The Michael McCorkle "Mac" Jones Thread

Awesome Fossum

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,910
Austin, TX
My point is, to those who think that Mac is so bad that getting an improvement should be pretty easy, I'm just saying, prepare yourself for the distinct possibility that it's not easy at all. But yes, they have to try.
Do you mean in 2024 or if they sign someone off the street for Week 10?

If it's the former, hard disagree. Look around the league -- how QB1s (the original Plan A) are clearly worse than Mac? Jimmy G and Desmond Ridder, maybe? It will be hard to be worse.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
My point is, to those who think that Mac is so bad that getting an improvement should be pretty easy, I'm just saying, prepare yourself for the distinct possibility that it's not easy at all. But yes, they have to try.
It’s not that finding someone better will be easy or that there isn’t a chance it could get worse. They have 2 wins and the worst record in the AFC and the worst point differential in the league. They suck. Who cares if it could get worse? It’s just such an inane point to make, and if you are in favor of moving on from Mac I literally do not understand why you keep saying this. Who the fuck cares that it could be worse?
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
I mean, be careful what you wish for. The next guy could be worse than Mac Jones, and instead of having a horrible offense it might be even worse than horrible. And instead of having 2 wins and the worst point differential in the league, they might only have 1 win and an even worse point differential. I do not understand why anyone should be concerned that the next guy could be worse. Who cares?

Edit: this is a huge pet peeve of mine, and literally the reason why organizations fail. “It could be worse” is loser talk if things are already bad. You have to be willing to take the chance that things could be worse when things are already bad. Fearing change because “things could be worse” is the way you run an organization that you never want to see excel. It pretty much guarantees mediocrity at best.
 

ponch73

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2006
872
Stumptown via Chelmsford
My point is, to those who think that Mac is so bad that getting an improvement should be pretty easy, I'm just saying, prepare yourself for the distinct possibility that it's not easy at all. But yes, they have to try.
It's also possible to envision an improvement in the form of better on-field demeanor and less distractions (e.g., cheap shots) with the same caliber of QB play. I don't think meeting that bar will be exceptionally difficult. Mac is a fungible asset.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,954
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
My point is, to those who think that Mac is so bad that getting an improvement should be pretty easy, I'm just saying, prepare yourself for the distinct possibility that it's not easy at all. But yes, they have to try.
I just want to know by what measure is that a distinct possibility. There are like 5 backups you can get at low money for next year in FA that'll give you the same.
 

ponch73

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2006
872
Stumptown via Chelmsford
I mean, be careful what you wish for. The next guy could be worse than Mac Jones, and instead of having a horrible offense it might be even worse than horrible. And instead of having 2 wins and the worst point differential in the league, they might only have 1 win and an even worse point differential. I do not understand why anyone should be concerned that the next guy could be worse. Who cares?

Edit: this is a huge pet peeve of mine, and literally the reason why organizations fail. “It could be worse” is loser talk if things are already bad. You have to be willing to take the chance that things could be worse when things are already bad. Fearing change because “things could be worse” is the way you run an organization that you never want to see excel. It pretty much guarantees mediocrity at best.
Could not agree more with this post. I'm not necessarily attributing this view to the BaseballJones per se, but the notion of being unwilling to try something new or to do things differently because "things could be worse" is the calling card of self-induced mediocrity or worse. I had friends who worked for Chicago's public schools administration who joked that the internal credo was "Excellence will not be tolerated." Building an offense around Mac Jones in 2024 would certainly embody that philosophy.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,378
"It could be worse" is a reasonable POV in the keep/fire Bill debate given his long track record of success. It's an argument that should be nowhere near Mac Jones at this point, who hasn't done shit. There's simply no way he should be playing QB for this team next year unless the guy in front of him is really, really hurt.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,856
Do you mean in 2024 or if they sign someone off the street for Week 10?

