The Michael McCorkle "Mac" Jones Thread

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,380
Yep, this feels like it. Even Rhamondre - who was supposed to be the best player on the offense - has looked very MEH. No explosion, no smashing through defenders, no....nothing.

Through 5 games: 68 att, 188 rush yards, 2.8 y/a, with a long of just 12 yards. 12 receptions for 87 yards. Just one total TD. He has no burst, and doesn't power through guys either. He just looks slow and lame. Much of that is the OL - he can't even get a head of steam going. Last year he had 2.9 yards before contact, and this year it's just 1.8. But his yards after contact this year is godawful.

2021: 2.7 yards after contact per attempt
2022: 2.1 yards after contact per attempt
2023: 1.0 yards after contact per attempt

According to pro-football-reference, he's broken a grand total of *THREE* tackles this season. In 2021 he averaged 8.3 rush attempts per broken tackle, and that was 8.8 last year. This year? 22.7 rush attempts per broken tackle.

So again, it's a team sport, right? The OL is getting him buried every time he touches the ball, but he's also not doing anything to help either. He's getting hit and going down instead of shrugging off contact.

It's totally depressing because they aren't doing ANYTHING right on offense. At all. The entire thing is broken.
Rham has disappointed me quite a bit. Like, we know the OL can get into a QB’s head but is it possible they’re getting into a RB’s head as well? He has looked so tentative running the ball. I’m also wondering what kind of shape he came into the season in. This was his big break and all the team did was line up a cooked Zeke behind him and he hasn’t taken the ball and run with it (bad pun intended).
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
Not sure that’s a fair leap to what they were implying, but either way, the question “is it Mac or is it the offense around him” has dominated BBTL for a year now. It has dominated most threads and even game threads. People disagree, but I don’t think people trying to bolster Mac sucks arguments by pretending the OL is good has really been a thing anyone would take seriously here. Unfortunately, team Mac sucks have plenty to work with to make their arguments right now without needing hyperbole.
Oh, there's been plenty of posts ignoring the suck around Mac dating back 2 years now.

Shit, there's posts in this thread blaming Mac on completed passes because his receivers got hurt.

As if Brock Purdy didn't almost get CMC killed on Sunday night.

You throw balls into tight windows, guys are going to get hit. If Mac now has to worry about throwing to his only open receiver because he might get hit hard, what are we even talking about?
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,966
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Both you and roddick like 5 posts ago looked at an impossible passing situation photo and concluded--and I'm paraphrasing--"that must be Mac's fault".

Tom Brady Resurrected Cyborg couldn't have done shit on Sunday with that offense. That doesn't imply that Mac doesn't suck. But "that must be Mac's fault" implies that you didn't notice what a joke that the OL was all damn day.
That's the most uncharitable reading you could conjure up, huh. I just don't see tackles letting DEs by like that without them generally believing they're driving the rusher past the quarterback. Maybe Trent Brown had a mental screw up and thought it was a 3 step drop when it was 5 and he wasn't just beat like a drum. Maybe Mac dropped deeper. I just don't see that kind of play often. But sure, that question is akin to being in denial over how bad the OL is, that seems like a fair interpretation.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
Rham has disappointed me quite a bit. Like, we know the OL can get into a QB’s head but is it possible they’re getting into a RB’s head as well? He has looked so tentative running the ball. I’m also wondering what kind of shape he came into the season in. This was his big break and all the team did was line up a cooked Zeke behind him and he hasn’t taken the ball and run with it (bad pun intended).
Stevenson is a jag. I know folks don't want to hear that, but he is the kind of guy that will pop for a game or two or even a season, but in reality, he's just not that great in today's game. He's Legarrette Blount 2.0, which can work well if it's 2016, and you have Tom Brady and Edelman and can bring James White in on third down to move the chains. Stevenson is not going to age well either, IMO.

It goes back to how fucking slow this team is in every way. Are people really surprised that a 4th round pick that runs a 4.64 in the 40 isn't making things happen behind a line that blows? Meanwhile, Miami goes out and uses a third rounder on a a guy who runs a 4.32 at the combine and the A Chain is tearing up the league.

