YouTube announces Sunday Ticket Pricing

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,697
NY
My TV room has 5 TVs on NFL Sundays and 4 TVs full time. What's wrong with an extra screen? Stick it in a closet when it's not Sunday? They are 150 bucks.
Hey I agree with you. It's not the money. She thinks the number of TVs we have is offensive. It's weird how she doesn't complain when she wants to watch Below Deck on a 77 inch TV though.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,697
NY
My wife complains too. The TVs still hang.
I actually have an old 40 inch Samsung in a storage closet. She won't let me set it up. Next time she goes out of town I may add it to my office and see how long it takes her to notice.
 

HereComesthePizza

New Member
Mar 29, 2023
35
You can't choose the games in the quad boxes. Google said something like, "It would require 10x the bandwidth to allow people to customize."

Same for the college games, too. You get the quad you get.
If you choose a single game from the menu, there’s the prompt that says watch live, start from beginning, catch up through key plays and watch in multi view. I don’t think it will let you pick the exact games but you can choose more options than the default ones on the homepage.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,962
Unreal America
Tangentially related to Sunday Ticket…

Screw the NFL for making you buy their ghastly NFL+ Premium service to stream Red Zone to a TV.

I subscribe to Optimum. I get a sports package for RedZone. I can stream it using my cable credentials on a phone or tablet.

But to stream it on a TV you must subscribe to NFL+ premium. The cable log in doesn’t work. So I had to use AirPlay to cast it from my phone to my TCL TV.

So frigging dumb and such a thumb in the eye to consumers.

(Note: I was doing this because my cable box is screwed up and I gotta replace it.)
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
Just wanted to note that Google did an excellent job in terms of the stream quality today.

DirecTV’s streams were usually bad, and a few years in a row, they completely collapsed on opening day.

Every stream loaded super fast, looked good, and never dropped or buffered for me.

So far, a significant upgrade, IMO.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,889
Tangentially related to Sunday Ticket…

Screw the NFL for making you buy their ghastly NFL+ Premium service to stream Red Zone to a TV.

I subscribe to Optimum. I get a sports package for RedZone. I can stream it using my cable credentials on a phone or tablet.

But to stream it on a TV you must subscribe to NFL+ premium. The cable log in doesn’t work. So I had to use AirPlay to cast it from my phone to my TCL TV.

So frigging dumb and such a thumb in the eye to consumers.

(Note: I was doing this because my cable box is screwed up and I gotta replace it.)
I had NFL+ premium last year and I loved the content (the all-22 specifically) but canceled it this year because it was such a pain in the ass to use it.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,867
Just wanted to note that Google did an excellent job in terms of the stream quality today.

DirecTV’s streams were usually bad, and a few years in a row, they completely collapsed on opening day.

Every stream loaded super fast, looked good, and never dropped or buffered for me.

So far, a significant upgrade, IMO.
same - was able to watch on multiple devices easily and loved how easy it was to have to 3 or 4 games on one screen and easily switch back and forth to the action.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,161
Tuukka's refugee camp
They probably were because DirectTV had the benefit of having Red Zone forever and an existing subscriber base from the cable offering. Inertia is a powerful thing and it’s difficult to get people to switch things up.

That said, this was always going to lose money for YouTube and is more likely a “tent pole” for their growing subscriptions offering and gets them a foot in the door with the sports leagues (and the most important one) for future rights discussions.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
They probably were because DirectTV had the benefit of having Red Zone forever and an existing subscriber base from the cable offering. Inertia is a powerful thing and it’s difficult to get people to switch things up.

That said, this was always going to lose money for YouTube and is more likely a “tent pole” for their growing subscriptions offering and gets them a foot in the door with the sports leagues (and the most important one) for future rights discussions.
Honestly, Google’s service is about 10x better than DirecTV’s streams ever were. The only gripe anyone has is the inability to build your own multi-stream.

