Joe Mazzulla officially named head coach

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,021
Saskatoon Canada
I mentioned this is the series thread, but what bothers me about Joe is how flats the Cs can begin games. Two years in a row vs Miami at home they have been sleepy out of the gate. This may be the poo particulars of these players, perhaps if they are too keyed up Tatum goes into Kobe mode (just a hypothetical) but it is weird at home in the playoffs they are not ready to start the 1st Q. Generally road teams want to survive the energy the home team has to start in front of their crowd.
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
2,744
South Dartmouth, MA
I mentioned this is the series thread, but what bothers me about Joe is how flats the Cs can begin games. Two years in a row vs Miami at home they have been sleepy out of the gate. This may be the poo particulars of these players, perhaps if they are too keyed up Tatum goes into Kobe mode (just a hypothetical) but it is weird at home in the playoffs they are not ready to start the 1st Q. Generally road teams want to survive the energy the home team has to start in front of their crowd.
But cant the flipside, especially in a game 2 with the team up 1-0 also be true? As in, the more desperate heat are going to come out guns a blazing and the celts want to absorb it...Just a quick glance at Denver but they lost the first quarters of games 2 & 5 at home vs the heat last year. And have lost first quarters in first two games at home vs lakers this year.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,865
where I was last at
G1 the Celts came out gang busters and were up 14-0 in the first 3 minutes.

G2 it was close in Q1 largely a reflection of Spo's decision to play and sink 3-balls. And the curious CJM decision to give them somewhat open 3 looks.

Last year was a shit show.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,504
G1 the Celts came out gang busters and were up 14-0 in the first 3 minutes.

G2 it was close in Q1 largely a reflection of Spo's decision to play and sink 3-balls. And the curious CJM decision to give them somewhat open 3 looks.

Last year was a shit show.
Are we sure Joe said, Hey lets play passive and not contest Miami's 3's? Based on the countless fundamental errors the Celtics made the entire game isn't it about 98% likely that this was one more? The coach can't play for the players and there is no doubt in anyones mind that these players didn't come out with any urgency last night. Remember how Miami got run off the floor by us in games last year? Was that Spo simply not having a good game plan or the players not executing/playing with an urgency? The blaming of coaches, especially in the playoffs, goes way overboard sometimes imo.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,865
where I was last at
Are we sure Joe said, Hey lets play passive and not contest Miami's 3's? Based on the countless fundamental errors the Celtics made the entire game isn't it about 98% likely that this was one more? The coach can't play for the players and there is no doubt in anyones mind that these players didn't come out with any urgency last night.
I wasn't in on the pre-game game plan discussion or the huddle. But the Heat came out immediately last night and were shooting 3s. At some point CJM might have suggested to defend the perimeter with a little more intensity.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,504
I wasn't in on the pre-game game plan discussion or the huddle. But the Heat came out immediately last night and were shooting 3s. At some point CJM might have suggested to defend the perimeter with a little more intensity.
To me it looked like they were giving fake hustle to defend it but not closing out hard. Again, I'm sure Joe and his staff chimed in about paying attention to detail on the other end too which didn't occur. There were many times a defender closed out but not hard.....that is a sign they they checked in to work but didn't compete to win. It was a tough game to get ready for from Bostons prespective and an easy one for Miami to be motivated for. Games 3 & 4 will give us a TON more information about this team as opposed to a somewhat expected flat effort against a team that played with desperation.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,315
It is but if a loaded 64 win team loses to an 8 seed without its best player in embarrassing fashion, I think anything is on the table at that point. Would I bet on Joe getting fired? No. But Wyc would be apeshit and who knows what a pissed off owner under pressure to win would do, especially if some star grumbling accompanies it.

So, let’s just avoid that situation and beat the crap out of this team in 3 straight games.
Yes, if the Celtics were to lose this series, everything would be on the table this offseason. Wyc is not writing those checks to watch 8 other teams play NBA basketball May and June and listen to people chalk it up to shooting variance and sub-optimal matchups. But it's still too much of a hypothetical to predict the reaction.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,865
where I was last at
HRB

If the Celts were playing with "fake hustle" against the Heat in the post-season, they learned nothing from last year, and is a damning conclusion about their game preparation.