The game is too fast for this plodding shit the Pats are running. At a minimum, you have to give a guy like Rhamondre a lead blocker. Watching San Fran just use Juszczyk to pile drives holes open for CMC makes me long for the days of James Develin, who, checks notes, did exactly that for Legarrette Blount.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,870
I mean, speed isn't everything. The Pats drafted the fastest RB in the draft a couple of years ago in Pierre Strong, and he's been a big fat zero in the NFL.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,380
Stevenson is a jag. I know folks don't want to hear that, but he is the kind of guy that will pop for a game or two or even a season, but in reality, he's just not that great in today's game. He's Legarrette Blount 2.0, which can work well if it's 2016, and you have Tom Brady and Edelman and can bring James White in on third down to move the chains. Stevenson is not going to age well either, IMO.

It goes back to how fucking slow this team is in every way. Are people really surprised that a 4th round pick that runs a 4.64 in the 40 isn't making things happen behind a line that blows? Meanwhile, Miami goes out and uses a third rounder on a a guy who runs a 4.32 at the combine and the A Chain is tearing up the league.

The game is too fast for this plodding shit the Pats are running. At a minimum, you have to give a guy like Rhamondre a lead blocker. Watching San Fran just use Juszczyk to pile drives holes open for CMC makes me long for the days of James Develin, who, checks notes, did exactly that for Legarrette Blount.
Sadly, this is all true. Stevenson is going to move on after his rookie contract. We need a more dynamic RB, if we’re going to be a run-dominant team. The only fast guy we have on offense can’t even get on the field.

There are just so many plodders on this team.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,870
Couldn't agree more. When people list him as their top skill player / a difference maker, that is extremely depressing. I would not offer him another contract. I don't think anyone on offense is part of their next contending team. Maybe possibly Pop.
I wouldn't offer him another contract either. I also agree with your point about not many (if any) of these guys being on their next contending team. I think Pop is terrific though, and I can see Boutte - if he can get out of the doghouse - being another maybe.

Holy crap am I depressed about this team right now. UGH.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,870
I think it's interesting though. As the NFL has gotten a lot faster, what's the best way to beat that? Is it to try to keep up with the speed? Or can you beat speed with power? I remember the Miami-Nebraska games in the 80s. Miami was smaller and much faster, while Nebraska was slower and much bigger and stronger. At times, Miami seemed to have the edge, but then I remember when Nebraska just steamrolled them to death. But then again, those were the days when you could run 85% of the time and win, and you can't really do that today. The only team really trying this to any degree is Baltimore: 164 rushes, 143 passes (plus I guess 15 sacks?), so a rush % of 50.9%.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,124
New York City
I think it's interesting though. As the NFL has gotten a lot faster, what's the best way to beat that? Is it to try to keep up with the speed? Or can you beat speed with power? I remember the Miami-Nebraska games in the 80s. Miami was smaller and much faster, while Nebraska was slower and much bigger and stronger. At times, Miami seemed to have the edge, but then I remember when Nebraska just steamrolled them to death. But then again, those were the days when you could run 85% of the time and win, and you can't really do that today. The only team really trying this to any degree is Baltimore: 164 rushes, 143 passes (plus I guess 15 sacks?), so a rush % of 50.9%.
You cannot beat speed with power in 2023.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,870
You cannot beat speed with power in 2023.
I get that you need a fast defense because you can't have slower guys out there trying to chase track stars with skills.

But why can't an offense with power beat a smaller/speedier defense? It used to be able to work. Why can't it work now? I'm not arguing with you. I'm genuinely wondering why you can't just steamroll smaller defenses anymore.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,898
Oregon
The Orlovsky point about Mac is that if the 49ers had drafted him, he might have turned out to be as good as Purdy. It's a popular media-type narrative these days; Curran was saying the same thing the other day.
It's an obvious comparison because of the draft-week chatter but, in the end, it's impossible to know. I think it is possible to suggest that in the steady and QB-friendly system SF employs, Mac would have had a better shot at success than he has had in NE's three systems in three years clusterfuck
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,870
Yeah, the gulf between run play efficiency (yards per play) and pass plays is so vast theres really no realistic way to make up for that gap.
In the old days yes you gained fewer yards per play but you consistently moved the ball and scored lots of points. And if you can do that, what does it matter if it's done with smaller yards per play?
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,988
Mtigawi
The Orlovsky point about Mac is that if the 49ers had drafted him, he might have turned out to be as good as Purdy. It's a popular media-type narrative these days; Curran was saying the same thing the other day.
It's an obvious comparison because of the draft-week chatter but, in the end, it's impossible to know. I think it is possible to suggest that in the steady and QB-friendly system SF employs, Mac would have had a better shot at success than he has had in NE's three systems in three years clusterfuck
Then Curran is a schmuck. Trey Lance was picked before him and cost a king's ransom in draft capital.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,124
New York City
You should have both. 49ers and Eagles have both speed and power for example. It shouldn't be one or the other.
Yes, power and speed can stop speed. But just power alone isn't doing anything in today's NFL. You can't have strong guys out there moving like they are carrying a refrigerator on their backs. That's more of an 80s or 90s NFL thing.

