The Michael McCorkle "Mac" Jones Thread

FL4WL3SS

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
14,970
Andy Brickley's potty mouth
It's because he went to Bama and not "THE" OSU. If the Pats had drafted Fields, I think I know who would be at the top of the wall defending him.
Not true. I agree I would have rather drafted Fields and think he would do better in this situation than Chicago, but at this point he's pretty trash too. Fun to root for in college though.

You've known me long enough to know I'm not a homer, if guys suck, they suck.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,663
around the way
Not true. I agree I would have rather drafted Fields and think he would do better in this situation than Chicago, but at this point he's pretty trash too. Fun to root for in college though.

You've known me long enough to know I'm not a homer, if guys suck, they suck.
I liked Fields too, and I'm still not 100% that he would be trash if he had landed basically anywhere besides Chicago. How many current QBs would look good in the Bears offense?
 

astrozombie

New Member
Sep 12, 2022
433
I liked Fields too, and I'm still not 100% that he would be trash if he had landed basically anywhere besides Chicago. How many current QBs would look good in the Bears offense?
I actually wanted Fields because I think Fields can do everything Mac does, as well as some things Mac can't do. I agree about Chicago - that team is just chewing up Fields and spitting him out in a way only Chicago can do.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
546
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
So this comes up a lot, but even if he had those guys in the NFL it wouldn't be the same. Guys are WIDE open all the time in college, the quality of secondary play in the average college game is terrible. He also had incredible lines. You can't compare anyone's college to NFL performance. Every guy in the NFL was a monster in college.... Myles Bryant was one of the best CBs in a major conference, he would be considered an elite defender in college.

We don't have a lot of guys who are good at beating man consistently, but also, Mac isn't the type of QB who can challenge tight coverage windows (and often doesn't try because of this).
Not the same, sure, but seemingly a lot better to have 4 different 1st round WR talents to throw to, no? Is there any Patriots player you wouldn't trade for Smith or Waddle straight up (obviously, Jeudy is hurt, and Ruggs...will not be playing football any time soon)? My point is not "Mac sucks", because I don't think he does. My point is that he, and this offense, do need at least one downfield threat in order to succeed.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
Not the same, sure, but seemingly a lot better to have 4 different 1st round WR talents to throw to, no? Is there any Patriots player you wouldn't trade for Smith or Waddle straight up (obviously, Jeudy is hurt, and Ruggs...will not be playing football any time soon)? My point is not "Mac sucks", because I don't think he does. My point is that he, and this offense, do need at least one downfield threat in order to succeed.
Sure, I agree the offense would be better with elite talent. But... people (as you did) point to his college throws and say "see he can do that in the NFL" and the point is that they are not the same throws even if he had elite WRs, and you can't translate one to the other (see Fields, Justin for a non-Mac example).
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
Sure, I agree the offense would be better with elite talent. But... people (as you did) point to his college throws and say "see he can do that in the NFL" and the point is that they are not the same throws even if he had elite WRs, and you can't translate one to the other (see Fields, Justin for a non-Mac example).
How are most of those throws that I posted by Tua and Jalen not the same throws? They're literally the same people, with the same teammates, running almost the same routes and with the same separation?

Fields, like Mac, may have been given the worst skill position players, worst line play and worst coaching situation to walk into in the NFL.

But unlike Mac, even when Fields had guys wide open in college, he was throwing wounded ducks that Olave and Garrett Wilson were coming back for and/or making plays on in most cases:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08hqZFXHi3s
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,625
CT
How are most of those throws that I posted by Tua and Jalen not the same throws? They're literally the same people, with the same teammates, running almost the same routes and with the same separation?
If you are curious to know what Tua is doing that makes him special the last year and a half, I would strongly encourage you to watch any of the QB School’s YouTube videos on him from this season.

Is Tua hitting some wide open, slam dunk TDs? Absolutely. He’s also letting balls rip 20 yards down field into a window before the receiver even starts to break.
 