And if CJM and staff didn't pay attention to the importance of D in playing their O game, (ie pace and space) I'm...

Let's just say " no words".
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,133
G1 the Celts came out gang busters and were up 14-0 in the first 3 minutes.

G2 it was close in Q1 largely a reflection of Spo's decision to play and sink 3-balls. And the curious CJM decision to give them somewhat open 3 looks.

Last year was a shit show.
Miami made a ton of first-half 3s last nite and still trailed at the break. I'm guessing the coaching staff figured the Heat would start missing more from outside and thus saw no reason to make sweeping strategical changes.
 

Light-Tower-Power

ask me about My Pillow
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2013
16,138
Nashua, NH
Miami made a ton of first-half 3s last nite and still trailed at the break. I'm guessing the coaching staff figured the Heat would start missing more from outside and thus saw no reason to make sweeping strategical changes.
And really it was the offensive execution in the second half that did them in. 40 point halves aren't going to cut it. I have a hard time blaming Joe for anything that happened last night. I think the players just kind of shit themselves at home yet again and it's on them.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,865
where I was last at
Miami made a ton of first-half 3s last nite and still trailed at the break. I'm guessing the coaching staff figured the Heat would start missing more from outside and thus saw no reason to make sweeping strategical changes.
Or that Jaylen Brown would continue his unconcious last two minutes of the 1st half play into the 2nd half.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,315
Miami made a ton of first-half 3s last nite and still trailed at the break. I'm guessing the coaching staff figured the Heat would start missing more from outside and thus saw no reason to make sweeping strategical changes.
May have also figured that KP would figure things out in the 2nd half, which has happened during the regular season. Just didn't happen last night; KP regressed from bad to awful in the 2nd half.
 

osori

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 8, 2009
2,448
And really it was the offensive execution in the second half that did them in. 40 point halves aren't going to cut it. I have a hard time blaming Joe for anything that happened last night. I think the players just kind of shit themselves at home yet again and it's on them.
Most of the players, especially KP, JH and JT, seemed to be really frustrated with how much the Heat were allowed to get away playing hyper physical. It probably threw them off.

IF the Celtics lose this series (which I doubt), they should just spend an entire offseason practicing how to do illegal screens / Heat-style hack-away defense without getting caught lol.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,871
Porzingis is getting bullied by Bam and it seems to be affecting his play on both ends. Mazzulla & staff do have to adjust for this going forward even if its not their fault.

This series has been the first time all season that KP has looked overwhelmed - its likely a matchup thing - but it as well as the Cs solutions bear watching going forward.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,356
Pittsburgh, PA
I mentioned this is the series thread, but what bothers me about Joe is how flats the Cs can begin games. Two years in a row vs Miami at home they have been sleepy out of the gate. This may be the poo particulars of these players, perhaps if they are too keyed up Tatum goes into Kobe mode (just a hypothetical) but it is weird at home in the playoffs they are not ready to start the 1st Q. Generally road teams want to survive the energy the home team has to start in front of their crowd.
They scored the first 17 points of Game 1.

Nobody brings it 100%, 100% of the time. But I don't think it's fair to say we have a "Beginning games flat" problem. We were 1st in 1Q scoring margin, IIRC.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,504
HRB

If the Celts were playing with "fake hustle" against the Heat in the post-season, they learned nothing from last year, and is a damning conclusion about their game preparation.

And if CJM and staff didn't pay attention to the importance of D in playing their O game, (ie pace and space) I'm...

Let's just say " no words".
Jrue and KP weren’t there and Jimmy Butler was. Last night was as ultimate of a “not take a team seriously” spot as there is in this league. The thing is if we were down 10 at the half we’d have arguably been in better shape than being up 3 as being down 10 allows the team to regroup and gain some urgency. That never happened.

Yeah the players play though. The coaches only coach. Was Spo getting ripped for his guys not showing in in G4/5 last year, one was to start the game and the other to start the 3Qi forget which was which?

