This is now: BB and the direction of the Patriots

Status
Not open for further replies.

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,666
Hingham, MA
It does show something. It shows the offensive coaching staff last year wasn't a historic catastrophe and personnel was more at fault for their performance than most people previously believed. I mean, just look at how BOB's hiring was received, I remember reading someone in this very board argue BOB would represent a bigger improvement for the 2023 Patriots than keeping Patricia as OC and replacing Mac Jones with prime Tom Brady would. In retrospect, we all vastly overestimated his impact in the offense's suckitude last year.
That was, ironically, me, back when I believed in Mac Jones.

The reason I said I'm not sure it means anything is that I think it's not out of the realm of possibilities that last year broke Mac, and therefore this season never had a chance with Mac. So while the offensive performance was worse under BOB than MP, it might be because MP permanently broke things (for Mac). I'm not sure if I believe that to be true or not, but I think it's at least possible.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
Was he officially promoted to DC by Siriani? I thought Dasai remained the DC, but Patricia took over the defensive play calling in game.

Which has certainly worked, LOL. They lost 20-17 to Seattle, beat the Giants 33-25 and lost to the fucking Cardinals at home 35-31 since the switch.
Patricia is a pox on any team he is on.

His crowning achievement is being the DC of the Pats when the Eagles scored 500 points in the Super Bowl. He then went 13-29 in Detroit. Excellent stuff there. Then he became the OC for the Pats in 22 and it was as successful as his 13-29 tenure in Detroit.

And now he's in Philly, getting murdered by Arizona.

It is incredible some of these guys, failures for 6+ years, continuing to get prime jobs.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,948
That was, ironically, me, back when I believed in Mac Jones.

The reason I said I'm not sure it means anything is that I think it's not out of the realm of possibilities that last year broke Mac, and therefore this season never had a chance with Mac. So while the offensive performance was worse under BOB than MP, it might be because MP permanently broke things (for Mac). I'm not sure if I believe that to be true or not, but I think it's at least possible.
I don't. If you're getting arguably outplayed by Bailey Zappe in a system because you don't like/trust the coach, you're not an NFL starter.
If you get a full offseason and a new coordinator with past success and you're still broken.... you aren't an NFL QB. Every QB eventually faces some adversity, if you crumble and piss yourself like Mac Jones you'll never make it. All the things that went wrong the last 2 years+ are things people had concerns about coming out of college, just a bit worse because people didn't realize how bad he was mentally.
Jones "broke" because he was fully incapable of making good decisions, feeling pressure, and applying basic fundamentals of technique under pressure. Even as a rookie there were plenty of concerning signs (he panicked under pressure, he didn't adapt to the schemed option not being there, and there were throws he couldn't/wouldn't make.
 

Jettisoned

Member
SoSH Member
May 6, 2008
1,059
Patricia is a pox on any team he is on.

His crowning achievement is being the DC of the Pats when the Eagles scored 500 points in the Super Bowl. He then went 13-29 in Detroit. Excellent stuff there. Then he became the OC for the Pats in 22 and it was as successful as his 13-29 tenure in Detroit.

And now he's in Philly, getting murdered by Arizona.

It is incredible some of these guys, failures for 6+ years, continuing to get prime jobs.
Really? Is that his crowning achievement? It wasn't being the DC when they won 2 super bowls in the 3 seasons prior?
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Patricia is a pox on any team he is on.

His crowning achievement is being the DC of the Pats when the Eagles scored 500 points in the Super Bowl. He then went 13-29 in Detroit. Excellent stuff there. Then he became the OC for the Pats in 22 and it was as successful as his 13-29 tenure in Detroit.

And now he's in Philly, getting murdered by Arizona.

It is incredible some of these guys, failures for 6+ years, continuing to get prime jobs.
His crowning achievement as a coach was being the DC of the SB Champion Pats in 2016-17, with his defense allowing the fewest points in the league and allowing the 8th fewest yards.