If it's the former, hard disagree. Look around the league -- how QB1s (the original Plan A) are clearly worse than Mac? Jimmy G and Desmond Ridder, maybe? It will be hard to be worse.
You’d be surprised just how easy it would be to get a worse QB than Mac Jones.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,856
It’s not that finding someone better will be easy or that there isn’t a chance it could get worse. They have 2 wins and the worst record in the AFC and the worst point differential in the league. They suck. Who cares if it could get worse? It’s just such an inane point to make, and if you are in favor of moving on from Mac I literally do not understand why you keep saying this. Who the fuck cares that it could be worse?
ok
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,856
I just want to know by what measure is that a distinct possibility. There are like 5 backups you can get at low money for next year in FA that'll give you the same.
I gave two measures: Mac’s career record as a starter and his actual passing performance. Neither is very good but there have been tons of starting QBs in the NFL who have been way way worse.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,013
Unreal America
"It could be worse" is a reasonable POV in the keep/fire Bill debate given his long track record of success. It's an argument that should be nowhere near Mac Jones at this point, who hasn't done shit. There's simply no way he should be playing QB for this team next year unless the guy in front of him is really, really hurt.
Yep. I don’t care who plays QB the rest of this season. It’ll be Mac, unless he gets hurt. And that’s fine.

But there’s no universe where he should be playing here next season.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,856
I mean, be careful what you wish for. The next guy could be worse than Mac Jones, and instead of having a horrible offense it might be even worse than horrible. And instead of having 2 wins and the worst point differential in the league, they might only have 1 win and an even worse point differential. I do not understand why anyone should be concerned that the next guy could be worse. Who cares?

Edit: this is a huge pet peeve of mine, and literally the reason why organizations fail. “It could be worse” is loser talk if things are already bad. You have to be willing to take the chance that things could be worse when things are already bad. Fearing change because “things could be worse” is the way you run an organization that you never want to see excel. It pretty much guarantees mediocrity at best.
I trust that you’ve read my posts which include the fact that I’ve stated numerous times that they need to draft their next QB this coming draft and that I’ve not been arguing that they should stay put.

If you haven’t read those, please do.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,856
At this point I’d risk it. Mac Jones is a terrible QB. If they actually try to upgrade the position by getting rid of him I’m fine with that even if it doesn’t work out. I’ve seen enough Mac Jones for a lifetime.
I’d risk it too. Frankly it’s not that big a risk because they’re already one of the worst teams in the league due in large part to their QB play.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,212
Missoula, MT
Jonnu Smith is on pace for 60+ catches, 850+ yards, and 4-5 TDs this season. Throwing to Smith was Ridder and his backup.

It's Jones.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,960
Deep inside Muppet Labs
I’d risk it too. Frankly it’s not that big a risk because they’re already one of the worst teams in the league due in large part to their QB play.
I have said this till blue in the face: the vast majority of the team’s problems stem from terrible QB play. Andy Dalton would have this team at .500, and he makes Gardner Minshew look like Dan Marino. But Mac makes Dalton look like Marino too.
 
Oct 12, 2023
741
"It could be worse" is a reasonable POV in the keep/fire Bill debate given his long track record of success. It's an argument that should be nowhere near Mac Jones at this point, who hasn't done shit. There's simply no way he should be playing QB for this team next year unless the guy in front of him is really, really hurt.
the problem being that even though Jones isn’t good, finding someone better will be very difficult. Who, on an NFL roster right now, is going to be both available and a sure bet to be as good or better than Jones? The veterans are all proven backups, broken down or bad. Cousins would have been the best option but his Achilles injury complicates things. Mayfield might be an upgrade if Tampa doesn’t retain him. Other veteran options would be Brissett, Jimmy G, Tyrod Taylor, Tannehill, Mariota, Winston, Darnold, Lock, Minshew, Bridgewater or Dobbs. After that, you’re really scraping the bottom of the barrel with the Snoop Huntley, Mason Rudolph, Blaine Gabbert types.

Mayfield is the obvious target (simply because the others are terrible or lateral moves) if he hits free agency but while he’s better than Mac, he probably doesn’t move the needle all that much. The Bucs offense, which has a fair bit more talent than the Pats’ is in the bottom 5-7 of the league.

the draft seems unlikely to give you an opening day starter. Too early to say obviously but if they’re drafting 6th or so, they will almost certainly miss out on Williams and Maye and I’m skeptical any of the next tier of Nix, Pennix, McCarthy, Ewers or Daniels will be both worth a top 6-7 pick and also ready to be “the guy” next year. It’s possible but none of them are obvious upgrades as far as 2024 goes and frankly I don’t see BB taking one of them that early.

of course, all of the QB discussion will end up coming back to the fact that Mac or his replacement will have garbage at WR unless the Pats part with high picks for Higgins. The free agency market at WR is as bad as the QB market
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,155
Jonnu Smith is on pace for 60+ catches, 850+ yards, and 4-5 TDs this season. Throwing to Smith is a rookie and now his backup.