Lol nobody is getting fired logs and all.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,329
Porzingis is getting bullied by Bam and it seems to be affecting his play on both ends. Mazzulla & staff do have to adjust for this going forward even if its not their fault.

This series has been the first time all season that KP has looked overwhelmed - its likely a matchup thing - but it as well as the Cs solutions bear watching going forward.
100% agree. KP should be the story today. I’ll be watching him closely in Game 3. When he’s normal, we win. If he doesn’t perform, hold onto your butts.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
“No words” had nothing to do with last nights coaching when the players on the floor did not show up for a playoff game. The “No words” had to do with suggesting Joe is fired if we lose this series. Hey, I tried 3x to give an actual repsonse but after reading that part of your post again I didn’t seem it worthy. :)

Edit: Ok I’ll try. If Joe wasn’t Brads guy then this would be a perfect excuse to get rid of him to bring in a guy who shares your vision. But you see Joe does share Brads vision which is why he was the one assistant that was going to be retained no matter who was brought in when Brad moved upstairs. Joe is Brads guy, players and some media people have raves about his process this year….one series isn’t going to chance that. Like absolute zero consideration….and you even doubled down on it at the end of this post. I want the last 3 obvious minutes of my life back.
Honestly - and I’m not trying to be snarky- now I’m at a loss for words. I mean, maybe you’re right but I would be shocked if Joe’s Celtics career survives a first round loss, and I’m really surprised you think that was a controversial take. This ownership team has gone all-in in a very aggressive, extremely expensive push to win a banner. And as great as Brad has been as a GM his one, surprising weakness has been choosing coaches, first saddling the team with a guy whose sex addiction apparently led to an incident where his chosen coach ended up sleeping with one of the owner’s wives and then landed on Brad’s full endorsement of a very young, very inexperienced guy who got a lot of criticism after the team flopped against the 8 seed in the ECF. His continued support of that guy prevented him from getting canned last year but if that same shit happened again, and this time in the first round and with that team not having their best player, the pressure to fire Mazz would be through the roof.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,504
Honestly - and I’m not trying to be snarky- now I’m at a loss for words. I mean, maybe you’re right but I would be shocked if Joe’s Celtics career survives a first round loss, and I’m really surprised you think that was a controversial take. This ownership team has gone all-in in a very aggressive, extremely expensive push to win a banner. And as great as Brad has been as a GM his one, surprising weakness has been choosing coaches, first saddling the team with a guy whose sex addiction apparently led to an incident where his chosen coach ended up sleeping with one of the owner’s wives and then landed on Brad’s full endorsement of a very young, very inexperienced guy who got a lot of criticism after the team flopped against the 8 seed in the ECF. His continued support of that guy prevented him from getting canned last year but if that same shit happened again, and this time in the first round and with that team not having their best player, the pressure to fire Mazz would be through the roof.
No snarkiness detected….I had more than this. We are all in snarky moods today. Yeah we are on completely two different sides of this fence and hopefully we never find out who was right and we win in 5, which is probably the most likely result of this series slightly ahead of us winning in 6.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,021
Saskatoon Canada
They scored the first 17 points of Game 1.

Nobody brings it 100%, 100% of the time. But I don't think it's fair to say we have a "Beginning games flat" problem. We were 1st in 1Q scoring margin, IIRC.
This is the playoffs with a chance to bury the heat. In the playoffs (not practice, talking about the playoffs) Not the regular season, the pkayoffs. We are talking about the pkayoffs.

The team that came out like a force of nature in game 1 was not the same in game 2, and not ready for the heat playing differently. The Heat said publically they needed to shoot more threes.

I understand many respond to gamethread anger with Pollyanna main board posts . But this is mostly the team that slept through two home games last year before waking up and playing well enough to win.

Spin rainbows and sunshine all you want but Joe and the Cs know that performance was awful.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,356
Pittsburgh, PA
The team that came out like a force of nature in game 1 was not the same in game 2, and not ready for the heat playing differently. The Heat said publically they needed to shoot more threes.