You don't have to like him and most people don't, but to pretend he's never done anything well in his football coaching career is silly IMO. You don't judge a coach on one game (and that game was a strange one, the Eagles allowed SIX HUNDRED AND THIRTEEN YARDS and their DC was Jim Schwartz who is generally regarded very well).
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,666
Hingham, MA
I don't. If you're getting arguably outplayed by Bailey Zappe in a system because you don't like/trust the coach, you're not an NFL starter.
If you get a full offseason and a new coordinator with past success and you're still broken.... you aren't an NFL QB. Every QB eventually faces some adversity, if you crumble and piss yourself like Mac Jones you'll never make it. All the things that went wrong the last 2 years+ are things people had concerns about coming out of college, just a bit worse because people didn't realize how bad he was mentally.
Jones "broke" because he was fully incapable of making good decisions, feeling pressure, and applying basic fundamentals of technique under pressure. Even as a rookie there were plenty of concerning signs (he panicked under pressure, he didn't adapt to the schemed option not being there, and there were throws he couldn't/wouldn't make.
That's fair. Like I said, I don't necessarily believe it to be true.
 
Oct 12, 2023
732
The ideas that BB is a bad GM and Patricia are a bad coach seem at odds with each other.

those defenses under Patricia were highly successful. Some years they gave up a ton of yards, this is true (usually the years of injury or talent deficiency in the secondary). But top 10 in points allowed isn’t an accident.

either he’s a good defensive coach with Bb’s bad talent, or Bill did well acquiring talent and Patricia rode those coattails to good defenses.

or maybe it’s both, he’s a pretty good defensive coach who had good talent to work with.

But the performances of those defenses is one of the few things that absolutely cannot be “But Brady!”. Belichick the GM or Patricia have to get credit for them in some form or fashion
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,666
Hingham, MA
The ideas that BB is a bad GM and Patricia are a bad coach seem at odds with each other.

those defenses under Patricia were highly successful. Some years they gave up a ton of yards, this is true (usually the years of injury or talent deficiency in the secondary). But top 10 in points allowed isn’t an accident.

either he’s a good defensive coach with Bb’s bad talent, or Bill did well acquiring talent and Patricia rode those coattails to good defenses.

or maybe it’s both, he’s a pretty good defensive coach who had good talent to work with.

But the performances of those defenses is one of the few things that absolutely cannot be “But Brady!”. Belichick the GM or Patricia have to get credit for them in some form or fashion
I don't think anyone has ever called BB a bad GM on the defensive side of the ball.
 

SemperFidelisSox

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2008
31,451
Boston, MA
Both the Herald column and the one in the Athletic don’t put any blame on the Krafts. This seemed like a sanctioned media hit that came from the top. A page out of the Red Sox playbook.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
His crowning achievement as a coach was being the DC of the SB Champion Pats in 2016-17, with his defense allowing the fewest points in the league and allowing the 8th fewest yards.

You don't have to like him and most people don't, but to pretend he's never done anything well in his football coaching career is silly IMO. You don't judge a coach on one game (and that game was a strange one, the Eagles allowed SIX HUNDRED AND THIRTEEN YARDS and their DC was Jim Schwartz who is generally regarded very well).
I know, I know. I shouldn't have gone so far. Patricia once had success.

But still, since those SBs, Patricia has been a complete failure for 7 seasons in whatever job he's done.
 

SemperFidelisSox

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2008
31,451
Boston, MA
I'm not saying you're wrong to notice this, but, what were the Krafts supposed to do in this situation absent from moving on from BB sooner?
Overrule Bill when it came to keeping Brady. Spend more on payroll. Not let the coaching staff and locker room turn into an episode of Game of Thrones.
 

FL4WL3SS

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
14,930
Andy Brickley's potty mouth
I don't think he's capable of processing at NFL speed. Perhaps he was when he first came into the league. But he isn't now. We may never know the precise reason why. Honestly it doesn't really matter.
Because the offense was extremely simplified for him and it worked for half the season before defenses started to realize he sucked and adjusted accordingly. He was smoke and mirrors the first half of 2021 and he's been trash ever since the curtain was pulled.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,948
Both the Herald column and the one in the Athletic don’t put any blame on the Krafts. This seemed like a sanctioned media hit that came from the top. A page out of the Red Sox playbook.
Yeah, it's been pretty clear all year that one or both of the Krafts have been very aggressively leaking to the press to burnish themselves and knock Belichick. Very much feels like they thought that forcing Belichick to go to Bill O'Brien was going to fix Mac (who Kraft loves, because he's the QB and Kraft is a starfucker of the highest order), and then when it didn't work they threw a tantrum.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,021
Isle of Plum
I'm not saying you're wrong to notice this, but, what were the Krafts supposed to do in this situation absent from moving on from BB sooner?
Seems more like disgruntled players and coaches.

