek, due to be put on the 40 man and/or developed by the Sox in their ML bullpen, was somehow wasted in trade. (And I hope you noticed I met your argument halfway by picking a guy who actually played a ML inning. Instead of the very many who did not.)

But one is not enough. You have to show that it's a pattern. And I think it's self-evident, skimming over the names, that in the main these are not guys you put on the 40 man, not guys you develop to be on your ML club, and/or guys who were blocked and who you're not going to keep in the minors until they hit MiL FA.

(AFAIK) all Dombrowski's trades over 4 years are there, majors and minors together.

Have at it, or drop it.
 
Last edited:

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,904
Miami (oh, Miami!)
They traded Basabe twice in the same season? Otherwise a good synopsis but would even be better with +/- WAR, or whatever, for all the trades.
You're welcome to add the +/- WAR, or any other notes if you're so inclined.

My only suggestion for that sort of thing is that you limit it to WAR that's under control by the clubs at the time of the trade. What happens later in the players' careers isn't really relevant to the trade. (I.e., Whether the player is traded again, or leaves or stays via FA, or signs an extension, isn't controlled by the original trade itself.)
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,699
No one else wanted Yoshida really, everyone wants Yamamoto.
I was simply pointing out that the Red Sox have been quite active in Japan, as evidenced by the extensive work done in preparation for Yoshida's posting. While contact with the player is forbidden until the posting happens, their reps are certainly aware of what MLB teams are doing.

I do agree that perhaps Chaim's time would have been better spent in personally scouting Yamamoto and putting the Red Sox in the best possible position to secure his services, although I'm sure his detractors would have responded by criticizing how such a trip was yet another example of Bloom ignoring the 2023 team.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,904
Miami (oh, Miami!)
May as well address this pivot-argument also:
It was not bare when he left. Bello, Casas, Houck, Duran, Murphy, Mata, Song, etc.
Exactly they had a collection of sub-A lottery tickets that they would have had to clean out to acquire a MLB player. That’s the problem, when all your talent is in the FCL and the DSL other teams require four or five of them to deal their MLB player. I’m not sure why people are struggling with this.
. . .The job in 2019 had changed because there was nothing left to trade in 2019 and the Red Sox future was full of spiraling payroll and two injured pitchers collecting $60 million per year. Just saying, "Oh yeah, but what about the following DSL players‽‽‽ Huh‽‽‽ Huh‽‽‽" doesn't change the fact that when you're dealing DSL guys for major league talent. . .
As a matter of fact, at the end of 2019, Sox top-20 prospects per Soxprospects.com.

AAA: Houck, Dalbec, Chatham
AA: Mata, Duran, Wilson
A/A+: Bello, Casas, Ward

And of course, some of the actual "sub-A lottery ticket" guys may have been promoted to start 2020 (canceled due to Covid.)
 
Last edited:

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Also, who knows what Yoshida has said to Yamamoto about what it's like playing in Boston.
Also do we know they are actually friends? They were teammates for five or six years but that doesn't mean they hung out a lot. Some tiny interval of familiarity that Yamamoto would gain from having Yoshida around doesn't seem like a driving factor in a decision as big as this, as I am sure he knows. The Sox will have to bring the money and the case for them being future winners to stay in this race. Thankfully they have their recent 2004-2018 history, or the case for winning would be pretty thin.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,728
I have to let it go? Dude - these are the world's facts, not my own private imaginings.
And it’s 100% irrelevant to the question that faced the Red Sox at the end of 2019. You can keep saying “But he kept the right guys!!!” but it’s not answer to the question that the ownership group had. That question was “Where do we go from here?” and the barren upper minors meant that there was no way to trade themselves into a perennial contender. And it doesn’t matter whose fault that situation was, that was the reality they were dealing with. And the man for that job wasn’t Dombrowski, much like the man for the current job wasn’t Bloom.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,904
Miami (oh, Miami!)
And it’s 100% irrelevant to the question that faced the Red Sox at the end of 2019. You can keep saying “But he kept the right guys!!!” but it’s not answer to the question that the ownership group had. That question was “Where do we go from here?” and the barren upper minors meant that there was no way to trade themselves into a perennial contender. And it doesn’t matter whose fault that situation was, that was the reality they were dealing with. And the man for that job wasn’t Dombrowski, much like the man for the current job wasn’t Bloom.
Shift goalposts much?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.