Last edited:

FL4WL3SS

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
14,970
Andy Brickley's potty mouth
I said this last year and it looks true again this year, the plays where he gets his footwork right are his best throws. The majority of his throws his feet aren't set and/or he's throwing off his back foot. The play coming out if the two minute warning was a beautiful set and throw even though it was a bit off target (or he expected the receiver to come back)
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,569
I said this last year and it looks true again this year, the plays where he gets his footwork right are his best throws. The majority of his throws his feet aren't set and/or he's throwing off his back foot. The play coming out if the two minute warning was a beautiful set and throw even though it was a bit off target (or he expected the receiver to come back)
The points about his footwork in that video really seem spot on. When he pops up at the back of his drop I also think he loses the timing on the routes. Mac often seems late getting the ball where it needs to go, which is generally attributed to his arm strength. To overcome that, the rest of his technique, including his footwork, has to be perfect. There's definitely room for improvement there.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,039
Deep inside Muppet Labs
The points about his footwork in that video really seem spot on. When he pops up at the back of his drop I also think he loses the timing on the routes. Mac often seems late getting the ball where it needs to go, which is generally attributed to his arm strength. To overcome that, the rest of his technique, including his footwork, has to be perfect. There's definitely room for improvement there.
This is well put. From my seat on the couch too many of his throws are late. Not by much, but by just enough that he and his throws look creaky.
 

jose melendez

Earl of Acie
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2003
31,263
Geneva, Switzerland
I've watched a lot of football this year, more than usual as I'm not working and I have the cheaper European game pass. And if finally reached where a decision on Mac.

First, let me say he absolutely deserves the rest of the year to prove he deserves to be a starter. This is the put up or shut up year. Second, let me say that unlike a lot of the other QBs drafter in his class, he is definitely an NFL QB. But I just don't see him as a starter on a good team. Watching Carolina and the Raiders play, it really struck me that Andy Dalton and Jimmy G are making throws down field that Mac just doesn't. He either doesn't have the arm or the accuracy down field. This might be something that you could work around if he were spectacular at the mental part of the game, the decision making, and the short throws, but from what I've seen he is, at absolute best, good at those things, not great. He needs to be great to be an NFL starter with his arm. If he fails to show dramatic improvement over the rest of the season, I'd let him walk if he won't reason for short money. He's not terrible, but I've seen no evidence that he isn't pretty easy to replace. If we have to sign him, better to draft another QB or sign some mediocre QB who is already Mac's best case.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,012
Dallas
A lot of the timing and rhythm that he needs to develop is a product of being in another offense, behind a bad OL, and he has to develop chemistry with his guys. He isn't on the same page with receivers - when that happens it is hard to throw with anticipation consistently. JTO, QB School, points out though that Mac is regularly throwing with anticipation - but it isn't 100% yet. Still, he is already better at anticipation throws than many NFL QBs.

The deep stuff is also tough because the stuff he drops in a bucket doesn't get caught anyway.

Let's see where he is at the end of the year. His outside stuff is better this year already. He made some great intermediate ropes to guys like Bourne already in all 3 games as well.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
A lot of the timing and rhythm that he needs to develop is a product of being in another offense, behind a bad OL, and he has to develop chemistry with his guys. He isn't on the same page with receivers - when that happens it is hard to throw with anticipation consistently. JTO, QB School, points out though that Mac is regularly throwing with anticipation - but it isn't 100% yet. Still, he is already better at anticipation throws than many NFL QBs.

The deep stuff is also tough because the stuff he drops in a bucket doesn't get caught anyway.

Let's see where he is at the end of the year. His outside stuff is better this year already. He made some great intermediate ropes to guys like Bourne already in all 3 games as well.
This is exactly right.

Mac has some footwork issues that he needs to clean up, there is no doubt about that, but it's hard to blame a game for having "happy feet" when he's getting hit on almost every single pass play. Even on his completions, you watch that video and there is nowhere to step into a throw, and he's getting drilled as soon as the ball comes out. When you have receivers that are a beat slower than most NFL receivers, and new guys that you aren't 100% sure where they're going, there is going to be some indecision. When you combine that with less than 2.5 seconds to get the ball out, most throws are going to be off the back foot.

When Mac has time to step up in the pocket, he can let it rip with almost anyone (obviously not the Allen's and Herbert's of the world, who still have won exactly nothing in this league too). I think people also mistake Mac's arm a bit too, because uses touch on his balls a lot. Always has. It may not look like he's firing it in there because he can't, but I think he's just always been a guy who tends to put touch on the ball as opposed to firing missiles at guys.

