There's no doubt playing the reigning FCS champ is exactly the same as playing Howard, or four FCS (plus Umass) teams in two seasons. And there's also no denying that a single loss to that team trumps 915 wins. Moreover, you seem to not actually understand what's behind these games for teams like Michigan vs. the goal for teams like BC or UConn. Michigan doesn't schedule Appy St. for a win; it's all risk, no reward on the field. The incentive is the almighty $$$, and season ticket holders like me certainly don't like it. But when you sell 110,000 tickets for a home game, you need to maximize these dates, and unfortunately, it's difficult to find FBS opponents who will agree to come unless Michigan agrees to a home-and-home, which, by losing a home date is much more expensive than paying $1 million to bring in an FCS opponent. That calculus is not operative for a BC that rarely sells out its much cheaper tickets in its much smaller stadium.
But if this thread were some kind of Michigan v. BC discussion, all of this might actually be relevant.
By the way, Michigan did beat Florida in a bowl game to end that year, and finished in the AP top 20. How did your team do, RedOctober? Because that's relevant, isn't it?
Also, what did it mean when you "guaranteed" that Michigan wouldn't get Harbaugh? Obviously too much to believe that you'd disappear, but I hoped you'd at least shut your idiot trap for a while.