Kyrie Irving traded to Celtics for IT, Crowder, Zizic, BKN 1st, 2020 2nd

Status
Not open for further replies.

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
Id like this trade better if Ainge had been able to add some top 2 protection, like Brooklyn pick is top 2 protected only if the Lakers pick conveys next year. Feels like that would have protected the Cavs (the only way they dont get the Brooklyn pick is if they are getting a pick from 2-5) and still probably have been the best offer on the table.

Celts gonna be a good exciting team for a long time, but I do fear the chance they are setting up to not be quite as good as GS the next 2-3 years and then not quite as good as Philly on the back end.
I mean if Embiid ever gets healthy and Simmons and Fultz get as good as Hayward & Irving Philly might get as good as Boston, but I think Tatum has the same sort of upside as Fultz, and might be more of a killer to boot. I'm still betting on Boston in the long term.
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,170
New York, NY
Since draft night I've been saying the Celtics version of the Butler deal is something like Smart (Lavine), Brown (Dunn), and Tatum (#7), and maybe Crowder or Bradley for salary purposes. Which, obviously, would have been icky.
That's great, but it's not remotely connected to reality. Smart is a better player than Lavine, although I can accept that some would disagree. But, Brown is more valuable than either Dunn (was drafted higher and had a better rookie year) or #7, arguably both combined. Tatum is easily more valuable than the two of those put together. Really, Tatum alone is more valuable than that whole package.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,552
That's great, but it's not remotely connected to reality. Smart is a better player than Lavine, although I can accept that some would disagree. But, Brown is more valuable than either Dunn (was drafted higher and had a better rookie year) or #7, arguably both combined. Tatum is easily more valuable than the two of those put together. Really, Tatum alone is more valuable than that whole package.
It's not what the value is it's what Chicago is asking for. Just because Boston's "this year's pick, last year's pick, and good young player" is better than Minnesota's doesn't mean Chicago isn't asking for it.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,385
Why do you guys feel that this deal isn't about 2017-18 as well as the future? Kyrie is healthy and the best player in the deal today (with an outside chance of the best player long term being the Nets pick) There is a decent chance Isaiah is a shell of his former self. I keep hearing "if Isaiah is heathy"......HE'S NOT! He has a torn labrum in his hip! We know this information. He is a guy who relies on speed and quickness who really can't do much physically all summer......how does this player help in 2017-18 more than Kyrie?
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,199
And, even *if* he's healthy--who's he guarding in a Celtics/Cavs matchup? How many pick and rolls would we run to get him switched onto Kyrie?
 

allstonite

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,500
For people wanting protections it would be extremely hard to do. That pick is from Brooklyn with 0 protection and it was the Celtics' next year no mater what. So if it got protected and we ended up keeping the pick, the Cavs would need something to replace it. The Memphis and/or LAC pick would not replace that value, never mind any of the Celtics future picks if they're as good as they're supposed to be.

They could have built something around the Lakers/Sac pick instead but if some of the stories above are true (LAL/Sac, Brooklyn, or Tatum choice) then Danny valued that more.
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
At some point you have to turn the picks into players. If we kept and use the BKN pick, you hope in 5 years that guy turns into today's version of Kyrie Irving. So we get the sure thing now and don't have to wait and hope the development turns out like you project. I was OK seeing what this team was going to be in 3-4 years, assuming the Warriors/Cavs cycle would be on the end. But now I'm firmly in "control the East now" mode and see what happens in the finals. Should be a fun couple of years in the Garden.
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,170
New York, NY
For people wanting protections it would be extremely hard to do. That pick is from Brooklyn with 0 protection and it was the Celtics' next year no mater what. So if it got protected and we ended up keeping the pick, the Cavs would need something to replace it. The Memphis and/or LAC pick would not replace that value, never mind any of the Celtics future picks if they're as good as they're supposed to be.