And why can't he just fire missiles, because of your bolded sentence. I keep coming back to that deep shot last week to Pop that should have been DPI. If Pop doesn't fucking turn for the ball, it hits him in stride in the hands and the DPI wouldn't have mattered.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
https://x.com/benbbaldwin/status/1707020402138939394?s=20

View attachment 71543

You can't live like this with a pocket passer and especially a guy who needs to be able to step into throws. They aren't even good by a single metric.
Strange, don't often see stats that actually match what you see with the naked eye when watching games as well as this does.

Looking at the bottom of the list, everyone can see the Pats and Jets offensive lines have sucked. Teams have been loading up on the Bengals knowing there is a hobbled Burrow back there, Pickett and Bryce Young have been under crazy pressure. The Giants and Falcons passing games have been terrible, the Saints just got Derek Carr hurt, the Titans can't block anyone. Only team in the bottom 10 that looked semi-decent was the Rams, and interestingly, there is a massive disparity between their PFF grade and their SIS grade.

Meanwhile, you have Miami just road grading everyone, the Packers making Jordan Love look like he's better than last year's Rodgers, Buffalo and KC as expected, Minnesota putting up a ton of yards only for Cousins to keep fucking them in the red zone, even Tampa is keeping Mayfield upright to decent success in the results.

If Mac Jones were getting DeShaun Watson's protection with the same results, I'd be losing my fucking mind.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,569
This is exactly right.

Mac has some footwork issues that he needs to clean up, there is no doubt about that, but it's hard to blame a game for having "happy feet" when he's getting hit on almost every single pass play. Even on his completions, you watch that video and there is nowhere to step into a throw, and he's getting drilled as soon as the ball comes out. When you have receivers that are a beat slower than most NFL receivers, and new guys that you aren't 100% sure where they're going, there is going to be some indecision. When you combine that with less than 2.5 seconds to get the ball out, most throws are going to be off the back foot.

When Mac has time to step up in the pocket, he can let it rip with almost anyone (obviously not the Allen's and Herbert's of the world, who still have won exactly nothing in this league too). I think people also mistake Mac's arm a bit too, because uses touch on his balls a lot. Always has. It may not look like he's firing it in there because he can't, but I think he's just always been a guy who tends to put touch on the ball as opposed to firing missiles at guys.

And why can't he just fire missiles, because of your bolded sentence. I keep coming back to that deep shot last week to Pop that should have been DPI. If Pop doesn't fucking turn for the ball, it hits him in stride in the hands and the DPI wouldn't have mattered.
My takeaway from the QB school video was that the footwork at the top of his drop actually delays his release, which may then make him more prone to pressure. (I went down the YouTube QB footwork rabbit hole earlier and Brady was just a damn ballerina, with an excellent wide base on his drops.) That said, I would not dispute the general point that he's lacked protection, which has an overall negative impact on what he can and can't do.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,660
deep inside Guido territory
That's great, but the offensive points this season have been 20, 17, and 13.

Which is not great.

At this point I don't know if Mac is the problem or the players around him. As mentioned elsewhere the real issue is that neither group is helping the other elevate their game. You're not going to win a Super Bowl without elite QB play. The issue is that I have no idea if giving Mac more weapons will make him an elite QB. I suspect it won't but I simply don't know.

I keep having the nagging feeling that his arm is simply not quite good enough, and the ball is being thrown a tad too late or slowly. But I just don't know.
One problem is that the offensive line has given his next to no time to throw. Look at SMU's chart he posted. So it is tough to be good throwing the ball down the field when you don't have time to sit back, step into throws, and let the routes fully develop. The skill guys are also lacking enough players who can stop on a dime and get open quickly as well as a pure speed outside receiver who can work outside the numbers. He also does not have a running back that he can use as an outlet in the passing game. It also does not help that they aren't running the ball effectively enough. When opposing defenses can rush the passer while playing man coverage because they don't respect the abilities of the WR's to get open it make things a hell of a lot harder to be effective as a QB.

If you give Mac adequate time to throw and some explosive playmakers, he'll be fine. Tua got Hill and Waddle and all of a sudden is putting up historic numbers. Jalen Hurts got AJ Brown to pair with D-Smith and is now 19-1 in his last 20 regular season starts. Mac is handling pressure better than he did last year and making tight window throws better as well. Give him some upgraded talent and things should open up. A star receiver like Tee Higgins is a must this offseason.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,012
Dallas
The two biggest culprits are LG and RT:

71544

He is doing a good job of not creating pressure on himself and his work out of the pocket has been refreshing.