If I were MLB or another league, I would definitely consider Google based on how well they’ve been able to handle the NFL.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,889
Honestly, Google’s service is about 10x better than DirecTV’s streams ever were. The only gripe anyone has is the inability to build your own multi-stream.

If I were MLB or another league, I would definitely consider Google based on how well they’ve been able to handle the NFL.
Im no coder but I dont get how this is a hard problem. YTTV has all the games playing in local markets already so the Sunday Ticket is just giving permission to someone with that plan access to all of those feeds. That seems, as YTTV is showing, a trivial problem. It’s odd that direct tv and the league apps sucked for this.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,088
New York City
Im no coder but I dont get how this is a hard problem. YTTV has all the games playing in local markets already so the Sunday Ticket is just giving permission to someone with that plan access to all of those feeds. That seems, as YTTV is showing, a trivial problem. It’s odd that direct tv and the league apps sucked for this.
With regards to the Sunday Ticket, YouTube TV is the iPhone 15 and Direct TV was a 1993 Sony cell phone.

It is so much better, I would like to put together a class action suit against Direct TV for making me endure a woeful, expensive product for years.
 

Oil Can Dan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2003
8,052
0-3 to 4-3
With regards to the Sunday Ticket, YouTube TV is the iPhone 15 and Direct TV was a 1993 Sony cell phone.

It is so much better, I would like to put together a class action suit against Direct TV for making me endure a woeful, expensive product for years.
I would like to sign up for your newsletter.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,726
Agreed that YTTV has been a gamechanger for football and sports in general. Multi-view is the idea of someone who watches sports like "us". That person or that set of people are probably woefully underpaid, even if YTTV is bleeding money on this.

As a side note, I will be shocked if this doesn't flip to wildly profitable or at least sets up something else that makes Alphabet a lot of money at some point in the future. They typically don't play unless they have a good plan and some sort of edge.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
Im no coder but I dont get how this is a hard problem. YTTV has all the games playing in local markets already so the Sunday Ticket is just giving permission to someone with that plan access to all of those feeds. That seems, as YTTV is showing, a trivial problem. It’s odd that direct tv and the league apps sucked for this.
Just in relation to DTV, it’s really just the horsepower to host and stream things really well. DirecTV just never handled the streams well because they always looked at streaming as their “second tier” offering.

Google does streaming better than anyone else.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,088
New York City
Agreed that YTTV has been a gamechanger for football and sports in general. Multi-view is the idea of someone who watches sports like "us". That person or that set of people are probably woefully underpaid, even if YTTV is bleeding money on this.

As a side note, I will be shocked if this doesn't flip to wildly profitable or at least sets up something else that makes Alphabet a lot of money at some point in the future. They typically don't play unless they have a good plan and some sort of edge.
I assume Google's goal is more sign ups overall for YouTube TV. Which probably will happen if people just get the Ticket and see how great it is and how easy it is to navigate.

I personally have Spectrum cable TV (for sports networks and because i'm dumb) and Youtube TV because I have a ton of screens going all the time. Spectrum looks worse, the closed captioning is way worse (to be fair, my boxes are old in my apartment, the newer boxes do allow CC customization, which I've had in other houses I've had) and dealing with a cable box can be a unreliable experience.

YouTube TV, on the other hand, is perfect, always. And the DVR process is so much better, too. It's better for taping, finding your taped shows, and watching your taped shows. The trifecta.
 

JerBear

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 11, 2006
1,584
Leeds, ME
I assume Google's goal is more sign ups overall for YouTube TV. Which probably will happen if people just get the Ticket and see how great it is and how easy it is to navigate.

I personally have Spectrum cable TV (for sports networks and because i'm dumb) and Youtube TV because I have a ton of screens going all the time. Spectrum looks worse, the closed captioning is way worse (to be fair, my boxes are old in my apartment, the newer boxes do allow CC customization, which I've had in other houses I've had) and dealing with a cable box can be a unreliable experience.