Not impossible, but if I’m the Krafts I wouldn’t want this piece making us look like a keystone cops routine. Bill just hangs it on the QBs and Offense, as though this some how exonerates him.

More likely one of them firing back.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,021
Isle of Plum
Overrule Bill when it came to keeping Brady. Spend more on payroll. Not let the coaching staff and locker room turn into an episode of Game of Thrones.
Those first two are really good ones, but ultimately they played their last card last year and brought in the only possible offensive coach that could conceivably work.

Feels like Bill turned it into Game of Thrones, so yeah hindsight, but I think you had to try.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,487
Browns lost Jack Conklin, (2 time first team all pro) his replacement Dawand Jones, and Jedrick Willis on the OL this year. Other guys in spots, too.

They are playing their 4th string QB. They lost their best player by a mile, Nick Chubb, in week 2. They lost their 60 million dollar QB for half the season. They have played PJ Walker and DTR in multiple games this season. Neither is better than Mac.

Browns are 4th in the AFC in points scored.

You can’t do the injury game because literally every team is injured.
Probably true.

And they averaged a whopping 17.5 points in the 6 games Walker/DTR started. Just for shits and giggles, remove the 39 point game against the Colts from the mix - you know, the one where the Browns D had a TD, 4 turnovers, and put the Browns offense in a position where all but two scoring drives started on the Colts side of the field - and they averaged 13.4 points in those starts.

So, games started by Watson/Flacco - 35 points per game (1st in the NFL). Games started by shitty QBs - 13.4 points per game (last in the NFL).

Its almost like having a credible QB has a huge, giant, incredible impact on the performance of the offense.

Hmmm...I wonder if theres a way we can apply that to the Patriots...
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,948
Seems more like disgruntled players and coaches.

Not impossible, but if I’m the Krafts I wouldn’t want this piece making us look like a keystone cops routine. Bill just hangs it on the QBs and Offense, as though this some how exonerates him.

More likely one of them firing back.
Some of this might be (though who is the source that Bill had to be convinced to switch OCs, or that Klemm got into it with Groh, those are both obviously execs). But all year there have been lots of leaks that were ownership adjacent. As to wanting to look like keystone cops.... they're about to move on from the greatest HC/GM ever to hold the posiiton in the sport, he's had 1 BAD year, it's a huge step, and they want to soften the ground to justify it. Imagine if you didn't have all the leaks.... what is the case... "he missed on a couple draft picks?" "The QB, who is about to be replaced sucks"... firing Belichick isn't CRAZY, but you're talking about a resume that nobody else has and even the "bad" years include a playoff appearance, a year they missed by 1 game and another where they were in it until the last 2 weeks.... that doesn't always get you fired even if you didn't have oh... the 20 or so best years in history before it.
 

FL4WL3SS

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
14,930
Andy Brickley's potty mouth
Probably true.

And they averaged a whopping 17.5 points in the 6 games Walker/DTR started. Just for shits and giggles, remove the 39 point game against the Colts from the mix - you know, the one where the Browns D had a TD, 4 turnovers, and put the Browns offense in a position where all but two scoring drives started on the Colts side of the field - and they averaged 13.4 points in those starts.

So, games started by Watson/Flacco - 35 points per game (1st in the NFL). Games started by shitty QBs - 13.4 points per game (last in the NFL).

Its almost like having a credible QB has a huge, giant, incredible impact on the performance of the offense.

Hmmm...I wonder if theres a way we can apply that to the Patriots...
It's amazing the hoops people have jumped through to not recognize how much havoc Mac has caused on this franchise. There is no cure for a shitty QB.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,021
Isle of Plum
Some of this might be (though who is the source that Bill had to be convinced to switch OCs, or that Klemm got into it with Groh, those are both obviously execs). But all year there have been lots of leaks that were ownership adjacent. As to wanting to look like keystone cops.... they're about to move on from the greatest HC/GM ever to hold the posiiton in the sport, he's had 1 BAD year, it's a huge step, and they want to soften the ground to justify it. Imagine if you didn't have all the leaks.... what is the case... "he missed on a couple draft picks?" "The QB, who is about to be replaced sucks"... firing Belichick isn't CRAZY, but you're talking about a resume that nobody else has and even the "bad" years include a playoff appearance, a year they missed by 1 game and another where they were in it until the last 2 weeks.... that doesn't always get you fired even if you didn't have oh... the 20 or so best years in history before it.
Sure, and I’ve got no insight and yes it could be coming from anywhere

However, re: the bolded, those could absolutely all be camp Obrien or Mac. They are the most potentially damaged by these outcomes.