They could have built something around the Lakers/Sac pick instead but if some of the stories above are true (LAL/Sac, Brooklyn, or Tatum choice) then Danny valued that more.
One possibility: if Lakers pick conveys, Cavs get lesser pick (you could make this a bit more nuanced, like if the lesser pick is lower than 5, they get a future first too). If the Lakers pick does not convey, the Nets pick is top 3 protected and, if it ends up in the protection, the Cavs get the Kings/Sixers pick. You could obviously quibble on details here, the point is that the other picks create options for creative protection and conditional conveyances that could've been used.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,552
At some point you have to turn the picks into players. If we kept and use the BKN pick, you hope in 5 years that guy turns into today's version of Kyrie Irving. So we get the sure thing now and don't have to wait and hope the development turns out like you project. I was OK seeing what this team was going to be in 3-4 years, assuming the Warriors/Cavs cycle would be on the end. But now I'm firmly in "control the East now" mode and see what happens in the finals. Should be a fun couple of years in the Garden.
Not only that, but if the LAL pick vests in 2018, you probably have to trade one of the two anyway given how tough it would be to compete while giving the appropriate development minutes to all of Brown, Tatum, Zizic, Yabusele, BK18, LAL18, and BOS18, not to mention older young guys like Ojeleye (who suddenly has a path to becoming a 3+D replacement for Crowder) and Rozier, with more extra picks on the way from LAC and MEM.

And, of course, who knows if you can even get someone as good as Kyrie next summer under the gun, especially if Brooklyn ends up at, say, #10 instead of #3. IT, meanwhile would no longer be an asset at all, and maybe Zizic becomes uninteresting to teams after exposure to the NBA level.

The LA pick vesting would retroactively do a lot for the overall response to this, I imagine. I think a lot of people (not here, but amongst Average Joe Celtic Fan) had not really acknowledged the fact that IT was almost certainly gone next summer no matter what, so there's a definite emotional response that has to be overcome before people can be on board with this trade. If Kyrie starts the season like he's been shot out of a cannon and the Celtics win a ton of games, it'll happen pretty quickly.

Stevens has worked magic on lesser players like Turner, Crowder, and even Thomas. What's he going to do with legit stars like Hayward and Irving?
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,814
Melrose, MA
Why do you guys feel that this deal isn't about 2017-18 as well as the future? Kyrie is healthy and the best player in the deal today (with an outside chance of the best player long term being the Nets pick) There is a decent chance Isaiah is a shell of his former self. I keep hearing "if Isaiah is heathy"......HE'S NOT! He has a torn labrum in his hip! We know this information. He is a guy who relies on speed and quickness who really can't do much physically all summer......how does this player help in 2017-18 more than Kyrie?
Putting this specific deal aside, and looking at all of the moves together, you have only 4 returning players (and only 1 returning starter) from last year's team. I just think the 2018-2019 edition of this core team will be better than next year's version.
 

allstonite

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,500
One possibility: if Lakers pick conveys, Cavs get lesser pick (you could make this a bit more nuanced, like if the lesser pick is lower than 5, they get a future first too). If the Lakers pick does not convey, the Nets pick is top 3 protected and, if it ends up in the protection, the Cavs get the Kings/Sixers pick. You could obviously quibble on details here, the point is that the other picks create options for creative protection and conditional conveyances that could've been used.
Right but then we still end up with only one of the picks and down the other in 2018 but all of the risk then falls to Cleveland on the Kings being shitty in 2 years. That was probably a deal breaker because the pick is the most valuable asset they were getting back.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
1. Irving is a proven #2 on a title winner. Some think there's upside (that Player A & B thing with Curry upthread is tantalizing) for Irving to become a #1. Unquestionably, we haven't seen Irving at "full power" yet; he was just a pup when LeBron arrived and has been playing second fiddle to LBJ's greatness since. Is he more than what we've seen? Ainge thinks so. Or at least he thinks that Irving's floor as a proven #2 is good enough for the team he's built.

2. IT4 is a very easy guy to root for, and I hope he gets PAID by someone next offseason. Get well soon, Little Big Man.

That said, there's precious few examples of a player IT4's size being one of the key components to a title contender. And sorry, he's no Isiah Thomas (that smirking fuckface). Add the bad hip – and based on Ainge's comments, it's bad and Cleveland knows it – and his desire to get paid clashing with the team's longterm plan and his age/health/size status: it was time. I do wonder how much they could have gotten had he not hurt the hip because he's basically salary filler and a lottery ticket in this trade and that's way less than he was worth last season.

3. Crowder had to go, both because his contract was needed in the deal but because he is just good enough to keep Brown and/or Tatum from minutes they need in order to become better than JC. That Brown/Tatum now need to play "important" minutes is a good thing, I think.

