Who do YOU want Pats to end up with in draft?

Who is YOUR preference?

  • Caleb Williams

    Votes: 71 29.1%
  • Drake Maye

    Votes: 74 30.3%
  • Marvin Harrison Jr.

    Votes: 99 40.6%

  • Total voters
    244

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,030
Quality “up top” really is dependent on the year though. And this year there will be a lot of talented quarterbacks available.

It’s hard to tell how much better Maye will be than, say, Penix. As someone said earlier: this appears to be a fairly deep draft.

Just two different approaches.
The chances that even in the deepest year you get a top QB as the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th QB off the board are incredibly low.

There are really only 2 reasonable approaches to QB in this draft:
1. You think you see a top QB in a prospect and you take him early 1st.
2. You think nobody available to you is ever going to be a top QB so you don't take a QB.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,632
Somewhere
So I think 2 things...
1. Some of those are underestimating the QB premium
2. I don't think there are many QB prospects you woud consider good on that list. Every year people really want there to be 7, 8, 9, 10 QB prospects who are for real, but it rarely works out that way. Every year guys get hyped up because they were good college players, but once NFL people really start looking at them they get crossed off.
As an aside, I think you see the name QBs go right off the top, just like last year. No use evaluating for fit, teams will trade up if they like them.
 

Frisbetarian

♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫
Moderator
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2003
5,275
Off the beaten track
LOL, the only place I've seen these values is here on SoSH when people are talking about hypothetical trades. Never even seen an official chart.

I was just throwing out what I would offer, given a shit ton of geeking out on drafts for like 40 years, and my perception of pick value. Honestly, had no idea you guys discounted so much for future picks that much, but it certainly makes sense.
Interesting. Your estimate was eerily accurate then. Sans future discount your suggested draft picks for the #2 pick had a total value of 2646 vs the second pick value of 2600.

Nicely done, hermano.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,849
After the Oregon State win, Penix is my strong preference. The skills, toughness and competitive drive (and Rome Odunze who is a flat out star) were the difference in the game. I think this stuff will play up - he has the physical tools but also seems pretty unflappable as well.
 

Zincman

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
441
New London
The great conundrum of drafting a QB is that two opposing things can be true at the same time. QB is the most over-drafted position on the board as desperate teams seek a solution for the most important position on the field. But, in looking closely at many past drafts the following strikes one as obvious.
1. If you want a top level QB, you are best served by having a very high draft pick because the hits are gone early with rare exception.
2. If you want a top level QB you must be unafraid of risk since a goodly number of those high QB picks will be busts.
3. Drafting the best available QB out of need is a bad strategy.

I'm cherry picking here but you'll get my point.
In 2020 Joe Burrow-1, Tua Tagovailoa-5, Justin Herbert-6, Jordan Love-26 and Jalen Hurts-53 represent a cornucopia of QB talent
OTOH-in 2021 Trevor Lawrence-1, Zach Wilson-2, Trey Lance-3, Justin Fields-11 and Mac Jones-15 which illustrates both points 2 and 3.
2018 gave us Baker Mayfield-1, Sam Darnold-3, Josh Allen-7, Josh Rosen-10, Lamar Jackson-32
In addition somebody thought Mitch Trubisky would be a better pro than Patrick Mahomes.

So its clear that fortune favors the bold but mostly the bold go down in flames. So what do the Pats do? Drafting MHJ or one of the two top LTs is a safer and legitimate way to start the rebuild but it is not without some risk. If you evaluate an available QB (top 3) as a franchise cornerstone, then, by all means, pull the trigger. But don't reach because this is a multi-year rebuild and acquiring "elite" talent is critical each of the next 3 years. What would I do? Way above my pay grade so I'll be a great SOSHer and simply second guess whatever they do.
 

Bowser

New Member
Sep 27, 2019
432
So its clear that fortune favors the bold but mostly the bold go down in flames.
An important point. I mean, sure, we'd all love to draft the next top 10 QB. But I for one would have been reasonably happy with the guy I thought we were getting in Mac Jones -- a player who, at the end of the day, was only ever going to be average at the position or maybe a cut above average.

In an alternate universe, Mac becomes that guy despite his massive physical limitations. And so when looking over the QB draft prospects -- while I don't see any sure bets to become top 10 QB (ehh, maybe Williams), I can't help but see many players with far better physical skills than Mac and who, as a result, have a shot at becoming the average QB Mac might have been.