If anything, the Krafts have spoken more with silence on Bills future.

edit - that said, your ‘softening the ground’ angle is hard to discount completely.
 
Last edited:

Sausage in Section 17

Poker Champ
SoSH Member
Mar 17, 2004
2,096
Yeah, it's been pretty clear all year that one or both of the Krafts have been very aggressively leaking to the press to burnish themselves and knock Belichick. Very much feels like they thought that forcing Belichick to go to Bill O'Brien was going to fix Mac (who Kraft loves, because he's the QB and Kraft is a starfucker of the highest order), and then when it didn't work they threw a tantrum.
And they will get what they deserve if they let him leave.

Winning it all is SO SO hard. Even when you have the best coach in history, and the best QB in history, you still have to navigate injuries, luck, and 31 other teams that are trying REALLY HARD to knock you off your perch. And even then, you are lucky to win, what, maybe 1/3 or 1/4 of the time. This is the best any team has ever done in history. Now that the team has lost the best QB in history, how often do we think that ought to happen?

How much time does anyone imagine a new coach/GM will need to get a new system installed, with their preferred personnel? How much time should the Kraft's give them?

If the Kraft's really want to make sure they do it "the right way", they will let the best coach ever decide when it's time to step away. It's hard to believe they can actually do better any time soon, or maybe even any time later.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,628
It's unfair to say Patricia lacks defensive chops. While coaching the Lions, I believe he deployed the quarters defense vs. the Rams that BB exploited in the SB win. He also maintains he was the one whose pre-game analysis identified the pass play the Seahawks were going to run that Butler intercepted. There remains some question, though, whether his best talent is executing what BB wants vs. coming up with his own schemes. The defense seemed to get better under the direction of Flores than Patricia here in NE, and it certainly played a more aggressive style that players find attractive. How much of that was Flores vs. BB? We just don't know for sure.

I wonder if BB has been in denial about his no longer being able to cover as many bases personally with his small staff (especially one with a much more junior makeup than he's had previously)? Or, has he lacked the energy to really explore and interview candidates for coaching roles in recent years, so he's been taking shortcuts in hiring? I still wonder if all the salary cap money available to spend for next season was BB plotting for his final season before retirement and turning the keys over to Mayo. If yes, it's hard to imagine Kraft not letting BB have that final season.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,628
Most coordinators don't get to hire all new staff, they bring a few guys. and let's be honest, do we think the remaining guys were worse? The biggest decline has been QB where Bill and his handpicked guy are running the show. Oline you could argue (though injuries) but that was a whole new group and a new system.

The biggest failure this year in coaching has been BOB. I say this as someone who:
1. Thought it made sense to fire Patricia
2. Thought BOB was going to be a good competent OC.

Mac Jones is probably the biggest culprit (plus O-line injuries) in the struggles of the offense, but BOB didn't come in and do any better than Patricia for all the talk about how he'd put in stuff Mac could trust, he was an experienced hand.

I'm sure Belichick deserves some blame too, but arguing that it's his failure that the moves he didn't want to make didn't pay off doesn't make sense to me. If he kept Patricia and we fell apart... sure, but he went to a tried old hand, he let him bring in some new staff, etc.
Unfortunately, there's (legitimately) way too much blame to hand out all around. I thought failure was supposed to be an orphan?
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,402
The passage about how hard the team still competes, and how great Bill still is in the meeting room and with preparation, I think makes a case against letting him go. New ideas, energy, and personnel are definitely needed in both the FO and offensive coaching staff. I’m increasingly leaning towards the idea that Bill doesn’t necessarily have to relinquish final say/veto power for that to happen. I think/hope he’s still open minded enough to learn some new tricks.
The above is what you originally said.

Exactly. Not unique, and not unto itself disqualifying of adapting to changes in the game, or embracing new ideas or even personnel.
Now you're echoing the idea that doing something the same way that most NFL organizations have done for decades is the optimal way to adapt to changes to the game and get new ideas in house.