Obviously, nothing exemplifies this more than Miami. All the power in the world doesn't matter when the RB is behind the front line so fast, the front line cannot do anything.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,664
around the way
In the old days yes you gained fewer yards per play but you consistently moved the ball and scored lots of points. And if you can do that, what does it matter if it's done with smaller yards per play?
I think that the end result is similar to what the Pats' short-passing offense produced, even in Mac's rookie year that was successful compared to today. If you have to churn 75-80 yards downfield four yards at a time, all you need is one holding penalty or one bad block, and the drive stalls. It's too hard to churn 80 yards downfield and put up the number of points required to win in 2023.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,124
New York City
The Orlovsky point about Mac is that if the 49ers had drafted him, he might have turned out to be as good as Purdy. It's a popular media-type narrative these days; Curran was saying the same thing the other day.
It's an obvious comparison because of the draft-week chatter but, in the end, it's impossible to know. I think it is possible to suggest that in the steady and QB-friendly system SF employs, Mac would have had a better shot at success than he has had in NE's three systems in three years clusterfuck
It's actually pretty easy to figure. Mac would be looking great in SF.

Every QB Shanny has had has peaked with him. Matt Ryan, Nick Mullens,(not good but had historic numbers in SF) Jimmy G. And now BCB.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,012
Dallas
Then Curran is a schmuck. Trey Lance was picked before him and cost a king's ransom in draft capital.
Curran is probably right tbh. Lance was Shanny trying to get a QB who could create more. When Shanny has to play from behind he has less success in his system. Defenses just crash the QB. Lance was also a unique prospect who was a major projection and has been injured 2/3 years. He never got a chance to develop and he came out raw. Mac would slay in SF's offense. Well, he probably would have slayed.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,898
Oregon
Then Curran is a schmuck. Trey Lance was picked before him and cost a king's ransom in draft capital.
Yeah, I didn't phrase that quite right. The question he was responding to was more of the "If Mac were on the 49ers and Purdy on the Patriots" how good would they be.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
I mean, speed isn't everything. The Pats drafted the fastest RB in the draft a couple of years ago in Pierre Strong, and he's been a big fat zero in the NFL.
Has he really, or has he just not had an opportunity?

Dude has only had 23 carries in his career, but they've gone for 177 yards and 2tds (7 yards per carry). Now, maybe he's not seeing the field much because he can't pass protect, or maybe teams feel like they have someone better in front of him, or maybe drafting a guy out of South Dakota fucking State because he's fast is very different than drafting a guy from Texas A&M with speed. Because there's probably a reason why a guy with Strong's speed ended up at South Dakota fucking State in the first place, and not an SEC school.

There's only a few Danny Woodhead's and Cooper Kupp's in the world. That said, I have no idea if Achane can block either, but he's been put into an offense with receivers that get open so quickly that they don't ask their RB's to do much blocking, because the ball is out of Tua's hands so quickly.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,708
San Francisco
In the old days yes you gained fewer yards per play but you consistently moved the ball and scored lots of points. And if you can do that, what does it matter if it's done with smaller yards per play?
I think there is also the issue of older teams just not being rational. Teams in the old days should have passed the ball more. Its a little bit like asking why old baseball teams were able to win back in the day without prioritizing OBP.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,012
Dallas
Yes, power and speed can stop speed. But just power alone isn't doing anything in today's NFL. You can't have strong guys out there moving like they are carrying a refrigerator on their backs. That's more of an 80s or 90s NFL thing.

Obviously, nothing exemplifies this more than Miami. All the power in the world doesn't matter when the RB is behind the front line so fast, the front line cannot do anything.
Sure - no disagreements there.

I would point though to the rise of more gap/power running schemes in recent years as a power counter to lighter faster defenses but that's just a part of an offensive system. The original conversation was really broad, speed vs power. The answer is a lot more nuanced.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,292
I mean, speed isn't everything. The Pats drafted the fastest RB in the draft a couple of years ago in Pierre Strong, and he's been a big fat zero in the NFL.
It's not everything. But on this iteration of the Patriots, it's nothing.

Eleanor Roosevelt was right. And they need to address that.