I understand many respond to gamethread anger with Pollyanna main board posts . But this is mostly the team that slept through two home games last year before waking up and playing well enough to win.

Spin rainbows and sunshine all you want but Joe and the Cs know that performance was awful.
We also had a 14-9 lead early in Game 2, it's not like we were blown off the court from the tip.

It's not a Pollyanna post to say "I don't think we have a beginning-games-flat problem". Nothing in that post suggested things were sunshine and rainbows - we just lost a playoff game at home to an inferior team, obviously there's some stuff needing work. But there are some baseline stats that strongly suggest that "beginning games flat" is not some sort of recurring problem for us. If your critique is a reasoned one, and not just a negative gamethread-y post, then I assume you've got some basis to say otherwise, besides the fact that "in game 2, we didn't come out quite as hot as we did in game 1".
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,133
We also had a 14-9 lead early in Game 2, it's not like we were blown off the court from the tip.

It's not a Pollyanna post to say "I don't think we have a beginning-games-flat problem". Nothing in that post suggested things were sunshine and rainbows - we just lost a playoff game at home to an inferior team, obviously there's some stuff needing work. But there are some baseline stats that strongly suggest that "beginning games flat" is not some sort of recurring problem for us. If your critique is a reasoned one, and not just a negative gamethread-y post, then I assume you've got some basis to say otherwise, besides the fact that "in game 2, we didn't come out quite as hot as we did in game 1".
Yeah, the C's led 42-37 with six minutes left in the second quarter, so I question that they came out "too flat." They had plenty of problems last nite, but their start wasn't one of them.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,051
Yeah, the C's led 42-37 with six minutes left in the second quarter, so I question that they came out "too flat." They had plenty of problems last nite, but their start wasn't one of them.
Yeah, honestly what last night felt like is they got more and more frustrated with how tough offense was coming and that MIA just could not miss, and it got them more and more off their game.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,865
where I was last at
Going by the scoreboard, Celts won the 1st half and lost the 2nd last night.

What hurt the Celts last night was CJM assuming Heat shooting reverting to the mean, making no half time adjustments and the Heat building the lead in the 3rd qtr.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,051
Going by the scoreboard, Celts won the 1st half and lost the 2nd last night.

What hurt the Celts last night was CJM assuming Heat shooting reverting to the mean, making no half time adjustments and the Heat building the lead in the 3rd qtr.
I'd say scoring 40 points in the second half was a pretty major factor
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,865
where I was last at
I'd say scoring 40 points in the second half was a pretty major factor
Yup. Before the series started I opined Heat were unlikely to win a 120-110 type game and would try to play and win a lower scoring type game.

Taking each half last night on a stand alone basis sort of supports both sides of that argument.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,888
Melrose, MA
I wonder if the Celtics players have fully onboarded what Mazzulla wants out of them. A year ago they clearly had not. This year they are closer to it, but maybe not quite there. I think there is something rote and mechanical about them sometimes. Mazzulla wants them figuring things out on the floor and adjusting on the fly, but sometimes they don't look read to do that.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,218
Going by the scoreboard, Celts won the 1st half and lost the 2nd last night.

What hurt the Celts last night was CJM assuming Heat shooting reverting to the mean, making no half time adjustments and the Heat building the lead in the 3rd qtr.
I thought that the game was still there to be taken - Miami cooled off, Celts had the last possession of Q3, the first possession of Q4 and the next 3 possessions before scoring. When Miami started getting some hoops again, the game should have been dead even; or the Celts should have been ahead.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,935
I wonder if the Celtics players have fully onboarded what Mazzulla wants out of them. A year ago they clearly had not. This year they are closer to it, but maybe not quite there. I think there is something rote and mechanical about them sometimes. Mazzulla wants them figuring things out on the floor and adjusting on the fly, but sometimes they don't look read to do that.
I think the Cs are fully onboard with CJM. And it's not just CJM this year. I'm sure Cassell and Charles Smith would be very vocal if they saw something that was sub-optimal.