So when the Patriots opted to go for a zone read offensive system last year, having no one in house to install it, they decided Matt Patricia was the best person to do it. Not hiring away someone like Bobby Slowik from SF to have him do it. You feel that this is the best way to import new ideas into an organization? There's nothing wrong with how BB approaches problem solving right now?

Someone is going to have the square the circle for me that BB is far and away the best ever and thinks differently from every other coach and how that works alongside the defenses of him that resort to "This is what every other team does."
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,094
Because the offense was extremely simplified for him and it worked for half the season before defenses started to realize he sucked and adjusted accordingly. He was smoke and mirrors the first half of 2021 and he's been trash ever since the curtain was pulled.
Except for the fact that Mac was better in the last 8 games of the season in 2021 (66.97 comp%, 12tds, 6ints, 5-3 record, 96.8 rating, team averaged 29ppg), than he was in the first 9 games (68.0comp%, 10tds, 7ints, 5-4 record, 89.8 rating and the team averaged 25.5ppg), this is exactly right.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,298
from the wilds of western ma
The above is what you originally said.



Now you're echoing the idea that doing something the same way that most NFL organizations have done for decades is the optimal way to adapt to changes to the game and get new ideas in house.

So when the Patriots opted to go for a zone read offensive system last year, having no one in house to install it, they decided Matt Patricia was the best person to do it. Not hiring away someone like Bobby Slowik from SF to have him do it. You feel that this is the best way to import new ideas into an organization? There's nothing wrong with how BB approaches problem solving right now?

Someone is going to have the square the circle for me that BB is far and away the best ever and thinks differently from every other coach and how that works alongside the defenses of him that resort to "This is what every other team does."
No, I’m not back tracking or goal post moving. I can hold two ideas in my head at the same time. You want BB gone, and that’s a reasonable, defensible position. I’ve come around to wanting back, and don’t think it’s impossible that he can make and/or except some changes that will get things back on track. We’ll see how it plays out.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,326
Except for the fact that Mac was better in the last 8 games of the season in 2021 (66.97 comp%, 12tds, 6ints, 5-3 record, 96.8 rating, team averaged 29ppg), than he was in the first 9 games (68.0comp%, 10tds, 7ints, 5-4 record, 89.8 rating and the team averaged 25.5ppg), this is exactly right.
My recollection is that in 21, down the stretch against good teams, Mac had lousy first halves, the Pats got down bit, and then he’d put up some #s in garbage time. The team also had a few monster games against awful teams which skew their overall offensive stats.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,666
Hingham, MA
My recollection is that in 21, down the stretch against good teams, Mac had lousy first halves, the Pats got down bit, and then he’d put up some #s in garbage time. The team also had a few monster games against awful teams which skew their overall offensive stats.
Define garbage time, I guess. He did have lousy first halves against Indy and Miami, and brought the team to within a field goal in both. You can parse his numbers any which way. He had a 9 game stretch mid-season:
71.7% completions, 8.1 Y/A, 14 TD, 5 INT, 105.4 rating. I don't think any of it was "smoke and mirrors".
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,211
Both the Herald column and the one in the Athletic don’t put any blame on the Krafts. This seemed like a sanctioned media hit that came from the top. A page out of the Red Sox playbook.
I mean they could be sources but Bill gets carte blance with the Patriots. Why would the Krafts get blamed for anything?
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
Probably true.

And they averaged a whopping 17.5 points in the 6 games Walker/DTR started. Just for shits and giggles, remove the 39 point game against the Colts from the mix - you know, the one where the Browns D had a TD, 4 turnovers, and put the Browns offense in a position where all but two scoring drives started on the Colts side of the field - and they averaged 13.4 points in those starts.

So, games started by Watson/Flacco - 35 points per game (1st in the NFL). Games started by shitty QBs - 13.4 points per game (last in the NFL).

Its almost like having a credible QB has a huge, giant, incredible impact on the performance of the offense.

Hmmm...I wonder if theres a way we can apply that to the Patriots...
Ok, so now Joe Flacco is elite?

Jesus christ, he was signed by a total of ZERO teams this season before the Browns picked him up. For almost nothing.

If you want to apply that to the Patriots, I guess, ask yourself why they didn't sign Flacco for nothing when they didn't have a stud, credible QB like Joe Flacco who could have a huge, giant, and incredible impact on the offense?