It's Jones.
Sure but that team has 3 first rd picks in Drake London, Kyle Pitts and Bijan Robinson doing squat. Arthur Smith isn't exactly the bastion of offensive genius. I'm pretty sure the fire Arthur Smith thread in whatever the SOSH equivalent will be 5X longer.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,155
There were so many open receivers today that he never found or couldn't hit. You put an average NFL QB in there today and they win by 20.
Not posting this as a defense of Mac, I've already said he was awful but on the last play I have no idea what the offense was doing. Gesicki seems to be running a decoy and not a good one and Henry and Pop seem to rub each other. With the game on the line if this is the best play you can come up with you have serious issues. I've also seen more than enough Gesicki, if you really want to feature him in the red zone fine but he should not see the field between the 20s.

 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
I trust that you’ve read my posts which include the fact that I’ve stated numerous times that they need to draft their next QB this coming draft and that I’ve not been arguing that they should stay put.

If you haven’t read those, please do.
So please tell me the point of pointing out that the next guy could be worse than Mac? It’s an inane point that adds nothing to the discussion. Of course this is true. Who cares?
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,463
Overland Park, KS
Jones can blame the receivers all he wants but he lacks the physical tools to play at this level. He definitely cannot win with his legs, he is accurate but he doesn’t throw guys open, he never makes the defense pay for blitzing him, he turns to mush under pressure, his arm does not scare anyone, does anyone play two high safeties against NE? Why would you when the QB cannot zip in a deep ball? He is Hoyer without the experience.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,212
Missoula, MT
Sure but that team has 3 first rd picks in Drake London, Kyle Pitts and Bijan Robinson doing squat. Arthur Smith isn't exactly the bastion of offensive genius. I'm pretty sure the fire Arthur Smith thread in whatever the SOSH equivalent will be 5X longer.
London is on pace for 60+ catches, 850+ yards, and 4 TDs this season. Oh, and he is hurt. Pitts is also on pace for 60+ catches, 800 yards, and 2 TD. Robinson is on pace for 200 carries, over 1,000 yards and a few TDs to go with 20 catches for 200 yard pace. That's 3 pass catchers and a RB all having good to very good seasons with, again, a rookie QB and his backup.

It's Jones.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,848
You’d be surprised just how easy it would be to get a worse QB than Mac Jones.
Please let's see them at least eff around and find out. I agree with you that Mac Jones is an NFL QB. My guess is that he may be able to be a capable backup at some point.

But not in New England after this season. Its not just that he's bad. He is no fun to root for or even watch. I'd rather watch Nike take the ball from under center, even with the penalty, than McCorkle. He doesn't have to go home but he can't stay here.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,490
I think if Jones is going to be out there as QB they need to run the ball a ton more. There is no hidden upside and either his turnovers and/or inability to score points put us behind often, so I get why they get away from the run. I wouldnt mind seeing 40 runs per game the next few weeks.
The Patriots want to see what they have with Mac, and they want enough tape for it to be crystal clear. Can he be the guy to win throwing the ball 50 times a game?

Expect more of the same.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,490
Not posting this as a defense of Mac, I've already said he was awful but on the last play I have no idea what the offense was doing. Gesicki seems to be running a decoy and not a good one and Henry and Pop seem to rub each other. With the game on the line if this is the best play you can come up with you have serious issues. I've also seen more than enough Gesicki, if you really want to feature him in the red zone fine but he should not see the field between the 20s.

Congrats on the nice throw. Now replicate it 5 more times.

He can't. Want to know why? Look at his footwork. Watch him lean backwards on the throw, afraid to step into it and take the hit. Its the epitome of Mac Jones and one of the many things good NFL QBs are willing to do. I don't want to make this a Brady/Mac thing, but how many times have we seen Brady step into that throw knowing he was going to get creamed? Literally exactly what @Smiling Joe Hesketh is talking about. When we teach kids fundamentals, we preach that we're doing so to make the task repeatable. His fundamentals are atrocious.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,155
Congrats on the nice throw. Now replicate it 5 more times.

He can't. Want to know why? Look at his footwork. Watch him lean backwards on the throw, afraid to step into it and take the hit. Its the epitome of Mac Jones and one of the many things good NFL QBs are willing to do. I don't want to make this a Brady/Mac thing, but how many times have we seen Brady step into that throw knowing he was going to get creamed? Literally exactly what @Smiling Joe Hesketh is talking about. When we teach kids fundamentals, we preach that we're doing so to make the task repeatable. His fundamentals are atrocious.
I agree his mechanics are horrible and have degraded severely from his rookie season. That play though is really a microcosm of the NE offense this season. Out of the 4 receivers only 1 has even 1/2 yard of separation and the O Line gives up interior pressure almost immediately, Mac actually makes a decent throw and it bounces off the only receiver he could throw to hands for the INT. The more times I watch that the more I want to know what Gesicki is doing on that play. At least Pop and Henry look like they failed at a rub route, Gesicki seems to be striking up a conversation with the defenders.
 