Losing Crowder is probably a net negative in November and December. Giving those minutes to Brown/Tatum may result in both of them being better options than Crowder come playoff time.

4. The Fultz Trade looks better today, and might look downright genius next spring. Brooklyn improved and I heard Chris Mannix on TSH this morning say they were unlikely to be a bottom five team, given the talent they brought in, the disincentive to tank, the other teams who were definitely going to be tanking, and the quality of play in the Western Conference (some OK teams are gonna have bad records because the competition is so stiff).

If the Brooklyn pick ends up out of the top 5 and the Lakers pick is? Wow, Danny fucking killed it with a trident. Obviously, there's a lot of moving parts and ping pong balls between now and then, but if the scenario plays out the way Ainge has bet it will then just start building him a statue.

5. This is Al Horford's team now, in the locker room. He's not just well paid, he's also OLD compared to the rest of them, has been around the league forever, and has a year in the system. Which seems like a good idea, given everything we know about Horford indicates that he is a model professional.

All the key parts of the team are under 30, except the selfless veteran who's best attribute is passing and is noted for his stability and work ethic. That's not a coincidence. Stevens obviously commands his room and works well with players. But having a savvy, respected veteran in place, with experience in Stevens system to anchor things? That's some really good team building.
 

fairlee76

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 9, 2005
3,634
jp
At some point you have to turn the picks into players. If we kept and use the BKN pick, you hope in 5 years that guy turns into today's version of Kyrie Irving. So we get the sure thing now and don't have to wait and hope the development turns out like you project. I was OK seeing what this team was going to be in 3-4 years, assuming the Warriors/Cavs cycle would be on the end. But now I'm firmly in "control the East now" mode and see what happens in the finals. Should be a fun couple of years in the Garden.
Agree completely. For all his faults (defensive effort, maybe not the facilitator you want as a PG, believes the Earth is flat), Irving is pretty much the ceiling for whomever ends up as the BKN pick. Adding him makes this team an instant contender and, given what the Celts gave up and retained asset-wise, I'll take that over the chance to maybe be a contender four years from now.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,504
deep inside Guido territory
I've heard people saying that Irving will disrupt the chemistry of the locker room. How is that going to happen? Ainge broke up the entire team besides a couple guys. This is a completely new team whose identity won't have anything to do with the last couple years.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,199
Seems like some SiriusXM NBA guys hate the Celts on principle.

"Now LBJ can stay and who knows--what if CP3 doesn't work out in Houston? Celtics gotta worry about that."
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
Actually just now listening to the Simmons podcast and Kevin O'Connor said they can probably just waive the physical. This lends more to the idea that he's a throw in to this trade and the centerpiece is the Brooklyn pick. He's Mike Lowell in the Beckett deal. There's a chance he becomes Finals MVP (or close it it, Lebron probably gets it no matter what) but I'd bet on it going the other way.
I actually do think the Cavs valued Thomas and that Lil' Zeke used up one of his nine lives in landing on the one team that will back up the Brinks truck for him because they want his ability to generate regular season wins going forward.

The centerpiece is clearly the lottery pick to build a team around, but Thomas will fill the same role in Cleveland that he did here, generating regular season wins so that their shiny new draft pick develops on a playoff team rather than picking up bad habits on a cellar dweller.

You know what else? Even if the Cavs ended up with the first pick out of this (let's be honest, the Cavaliers seem to have a talent for winning the lottery) I'm still not regretting the trade. I mostly feel sorry for the Cleveland fans given that they root for a franchise that's suffered nearly two decades of crappy ownership and worse management (obviously those two items are related). So if the Cavs got #1 and Doncic or Porter to build around for the future, I'm happy for the their fans. Boston already has a guy with that sort of upside in Tatum, the real possibility of adding another with the LA pick, and two all stars to boot.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
Seems like some SiriusXM NBA guys hate the Celts on principle.