Having said that, i certainly understand why people are nervous about this series. One of the podcasts said that MIA shot over 50% from 3P three times this entire season. But they've done it 4 times in the last 9 playoff games against the Cs, including 3 out of the last 6 in Boston Garden - even though role players are supposed to shoot worse on the road than at home. Obviously, MIA is super comfortable playing BOS particularly when playing from ahead.

Maybe there's a simple strategy adjustment that will make that stop. Maybe it's as simple as the guys playing harder on defense - or executing better on offense.

Fortunately, in the NBA, an overwhelming talent gap generally wins out. Hopefully that will remain true in this series.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,504

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,871

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,448
One day we will all understand that the words coming out of a coaches mouth have a specific purpose….and is usually 98% not the actual truth.
It's almost like Joe Mazzulla really really cares about winning, and is more knowledgeable about basketball than anyone here.

Doesn't mean he's infallible, but if your immediate reaction is "why is he being a moron?", you probably should take an extra beat and go slightly deeper.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,888
Melrose, MA
It's almost like Joe Mazzulla really really cares about winning, and is more knowledgeable about basketball than anyone here.

Doesn't mean he's infallible, but if your immediate reaction is "why is he being a moron?", you probably should take an extra beat and go slightly deeper.
I guess I missed the part of my post where I called Joe a moron.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,448
I guess I missed the part of my post where I called Joe a moron.
I don't think you called him a moron, but I think he (and most current NBA coaches) have earned the benefit of the doubt in terms of not missing obvious stuff like "probably Luke Kornet isn't the answer."

(This probably wasn't true when coaching was a less meritocratic network, but teams optimize the hiring process pretty heavily now.)
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,093
Cultural hub of the universe
So does Joe get credit for game 3 adjustments, after the the brilliant Spo made all the right moves for game 2? Or was it just players playing better? Closeouts certainly seemed crisper in game 3, and Porzingis was far more effective.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,888
Melrose, MA
So does Joe get credit for game 3 adjustments, after the the brilliant Spo made all the right moves for game 2? Or was it just players playing better? Closeouts certainly seemed crisper in game 3, and Porzingis was far more effective.
How could he not? The Celtics played like a different team.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,921
I also favored bringing in Nurse but I don’t blame Joe for game 2 and hope he succeeds now that he is firmly installed.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,356
Pittsburgh, PA
So does Joe get credit for game 3 adjustments, after the the brilliant Spo made all the right moves for game 2? Or was it just players playing better? Closeouts certainly seemed crisper in game 3, and Porzingis was far more effective.
I've had about enough of your sunshine and rainbows, Mr. Pollyanna!

No but seriously, Mazz has the boys flying out there tonight. How many open 3s do you remember, maybe 2? Compared to game 2 where it was like 20. We played fast all through the 3rd quarter, until it was time to just run clock up 25+. How many live ball turnovers did we give them? Maybe one or two? Other than Porzingis getting played for a fool a bit by Bam, we more or less took away all the stuff that worked for them in Game 2. And while shooting only 32% from 3, too. Looked like great coaching to me.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
I've had about enough of your sunshine and rainbows, Mr. Pollyanna!

No but seriously, Mazz has the boys flying out there tonight. How many open 3s do you remember, maybe 2? Compared to game 2 where it was like 20. We played fast all through the 3rd quarter, until it was time to just run clock up 25+. How many live ball turnovers did we give them? Maybe one or two? Other than Porzingis getting played for a fool a bit by Bam, we more or less took away all the stuff that worked for them in Game 2. And while shooting only 32% from 3, too. Looked like great coaching to me.
I am waiting to see the numbers on 3’s but it looked like the Heat missed a decent amount of open ones (I’d say around 6).