Strange, Mafi, RT of the week, none of these guys are doing well enough in pass pro.

Mac is under pressure around 36% of his dropbacks which is problematic. You really want to be 30% or under. The interesting thing with his pressure rate is 1) when you look at the 17 guys who have been under more % pressure than him only 2 guys have a lower rate of own pressure, Stafford and Purdy and it's just SSS at this point 1 vs 2 own pressures, and 2) only 3 of the 17 other guys have a faster time to throw under pressure than him, Tannehill 2.92 vs 2.94, Purdy 2.82 vs 2.94, and Andy Dalton.

Mac's time to throw not under pressure is third fastest in the league at 2.07 seconds.

When he isn't under pressure his ADOT is 7.6 but under pressure it is 12.7. Average Depth of Target.

What does all this tell us?

Mac is under duress when he is not doing quick game or 0-10 yard throws that he can get out quickly. When Mac wants to work the intermediate or deeper parts of the field he doesn't have much time to do so as protection is breaking down quickly. It is difficult for him to step into these deeper and intermediate throws because of the pass protection issues. He doesn't have the physical talent to be able to throws a frozen rope off his back foot. So as frustrating and/or mediocre to bad his pass catchers are he doesn't have the protection to operate effectively in the intermediate and deep passing game because protection is so unreliable.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,012
Dallas
I know they have Waddle and Hill, etc, but swap the Pats' protection with the Dolphins', and let's see how each offense performs.
I don't think it would be as big of a difference as you think because their offense is based on speed and space and quick throws. That works when you have Waddle and Hill. When you have Bourne and Parker you just can't do that. Shanny and a lot of his disciples have found a way to minimize investment in the OL. However in order for that to work you need the right set of weapons. You need guys who are man beaters too. There are so many ways to mitigate one or two problems but all of those solutions require for every weakness that you want to cover up you have a corresponding mitigating strength. The Patriots don't have one of those guys and they have multiple issues so it's messy right now.

At least the run blocking is looking better.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,869
If you give Mac adequate time to throw and some explosive playmakers, he'll be fine.
I agree but...shouldn't this be true of ANY staring QB in the NFL? Give him time to throw, and explosive playmakers, and they all should put up big time numbers and results, right?
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,985
Thought Mac had a really fine start and then a pretty ugly end. However, there were no egregiously dangerous/bad throws or turnovers, which is really key against the Jets, so all in all a decent game. Still not exercising that 5th year option, though, and next year’s QB class is stacked af…
I know they have Waddle and Hill, etc, but swap the Pats' protection with the Dolphins', and let's see how each offense performs.
The Dolphins have some new guy at left guard named Isaiah Wynn. Would be a big upgrade over Cole Strange.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
I agree but...shouldn't this be true of ANY staring QB in the NFL? Give him time to throw, and explosive playmakers, and they all should put up big time numbers and results, right?
Yes, it's probably true of between 35 and 50 guys (fine, not elite). Now I think Mac is not at the bottom of that group, but yes, lots of QBs can be pretty good with a good O-line and explosive playmakers.

Mac has struck me the last 3 years as a guy who fits into that category of... low-end starter. He's probably too good to be a backup for long, but also not good enough that you aren't looking for "the guy" while you have him. Love to have him on the roster cheap (like now) but once you start paying starter money..... meh.

Like I think Mac can give you consistently somewhere between 15th and 25th best QB in the league, depending on what's around him, but to get to 15th takes a lot of work/money around him, so I'd certainly be looking for one of those guys who can put you 3-15 (top end talent with top talent, mid-range with poor talent).
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
I agree but...shouldn't this be true of ANY staring QB in the NFL? Give him time to throw, and explosive playmakers, and they all should put up big time numbers and results, right?
They should, that's for damned sure. Which quarterbacks in the NFL that have time throw and have explosive playmakers are not putting up big time numbers?

Results, with respect to w/l records is a different story. Example 1 is Kirk Cousins, example 1A is Justin Herbert.