"Now LBJ can stay and who knows--what if CP3 doesn't work out in Houston? Celtics gotta worry about that."
Yeah, I think they're seriously delusional. Cleveland improved their chances slightly for this season, I think, but LBJ isn't staying with that ownership group. It will take them a couple of years to turn the roster over with that payroll, but this deal isn't about retaining LBJ, it's about what comes next.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,726
Why do you guys feel that this deal isn't about 2017-18 as well as the future? Kyrie is healthy and the best player in the deal today (with an outside chance of the best player long term being the Nets pick) There is a decent chance Isaiah is a shell of his former self. I keep hearing "if Isaiah is heathy"......HE'S NOT! He has a torn labrum in his hip! We know this information. He is a guy who relies on speed and quickness who really can't do much physically all summer......how does this player help in 2017-18 more than Kyrie?
I get that Thomas is hurt and that he is a deeply flawed player. I also know you have been banging the drum for Ainge to move him before his next contract which makes sense. But you are assuming that Irving has no question marks. It remains to be seen if he is capable of playing in Stevens system and if he will buy into playing consistent defense. It also remains to be seen what he can do as the focal point of the opposing defense with nobody close to LeBron along side him.

I get that part of the reason Irving wanted out of Cleveland was because LeBron is likely gone after this season but most reports suggested that he wanted to leave for a bigger role. The problem is that just about any viable destination that offered him that would also decrease his chances of playing for a contender. That says something about Irving's mindset versus contending with the Cavs this season and then ascending to the lead role for at most one year after LeBron bolts next summer.

In any event, we will see. I hope Stevens and Irving work because the guy has undeniable talent.
 

Koufax

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,946
I'm irrational about this, but it seems to me that giving up Zizic was a bridge too far. The Celtics need a banger / rim protector, and he could have been that guy for years. He may also develop more of an outside shot in time. I have a hard time believing that they couldn't close the deal with the Brooklyn pick, Crowder and IT. If they really needed to shed payroll to make the deal work, they could have parted with Shane Larkin or Abdel Nader.
 

BigMike

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 26, 2000
23,250
One possibility: if Lakers pick conveys, Cavs get lesser pick (you could make this a bit more nuanced, like if the lesser pick is lower than 5, they get a future first too). If the Lakers pick does not convey, the Nets pick is top 3 protected and, if it ends up in the protection, the Cavs get the Kings/Sixers pick. You could obviously quibble on details here, the point is that the other picks create options for creative protection and conditional conveyances that could've been used.
But then you have taken the upside out of the deal for CLeveland? While Crowder will be a useful reserve for them, they are taking a ton of risk in this deal as IT may be completely useless. ANd while ZIzic is a decent prospect a deal of Zizic, Crowder and a complete unknown IT, doesn't even get you into the ballpark for a 25 year old superstar who had several other teams pursuing him
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,385
Seems like some SiriusXM NBA guys hate the Celts on principle.

"Now LBJ can stay and who knows--what if CP3 doesn't work out in Houston? Celtics gotta worry about that."
I've heard this elsewhere too and it's hysterical. Yeah, LeBron has been pinning all summer for the Cavs to acquire Jae and Zizic to help him moving forward. Delusional.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
I've heard people saying that Irving will disrupt the chemistry of the locker room. How is that going to happen? Ainge broke up the entire team besides a couple guys. This is a completely new team whose identity won't have anything to do with the last couple years.
How bout the fact that Irving is a fucking moron, who somehow thought the best player in the league was holding him back (and the world is flat) while that very player gifted him a championship ring. The potential clubhouse problem comes down to one issue: Irving is probably the third best player on this team and thinks he's the best player in the league. Succinctly put, Irving is a nutcase.
 

allstonite

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,500
I actually do think the Cavs valued Thomas and that Lil' Zeke used up one of his nine lives in landing on the one team that will back up the Brinks truck for him because they want his ability to generate regular season wins going forward.

The centerpiece is clearly the lottery pick to build a team around, but Thomas will fill the same role in Cleveland that he did here, generating regular season wins so that their shiny new draft pick develops on a playoff team rather than picking up bad habits on a cellar dweller.
I actually kind of agree to an extent and said something similar upthread. They have a ton of uncertainty after next year so Thomas' contract expiring is perfect for them. They get a year to kick the tires on him and see if he fully recovers.

1) If he does and Lebron stays, they get a solid #2 similar to Kyrie but with less issues meshing because he doesn't mind playing Robin.
2) If he stays good and Lebron leaves, he could fill the star role like he did for us as you said. Give him the max since they won't need the money anyway while rebuilding.
3) If his injuries get the best of him and he falls off a cliff, they have no obligation to him after next season and he can be on his way.