In short, I see a strong argument for trading down to 10-20 to land our QB of the future ... or drafting him in Round 2.

Note: Of course, it may be that all of the Round 2 type QBs get drafted in Round 1, but the broader point stands, I think.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I think it's impossible to have a great grasp on how QBs will translate and we've seen a ton of QBs with obvious flaws coming out of college become incredible players in the pros the last few years (Josh Allen's accuracy, Mahomes' machanics, Lamar Jackson's polish as a passer, Joe Burrow's lack of a track record, CJ Stroud's inability to create outside of structure), so if you like one of them and believe the flaws to either be fixable or not that big of a deal in contrast to the player's strengths, just pull the trigger. Ideally you'd pick first in a year in which Andrew Luck was available, but other than that every single one of those guys will have questions.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,833
Hingham, MA
I think it's impossible to have a great grasp on how QBs will translate and we've seen a ton of QBs with obvious flaws coming out of college become incredible players in the pros the last few years (Josh Allen's accuracy, Mahomes' machanics, Lamar Jackson's polish as a passer, Joe Burrow's lack of a track record, CJ Stroud's inability to create outside of structure), so if you like one of them and believe the flaws to either be fixable or not that big of a deal in contrast to the player's strengths, just pull the trigger. Ideally you'd pick first in a year in which Andrew Luck was available, but other than that every single one of those guys will have questions.
Moreover, there have been 3 QBs who had this level of hype that I can remember in the last ~30 years: Manning, Luck, and Lawrence. Manning obviously fulfilled the prophecy, disappointing postseason career notwithstanding. Luck was a good and at times very good player, but ultimately did not live up to the hype. Lawrence is off to a promising start, but the jury is very much out and at this point I'd bet on him ending up on the Luck path as opposed to the Manning path - he simply hasn't put up stats yet, especially in this era and compared to guys like Burrow and Herbert.

Moral of the story is that even the generational QB prospects don't always end up in the Hall of Fame.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Moreover, there have been 3 QBs who had this level of hype that I can remember in the last ~30 years: Manning, Luck, and Lawrence. Manning obviously fulfilled the prophecy, disappointing postseason career notwithstanding. Luck was a good and at times very good player, but ultimately did not live up to the hype. Lawrence is off to a promising start, but the jury is very much out and at this point I'd bet on him ending up on the Luck path as opposed to the Manning path - he simply hasn't put up stats yet, especially in this era and compared to guys like Burrow and Herbert.

Moral of the story is that even the generational QB prospects don't always end up in the Hall of Fame.
Sure, just talking about wanting the "safe" pick in general. Safe doesn't really exist and especially when you're drafting a QB that high you're looking for ceiling, not floor. If Caleb Williams ends up as a solid, competent starter for the Patriots that's not really good enough to turn the franchise around either, so who cares.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,034
Isle of Plum
I think it's impossible to have a great grasp on how QBs will translate and we've seen a ton of QBs with obvious flaws coming out of college become incredible players in the pros the last few years (Josh Allen's accuracy, Mahomes' machanics, Lamar Jackson's polish as a passer, Joe Burrow's lack of a track record, CJ Stroud's inability to create outside of structure), so if you like one of them and believe the flaws to either be fixable or not that big of a deal in contrast to the player's strengths, just pull the trigger. Ideally you'd pick first in a year in which Andrew Luck was available, but other than that every single one of those guys will have questions.
I suspect it’s much more about where they landed than who they might have been.

For example, were the run of Bengals QB failures (or Jets or Giants or…) really a result of the kids busting? If they drafted a different player does it go differently? I don’t think there is a right answer for some situations, just a sausage factory.

Sure there’s the Lebron/Luck level talent that transcends but even the potentially great players (non ultra elite) are going to need something.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,267
306, row 14
Is Williams in that category as the pre-draft Manning, Luck or Lawrence? Or is there just more heightened awareness around here because of the position the Pats are in?
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I suspect it’s much more about where they landed than who they might have been.

For example, were the run of Bengals QB failures (or Jets or Giants or…) really a result of the kids busting? If they drafted a different player does it go differently? I don’t think there is a right answer for some situations, just a sausage factory.

