Post-Game 17 BB update poll

Vote twice.

  • WANT BB back as GM/HC

    Votes: 136 39.3%
  • WANT BB back only as HC

    Votes: 151 43.6%
  • WANT BB to move on

    Votes: 44 12.7%
  • THINK BB will be back as GM/HC

    Votes: 57 16.5%
  • THINK BB will be back only as HC

    Votes: 14 4.0%
  • THINK BB will not return

    Votes: 193 55.8%

  • Total voters
    346

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
3,220
Want him back as HC/GM. Nobody knows more football and I trust him to make decisions in the long term best interest of the franchise.
 

Seels

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
4,978
NH
Want him back, just with help. Think there's too much smoke to ignore.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,127
Newton
Want him back. As is. Even losing football is more interesting with Bill coaching our team.

But I think it’s over.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,377
Want him back, primarily as HC, but HC/GM with some new blood in the organization below him would be fine by me. Seems like it’s a done deal that he’s gone, but I think it will be a mistake.
 

Bowser

New Member
Sep 27, 2019
431
Want him back as both HC/GM but think he's gone. If we trade him for a #1 pick, though, I'm fine, mostly. But if he's just gone with no compensation, then that's some B.S.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,242
CA
Want him back as HC only. Think he will likely not accept that. Half faint hope that Kraft realizes letting TB12 go was a mistake and he won’t want to do it again.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
Don’t really know what I want. If pressed, I guess I want them to move on only because I don’t trust him to pick guys on offense anymore. Would take him back as coach only if that were an option but I don’t think it is.

Think he’s gone.
 

Mloaf71

Well-Known Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
644
I want a coach or offensive coordinator that will bring a modern offense. Whether that is with or without BB I’m indifferent.
 

mjs

New Member
Mar 30, 2020
36
I want the Patriots to move on from BB. I am extremely grateful for the greatness of the NEP for the past 20 years and the unexpected and unreasonable happiness that their success has brought me. (I mean, WTF? 8 AFC championship games in a row! I would have settled for that first SB against the Rams.) BB is a football savant and knows more than anybody about the game. But his personnel management -- player selection (drafts, free agents), coaches, front office -- is, at this point in his career, subpar. Based on the data of the past 4 years or so. My impression is that he is locked into his way -- which is understandable since it has brought him and his teams great success, fame and riches. But, I don't want to give him the reins for the rebuild. No longer in BB do I trust.

And I suspect that the Krafts feel the same way.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,713
NOVA
This reminds of the polls that show Biden losing to the generic Dem but beating every named Dem one-on-one (not a political statement!). Just saying that until potential successors are interviewed it's easier to be on the side of move on.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,962
Unreal America
My preference is that he’s back as HC, and we start the franchise transition process by bringing in a real GM. But I can’t see him accepting that.

After he refuses that option, I’d bring him back as HC/GM for one more season. But it’s playoffs or bust.

I think he’s gone though.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,518
I want him back (he's the best coach and very likely the best GM "on the market") but I think if that was the decision you would have seen a statement several weeks ago to that effect. The silence coming from the Krafts is deafening. I would expect a very quick process from here, and I think it's all lined up already between Bill and the two owners. Assuming he's not bed ridden tomorrow, I think they'll announce, do the song and dance and hire Mayo, and bring back an old friend for GM (Quinn, Dimitroff, Robinson, etc.).
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,231
This reminds of the polls that show Biden losing to the generic Dem but beating every named Dem one-on-one (not a political statement!). Just saying that until potential successors are interviewed it's easier to be on the side of move on.
The problem with that is once we have interviews we know BB is gone.

And only 13% are voting "move on".
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
The problem with that is once we have interviews we know BB is gone.

And only 13% are voting "move on".
The problem is a lot of people want BB as the head coach but not the GM. But that doesn't seem like an actual possibility.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,941
The problem with that is once we have interviews we know BB is gone.

And only 13% are voting "move on".
True but that's partially because the poll gives a cop out option. If the options were "Bill back in his current role with current power" versus "Bill out" you'd probably get different results. We can't know if Bill would accept a demotion but.... we kinda know. Final say on personnel was a requirement to sign him, I doubt that changed after 20 years
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,231
The problem is a lot of people want BB as the head coach but not the GM. But that doesn't seem like an actual possibility.
Yeah, I know that's apparently unlikely, was just wondering how many would like that.
 

Reverse Curve

New Member
Sep 11, 2021
82
As a Belichick supporter, I’ve kind of vacillated on these scenarios over a decent chunk of this season, but I voted for wanting BB to move on and thinking he will not return.

These last few weeks seem to be heading towards a flashpoint of sorts in the BB - Kraft dynamic, and to me, the time for change is now. Not next year. I would not want to see him return in any capacity with an ultimatum looming (e.g. playoffs or you’re out).

Time for a reset, and I say that as a very fortunate fan of this franchise.