I'd just put my money into #3 which is why I feel more optimistic about this trade
 

BigMike

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 26, 2000
23,250
I do find some of the Brroklyn goetting a ton better stuff a bit much. Anything is possible, and they are a young team, so maybe Deangelo Russel finds himself and blows up this year, and they made some nice moves. But we are still talking about a team where Jeremy Linn is by far the best player on the team. Anyhing is possible and they could jump out of the bottom 5 in the league, but that assumes everything breaks perfectly for them
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,992
Los Angeles, CA
If you want to feel even better about the trade watch replay of Rondo running circles around Isaiah in the first couple games of last springs Bulls series.

Then think of the trade in terms of Kyrie for the Nets pick, with a couple role playing fillers (Jae and Ante), along with an expiring contract (Isaiah) that Ainge was never investing in long term.
I mean, that's how I thought of it from the beginning. The pick is the prize for the Cavs.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,552
around the way
How bout the fact that Irving is a fucking moron, who somehow thought the best player in the league was holding him back (and the world is flat) while that very player gifted him a championship ring. The potential clubhouse problem comes down to one issue: Irving is probably the third best player on this team and thinks he's the best player in the league. Succinctly put, Irving is a nutcase.
You really need to provide better evidence for "Irving is a nutcase."

Stating that the earth is flat and not wanting to play on that particular team is hardly predictive of future clubhouse chemistry issues on this particular team.

Ftr, I am not a fan of this trade. I just think that we need to do better.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
I do find some of the Brroklyn goetting a ton better stuff a bit much. Anything is possible, and they are a young team, so maybe Deangelo Russel finds himself and blows up this year, and they made some nice moves. But we are still talking about a team where Jeremy Linn is by far the best player on the team. Anyhing is possible and they could jump out of the bottom 5 in the league, but that assumes everything breaks perfectly for them
Totally agree. All of a sudden the Lakers pick is the better pick because the Nets pick got traded? The Nets are a horrible fucking team and that pick is a huge fucking asset. I know people have some deep desire to think that their team didn't just make a huge mistake, but that's what just happened. I guess we should just enjoy the four fifty win seasons we got coming and embrace the rebuild that follows . After all when the Cs bottom out in 2025 that draft could be really special....
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,552
I'm irrational about this, but it seems to me that giving up Zizic was a bridge too far. The Celtics need a banger / rim protector, and he could have been that guy for years. He may also develop more of an outside shot in time. I have a hard time believing that they couldn't close the deal with the Brooklyn pick, Crowder and IT. If they really needed to shed payroll to make the deal work, they could have parted with Shane Larkin or Abdel Nader.
Given his athletic profile I think you're probably looking at a couple years at least before Zizic is able to play credible defense in the modern NBA, and even then you're probably looking at a limited 20mpg-esque role where you realize that he's actually being exposed badly by the P&R despite raw rebound numbers that look good on paper. Semi Ojeleye is closer to playing NBA-level defense against big men than Zizic is.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,552
Totally agree. All of a sudden the Lakers pick is the better pick because the Nets pick got traded? The Nets are a horrible fucking team and that pick is a huge fucking asset. I know people have some deep desire to think that their team didn't just make a huge mistake, but that's what just happened. I guess we should just enjoy the four fifty win seasons we got coming and embrace the rebuild that follows . After all when the Cs bottom out in 2025 that draft could be really special....
The Lakers have loaded up on young players in a ridiculously stacked conference while Brooklyn has acquired credible veteran (unsexy, but veteran) talent to fill out its roster in a ridiculously shitty conference. Why are the Lakers' young guys suddenly going to be the first ones who figure out how to win NBA basketball games?
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
With all due respect to Kyrie forcing his way out, I believe it was as simple as wanting to get out the year before LeBron leaves. He can't really say that publicly without putting his teammate on the spot. So he just makes the moves to get himself moved, takes heat for it, and is suddenly in a real good situation. I think it's brilliant really. Publicly the optics may not be ideal, but he can't really say, "LeBron's got one year left here, I've got 2. I'm not going to wait around and hold the bag...so I can be the man in Cleveland."
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,820
I'm irrational about this, but it seems to me that giving up Zizic was a bridge too far. The Celtics need a banger / rim protector, and he could have been that guy for years. He may also develop more of an outside shot in time. I have a hard time believing that they couldn't close the deal with the Brooklyn pick, Crowder and IT. If they really needed to shed payroll to make the deal work, they could have parted with Shane Larkin or Abdel Nader.
yes you are irrational about this. There is nothing about Zizac that says anything more than rotation player. He'll have a 10 year career in gbe NBA because of how hard he works but he'sprobay not going to be as successful as Olynyk.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
I do find some of the Brroklyn goetting a ton better stuff a bit much. Anything is possible, and they are a young team, so maybe Deangelo Russel finds himself and blows up this year, and they made some nice moves. But we are still talking about a team where Jeremy Linn is by far the best player on the team. Anyhing is possible and they could jump out of the bottom 5 in the league, but that assumes everything breaks perfectly for them
I don't think anyone is arguing that "they got a ton better". The fear that a lot of us expressed was that the bottom of the east was suddenly filled with bad teams that will be looking to lose next year, and the Nets won't be one of them. The security that most of is expressed was that the draft pool was deep enough that Boston would do well even if they were drafting mid lottery.