Jinhocho

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
10,290
Durham, NC
The Pats entered today 28th in the league in rushing yards per attempt (and take away the one big run today, and they averaged just 2.7 yards per designed rush). It takes a special running game (offensive line and running backs) to overcome a stacked box (which happens when the passing game scares no one), and the Patriots do not have a special running game by any stretch of the imagination. If the Pats really tried just running the ball 40x per game, the only benefit would be that the game would end sooner.
I think it has been more that they've been playing from behind the entire year as well.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,490
I agree his mechanics are horrible and have degraded severely from his rookie season. That play though is really a microcosm of the NE offense this season. Out of the 4 receivers only 1 has even 1/2 yard of separation and the O Line gives up interior pressure almost immediately, Mac actually makes a decent throw and it bounces off the only receiver he could throw to hands for the INT. The more times I watch that the more I want to know what Gesicki is doing on that play. At least Pop and Henry look like they failed at a rub route, Gesicki seems to be striking up a conversation with the defenders.
But he DOESNT LEARN. After the Ramsey pick last week, he said he has to learn to just swallow the ball. This is the fucking NFL. People are covered on some plays. How many times a game do you hear "so-and-so had nowhere to throw that ball"? That's the play we want to hang our hat on? Mac falling away on his throw to a receiver completely draped in coverage?
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,013
Unreal America
I think it has been more that they've been playing from behind the entire year as well.
I’ve never understood this. Why would a team feel like they need to abandon the run game if they’re down, say, 14-0 late in the first quarter?

Time is certainly not an issue. You don’t get bonus points for catching up quickly. If you’re a decent running team then just run the ball like normal.

Seems like doing what you do well is a better recipe for eventually catching up than throwing a bajillion times.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,299
Imaginationland
I think it has been more that they've been playing from behind the entire year as well.
That would explain why their rushing attempts (22nd) and yards (25th) are relatively low, but if teams are playing us to pass because they're ahead, you'd expect our rushing yards per carry to be on the higher end (fewer attempts and more DBs on the defense). Given a solid passing attack I think our running game could potentially be very effective, but when other teams can just load up on it because our passing game isn't a threat to complete anything deep, it just doesn't have a chance.
 

k-factory

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
1,866
seattle, wa
It’s not about winning games anymore this season. That ship has sailed.
At this point the goal should purely be about evaluating Reagor and Boutte and Thornton and getting Pop more seasoning.
So you need the best QB that can help you with that eval.
Is Grier capable of that? He’s going to be his own case of acclimating and learning the fundamentals
Zappe? He’s worse than Mac and we’ve seen him.
 

caesarbear

New Member
Jan 28, 2007
271


This is the Mac fuck up that raged me the most. Stevenson performs a great play fake going to the sideline and is all alone, uncovered, begging for the ball. Mac doesn't even look his way.

If the job of finding a new QB is difficult then why aren't we suiting up Air Bud at this point? Why are we wasting time with this?
 

Zedia

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
7,036
Pasadena, CA
Great play fake? He lined up outside. There was some initial WSH confusion about how to cover him, but they had it sorted before the Patriots were even set, and he was never really open other than the initial cushion the CB gave him.
 

caesarbear

New Member
Jan 28, 2007
271
There is no back on him. The Pats are already set in this image. It takes another second or two for the D to recognize it.
(Stevenson is at the top of the image.)
Easy yardage at least, maybe a a chance at a big play.
 

Zedia

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
7,036
Pasadena, CA
There is no back on him. The Pats are already set in this image. It takes another second or two for the D to recognize it.
(Stevenson is at the top of the image.)
Easy yardage at least, maybe a a chance at a big play.
I guess if Mac could have magically had the ball in his hands the split second of your pic they might have had something. Gesicki is still getting set in the first pic as the CB starts to go over and a second later they’ve got it covered. They ended up snapping at 13:33.

6ADB2443-74BB-4099-A4C7-5F20DF57FA48.jpeg

71A8B396-30E4-4EDF-8493-40554F0690A2.jpeg