72304
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,012
Dallas
I wanted to get @SMU_Sox's take on this play in particular, because to me the way Trent Brown sets and just tries to widen the pass rusher only to look back at Mac and then desperately stick his arm out could indicate he expected Mac to be anchored much shallower in the pocket and was trying to guide the DE towards depth and then was surprised to see Mac 11 yards deep. Am I reading too much into this? Is it possible either Mac or the tackles fucked up the expected depth of the drop there?
I would need to watch the full replay - the answer depends on what the play-call was and how many steps a drop back it was. Watching live it looked like it was not on Mac though. Seems like both OTs got beat cleanly.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
Yes, power and speed can stop speed. But just power alone isn't doing anything in today's NFL. You can't have strong guys out there moving like they are carrying a refrigerator on their backs. That's more of an 80s or 90s NFL thing.

Obviously, nothing exemplifies this more than Miami. All the power in the world doesn't matter when the RB is behind the front line so fast, the front line cannot do anything.
Power alone does not exist, and will never exist again in the NFL.

Rhamondre ran a 4.64 at his pro day.

Wil Anderson Jr., who is 6' 3.5" and weighs 253 pounds ran a 4.60 at the combine. Nolan Smith who is 6'2", 238 pounds ran a fucking 4.39.

Meanwhile, in the speed isn't everything category, a 6'4", 260 pound edge linebacker from Oregon ran a 4.54 at the combine and wasn't even drafted.

The NFL is playing at a different pace, than the New England Patriots are.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,180
Achane likely going on IR so I'd pump the brakes on him for the time being. He was a bit of a unicorn coming out at that size and while he held up as a workhorse in NCAA it remains to be seen if he can be effective over the long term in the NFL facing much bigger/stronger defenders.

Seems like NE has gone for the extremes recently either the fastest WR/RB in Thornton, Strong (ironic name), or the most powerful in the class (Rham/Harry) where optimally you want players that have a little of both and ideally have produced in good conferences.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,966
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I would need to watch the full replay - the answer depends on what the play-call was and how many steps a drop back it was. Watching live it looked like it was not on Mac though. Seems like both OTs got beat cleanly.
I think Lowe was beat cleanly no doubt, Brown to me looked like he was trying to push the DE past where he thought the QB would be. If that's just a regular beat, that's next level bad. Lowe at least tried and failed, he didn't even try.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,040
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Stevenson has taken a step back. I'm not sure that implies he was never any good as a starting RB. He averaged 4.6 and 5.0 YPC in his first two seasons; this year he is at 2.8. He looks like he's lost explosiveness.

I honestly think he's injured.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
Achane likely going on IR so I'd pump the brakes on him for the time being. He was a bit of a unicorn coming out at that size and while he held up as a workhorse in NCAA it remains to be seen if he can be effective over the long term in the NFL facing much bigger/stronger defenders.

Seems like NE has gone for the extremes recently either the fastest WR/RB in Thornton, Strong (ironic name), or the most powerful in the class (Rham/Harry) where optimally you want players that have a little of both and ideally have produced in good conferences.
Oh, I'm not saying Achane is the second coming of Chris Johnson or anything. I'm just talking about building an offense in today's NFL. How many people even know that Raheem Mostert is nearly 32 years old, and is on his EIGTH NFL team (2nd time with Miami)? He's not a great running back, he's just great for their system.

Rhamondre might be just fine if he were playing behind a good offensive line and a lead back. He's just not good enough to be a difference maker in an offense like this, and frankly, I'm not sure anybody is...
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,342
It's actually pretty easy to figure. Mac would be looking great in SF.

Every QB Shanny has had has peaked with him. Matt Ryan, Nick Mullens,(not good but had historic numbers in SF) Jimmy G. And now BCB.
Trey Lance looked awful and was dumped for nothing. Mac would likely be looking better, but I doubt very much he would be looking "great" for the 49'ers.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,966
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I wonder if every QB's agent gives Shanahan a fraction of their earnings because right now 60 guys in the league are using "he'd look great with the 49ers" as an argument for playing time or a contract.
 

FL4WL3SS

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
14,970
Andy Brickley's potty mouth
Yeah, to me Bill gave Zappe two chances to force the issue and allow him to go "oh well, the kid just played better, have to see what it looks like with him starting" and he was awful both times.
Are you talking about when he came in after the team was getting thoroughly throttled and mostly quit and where he did not take first team reps in practice?

Zappe sucks, but he's been given zero chance to succeed.
 