I think that the only fear with the Laker pick (and it's entirely rational) is that it won't convey because it will land #1, the West is just that fucking brutal right now. And despite the ESPN talking heads assuring us all that rookie Lonzo Ball is going to deliver prime Jason Kidd levels of performance, we're just not seeing a lot of victories for them in a conference where there could, legitimately, be 12 teams finishing with 40+ wins.
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,170
New York, NY
I'm irrational about this, but it seems to me that giving up Zizic was a bridge too far. The Celtics need a banger / rim protector, and he could have been that guy for years. He may also develop more of an outside shot in time. I have a hard time believing that they couldn't close the deal with the Brooklyn pick, Crowder and IT. If they really needed to shed payroll to make the deal work, they could have parted with Shane Larkin or Abdel Nader.
Zivic was the only one who was tradable. I assume Ainge would've preferred not to include him and that the deal wouldn't have been impacted if we had just tossed a worthless contract in, but we didn't have one. The trade options were Zivic or Rozier to hit the salary level needed to make the deal work.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,504
deep inside Guido territory
How bout the fact that Irving is a fucking moron, who somehow thought the best player in the league was holding him back (and the world is flat) while that very player gifted him a championship ring. The potential clubhouse problem comes down to one issue: Irving is probably the third best player on this team and thinks he's the best player in the league. Succinctly put, Irving is a nutcase.
Who cares about the world is flat stuff? That's great talk radio fodder but doesn't do anything for real basketball discussion. If you want to argue whether Hayward is better than Irving I can see an argument on who is the best player. But that's as far as it goes. Kyrie isn't the 3rd best player on this team. I also don't think he thinks he's the best player in the league. I just think he wanted out of a potential rebuilding Cleveland team if/when LeBron left him holding the bag.

It comes down to this: when the game is on the line who is going to have the ball in their hands? My bet is that it's Kyrie and he's proven that he can make that shot. That's what he wants and if he gets that I don't think there will be an issue.

As far as your post about the team making a big mistake: what would your take be if Brooklyn makes a modest improvement and the Lakers win the lottery? You'd still have a pick that is probably in the 4-8 range but not the top 3 pick you'd wanted. Is it still a big mistake? People have wanted Danny and Zaren to cash in on the asset haul for an established star player for years and he finally did.

Would you have been OK giving up either Tatum or Brown instead of the Brooklyn pick?
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,820
I do find some of the Brroklyn goetting a ton better stuff a bit much. Anything is possible, and they are a young team, so maybe Deangelo Russel finds himself and blows up this year, and they made some nice moves. But we are still talking about a team where Jeremy Linn is by far the best player on the team. Anyhing is possible and they could jump out of the bottom 5 in the league, but that assumes everything breaks perfectly for them
As opposed to CHI or IND or ATL?

ATL is way worse than BRK. It's doubtful that BRK will have the worse record in the conference. And while LAL and PHO would handily win 7 game series against BRK, they have to play against 11 or so teams that could win 40+ games.

I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that DA and his staff has run multiple projections and have BRK well off the bottom.
 

