Trade Kutter Crawford or fire Alex Cora

Status
Not open for further replies.

RCheco56

New Member
Jul 20, 2023
106
Providence, RI
On the whole I want to like Alex Cora. He seems very loyal w/ a lot of the players, and shows real patience w/ some like Jarren Duran. He was the manager for the last Boston World Series win. But what he is doing to the pitching staff is criminal.

The one redeeming part of this season is the Red Sox building a young pitching staff. Bello, Crawford and Houck are young arms any team would be ecstatic to build a staff around. But Cora has zero faith in Crawford or Houck as evidenced by his quick hooks of both. He famously pulled Tanner in a game against the Nats when he was pitching a no-hitter. Today, once again, what appeared to be a solid start from the improving Crawford was ended after a solo homer. The final numbers: 4.2 innings, 73 pitches, 2 runs. Nowhere near good enough for the red sox manager.

If Cora doesn't believe in 2 pitchers any other team in the league would be ecstatic to have, than either trade Crawford (I can't bring myself to say trade Tanner Houck) or fire Cora. If it's trade Kutter, then include Verdugo and Blaze Jordan/Nick Yorke or both to get Dylan Cease or Mitch Keller. Then have a sit down with Cora and explain that he will have faith in the pitcher the team just acquired, or he will be shown the door.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,948
Maine
On the whole I want to like Alex Cora. He seems very loyal w/ a lot of the players, and shows real patience w/ some like Jarren Duran. He was the manager for the last Boston World Series win. But what he is doing to the pitching staff is criminal.

The one redeeming part of this season is the Red Sox building a young pitching staff. Bello, Crawford and Houck are young arms any team would be ecstatic to build a staff around. But Cora has zero faith in Crawford or Houck as evidenced by his quick hooks of both. He famously pulled Tanner in a game against the Nats when he was pitching a no-hitter. Today, once again, what appeared to be a solid start from the improving Crawford was ended after a solo homer. The final numbers: 4.2 innings, 73 pitches, 2 runs. Nowhere near good enough for the red sox manager.

If Cora doesn't believe in 2 pitchers any other team in the league would be ecstatic to have, than either trade Crawford (I can't bring myself to say trade Tanner Houck) or fire Cora. If it's trade Kutter, then include Verdugo and Blaze Jordan/Nick Yorke or both to get Dylan Cease or Mitch Keller. Then have a sit down with Cora and explain that he will have faith in the pitcher the team just acquired, or he will be shown the door.
Hate to break it to you, but a lot of these decisions on limiting pitch counts and pulling a guy a batter early rather than a batter late are made for Cora (and any other manager). It has nothing to do with faith and everything to do with analytics.

And as I recall, the Houck pull was about protecting a young asset who was on a pitch limit. And they won that game, so it's not like pulling Houck did any harm (he wasn't going to finish that game regardless).
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,491
Thanks for breaking it to me. If analytics makes the decision it can't be wrong
I’m definitely not a Grade A poster here- maybe a C+ quality at best…. But step back and think about this. While it might not be a bad post at all…. It’s not a good thread start. There’s an Alex Cora thread already that your post could be under and in that context it’s a decent post. Same with a thread about ‘23 starting pitching.
The team has a day off tomorrow. Whitlock needs a look. Martin hasn’t pitched. There’s lots to consider here. If Cora pulled Crawford when he did and the Sox were tied it would have been more an issue. Take a breath
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,626
Miami (oh, Miami!)
If it's trade Kutter, then include Verdugo and Blaze Jordan/Nick Yorke or both to get Dylan Cease or Mitch Keller. Then have a sit down with Cora and explain that he will have faith in the pitcher the team just acquired, or he will be shown the door.
Because the trade deadline has passed, Crawford could only be released, not traded to a ML club.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,282
Not sure if this is the place for this conversation...

But his 1st time through the order Crawford, as a starter this season, had a 2.25 ERA. The 2nd time he had a 7.30 ERA (don't think these include today).

Also, on the season...

