Or there is 100% change he's still manager, regardless.For me, evaluating Farrell has less to do with in-game tactics than weighing the credit he presumably deserves for the hitters' performance against the blame he presumably deserves for the pitchers' performance. In-season managerial changes are typically the hallmark of a poorly run organization, so I lean toward letting Farrell finish the season and evaluating him then, but in light of the unusual circumstances of last offseason (i.e., there's zero chance he's still manager if he didn't have cancer), I understand why others feel differently, even if they would agree that in-season changes are normally a bad thing.
We have absolutely no idea