Strike4

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,911
Portland, Maine
At some point you have to turn the picks into players.
Amen. It's like a family buying a house - you save money and then wait for what you want to come onto the market. In a competitive market, you prepare to pay more to get the features you want - school district, yard, bedrooms, garage, etc. You aren't buying the house to make a great deal, you are buying the house to live in it. Some might say "but you're paying above appraised value!!!" but the goal is to GET THE HOUSE, not play at trades (as a real estate investor would).

For Ainge, this was the house the Celtics wanted.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,719
i think that's all correct, but to further your metaphor: is Irving "the house" in which an analyst can have faith? I don't think the objection is that the Celtics may have "lost" the trade in the abstract -- it's more that they pushed all chips in on a guy who is immensely talented but a flawed team player up until now. Will be fun to see if he takes the next step, and the Celtics with him.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
As opposed to CHI or IND or ATL?

ATL is way worse than BRK. It's doubtful that BRK will have the worse record in the conference. And while LAL and PHO would handily win 7 game series against BRK, they have to play against 11 or so teams that could win 40+ games.
I don't think that the Pacers are going to be in contention for a top 3 pick. Honestly despite the loss of George I'm expecting them to compete for a playoff spot because the #8 seed looks like a 36 game winner from here. And I think that with Turner still getting better that they're definitely going to be in the mix for #8. Although they have to be majorly pissed that Pritchard ejaculated prematurely given what they could have had for George.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,199
How bout the fact that Irving is a fucking moron, who somehow thought the best player in the league was holding him back (and the world is flat) while that very player gifted him a championship ring. The potential clubhouse problem comes down to one issue: Irving is probably the third best player on this team and thinks he's the best player in the league. Succinctly put, Irving is a nutcase.
Irving doesn't want to spend his prime with a shitty ownership group after LBJ leaves. That's not nuts.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
But then you have taken the upside out of the deal for CLeveland? While Crowder will be a useful reserve for them, they are taking a ton of risk in this deal as IT may be completely useless. ANd while ZIzic is a decent prospect a deal of Zizic, Crowder and a complete unknown IT, doesn't even get you into the ballpark for a 25 year old superstar who had several other teams pursuing him
The rest of the trade outside of the pick is not quite window dressing, but yeah, its not driving the trade for Cleveland. I dont think there was a better asset on the table than a modestly protected Brooklyn pick though. I dont think its reasonable for Cleveland to have given up all of the upside of that pick, but I think there were ways to at least somewhat protect the pick and still have had the best deal on the table.

That said, Celtics were probably going to have to pay a tax to get Cleveland to send Kyrie to Boston and the IT dilemma was going to suck after the season, so possible he didnt want to play chicken and risk losing the deal. They needed a consolidation trade and outside of pleasant AD fever dreams, Kyrie was probably towards the higher end of asset that reasonably could come available.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,719
Irving doesn't want to spend his prime with a shitty ownership group after LBJ leaves. That's not nuts.
um....his first choice of destination was NY -- I don't think you want to hang your hat on his ownership preferences in defending his sanity. In any case, who cares: I think the negative critique at the heart of it is that he seems to be a classic hero ball sort.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,726
Irving doesn't want to spend his prime with a shitty ownership group after LBJ leaves. That's not nuts.
It was only going to be for, at most, one season and then he could bolt for a better situation. Kyrie, reportedly, would have been ok going to the Knicks for the next two seasons versus staying with the Cavs and contending for a ring for at least this year. If true, that kind of blows a hole in the whole not wanting to play for shitty ownership theory.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,157
I think the Nets have a chance to be better than at least six teams: the Bulls, the Hawks, the Mavs, the Magic, the Suns, and the Lakers. Sure, Crabbe is a disaster defensively, but Carroll is Crowder-lite, and if he has a good shooting season, an extremely useful player. Hollis-Jefferson is going to give people fits, too, and if Lin stays on the court, and Russel continues to improve, they've got enough shooters that they'll score no problem. I have no idea what will happen at center, admittedly. If Mozgov is terrible and Allen shows nothing, they could be in real trouble.

The Lakers, meanwhile, lost one of their better perimeter defenders in Nick fucking Young. Magic Johnson wants KCP to set the tone on defense. Think about that for a second. Now, if Lin, Rondae, and Carroll all miss significant time, things will be a little more up in the air. I think the Lakers could see real strides on the offensive end from guys like Ingram and Randle -- but one of these teams is primed to compete on the defensive end every night, and the other is going to get buried on that end, night in, night out.