That's pretty much been my argument for 3 years now. We have no idea if Mac can put up big time numbers and get good results, because he's never had a truly good offensive line, and nowhere near good enough receivers. (never mind the coaching carousel around him).
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
2,790
South Dartmouth, MA
They should, that's for damned sure. Which quarterbacks in the NFL that have time throw and have explosive playmakers are not putting up big time numbers?

Results, with respect to w/l records is a different story. Example 1 is Kirk Cousins, example 1A is Justin Herbert.

That's pretty much been my argument for 3 years now. We have no idea if Mac can put up big time numbers and get good results, because he's never had a truly good offensive line, and nowhere near good enough receivers. (never mind the coaching carousel around him).
Right. I dont know any Mac "defenders" on here claiming he can be an elite elevator of team around him (lets call that Tier 1), just that we dont really know what lower tier of starter he actually falls into. He actually did have decent line play in his rookie year, and McDaniels as coach, and finished smack dab in the middle of most qb rankings (PFF, QBR, rating).
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
Yes, it's probably true of between 35 and 50 guys (fine, not elite). Now I think Mac is not at the bottom of that group, but yes, lots of QBs can be pretty good with a good O-line and explosive playmakers.

Mac has struck me the last 3 years as a guy who fits into that category of... low-end starter. He's probably too good to be a backup for long, but also not good enough that you aren't looking for "the guy" while you have him. Love to have him on the roster cheap (like now) but once you start paying starter money..... meh.

Like I think Mac can give you consistently somewhere between 15th and 25th best QB in the league, depending on what's around him, but to get to 15th takes a lot of work/money around him, so I'd certainly be looking for one of those guys who can put you 3-15 (top end talent with top talent, mid-range with poor talent).
Who is putting up top 10-15 numbers regularly with poor talent around them, both on the offensive line and at the skill positions? By QBR last year, the 10-15 guys were 91.1 to 95.2. If that's the standard we're going to hold Mac to, then I'd say he's already pretty damn close. This year, the sample size is obviously small, but #15 is at 90.6, while Mac is currently 19th at 87.7.

If folks don't like QB rating, I get that, but he's pretty much right around that mid range, with awful weapons right now. There are guys like Jordan Love getting around a lack of players at the skill positions, but he's getting incredible work from his offensive line. Then you have guys like Burrow getting shit from their offensive line, but he obviously has playmakers. Tua and Hurts have both. Mac has neither.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,161
Hingham, MA
Yes, it's probably true of between 35 and 50 guys (fine, not elite). Now I think Mac is not at the bottom of that group, but yes, lots of QBs can be pretty good with a good O-line and explosive playmakers.

Mac has struck me the last 3 years as a guy who fits into that category of... low-end starter. He's probably too good to be a backup for long, but also not good enough that you aren't looking for "the guy" while you have him. Love to have him on the roster cheap (like now) but once you start paying starter money..... meh.

Like I think Mac can give you consistently somewhere between 15th and 25th best QB in the league, depending on what's around him, but to get to 15th takes a lot of work/money around him, so I'd certainly be looking for one of those guys who can put you 3-15 (top end talent with top talent, mid-range with poor talent).
See the below posts, but I was going to make a similar point. Back in 2021, Mac was right around mid-league by a lot of metrics. Would you say that took a lot of work/money around him? I mean, I guess it cost money from the standpoint that they paid Henry, Jonnu, and Agholor going into that season, but it's not like those guys were the reason he played pretty well.



They should, that's for damned sure. Which quarterbacks in the NFL that have time throw and have explosive playmakers are not putting up big time numbers?

Results, with respect to w/l records is a different story. Example 1 is Kirk Cousins, example 1A is Justin Herbert.

That's pretty much been my argument for 3 years now. We have no idea if Mac can put up big time numbers and get good results, because he's never had a truly good offensive line, and nowhere near good enough receivers. (never mind the coaching carousel around him).
Right. I dont know any Mac "defenders" on here claiming he can be an elite elevator of team around him (lets call that Tier 1), just that we dont really know what lower tier of starter he actually falls into. He actually did have decent line play in his rookie year, and McDaniels as coach, and finished smack dab in the middle of most qb rankings (PFF, QBR, rating).
Who is putting up top 10-15 numbers regularly with poor talent around them, both on the offensive line and at the skill positions? By QBR last year, the 10-15 guys were 91.1 to 95.2. If that's the standard we're going to hold Mac to, then I'd say he's already pretty damn close. This year, the sample size is obviously small, but #15 is at 90.6, while Mac is currently 19th at 87.7.