Sure there’s the Lebron/Luck level talent that transcends but even the potentially great players (non ultra elite) are going to need something.
Environment obviously plays a role, but the Bengals were trash and Burrow was good there right away and I wouldn't necessarily call Zach Taylor a great coach. Stroud has Slowik doing a great job, but a lot of people projected that team to be among the worst in football again coming into this season. I think getting the right guy at that position elevates your entire franchise.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,671
Gallows Hill
Is Williams in that category as the pre-draft Manning, Luck or Lawrence? Or is there just more heightened awareness around here because of the position the Pats are in?
I think it’s the latter. Pre draft Manning was probably the 2nd most hyped athlete coming into a professional league in my sports watching lifetime behind LeBron James. The hype with Luck probably had more to do with where he was going (Indy to replace Manning). Lawrence hype was probably similar to the guys this year. But the hype for Manning was on another level when he was coming out if Tennessee.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,833
Hingham, MA
I think it’s the latter. Pre draft Manning was probably the 2nd most hyped athlete coming into a professional league in my sports watching lifetime behind LeBron James. The hype with Luck probably had more to do with where he was going (Indy to replace Manning). Lawrence hype was probably similar to the guys this year. But the hype for Manning was on another level when he was coming out if Tennessee.
Yeah, there have only been a small handful of guys who you knew would be the #1 pick prior to them playing their final season and maybe even second to last season: Manning, Luck, Lawrence. Personally I would exclude Caleb Williams from the list, but YMMV.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,034
Isle of Plum
Environment obviously plays a role, but the Bengals were trash and Burrow was good there right away and I wouldn't necessarily call Zach Taylor a great coach. Stroud has Slowik doing a great job, but a lot of people projected that team to be among the worst in football again coming into this season. I think getting the right guy at that position elevates your entire franchise.
You are right - for sure the right guy can elevate but to me it’s a matter of degree not a binary aside from that special handful.

I’m just saying I think that 30-40 success rate for an incoming ‘stud qb’ could swing wildly based as much on the situation as much as skill, but I’ve never really studied it so could be way off.

Fwiw I was actually thinking Akili Smith period of Bengal draft busts lol but Burrow a good example of upside.
 

jablo1312

New Member
Sep 20, 2005
999
The great conundrum of drafting a QB is that two opposing things can be true at the same time. QB is the most over-drafted position on the board as desperate teams seek a solution for the most important position on the field. But, in looking closely at many past drafts the following strikes one as obvious.
1. If you want a top level QB, you are best served by having a very high draft pick because the hits are gone early with rare exception.
2. If you want a top level QB you must be unafraid of risk since a goodly number of those high QB picks will be busts.
3. Drafting the best available QB out of need is a bad strategy.

I'm cherry picking here but you'll get my point.
In 2020 Joe Burrow-1, Tua Tagovailoa-5, Justin Herbert-6, Jordan Love-26 and Jalen Hurts-53 represent a cornucopia of QB talent
OTOH-in 2021 Trevor Lawrence-1, Zach Wilson-2, Trey Lance-3, Justin Fields-11 and Mac Jones-15 which illustrates both points 2 and 3.
2018 gave us Baker Mayfield-1, Sam Darnold-3, Josh Allen-7, Josh Rosen-10, Lamar Jackson-32
In addition somebody thought Mitch Trubisky would be a better pro than Patrick Mahomes.

So its clear that fortune favors the bold but mostly the bold go down in flames. So what do the Pats do? Drafting MHJ or one of the two top LTs is a safer and legitimate way to start the rebuild but it is not without some risk. If you evaluate an available QB (top 3) as a franchise cornerstone, then, by all means, pull the trigger. But don't reach because this is a multi-year rebuild and acquiring "elite" talent is critical each of the next 3 years. What would I do? Way above my pay grade so I'll be a great SOSHer and simply second guess whatever they do.
Fortune favors the bold, the bold mostly go down in flames...but so do most team-building approaches in the NFL. The (by-far) cleanest path to playoff contention and beyond in the NFL is acquiring an NFL caliber QB. If you have the pick, a dire need at QB, and there are legitimate prospects up there...its tough for me to see not taking a QB there.

