Literally no one is disputing that he kept the right players. Literally no one. You have to let this go. The job in 2019 had changed because there was nothing left to trade in 2019 and the Red Sox future was full of spiraling payroll and two injured pitchers collecting $60 million per year. Just saying, "Oh yeah, but what about the following DSL players‽‽‽ Huh‽‽‽ Huh‽‽‽" doesn't change the fact that when you're dealing DSL guys for major league talent you need to give up a shitload of them and you don't get superstars in exchange. The job changed and Dombrowski wasn't the right man for the job as it existed at the end of the 2019 season. Much like Bloom wasn't the right guy for the job facing the Red Sox today. Gawd do I hope the Bloomaphiles are less annoying and we don't need to be reading their diatribes in 2028.
I have to let it go? Dude -
these are the world's facts, not my own private imaginings. And it may be unfortunate for the position you've staked out that this isn't a simple situation, but it's not some kind of personal diatribe. The only reason I'm responding is because I'd rather look at the data and try to get an accurate take on what happened, than push some kind of narrative. For the life of me, I can't figure out why you are so fixated on your view of what happened that you can't adjust it, and can't seem to go a page without repeating it. Like literally - why do you care?
There was plenty left to trade in 2019, including several first round picks. Dombrowski traded off a bunch of crap Cherington acquisitions and farm drek for useful ML players. That drek did not have an infinate shelf-life, not was it getting better with age. It's not a wine cellar.
Now if you want to point out all of those trades didn't work, that's fine and fair, because not all of them did. Just the world's facts. But this idea that Dombrowski was somehow shoveling decent prospects out the door like a spendthrift is a lazy narrative.
If you want to argue a specific trade - say, that
Stephen Nogosek was one prospect too many to trade for Anderson Reed, by all means have at it. You don't even have to (though you absolutely should at this point) propose what future value Stephen Nogosek would have had to the org, or what he might reasonably have been traded for. Because that's your thesis:
Stephen Nogosek, due to be put on the 40 man and/or developed by the Sox in their ML bullpen, was somehow wasted in trade. (And I hope you noticed I met your argument halfway by picking a guy who actually played a ML inning. Instead of the very many who did not.)
But one is not enough. You have to show that it's a pattern. And I think it's self-evident, skimming over the names, that in the main these are not guys you put on the 40 man, not guys you develop to be on your ML club, and/or guys who were blocked and who you're not going to keep in the minors until they hit MiL FA.
(AFAIK) all Dombrowski's trades over 4 years are there, majors and minors together.
Have at it, or drop it.