If folks don't like QB rating, I get that, but he's pretty much right around that mid range, with awful weapons right now. There are guys like Jordan Love getting around a lack of players at the skill positions, but he's getting incredible work from his offensive line. Then you have guys like Burrow getting shit from their offensive line, but he obviously has playmakers. Tua and Hurts have both. Mac has neither.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
See the below posts, but I was going to make a similar point. Back in 2021, Mac was right around mid-league by a lot of metrics. Would you say that took a lot of work/money around him? I mean, I guess it cost money from the standpoint that they paid Henry, Jonnu, and Agholor going into that season, but it's not like those guys were the reason he played pretty well.
We had one of the best lines in the league, and it took significant resources to build it (picks and money) and that is with getting incredibly lucky in Onwenwu.

That we spent a bunch on TE and WR who were good but not special shows how expensive (and hard to get) true difference makers are. Though, I think saying those guys aren't reason he played well is wrong. Henry in particular. Guys they went out and spent on in FA caught 18 of his 22 TDs... Jakobi was the only one of his top 5 passcatchers who wasn't a FA signing for significant money.

So yes... it takes a lot of investment to get anywhere near top weapons and a good line.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,161
Hingham, MA
We had one of the best lines in the league, and it took significant resources to build it (picks and money) and that is with getting incredibly lucky in Onwenwu.

That we spent a bunch on TE and WR who were good but not special shows how expensive (and hard to get) true difference makers are. Though, I think saying those guys aren't reason he played well is wrong. Henry in particular. Guys they went out and spent on in FA caught 18 of his 22 TDs... Jakobi was the only one of his top 5 passcatchers who wasn't a FA signing for significant money.

So yes... it takes a lot of investment to get anywhere near top weapons and a good line.
Significant resources to build that line?

Ok, they drafted Wynn in the first round.

Trent Brown was a 1 year, $9M contract.

Mason was a 3rd round pick, but they had signed him to a fairly substantial 5 year / $45M deal.

Onwenu was a 6th.

Ted Karras played 98% of the snaps that year.

Andrews was on a 4 year, $19M contract, hardly a big investment.

They didn't have anyone making $10M.

And they didn't have some great group of pass catchers.

So yeah, I would disagree that the production in 2021 was a result in the investment at OL and skill position.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
Significant resources to build that line?

Ok, they drafted Wynn in the first round.

Trent Brown was a 1 year, $9M contract.

Mason was a 3rd round pick, but they had signed him to a fairly substantial 5 year / $45M deal.

Onwenu was a 6th.

Ted Karras played 98% of the snaps that year.

Andrews was on a 4 year, $19M contract, hardly a big investment.

They didn't have anyone making $10M.

And they didn't have some great group of pass catchers.

So yeah, I would disagree that the production in 2021 was a result in the investment at OL and skill position.
They had the 9th most expensive line in the league, depite starting a rookie 6th rounder, and not having to pay all of Brown's money because they traded a 5th for him.

They also had the 10th most expensive WR corps, and the 2nd most expensive TE group.
Overall it looks like they had the 6th highest spend on OL/TE/WR combined.

The Patriots spent a lot of money on the offense to try and make it easy on Mac.... it worked generally under a really good OC, honestly I think people forget how high many here were on the offense by EOY as it jelled. Now they didn't have any individual studs at WR, but they had a lot of depth based on spending. Now it turned out a bunch of those signings didn't work long term, and they cut costs by letting expensive O-line players and WR/TE go.... also looking at last year... terrible offensive coaching played a major role.

Edit- I also think this illustrates one of the things about the "just go get weapons" thing.... the Patriots in recent years have gone out and gotten some of the top of the market guys (top TEs in 2021, top WR in 2023 on many boards).... those guys are expensive, and the truly elite ones never make it to UFA, you have to either draft them (Bill tried with a 1st and a 2nd in recent years) or trade a ton for them usually (then give them a fat extension, so picks and above top of the market FA $).
 