If you absolutely have to go outside of that, it's extremely tough to make a the call to draft anything besides WR, OT, and Edge. Luckily for the Pats, there are legit elite prospects at the top of this draft at both WR and OT. Even so, if they decide to not go QB early (for whatever reason) I wouldn't have a problem with them trading down out of a top 5 spot (look at the haul the Cardinals got for the pick that became Will Anderson). If they don't go QB, and then don't trade down, getting Harrison Jr. (if he's there) makes the most sense to me.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,858
What are the negatives on Caleb Williams? The stats are off the charts. Plays in a pretty solid league. Won the Heisman as a junior. Has ridiculous arm talent and is a good athlete. Not that big so is that it? Or is there something more?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,833
Hingham, MA
What are the negatives on Caleb Williams? The stats are off the charts. Plays in a pretty solid league. Won the Heisman as a junior. Has ridiculous arm talent and is a good athlete. Not that big so is that it? Or is there something more?
Height, seems to make most of his plays off structure / playground ball.
 

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
3,226
Manning vs Leaf was almost a coin flip. Manning wasn't heads and shoulders the best prospect in that draft.
 

EL Jeffe

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2006
1,329
What are the negatives on Caleb Williams? The stats are off the charts. Plays in a pretty solid league. Won the Heisman as a junior. Has ridiculous arm talent and is a good athlete. Not that big so is that it? Or is there something more?
A little bit of the Mahomes Syndrome of trying to make highlight plays out of structure. Mahomes can obviously do it, but he may be 1 of 1. Zach Wilson did it at BYU, but NFL defenses are just a little bit different than the COIVD schedule Wilson played in 2020.

That said, Williams has ridiculous talent. But he's going to have to do more in the pocket and in structure than what he's doing at the college level.
 

EL Jeffe

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2006
1,329
As of this moment, my QB rankings go:
  1. Williams
  2. Daniels
  3. Nix
  4. Maye (I'm much lower on him than the consensus)
  5. Penix
Williams is the clear #1 for me, barring some sort of medical or unreported off field issue I'm unaware of.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
I think it’s the latter. Pre draft Manning was probably the 2nd most hyped athlete coming into a professional league in my sports watching lifetime behind LeBron James. The hype with Luck probably had more to do with where he was going (Indy to replace Manning). Lawrence hype was probably similar to the guys this year. But the hype for Manning was on another level when he was coming out if Tennessee.
I'm 34 but I really don't remember the hype for Manning being at this level. There was legitimate debate between Ryan Leaf and Peyton and Peyton definitely had flaws (I think he was considered somewhat of a choke artist at Tennessee).

I mean, I think its a legitimate argument if he's top 5 in football when it comes to hype. When you enter in other sports, I don't think Manning is even close to 2nd.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,030
What are the negatives on Caleb Williams? The stats are off the charts. Plays in a pretty solid league. Won the Heisman as a junior. Has ridiculous arm talent and is a good athlete. Not that big so is that it? Or is there something more?
Size, not great performance against the few good defenses, lot of LONG plays where he holds it way too long, sometimes rolls himself into trouble.
On the other hand the arm is legit and he's fairly mobile.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,796
Is Williams in that category as the pre-draft Manning, Luck or Lawrence? Or is there just more heightened awareness around here because of the position the Pats are in?
He’s been pretty hyped. I’m not sure what the Patriots have to do with it: they seem unlikely to get to #1.
 

Arroyoyo

New Member
Dec 13, 2021
836
I'm 34 but I really don't remember the hype for Manning being at this level. There was legitimate debate between Ryan Leaf and Peyton and Peyton definitely had flaws (I think he was considered somewhat of a choke artist at Tennessee).

I mean, I think its a legitimate argument if he's top 5 in football when it comes to hype. When you enter in other sports, I don't think Manning is even close to 2nd.
Manning, in most circles, was the consensus pick over Leaf. There were some that thought Leaf was better, but Manning was most definitely known as a once-in-a-generation talent coming out of Tennessee.

I’d say he lived up to it.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,442
What are the negatives on Caleb Williams? The stats are off the charts. Plays in a pretty solid league. Won the Heisman as a junior. Has ridiculous arm talent and is a good athlete. Not that big so is that it? Or is there something more?
The report that he wanted an ownership stake in whatever team he was drafted didn't go over well. Rumor was it was floated by his father, but who knows.