Through my rose colored (mutual decision) glasses, I would love to see BB ride off into the sunset to his next NFL venture, having orchestrated his own trade to the franchise of his best fit (half joking).
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,244
Back, just because of Hard Knocks. But that’s not how things work in the NFL, so he won’t be.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,941
Age 23 Tom Brady
Hmm, but would he develop the same without Belichik... I kind of doubt it. Chicken/egg kinda thing. Belichick is a genius coach, but he'd never have had the same ridiculous success without Brady who was a perfect fit. Brady built himself into the best QB ever, but does that happen without Belichick? Doubtful. It's why all Brady vs. Belichik arguments are generally pointless, they are integral parts of what made the other successful.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,783
Hmm, but would he develop the same without Belichik... I kind of doubt it. Chicken/egg kinda thing. Belichick is a genius coach, but he'd never have had the same ridiculous success without Brady who was a perfect fit. Brady built himself into the best QB ever, but does that happen without Belichick? Doubtful. It's why all Brady vs. Belichik arguments are generally pointless, they are integral parts of what made the other successful.
Yep. Brady and Belichick individually are great. Together they made the Patriots the greatest dynasty the sport has ever seen.

There have been lots of great QBs that have won a ton and lots of great coaches that have won a ton but putting Brady and Belichick together was like a superpower.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,127
Newton
Not that it would happen but if Bill were kicked upstairs to *just* be the GM a la Parcells? Are we sure it wouldn’t work?

I imagine a bunch of posters think Bill as GM without the coaching part would be a disaster – that he can’t draft WRs, has no idea to design a modern offense, etc. But is it possible that he would see the game differently without having to coach the players himself? After all, this is the guy who famously said, “At this point in my career, I only want to coach guys I want to coach” (slightly paraphrasing).

What if he didn’t have to coach them?
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,628
Not that it would happen but if Bill were kicked upstairs to *just* be the GM a la Parcells? Are we sure it wouldn’t work?

I imagine a bunch of posters think Bill as GM without the coaching part would be a disaster – that he can’t draft WRs, has no idea to design a modern offense, etc. But is it possible that he would see the game differently without having to coach the players himself? After all, this is the guy who famously said, “At this point in my career, I only want to coach guys I want to coach” (slightly paraphrasing).

What if he didn’t have to coach them?


Here's what he said today:

Despite the miserable season, and the fact. that Belichick is turning 72 in April, his desire to keep coaching has not wavered.

"No, I mean, I enjoy coaching," Belichick told reporters after the game. "Like I said, it's a disappointing season. I covered that in the opening statement. I don't have anything to add. That's how I feel. But no, I still – I like coaching the team. I like preparing the team, game planning, coaching on Sundays. But the results weren't good and none of us are happy with those."
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,459
Overland Park, KS
I very appreciate all that he has accomplished in NE but I think keeping BB only delays the inevitable. If they draft a QB with this high draft pick, does anyone here trust him to develop the guy? Tom Brady is a unicorn. He fought through adversity at Michigan and busted his ass in a tough environment in NE. He is also a football savant. It takes special players and coaches to run this Ehrhart-Perkins offense. Has BB found these players? Look at all the rookies and young players that thrive in the Shanahan and his disciples offense. It’s an easier system to learn and execute. BB knew this that’s why they made changes last year in camp but instead of getting a Shanahan OC he chose Marty P to implement it.
 

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
3,220
If they draft a QB with this high draft pick, does anyone here trust him to develop the guy?
Yes I do. Even setting aside Brady, his track record with QBs is excellent. He turned a lot of mid round picks into long time NFL players.
 

Cotillion

New Member
Jun 11, 2019
5,099
Yes, obviously, that's why I chose age 32.
That developed under who? We assume Brady gets to the same place from pick 199 (or whatever super high level pick he would have still been drafted). This is the problem of picking Brady out of some random time in his career. A huge part of what made him him came from learning under Bill. Just as a big part of Bill came from Brady even though he had a defensive track record long before Brady came along.

They both make each other.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,638
02130
I wanted him to move on earlier in the year if he didn't want to give up GM duties, but at this point I think he deserves another year and I think he's going to get it.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,783
86.8% of us want him back. This is gonna hurt.
I’ve always been on the keep BB side of this. The reason I think it will hurt is because it’s easy to say can the guy when you’re in the midst of a terrible season but when you step back for a moment and it comes time to make that decision, you think…uh…wait a minute here…is this really what we want to do? And you conclude that he is still top shelf at what he does AND he’s given us so many great memories.
 

Manuel Aristides

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 7, 2009
229
I wanted him to move on earlier in the year if he didn't want to give up GM duties, but at this point I think he deserves another year and I think he's going to get it.
I'm not going to stand here and say there aren't problems with the roster; there plainly are. But I kind of agree with you-- they never quit on him, they won some games down the stretch with total ass QB play, and they were in a shitload of close games. They were 4-8 in one score games... if they were 8-4 instead, they'd be .500. Really hoping that all parties can get to "HC but not GM"... not optimistic though.