Mike Carp requests trade

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
Mike Carp, a valuable bench player for the #RedSox last season, has requested a trade. Spoke to the team after the break.
 
https://twitter.com/PeteAbe/status/493133960965525505
 

LeoCarrillo

Do his bits at your peril
SoSH Member
Oct 13, 2008
10,442
This is like the trumpet player for the band Chicago being like, "Fuck this, I quit!"
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
16,897
I've been requesting Carp to hit a home run all season but he still has zero. Carp has one homer in the last calendar year. One. For a guy who can't run and can't play much defense, that is horrible. I liked the Carp pick up last year and thought he would be a solid bat for years, but he has just not done the job at all this year. If he leaves it means we'll probably have to DFA him. 
 
Here are just a few of the players with more homers than Carp this year:
Tuffy Gosewich, Endy Chavez, Kevin Frandsen, Aaron Hicks, Grant Green, Carlos Pena, Skip Schumaker, Bobby Abreu, Ben Revere, Ender Inciarte, Wil Nieves, Wilmer Flores, Nyjer Morgan, Abraham Almonte, Jake Goebbert, Willie Bloomquist, Reid Brignac, Sandy Leon, Travis Wood, Madison Bumgarner, Jordan Lyles, Ian Kennedy, Mike Minor, Gio Gonzalez, and Mike Leake. (The last 7 are pitchers, by the way.)
 
Sam Fuld has more HRs this year alone than Carp his hit in the last 365 days. 
 
Carp should be glad he even has a job in the majors. He didn't have one when we picked him up, and if he gets dumped he might have to take a minor league deal.
 

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
34,644
Haiku
Carp will be on waivers on August 1, along with most of the team, and then perhaps we'll find out if anybody actually values Carp, but until then I don't want Cherington wasting his time to accommodate an underperforming batter at a low-priority position.
 

richgedman'sghost

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2006
1,890
ct
Bone Chips said:
He's a real nowhere man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.
Not that it really makes a difference, but our friend  Nick C stated that Carp cannot officially request a trade according to the collective bargining agreement. He also stated that Carp did not exactly bolt into Ben Charington's office and throw things to demand a trade. It was more a "request" than a "demand" and done in a respectful manner. 
 

edoug

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
6,007
Bone Chips said:
He's a real nowhere man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.
Umpires are the Blue Meanies
 

DLew On Roids

guilty of being sex
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2001
13,906
The Pine Street Inn
If he goes on waivers right now, does anyone put in a claim?  Besides the Yankees, of course, who seem to have a crush on anyone who's worn a Sox uniform (the Reverse Mendoza).
 

alwyn96

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 24, 2005
1,351
I can't say I blame the guy. They've barely played him recently, and at 28, he's running out of chances to try to catch on as a starter and maybe get a sweet payday at some point. It isn't going to be in Boston any time soon. He probably wouldn't be any worse than say, Garrett Jones, or whoever is playing 1B for Miami these days. Maybe if Ike Davis didn't exist you could see him in Pittsburgh?
 
It's tough. Maybe he can Brandon Moss his way into a lineup at some point, but most teams either have guys who are better or guys who are younger or both. I still think with regular playing time he could probably put up a 110 OPS+ with terrible defense. Miami seems like a good fit, but he might even be too expensive for them since he's not making the minimum. Not that they'd give up anything for him anyway. 
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
Is there any real evidence that Mike Carp is a terrible first baseman? I would think the sample sizes are too small to say anything definitive, and the fact that he's athletic enough to at least pretend to play the outfield would suggest to me that he wouldn't, in fact, have terrible range for a first baseman. I don't recall too many times where there were bounced throws to first and my reaction was, "Napoli would have had it," either.
 

alwyn96

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 24, 2005
1,351
Plympton91 said:
Is there any real evidence that Mike Carp is a terrible first baseman? I would think the sample sizes are too small to say anything definitive, and the fact that he's athletic enough to at least pretend to play the outfield would suggest to me that he wouldn't, in fact, have terrible range for a first baseman. I don't recall too many times where there were bounced throws to first and my reaction was, "Napoli would have had it," either.
 
I think you're right that we can't really look at fielding stats for him, but he just looks bad to me, which maybe isn't the most persuasive evidence. I think Napoli scoops throws noticably better, and seems generally more athletic and sure-handed, but you may be right we just haven't seen enough of Carp to know. I certainly haven't seen Carp do anything more than routine over there, though.
 
Even if he's merely below average or mediocre, I'm not sure it changes much for his ability to get a deal in the near future. I'm not trying to put him down - I do hope he gets a chance somewhere. He seems like a decent enough dude, and there are worse (or at least, similarly talented) starting 1B in the MLB. 
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Plympton91 said:
Is there any real evidence that Mike Carp is a terrible first baseman? I would think the sample sizes are too small to say anything definitive,
I agree, and FWIW what the small sample (970 career innings) numbers say and what my eyes tell me are the same thing: he's not a terrible defensive 1B at all, just a little on the wrong side of average. With last year's offense that's a very viable player. With this year's, not so much. He needs a chance to prove that the truth (at a minimum) lies in between.