ERA as a starter: 4.52
ERA as a reliever: 1.66

It might make a lot of sense for him to go to the bullpen, keep Pivetta in his current role, & go with a rotation of Bello/Paxton/Sale/Pivetta/Houck.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
I have to admit, the thread title made me look.
On the whole I want to like Alex Cora. He seems very loyal w/ a lot of the players, and shows real patience w/ some like Jarren Duran. He was the manager for the last Boston World Series win. But what he is doing to the pitching staff is criminal.
The one redeeming part of this season is the Red Sox building a young pitching staff. Bello, Crawford and Houck are young arms any team would be ecstatic to build a staff around. But Cora has zero faith in Crawford or Houck as evidenced by his quick hooks of both. He famously pulled Tanner in a game against the Nats when he was pitching a no-hitter. Today, once again, what appeared to be a solid start from the improving Crawford was ended after a solo homer. The final numbers: 4.2 innings, 73 pitches, 2 runs. Nowhere near good enough for the red sox manager.
If Cora doesn't believe in 2 pitchers any other team in the league would be ecstatic to have, than either trade Crawford (I can't bring myself to say trade Tanner Houck) or fire Cora. If it's trade Kutter, then include Verdugo and Blaze Jordan/Nick Yorke or both to get Dylan Cease or Mitch Keller. Then have a sit down with Cora and explain that he will have faith in the pitcher the team just acquired, or he will be shown the door.
But your post suggests you've drawn this conclusion based on 2 games?
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,696
Hate to break it to you, but a lot of these decisions on limiting pitch counts and pulling a guy a batter early rather than a batter late are made for Cora (and any other manager). It has nothing to do with faith and everything to do with analytics.
This was likely it - Akil Baddoo was the only Tigers hitter to see Crawford a third time and promptly took him deep, making it a one-run game. If Kutter wants to work deeper into games, he can prove he deserves it with his pitching, otherwise I have no issues with the manager pulling him 'too soon' and trying to preserve a lead.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,342
Sucks that all the young controlled position players aren't a redeeming part of this season.
 

RCheco56

New Member
Jul 20, 2023
106
Providence, RI
I like the sox building a young starting staff. Bello, Houck and Crawford being the nucleus. I like Crawford's stuff. Like Houck he just does not seem to be given the chance to see if he can go deeper in games. The San Fran game where he was pulled after 5 allowing no runs seemed like another example
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,817
Alamogordo
I like the sox building a young starting staff. Bello, Houck and Crawford being the nucleus. I like Crawford's stuff. Like Houck he just does not seem to be given the chance to see if he can go deeper in games. The San Fran game where he was pulled after 5 allowing no runs seemed like another example
A team that is up 5 games or something in the playoff race and has some room for error could afford to do that. This team does not have that luxury.
 

RCheco56

New Member
Jul 20, 2023
106
Providence, RI
A team that is up 5 games or something in the playoff race and has some room for error could afford to do that. This team does not have that luxury.
Yeah. Today they had arms to go to. Against the Giants they pulled him and brought in Llovera. The stiff San Fran had DFAd. That game mattered too
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,734
Just so we are clear, the complaint here boils down to Cora doing everything to ensure a win today but because it *might* be at the expense of a future win (assuming there is some correlation between how many IP Crawford throws per start and wins), he should be relieved of his job. Even after the team got the win. Is that roughly correct?
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
I like the sox building a young starting staff. Bello, Houck and Crawford being the nucleus. I like Crawford's stuff. Like Houck he just does not seem to be given the chance to see if he can go deeper in games. The San Fran game where he was pulled after 5 allowing no runs seemed like another example
If you're talking about Crawford this year, he's faced SFG once. Pitched 5.2. was pulled in the 6th after giving up line drive single, wild pitch, line drive single and deep fly out. And a run.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,675
Youk on the broadcast said something about expecting a lower pitch count on Crawford today. Maybe planned light outing? Tomorrow is their only day off in a 4 week stretch.

The thread title / concept is absurd - they can do either, both or none, they aren't really related.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,123
Entering today, Crawford had a 4.52 ERA as a starter across 64 innings (14 starts). He has been much better in relief.

Seems like a textbook example of a guy who should be on a short leash.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.