YouTube TV, on the other hand, is perfect, always. And the DVR process is so much better, too. It's better for taping, finding your taped shows, and watching your taped shows. The trifecta.
Have you used the Spectrum app through Roku? My folks got away from the cable boxes (and associated rental fees) and just went through the Spectrum app on Roku. They didn't find a limit on number of screens, but they also didn't push it that far (3 Roku + me stealing their access for various mobile apps).

Not the YTTV experience, and I don't know how it handles DVR as they didn't use it, but might smooth out your Spectrum experience a bit.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,437
I assume Google's goal is more sign ups overall for YouTube TV. Which probably will happen if people just get the Ticket and see how great it is and how easy it is to navigate.

I personally have Spectrum cable TV (for sports networks and because i'm dumb) and Youtube TV because I have a ton of screens going all the time. Spectrum looks worse, the closed captioning is way worse (to be fair, my boxes are old in my apartment, the newer boxes do allow CC customization, which I've had in other houses I've had) and dealing with a cable box can be a unreliable experience.

YouTube TV, on the other hand, is perfect, always. And the DVR process is so much better, too. It's better for taping, finding your taped shows, and watching your taped shows. The trifecta.
What does Spectrum have for sports networks that YTTV doesn't?

Quick glance shows possibly NHLN, MLBN, and ACCN, YTTV shows to have ESPN 1, 2, U, NEWS, FS1 and 2, SECN, B1N, NFLN, NBATV
Is there anything else?

is it YES and MASN that you want?

I'm seeing a first 3 month special for $53 each (YTTV) so considering it.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,088
New York City
Have you used the Spectrum app through Roku? My folks got away from the cable boxes (and associated rental fees) and just went through the Spectrum app on Roku. They didn't find a limit on number of screens, but they also didn't push it that far (3 Roku + me stealing their access for various mobile apps).

Not the YTTV experience, and I don't know how it handles DVR as they didn't use it, but might smooth out your Spectrum experience a bit.
I have tried to Roku app. It's not bad and it does work, but it's slow and a little hard to navigate.

The cable box is more responsive for the TVs that I have the cable box on. For other TVs that I'm streaming, (either a Roku, FireTV or Apple TV depending on the room and the TV, i have a lot of screens) YTTV is the way to go.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,088
New York City
What does Spectrum have for sports networks that YTTV doesn't?

Quick glance shows possibly NHLN, MLBN, and ACCN, YTTV shows to have ESPN 1, 2, U, NEWS, FS1 and 2, SECN, B1N, NFLN, NBATV
Is there anything else?

is it YES and MASN that you want?

I'm seeing a first 3 month special for $53 each (YTTV) so considering it.
MSG network, mainly, so I can watch the Rangers. Plus I already have a Spectrum phone and internet, so I get the triple play. I added all the movie channels because sometimes it's cool to surf and find a movie you like and chuck it up on the side TV.

My process is odd, I know. But it works for me. I like options. And screens.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,889
The individual games worked all day.
Not for me. I was pretty far behind because of “buffering”. Second half was ok for the most part.

I was actually scrambling to find an antenna I have stowed away somewhere during halftime but I couldn’t find it.
 

Oil Can Dan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2003
8,052
0-3 to 4-3
The individual games worked all day. On the quad box, I was dealing with a fuzzy screen from 1pm to 2pm. Then it cleared up. By far the worst performance by Google since they started the Sunday ticket.
Me neither on the single game issue. Everything was a mess.
 

JokersWildJIMED

Blinded by Borges
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2004
2,754
Early games were a mess. Buffering and poor picture all during the first early games. Frustrating to say the least.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,623
CT
Funny. Just as I was heaping praise on YouTube, they go and lay an egg this week. Would be curious if they release an explanation as to what the issue was.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,027
AZ
Early games were a mess. Buffering and poor picture all during the first early games. Frustrating to say the least.
It has been like this for three weeks for me. First 30 minutes of the early games have been going in and out of SD all month. Last week was the worst though.
 

TheRooster

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2001
2,490
FWIW, this was not only on Sunday Ticket. I was simply trying to watch the Pats on the local feed through YT TV and had multiple issues.