I guess I’ll be the turd in the punch bowl here but…the Celtics should absolutely run through this team. The talent gap is absolutely MASSIVE. I have trouble giving Mazzulla a ton of credit for the Celtics winning a game that they should have won
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,356
Pittsburgh, PA
As always with evaluating sports, you shouldn't focus on the "what", but instead the "how". That's what's predictive and replicable. Not the results (they won! Big!) but the process. And process wise, they looked like they were doing very different things from game 2 out there on both ends. We seemingly got to the rim at will, while for Miami only Bam looked effective (and only sometimes) at operating down low. Our footwork on ball defense was more decisive and in tune with whoever had the screener. There were like 2 or 3 defensive breakdowns where we forgot about somebody or gave them an open lane to the hoop, and otherwise we were well organized. When Miami tried the zone, we shredded it.

The players all deserve credit for executing well, but when we're doing all the right things, some credit can be headed the coach's way, too. Teams with a talent differential somehow screw that up routinely.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,448
I am waiting to see the numbers on 3’s but it looked like the Heat missed a decent amount of open ones (I’d say around 6).

I guess I’ll be the turd in the punch bowl here but…the Celtics should absolutely run through this team. The talent gap is absolutely MASSIVE. I have trouble giving Mazzulla a ton of credit for the Celtics winning a game that they should have won
6 open 3s isn't many for an NBA game. And 28 total attempts, from a team that it knows it needs to shoot them, is impressive.

I don't think Mazzulla should get some kind of huge credit if they beat Miami, but he's also taking blame for stuff like the players going through the motions in game 2. At some point, people need to pick a criticism lane.
 

JoeSuit

New Member
Feb 9, 2017
89
I know Scal has been calling for more on-ball pressure and I think everything really does start there. Make MIA's non-pure ball handlers - especially Herro - uncomfortable. I think that's why PP was an actual defensive asset. He dogs the ball handler incessantly. I'm wondering if MIA counters with more Patty Mills in G4.
 

Eric Fernsten's Disco Mustache

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Was travelling for work since after game 1, just getting caught up around here, and so may be posting some thoughts that others have already said somewhere else

People talk about the 'chess match' between coaches in playoff basketball, but I think that sometimes 'rock, paper, scissors' is the better analogy. Both coaching staffs make decisions before a game, and then you find out what happens when they come together.

In that vein, my read of game 2 & 3 is that a few things happened at once:
  • Joe and Boston's coaching staff decided to try a defensive strategy along the lines of 'make sure to not give up dribble penetration, with less of a contest of outside shots if needed' at the same time that Miami's coaching staff told their team something like 'get into our offense fast, look and take the first good three you can, take as many 3s as possible'
  • Once the game started the 'soft contests are OK' part of 'deny dribble penetration', in practice, turned into much less ball pressure and lots more open Miami 3s than Boston expected or wanted. On paper, when Boston's coaches drew it up, the game plan wasn't to turn Miami's outside looks into a version of pre-game shoot-around. But once our guys tried to implement the plan things shifted too far in that direction.
  • Joe being a numbers guy, he might have watched the first half and thought "Miami can't keep shooting this good forever; we're up at the half; I'll keep telling my guys to tighten things up; law of averages kicks w/r/t Miami's shooting and we'll win this thing comfortably'
  • Law of averages did not kick in. And both our offensive safety valve (Porzingis) and our 'things have gone to crap create something off the dribble' guy (Jrue) had their worst shooting nights in a while.
  • So then, after game 2, Joe and Boston's coaching staff probably looked at each other and said something like 'Fuck it, that defensive strategy was too cute by half. Let's go back to pressuring them all over the court, running them off the three point line, and then rotating aggressively to deal with dribble penetration when it happens.' Which is more or less that we've done all year. And in game 3 lo and behold that defense worked much better, Porzingis had a nice bounce-back game, and we won comfortably
So-- I'm not sure if this has been said somewhere-- but to me the big irony / story about game 2 was the Joe (who keeps getting hammered for how he's not as good as Spo at things like playoff adjustments) didn't need to make big defensive adjustments. But he did, perhaps thinking he was getting ahead of whatever Spo was going to do. And then it didn't work. And so we switched back and were fine.

Sec-- who hasn't posted over here in lord knows how long-- used to have a great point about the mistakes people can make when they feel public pressure to be seen taking action.

As he used to say: "Don't just do something --> stand there!"