There's been a ton written about him crying and losing it with his mother after losing to UCLA. He responded well by talking about mental health and said all the right things, but that's another narrative.

I'm not sure I buy either one or if organizations care, but they seem like a couple of warning signs.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,839
Needham, MA
Yeah, as others have noted, Manning vs. Leaf wasn't a slam dunk by any means, both were hyped. Also, "Suck for Luck" was a thing before anyone knew that he was going to Indy to replace Manning. Manning was a long time ago and the league was very different then. In the last 15 years or so I think the only two guys who were universally seen as a "sure thing" at QB were Luck and Lawrence.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I didn't see Elway, so Luck to me was far and away the most hyped as a "sure thing" QB prospect I've seen. And even then there were some "but is RGIII better?" discourse in the months leading up to that draft.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
Manning, in most circles, was the consensus pick over Leaf. There were some that thought Leaf was better, but Manning was most definitely known as a once-in-a-generation talent coming out of Tennessee.

I’d say he lived up to it.
That's fair but I still maintain that he's nowhere near the 2nd most hyped athlete coming out of college in the last 30 years. I mean, I think both Wembanyama and LeBron surpass him. Sidney Crosby in the NHL.
Maybe I was too young too appreciate the hype but I would actually say that Luck (and maybe Trevor Lawrence) had more hype than he did
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,343
That's fair but I still maintain that he's nowhere near the 2nd most hyped athlete coming out of college in the last 30 years. I mean, I think both Wembanyama and LeBron surpass him. Sidney Crosby in the NHL.
Maybe pedantic or overly literal, but none of those three went to college.
 

EL Jeffe

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2006
1,329
Caleb Williams, QB
Patrick Paul, OT
Brian Thomas Jr., WR

That would be my early read on an ideal 3 round haul


11/29 Edit: With Brugler mocking Thomas Jr. in the 1st round, he's not lasting to the 3rd. So maybe a guy like Devontez Walker instead. Essentially, I'm looking for an X with some juice (what everyone wanted Thornton to be, but a guy without Thornton's limitations).
 
Last edited:

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
I don't know if @Super Nomario cut the video before Dan Hatman talks about his concerns with Maye (I am the faceless voice before that, if it is in there, saying Daniels is my number 2 and I have concerns with Maye). But look, right now there is so much groupthinking going on it makes me sick. I hate draft groupthink.
No, I don't, and I can't even get it now. Should have saved off the whole video before I edited it.

I'm 34 but I really don't remember the hype for Manning being at this level. There was legitimate debate between Ryan Leaf and Peyton and Peyton definitely had flaws (I think he was considered somewhat of a choke artist at Tennessee).
Leaf came on late and was kind of an exciting alternative (kind of like RGIII the Luck year), but Manning would have been #1 the year before, went back, was still #1. He was the best QB prospect since Elway, and there hasn't been anyone on the same level since. Luck is closest. Lawrence a bit behind that, and maybe Williams this year is on the same level as Lawrence.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,544
Leaf came on late and was kind of an exciting alternative (kind of like RGIII the Luck year), but Manning would have been #1 the year before, went back, was still #1. He was the best QB prospect since Elway, and there hasn't been anyone on the same level since. Luck is closest. Lawrence a bit behind that, and maybe Williams this year is on the same level as Lawrence.
I remember being really excited about Leaf. Part of that was the Washington State connection and Bledsoe. The guy could sling it. It's too bad his head couldn't catch up to his physical talent. He was out of the league at record speed for a #2 pick. Peyton was a generational prospect but even at Tenn couldn't win the big games.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,023
Unreal America
I think people confused the media’s need to cover a horse race with an actual debate among front offices. Manning was always going to be the #1 pick. The hype for Manning was monstrous. Leaf was something to talk about for the months leading into the draft. And that was during the glory days of sports talk radio. There needed to be a debate that generated takes.

I’m of the opinion that a franchise in need should always take the QB if a legitimate one is available. I mean we’ve seen our very own Pats execute both approaches.

In 1991 the traded away the #1 pick to disastrous results.

In 1993, with far from a finished team, they took Bledsoe.