Good gotcha, I feel like I got owned.

Also, you think Joe Flacco would be doing for the Pats what he's done for the Browns? Pish posh.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,326
Define garbage time, I guess. He did have lousy first halves against Indy and Miami, and brought the team to within a field goal in both. You can parse his numbers any which way. He had a 9 game stretch mid-season:
71.7% completions, 8.1 Y/A, 14 TD, 5 INT, 105.4 rating. I don't think any of it was "smoke and mirrors".
QB rating in the last five games, apart from the Jags game, pretty meh.

Colts 74.2
Bills 31.4
Jags 128.1
Dolphins 91
Bills 75.8
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,402
No, I’m not back tracking or goal post moving. I can hold two ideas in my head at the same time. You want BB gone, and that’s a reasonable, defensible position. I’ve come around to wanting back, and don’t think it’s impossible that he can make and/or except some changes that will get things back on track. We’ll see how it plays out.
I'm just trying to understand how in one post you're asking for new ideas AND personnel in the coaching staff and front office, and then in the next you're affirming that the way BB currently operates (i.e. hiring the way NFL teams have hired for decades). How could favoring his own ex-players, ex-coaches, and kids in the hiring process lead to the things you ask for in your first post?

Forget if I want BB gone or not - I'm pushing back against the idea that there's a happy path in which he stays AND fills his staff with new blood. Yes, that's my ideal outcome, too - there's just nothing about his behavior the last five years that indicates he would go in that direction. It's one or the other.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,094
My recollection is that in 21, down the stretch against good teams, Mac had lousy first halves, the Pats got down bit, and then he’d put up some #s in garbage time. The team also had a few monster games against awful teams which skew their overall offensive stats.
They only lost 3 games in the 2nd half of the season. They went down early against Indy, Mac had a huge fourth quarter, making the score 20-17, then on 2nd and 8 before the 2 minute warning, the defense gave up a 67 yard td to Jonathan Taylor. I guess it was another example of Mac turtling.

He was bad against the Bills, but the Pats were down 20-14 going into the 4th quarter. That's the game where Buffalo never punted. Probably because the defense knew Mac sucked and didn't want to play for him.

Then the final game against Miami, they were down big, and they got back to 27-24 with over 2 minutes to go, the Pats couldn't get the ball back. Tua in that game, was 15/22 for 109 yards.

In that same stretch, yes, the blew out Jacksonville. Mac also went for 310 yards and 2tds against an 8-3 Tennessee team in a 35-13 win. They stomped a 5-4 Cleveland team, etc.

I never put much stock in the "well, they played a bad opponent." A lot of QB's feast on shitty opponents. We almost never talk about it. It's what they're supposed to do. Mac was a rookie, who went 5-3 down the stretch and played very well. Folks can take that away from him all they want, but if we had that Mac this season, I'm sure folks would be happy with it.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,094
QB rating in the last five games, apart from the Jags game, pretty meh.

Colts 74.2
Bills 31.4
Jags 128.1
Dolphins 91
Bills 75.8
So we're ignoring the prior 3 games before that stretch (even though the post i responded to was talking about the 2nd half of the season), in which his ratings were 142.1, 96.6, and 123.2 and then also eliminating the game against Jacksonville (128.1)? I mean, this is Eric Van level stuff.

What would you think if I gave you these numbers?

88.9, 80.7, 96.9, 80.4, 67.3, 70.8, 85.9, 63.3, 86.6, 111.0, 88.4 and 59.4. I mean, that QB must have been terrible, right?

Those are Tom Brady's last 12 games in a Patriots uniform. Maybe the Pats were right to let him walk.

Tua is currently has the 4th highest passer rating in the NFL this year at 103.0. The only teams he's had a passer rating over 100 this season are the following: Jets, Commanders, Patriots, Raiders, Panthers, Giants, and Chargers. Which of those games should we eliminate from his stats to show he hasn't played that well?

You gotta play whose on the schedule.
 

FL4WL3SS

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
14,930
Andy Brickley's potty mouth
So we're ignoring the prior 3 games before that stretch (even though the post i responded to was talking about the 2nd half of the season), in which his ratings were 142.1, 96.6, and 123.2 and then also eliminating the game against Jacksonville (128.1)? I mean, this is Eric Van level stuff.

What would you think if I gave you these numbers?

