Red Sox Riddles

EddieYost

is not associated in any way with GHoff
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
10,763
NH
Assuming Adair is right, someone else can go. I got nothin’.
 

m0ckduck

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,774
Assuming Adair is right, someone else can go. I got nothin’.
Rich Gedman had a pinch-hit, game-winning grand slam against the Tigers on Aug 10, 1986.
Shea Hillenbrand had a pinch-hit, game-winning grand slam against the Rays on May 4, 2002.

What strange circumstance do these two at-bats have in common?
 

Whoop-La White

used to be zougwa
SoSH Member
Rich Gedman had a pinch-hit, game-winning grand slam against the Tigers on Aug 10, 1986.
Shea Hillenbrand had a pinch-hit, game-winning grand slam against the Rays on May 4, 2002.

What strange circumstance do these two at-bats have in common?
Hillenbrand's hit the catwalk. But you probably are thinking of:

Gedman, a left-handed hitter, pinch-hit for a righty against a lefty pitcher;
Hillenbrand, a right-handed hitter, pinch-hit for a lefty against a righty pitcher.
 

m0ckduck

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,774
Hillenbrand's hit the catwalk. But you probably are thinking of:

Gedman, a left-handed hitter, pinch-hit for a righty against a lefty pitcher;
Hillenbrand, a right-handed hitter, pinch-hit for a lefty against a righty pitcher.
Yes, that's it (the spoiler part). Which puts Marc Sullivan and Tony Clark in a special category of shared ignominy.
 

BuellMiller

New Member
Mar 25, 2015
452
Looks like the Orioles had Dick Williams, Darrell Johnson and Whitey Herzog. Earlier in the season they had bought Johnson from the Reds, who also would have Eddie Kasko and Don Zimmer on their 62 roster.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,445
If nobody else has one, I'll go.

What does Roman Anthony have in common with JBJ, Jacoby Ellsbury, Dan Bard, and Scott Hatteberg?

Among non-Sox, they also have this in common with Mike Trout!
 

BuellMiller

New Member
Mar 25, 2015
452
If nobody else has one, I'll go.

What does Roman Anthony have in common with JBJ, Jacoby Ellsbury, Dan Bard, and Scott Hatteberg?

Among non-Sox, they also have this in common with Mike Trout!
They were all drafted with compensation picks for losing FAs
 

BuellMiller

New Member
Mar 25, 2015
452
Not Red Sox related, but of the Yankees 27 WS, only 7 have occurred while this has also been true: their first 4 and none since the Eisenhower administration.
 

TapeAndPosts

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2006
581
Not Red Sox related, but of the Yankees 27 WS, only 7 have occurred while this has also been true: their first 4 and none since the Eisenhower administration.
Only 7 with Republican presidents: 3 Coolidge, 1 Hoover, 3 Eisenhower. Meanwhile 20 under Democrats: 6 FDR, 5 Truman, 2 JFK, 2 Carter, 4 Clinton and 1 Obama.

Had to check Sox while I was at it: they are more even with 5 under Republicans, 4 under Democrats. 1 Teddy Roosevelt, 1 Taft, 3 Wilson, 2 G. W. Bush, 1 Obama, 1 Trump.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,257
Not Red Sox - but I think this one is interesting anyway.

There is something remarkable about this player, that is not true for any other player. What is it?
I assume it relates to the fact that...

He was a 94th round draft pick who made it to MLB.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,257
This isn't much of a riddle but...

...who is the all-time leader in games with the Red Sox who isn't the all-time Red Sox leader in games by someone with their initials?
 

Martin and Woods

New Member
Dec 8, 2017
82
This isn't much of a riddle but...

...who is the all-time leader in games with the Red Sox who isn't the all-time Red Sox leader in games by someone with their initials?
If I'm following the logic (it's late and I've had a few IPAs), Cy Young (same initials as Yaz)?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,257
If I'm following the logic (it's late and I've had a few IPAs), Cy Young (same initials as Yaz)?
You are following the logic correctly, but Cy Young only played 327 games for the Red Sox & is not the correct answer.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,806
Alamogordo
I still don't understand the question :-(
I understand it now, and will try, but am not sure I can explain it better:

He is asking, which player has the most amounts of games played as a Red Sox, but is second in games play among players with his initials. Young is second by his initials, but played less games than Valentin. Valentin is second to Varitek among players with the initials JV, and is the highest such player.
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,253
Herndon, VA
I understand it now, and will try, but am not sure I can explain it better:

He is asking, which player has the most amounts of games played as a Red Sox, but is second in games play among players with his initials. Young is second by his initials, but played less games than Valentin. Valentin is second to Varitek among players with the initials JV, and is the highest such player.
It took me multiple rereads to realize the second "Red Sox" reference meant who played with the Red Sox at least a game, not necessarily how many games they played as a Red Sox.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,257
It took me multiple rereads to realize the second "Red Sox" reference meant who played with the Red Sox at least a game, not necessarily how many games they played as a Red Sox.
It was supposed to mean how many games they played with the Red Sox. I could have worded it more clearly but I leaned a bit too hard into the "riddle" angle.
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,253
Herndon, VA
It was supposed to mean how many games they played with the Red Sox. I could have worded it more clearly but I leaned a bit too hard into the "riddle" angle.
Yeah that's what I understood the first Red Sox player reference to be. It was the second Red Sox reference in the riddle that was confusing me.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,257
Yeah that's what I understood the first Red Sox player reference to be. It was the second Red Sox reference in the riddle that was confusing me.
I tried to make it clear(ish) that only games with the Red Sox counted to sidestep that loophole by saying "Red Sox leader in games" instead of leader in games, because that would imply that the 1st guys games didn't all have to be with the Red Sox to count.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,608
Miami (oh, Miami!)
I tried to make it clear(ish) that only games with the Red Sox counted to sidestep that loophole by saying "Red Sox leader in games" instead of leader in games, because that would imply that the 1st guys games didn't all have to be with the Red Sox to count.
Riddles are notorious for not being 100% obvious in suggesting the answer. Clear(ish) is where we want to be, IMO.