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
4,550
Worcester
Are you talking about when he came in after the team was getting thoroughly throttled and mostly quit and where he did not take first team reps in practice?

Zappe sucks, but he's been given zero chance to succeed.
I think they were talking about when he came in after the team was getting thoroughly throttled and mostly quit but got a significant number of first team reps in practice.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,321
306, row 14
Yeah, to me Bill gave Zappe two chances to force the issue and allow him to go "oh well, the kid just played better, have to see what it looks like with him starting" and he was awful both times.
Zappe looked terrible but he also came in to games in the 4th quarter while they were getting pounded. Not saying that's an excuse but also not an opitmal situations. He's basically sucked in 3 of his 4 relief appearances but was playable (and won) the 2 weeks he had a full week to prepare to start.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,966
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Are you talking about when he came in after the team was getting thoroughly throttled and mostly quit and where he did not take first team reps in practice?

Zappe sucks, but he's been given zero chance to succeed.
Yes, I'm talking about that. Don't really care about overall effort level when you're overthrowing wide open receivers by 10 yards. Sure, he won't be at his best coming into that situation without repping all week with the starters, but I honestly think a Jimmy G versus the Chiefs in 2014 level drive could have earned him a start next week.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,124
New York City
Trey Lance looked awful and was dumped for nothing. Mac would likely be looking better, but I doubt very much he would be looking "great" for the 49'ers.
Lance didn't look awful. Lance didn't play because he was hurt. And then SF found Brock(who fit more in the system) and moved on from Lance, which is what smart franchises do.

And Brock Purdy was the last pick of the 2022 draft. Now he's undefeated in his first 10 NFL games. Do you think that is more Purdy or more the system?
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,966
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Lance didn't look awful. Lance didn't play because he was hurt. And then SF found Brock(who fit more in the system) and moved on from Lance, which is what smart franchises do.

And Brock Purdy was the last pick of the 2022 draft. Now he's undefeated in his first 10 NFL games. Do you think that is more Purdy or more the system?
I think it's both. I mean, it's super easy to point out just how their offense went from really good to historic in EPA/Play with Purdy replacing Jimmy, and Jimmy is an adequate NFL quarterback. He's playing really, really good ball. He's not as good a player as his results have been because that'd mean he's a Dan Marino/Mahomes type phenomenon at the position which isn't really true, but he's playing super well. Don't think the draft status should impact this evaluation, otherwise we're falling into a lot of the same stuff we heard about Brady in the early 2000's. Not saying he's Brady of course, just that he was good in college and has been good in the pros, his main issues were lack of size and arm strength and thus far his quick feet and processing speed have more than made up for those defficiencies (in that system, of course).
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,328
Washington
Of all the fan bases, I wouldn't expect Patriots fans to hold Purdy's draft position against him with regard to what his true talent level might be. :)

But yeah, it's harder to evaluate talent level when a QB is in a really good or really bad offense.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,040
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Of all the fan bases, I wouldn't expect Patriots fans to hold Purdy's draft position against him with regard to what his true talent level might be. :)

But yeah, it's harder to evaluate talent level when a QB is in a really good or really bad offense.
Purdy reminds me very, very much of an early-career Tom Brady. His best attributes are his decision-making and incredible accuracy. It's eerie how alike he is to Brady circa-2003.

Mac, unfortunately, is none of those things. As things continue to unravel I can't help but wonder if BB got a good recommendation from his buddy Saban and figured he was all set at QB.
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
2,790
South Dartmouth, MA
I may be parsing words a bit, but I personally dont think there is any such thing as a "system QB." There are systems that are better set to help a QB reach his ceiling though. But that doesnt always mean a qb is going to reach said ceiling. Im pretty confident saying that Mac's ceiling isn't as high as Brock's, but Im even more confident in saying Mac would have a better chance of reaching his personal ceiling in San Fran right now than New England.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
Purdy reminds me very, very much of an early-career Tom Brady. His best attributes are his decision-making and incredible accuracy. It's eerie how alike he is to Brady circa-2003.

Mac, unfortunately, is none of those things. As things continue to unravel I can't help but wonder if BB got a good recommendation from his buddy Saban and figured he was all set at QB.
How did Brock Purdy turn into this guy with incredible decision making?

I mean, he was this guy like 2 years ago?

How do we think these changes ocurred?

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osa1SiwG-B4


And I think that's the reality of the two situations. Brock Purdy went from playing at Iowa State to Alabama. Mac Jones went from playing at Alabama to playing at UMASS.