If they’re in a position to take one of the top QBs don’t overthink it. Take him.
 

dirtynine

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 17, 2002
8,439
Philly
Wasn’t there a ton of hype around Eli as well? I seem to remember that as almost as big as Peyton. Maybe it was the trade-to-NY drama.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,157
Beginning to wonder if Drake Maye played himself outside the top 4 QBs this year. Take out a 4 TD game vs. Campbell and he had a very pedestrian 20-9 TD ratio and somewhere around a 60% completion percentage while not playing a murders row of defenses. He is beginning to look a lot closer to Mac 2.0 than Herbert who he had drawn comparisons to. Maybe Zach Wilson is a better comp for him because he can run a bit and has a better arm than Mac but the decision making is questionable at best. I'll wait to see what JT and others have to say after scouting his film more but I'm getting very nervous about him. I think at this point Jayden Daniels and cringe Bo Nix and possibly even Penix have a shot at being taken before Maye. Williams seems to be the clear 1 but I no longer think Maye is the clear #2.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,858
I hear you @j44thor - I'm thinking that if the Pats have the #2 pick and Caleb Williams is gone, just take MHJ and then the best QB available in round 2. If Maye falls so far that the Pats can snag him with the #34 pick, great. If he doesn't, then I'm maybe at this point just as comfortable with McCarthy (say) as I am with Maye.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,296
Wasn’t there a ton of hype around Eli as well? I seem to remember that as almost as big as Peyton. Maybe it was the trade-to-NY drama.
Personal anecdote: was taking a tour of the New Orleans Garden District in the summer of 1999. When the tour guide stopped in front of Archie Manning's home, he of course mentioned Peyton Manning, as P Manning had just finished his 2nd season finishing 2nd in the NFL MVP vote. He also mentioned (paraphrasing) that "Peyton has a younger brother, Eli, who is playing high school football. And we here in 'Nawlins are going to do everything we can to make sure he comes back here as a pro. Because Eli is going to be even better than his brother."

By the time of the NFL draft, that hype train had slowed down a bit, but he was clearly the consensus #1 overall pick in the 2004 draft. And, of course, the Manning's made sure there was plenty of extra drama.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,157
I'd strongly consider Daniels at #2 over Maye and MJH I think. There could be a record number of QBs picked this draft which should lead to quality WR/T still being available at the top of round 2. I'd rather have a top 3 QB and top 8WR/T than a top 1 WR and top 7-8 QB. Latest mocks have McCarthy going 1st rd so I think you are looking at Ewers as probably the best available QB in rd 2, assuming he lasts that long. There are a lot of teams that need upgrades at QB this off-season.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,030
Beginning to wonder if Drake Maye played himself outside the top 4 QBs this year. Take out a 4 TD game vs. Campbell and he had a very pedestrian 20-9 TD ratio and somewhere around a 60% completion percentage while not playing a murders row of defenses. He is beginning to look a lot closer to Mac 2.0 than Herbert who he had drawn comparisons to. Maybe Zach Wilson is a better comp for him because he can run a bit and has a better arm than Mac but the decision making is questionable at best. I'll wait to see what JT and others have to say after scouting his film more but I'm getting very nervous about him. I think at this point Jayden Daniels and cringe Bo Nix and possibly even Penix have a shot at being taken before Maye. Williams seems to be the clear 1 but I no longer think Maye is the clear #2.
I think there is a case Maye could go as the 3rd QB for sure. I don't see any way someone other than Daniels jumps him, those other guys have plenty of their own warts for an NFL team, and they don't have the top end Maye does. One of the most important things.... college stats don't matter. Or at least not in evaluation of prospects, plenty of high drafted NFL successes had comparatively poor college stats, plenty of the best college stats guys go undrafted or late rounds and never play and NFL game.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
I hear you @j44thor - I'm thinking that if the Pats have the #2 pick and Caleb Williams is gone, just take MHJ and then the best QB available in round 2. If Maye falls so far that the Pats can snag him with the #34 pick, great. If he doesn't, then I'm maybe at this point just as comfortable with McCarthy (say) as I am with Maye.
If the Pats have the #2 pick and don't want a QB, they should trade back with someone who does IMO.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
As someone who doesn't watch all that much college football during the season, how comparable is Maye's situation in college to Josh Allen's? Because we ding prospects for playing with superior talent all the time, so is this a case of not having the surrounding cast to put up Heisman winning numbers?