Last edited:

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,012
Dallas
I don't know how well the offense worked in 2021. They blew out some bad teams but were relatively mid against the non-dreck of the league. The other thing is yeah they spent money on Agholor and Jonnu but those were misevaluations and/or bad bets. You can invest in anything but if you don't make the right investments... well... you see where we are now. They drafted a 1 in 2019, and a 2 in 2022. They knew after 2019 or 2020 that Harry was a bust. Some of these moves, like paying top dollar for a guy coming off of a career year like Agholor and betting that they could make Henry and Jonnu a very good 12 package that was not great process.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,789
In the absolute sense, I've become fairly meh-to-maybe on Mac (which of course in the relative sense makes me a massive Mac Fan-boy on SoSH). That said, there was a lot to like in that QB School video. I might be more bullish on him than I thought.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
In the absolute sense, I've become fairly meh-to-maybe on Mac (which of course in the relative sense makes me a massive Mac Fan-boy on SoSH). That said, there was a lot to like in that QB School video. I might be more bullish on him than I thought.
I don't think that makes you a massive Mac fanboy for SoSH, I;d say there is a very small group who is all out on Mac, a lot of people (myself included) who think meh is about right, and a few people who are on the opposite end of "he's the next Brady being held back".

I thought there was a mix in the QB school video. Lot of bad footwork, but also... that throw to Bourne is one I wasn't sure he could make. That he could makes me a bit more optimistic that if he fixes his footwork and mechanics he could offset the arm concerns a lot more, and make defenses respect certain throws they don't now.
 

azsoxpatsfan

Does not enjoy the go
SoSH Member
May 23, 2014
4,821
I don't think that makes you a massive Mac fanboy for SoSH, I;d say there is a very small group who is all out on Mac, a lot of people (myself included) who think meh is about right, and a few people who are on the opposite end of "he's the next Brady being held back".

I thought there was a mix in the QB school video. Lot of bad footwork, but also... that throw to Bourne is one I wasn't sure he could make. That he could makes me a bit more optimistic that if he fixes his footwork and mechanics he could offset the arm concerns a lot more, and make defenses respect certain throws they don't now.
I don’t think there’s anyone saying he’s the next Brady being held back. I haven’t seen anyone say he’s even top 10. That’s a straw man that the posters saying he’s bottom 2 make up and argue against so they can rehash the same points they’ve made a million times
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,382
Why would a third year pro who played at Alabama be having the kind of footwork issues that are still capable of being improved? He just doesn’t look like much of an athlete out there or someone who is able to keep their wits under pressure, so I’m not sure where the more reps idea comes in.
 

azsoxpatsfan

Does not enjoy the go
SoSH Member
May 23, 2014
4,821
Why would a third year pro who played at Alabama be having the kind of footwork issues that are still capable of being improved? He just doesn’t look like much of an athlete out there or someone who is able to keep their wits under pressure, so I’m not sure where the more reps idea comes in.
Idk if it’s necessarily a more reps issue. Guys fix mechanical issues all the time, Brady changed his throwing mechanics in like 2006 after having won 3 super bowls. You see the same thing with pitchers. It’s not always a reps problem, sometimes it’s just a “what you’ve been doing is working” problem that you try to adjust
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,663
around the way
Why would a third year pro who played at Alabama be having the kind of footwork issues that are still capable of being improved? He just doesn’t look like much of an athlete out there or someone who is able to keep their wits under pressure, so I’m not sure where the more reps idea comes in.
I don't think that anyone thinks that it's a "more reps" thing. QBs work with throwing coaches and often improve their mechanics to the point that it not only increases their accuracy and release time but also the zip on their ball. Brady is a perfect example of a guy who improved materially through this, although he didn't have the zip issues that Mac does. Tiger Woods had swing coaches when he was the best golfer on earth. It helps.

edit: dupe
 
Last edited:

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,179
I don't think that makes you a massive Mac fanboy for SoSH, I;d say there is a very small group who is all out on Mac, a lot of people (myself included) who think meh is about right, and a few people who are on the opposite end of "he's the next Brady being held back".

