Just denying the motion to dismiss means, generally, what you quote. The language quoted from the judge's opinion goes a lot further.
Just denying the motion to dismiss means, generally, what you quote. The language quoted from the judge's opinion goes a lot further.
And today Golic's off the air ostensibly due to a pipe bursting in his house causing "significant damage."
Holding Archie and Peyton accountable for a book they did not write simply because they agreed to put their name on it is conclusive proof that Shaun King is a biased liar.
I really thought that adding the Al-Jazeera comment would clear up any confusion. I was wrong.
This is like asking "what we can do?" about Bill Cosby.
I would be happy if some sponsors, the League and the general public come to realize that Payton Manning is no tower of virtue like the League has represented him to be over the years. He is noted as an adulterer. This incident and the resulting smear campaign against the woman, the HGH allegations all point to the fact that his image is not what has been portrayed. For whatever reason, he is still the League darling and I would just like to see them recognise this and not make him the face of this League. But maybe that is just too much to ask.
Is this true? I know it's been repeated that he's a #1 choice, he's going to take Simms' job etc. I haven't seen a reference for it from anywhere semi-official outside of people assuming it's true.
I can't imagine Manning getting a TV gig, unless new evidence emerges that casts doubt on these allegations.
You may be right but between (a) the awesome cognitive dissonance that Peyton enjoys and (b) the fact that the likes of Ray Lewis and, in a much different but related to Manning sense, Rodney Harrison, have jobs in TV suggests to me that we may be stuck with Peyton behind the mike notwithstanding the current stink. And the circumstances are very different but we all remember when most people assumed that Marv Albert's career in television was over.
Marv Albert is still working in TV because a tape surfaced of his alleged victim offering money to a potential witness in exchange for false testimony. If there's a similar bombshell in the Manning case that casts doubt on his accuser's credibility, then yeah, he might get a TV gig.
I don't see how it could work with him taking Simms job. Who would handle the play by play? Nantz will be on his knees and his mouth otherwise too occupied to do it.
he is still going to get a TV gig unless something fool proof comes out that he 1000% cannot deny... we might as well accept that he will be gracing our TV's for the next 30 years
I mean like he did something horrible while in the NFL. not something "so long ago". We saw how far the HGH stuff wen't (nowhere)
I'm not sure what you're saying here, but I was responding to your statement "unless something fool proof comes out that he 1000% cannot deny" with the fact that he cannot discuss (deny) this case due to the confidentiality agreement between he and Dr. Naughright.
CBS may want him, but he's not going to drive massive eyeballs to listen to him pontificate. However if this story gains a little traction in the right places that network will not want to deal with their advertisers getting blowback.
I keep hearing this but does he even want a TV gig? A lot of other media sites (CBS Sports, Fox, Sporting News) claim he wants to get into a management position with an ownership stake. That's why he's constantly constantly been linked to both the Titans and Browns.