88.9, 80.7, 96.9, 80.4, 67.3, 70.8, 85.9, 63.3, 86.6, 111.0, 88.4 and 59.4. I mean, that QB must have been terrible, right?

Those are Tom Brady's last 12 games in a Patriots uniform. Maybe the Pats were right to let him walk.

Tua is currently has the 4th highest passer rating in the NFL this year at 103.0. The only teams he's had a passer rating over 100 this season are the following: Jets, Commanders, Patriots, Raiders, Panthers, Giants, and Chargers. Which of those games should we eliminate from his stats to show he hasn't played that well?

You gotta play whose on the schedule.
Semantics aside, there was a clear dropoff in his play during the second half of the season. Admittedly, I didn't offer an exact date.
 

4 6 3 DP

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 24, 2001
2,380
I certainly hope that this isn't at the Kraft family's hands. They don't need a pretense to move on from Bill - and he has worked tirelessly for 23 years for them, plus been responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars of family wealth because of his performance. Frankly, it would be completely understandable if the Kraft family allowed BB to go out on his own terms even if they believed he wasn't the best man for the job, given his tenure and performance for this period of time.

Some of the best moments of my life over the last 20+years are the result of BB's work and I think it's outrageous the Kraft family hasn't publicly supported him. I wonder just how much animosity there must be over Brady for that to be the case.

I say this as someone who turned on Bill when Brady left, thinks he's been terrible on personnel, and wouldn't be upset if he left after the season. But if the Patriots rebuild took a couple extra years so the architect of it all could retire on his own terms, I'd be fine with it. He's earned it. And I think less of Kraft for refusing to go out in public and speak well of the greatest coach in NFL history. There are some things a little bigger than whether a football team wins 4,5, or 8 games in a season.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,487
Ok, so now Joe Flacco is elite?

Jesus christ, he was signed by a total of ZERO teams this season before the Browns picked him up. For almost nothing.

If you want to apply that to the Patriots, I guess, ask yourself why they didn't sign Flacco for nothing when they didn't have a stud, credible QB like Joe Flacco who could have a huge, giant, and incredible impact on the offense?

Good gotcha, I feel like I got owned.

Also, you think Joe Flacco would be doing for the Pats what he's done for the Browns? Pish posh.
When did I say he was elite?

I said having a competent, credible QB has a huge impact on an offense. Going from "Mac Jones level" to "cromulent" is the difference between first and last in points for the Browns. And while I think it's an exaggerated outcome, I also think it's nearly that big of a differentiator.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
When did I say he was elite?

I said having a competent, credible QB has a huge impact on an offense. Going from "Mac Jones level" to "cromulent" is the difference between first and last in points for the Browns. And while I think it's an exaggerated outcome, I also think it's nearly that big of a differentiator.
But your solution is part of the problem. The Pats just kept rolling out Mac. Over and over. Even after he was benched. They didn't try anything but Mac until the season was way past lost.

But Flacco wouldn't be doing on the Pats what he's doing for the Browns. The Browns have a real offensive unit, with a solid scheme and some great players.(Njoku, Cooper) The Pats have Boutte, Parker, and Juju.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,704
Probably true.

And they averaged a whopping 17.5 points in the 6 games Walker/DTR started. Just for shits and giggles, remove the 39 point game against the Colts from the mix - you know, the one where the Browns D had a TD, 4 turnovers, and put the Browns offense in a position where all but two scoring drives started on the Colts side of the field - and they averaged 13.4 points in those starts.

So, games started by Watson/Flacco - 35 points per game (1st in the NFL). Games started by shitty QBs - 13.4 points per game (last in the NFL).

Its almost like having a credible QB has a huge, giant, incredible impact on the performance of the offense.

Hmmm...I wonder if theres a way we can apply that to the Patriots...
I am not quite sure this is making the point that you want it to make...

Joe Flacco was available to every team in the NFL. Joe Flacco was available to the Patriots AFTER it was pretty clear that Mac Jones wasn't the answer. If getting Flacco would have made the Patriots that much better then it's a tremendous failure on their part to not go acquire him (not to mention the Jets and the other teams that didn't want to sign him)
 

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
4,516
Worcester
So the people who are saying that the Pats should have gotten Flacco so they could go 8-9 are the same ones who will be bemoaning the fact that the Pats beat the Jests on Sunday and hurt their draft position...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.