I thought there was a mix in the QB school video. Lot of bad footwork, but also... that throw to Bourne is one I wasn't sure he could make. That he could makes me a bit more optimistic that if he fixes his footwork and mechanics he could offset the arm concerns a lot more, and make defenses respect certain throws they don't now.
If you thought that was bad footwork in the QB school vid you need to watch more. He was picking up very minor issues compared to a lot of other QBs he reviews. Overall he was very positive about Mac's game compared to many other QB vids I've seen and he even mentioned he was putting good velocity on the throws, more than I would expect from him.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,660
deep inside Guido territory
Why would a third year pro who played at Alabama be having the kind of footwork issues that are still capable of being improved? He just doesn’t look like much of an athlete out there or someone who is able to keep their wits under pressure, so I’m not sure where the more reps idea comes in.
Footwork and technique is something that has to constantly be worked on. I think the lack of quality coaching for him last year allowed him to develop and continue some bad habits. OB has done a pretty good job in getting him to be better under pressure inside the pocket, but the back foot throws have seeped in.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,789
I don't think that makes you a massive Mac fanboy for SoSH, I;d say there is a very small group who is all out on Mac, a lot of people (myself included) who think meh is about right, and a few people who are on the opposite end of "he's the next Brady being held back".
Interesting. Can you name one? Maybe I have him/her/them blocked.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,873
This tracks with my thoughts on Mac thus far this season. Some great reads, plays/throws but the production just simply not there so far. Be it the line, receivers or some bad throws by Mac. I personally think its mostly a function of line and receivers so far (plus some tough defenses) but he did miss a few throws in the Jets game. Still feels like every time we block it up for a long pass and Mac delivers...the receiver shits his pants.

View: https://twitter.com/QBKlass/status/1707058773305827746


The New England Patriots‘ 15-10 win over the Jets was a clear example of what New England’s offense is and isn’t capable of right now.

On one hand, Mac Jones did a great job playing on time and peppering the Jets underneath. Jones’ decision-making has been top-quality this year, even if the accuracy is a step behind what we’re used to seeing from him. On the other hand, Jones went 0-for-5 beyond 20 yards, which speaks both to his average deep throwing ability and the Patriots’ complete lack of juice down the field.

Jones continues to play well this season, but the margin for error is so slim. He has to be perfect as a short-to-intermediate distributor or else the drive stalls out. The Patriots badly need some explosive potential in this offense to open things up.
https://www.the33rdteam.com/category/rankings/2023-nfl-week-4-qb-power-rankings-joe-burrow-trending-downward/
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,150
Interesting. Can you name one? Maybe I have him/her/them blocked.
It's hyperbole.. But you can just look back in this thread to see the "even Brady couldn't succeed with these teammates" quotes. Along with many other similar posts about how no QB would succeed
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,341
It's hyperbole.. But you can just look back in this thread to see the "even Brady couldn't succeed with these teammates" quotes. Along with many other similar posts about how no QB would succeed
As someone who did say roughly the above, I cannot speak for others. But the supporting cast was awful in the Dolphins game: receivers not getting open or running the wrong routes or being pushed off the route by the defender; running backs slow getting the hole; and OL giving Mac literally zero time. A mobile QB would have had difficulty with as many defenders in the backfield as Miami had all game. Mac made several good throws and several completions just as he was about to be hammered. And he threw the ball away a lot because it was his only option.

Mac's ceiling probably is league average starter, IMO. I also agree with many here that believe we just don't know yet, because the supporting cast has played so poorly.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,789
It's hyperbole.. But you can just look back in this thread to see the "even Brady couldn't succeed with these teammates" quotes. Along with many other similar posts about how no QB would succeed
There is a very good chance Tom Brady would not be TOM BRADY with the way the offense has looked. There were several seasons in his career that he did not.

As for "hyperbole" - when directing it at posters, it is 100% guaranteed hyperbole! to strain collegiality and subtract from the quality of discourse, as we have seen in this very thread.
 
Last edited:

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,162
It's hyperbole.. But you can just look back in this thread to see the "even Brady couldn't succeed with these teammates" quotes. Along with many other similar posts about how no QB would succeed
Shit, I'll stand by that.

I've asked for examples repeatedly.

What QB in the past decade, playing with an offensive line this bad, and receivers this mediocre or worse have put up top 5, or even top 10 numbers passing the ball. If folks can provide me one example without including Brady or Mahomes (and even in their cases, I'm not sure you'll find a season with less weapons and a worse line than what Mac has had the last 2 years), let me know, because everyone here has acknowledged that Mac Jones is neither of those guys.

So putting them aside, who? And if the standard that we're holding Mac to is Brady/Mahomes or bust, then I've got news for folks. You're going to be waiting a while.

I'll hang up and listen.