I'll admit I didn't like this deal when I saw it had happened, but I've thought about it now: Crowder and Irving are the only sure things in this deal. Crowder, much as I may like him, is one of the more redundant pieces on the team (and I've had to have that point made to me in the past). With his hip, and his age, as someone who relies on getting to the line so much, Thomas may never score 20 ppg again. And the Nets pick may be #8. It's a real upgrade at a position of need (given Isaiah's uncertainty), and the place where it reduces depth is at SF, where we're deeper than anywhere else, and at C, where Zizic may never be anything more than a better rebounding Tyler Zeller.

The points that HRB and others have made repeatedly about Irving's skillset translating on the biggest stage are well-taken. Having a player who can shoot and handle the ball like Irving, when it comes to crunch time, is invaluable. He can be a ballhog, but we had many of the same complaints about Isaiah.

I thought Isaiah's performance in the playoffs last year -- on a bad fucking hip -- was one of the coolest things I've ever seen. He'll be missed.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,385
It was only going to be for, at most, one season and then he could bolt for a better situation. Kyrie, reportedly, would have been ok going to the Knicks for the next two seasons versus staying with the Cavs and contending for a ring for at least this year. If true, that kind of blows a hole in the whole not wanting to play for shitty ownership theory.
Kyrie lived through the Cleveland days without LeBron before and didn't want to go through that hell again in his prime seasons. I don't see anything wrong with that.......he played his hand and ended up in Boston on a Championship contender with its best years ahead of them. I can't imagine Kyrie playing this any better than he did. He's the clear winner here.

The nonsense about Kyrie being -insert derogatory terms- is completely that.....nonsense. Steve Pagliuca is heavily involved with Duke and knows Kyrie/Coach K enough to formulate an educated decision as to the man he is. His reputation at Duke was fine and everyone loved him. He's never been in trouble with the law and by all accounts a cool guy......problems in Cleveland nothwithstanding.
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,253
Herndon, VA
It was only going to be for, at most, one season and then he could bolt for a better situation. Kyrie, reportedly, would have been ok going to the Knicks for the next two seasons versus staying with the Cavs and contending for a ring for at least this year. If true, that kind of blows a hole in the whole not wanting to play for shitty ownership theory.
I dunno, it's not a binary choice... he might have been okay playing for a hometown team -or- for a team with not-crappy ownership. They each have their own pros and cons.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,504
deep inside Guido territory
Kyrie lived through the Cleveland days without LeBron before and didn't want to go through that hell again in his prime seasons. I don't see anything wrong with that.......he played his hand and ended up in Boston on a Championship contender with its best years ahead of them. I can't imagine Kyrie playing this any better than he did. He's the clear winner here.

The nonsense about Kyrie being -insert derogatory terms- is completely that.....nonsense. Steve Pagliuca is heavily involved with Duke and knows Kyrie/Coach K enough to formulate an educated decision as to the man he is. His reputation at Duke was fine and everyone loved him. He's never been in trouble with the law and by all accounts a cool guy......problems in Cleveland nothwithstanding.
We also don't know the in-house dynamics that went on in the Cleveland locker room.
 

Captaincoop

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
13,488
Santa Monica, CA
To those who don't like this trade, consider that both Danny and the Cavs have way more information about IT's hip than we do. And as for the BKN pick, I trust the absolute heck out of the Celtics' front office to properly value that asset.

My educated guess is that IT is damaged goods, both teams know it, Cleveland valued the BKN pick highly, and the Celtics have evaluated it and think it ends up lower than some here expect.

Celtics end up with a 25-year-old superstar, Cleveland is hoping to win the lottery for the 14th time in the last decade. I'll take that and move along happy.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,199
um....his first choice of destination was NY -- I don't think you want to hang your hat on his ownership preferences in defending his sanity.
Boston was on his list. He knew what he was doing.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
i think that's all correct, but to further your metaphor: is Irving "the house" in which an analyst can have faith? I don't think the objection is that the Celtics may have "lost" the trade in the abstract -- it's more that they pushed all chips in on a guy who is immensely talented but a flawed team player up until now. Will be fun to see if he takes the next step, and the Celtics with him.
On the other hand Irving left about $3 million on the table to come to Boston, so he apparently wants to be here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.