Having some fun with play money

Curll

Guest
Jul 13, 2005
9,205
Let's make some assumptions:
 
1) The Red Sox are going for a championship in 2015
 
2) The Red Sox finish 10th or worse overall this season
 
3) The Red Sox budget is beyond $194M, exceeding the tax threshold easily
 
 
The Red Sox could, in theory:
 
  • Sign Jon Lester to a 6/$144M deal
  • Sign Max Scherzer to a 6/$144M deal
  • Extend Cespedes with a 4/$85M deal
  • Maintain a top 10 pick, protected
  • Trade SP prospects/extras for needs/Cliff Lee/Tulo
 
I understand the highly speculative nature of this, but considering the flexibility of a protected top 10 pick and 2nd highest revenue stream in the MLB, the Red Sox could be in an enviable position this off-season with a lot of money to spend, a lot of MLB-ready prospects to trade, and nothing substantial to lose.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
they have the $800k comp pick to offset the loss of the 2nd a little. Can they possibly lose that?
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
21,002
Maine
You really think it will take $21M+ to extend Cespedes? Or that they can sign Scherzer for the exact deal he already turned down from Detroit?

I get that it's just a thought exercise for fun, but let's be a bit realistic.
 

johnnywayback

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 8, 2004
1,422
I'm on #teammatlatos.  Our previously-existing Prospect Depth has only gotten deeper, and our absolute critical need to get a RH power bat into the organization has been somewhat mitigated, so let's go find us an ace in his twenties and pair him with one of Scherzer or Lester.
 

Tyrone Biggums

nfl meets tri-annually at a secret country mansion
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,424
Lester 5/115 (vesting option for the 6th year) I really think he's going to take a slight discount to come back.

Cespedes - 3/45 extension. Seems fair on both sides he isn't a 20 million dollar player yet and it's short enough where he can hit the market again in a few years.

Trade Mookie Betts Joe Kelly and a prospect for Cole Hamels. Absorb the entire contract.
 

Brianish

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2008
5,573
Tyrone Biggums said:
Trade Mookie Betts Joe Kelly and a prospect for Cole Hamels. Absorb the entire contract.
 
If the Sox trade for Hamels and absorb the entire contract, I don't want to hear Mookie's name anywhere near the conversation. 
 

Tyrone Biggums

nfl meets tri-annually at a secret country mansion
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,424
Brianish said:
 
If the Sox trade for Hamels and absorb the entire contract, I don't want to hear Mookie's name anywhere near the conversation. 
The contract isn't awful and he is an ace. I mean you do have to give up talent to get talent let's be realistic here.
 

BornToRun

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2011
17,553
Tyrone Biggums said:
The contract isn't awful and he is an ace. I mean you do have to give up talent to get talent let's be realistic here.
Not only am I not trading Betts for Cole Hamels, I guarantee you that the package you propose would not be enough to land him. Amaro is a jackass who's absurd trade demands have gained infamy.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Red(s)HawksFan said:
You really think it will take $21M+ to extend Cespedes? Or that they can sign Scherzer for the exact deal he already turned down from Detroit?

I get that it's just a thought exercise for fun, but let's be a bit realistic.
What do you think it would take to extend Cespedes then? I'm actually curious. I was thinking something like 4/60. It's probably a bit of an overpay, but not by a crazy amount. 
 

Curll

Guest
Jul 13, 2005
9,205
Tyrone Biggums said:
Lester 5/115 (vesting option for the 6th year) I really think he's going to take a slight discount to come back.

Cespedes - 3/45 extension. Seems fair on both sides he isn't a 20 million dollar player yet and it's short enough where he can hit the market again in a few years.

Trade Mookie Betts Joe Kelly and a prospect for Cole Hamels. Absorb the entire contract.
Alright, my initial extension was a bit much. It projects for a 40HR player who could fetch $200M on the open market. A bit optimistic, but I really like Cespedes for the Sox.
 
4/70 is more likely.
 

jimv

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 5, 2011
1,118
BornToRun said:
Not only am I not trading Betts for Cole Hamels, I guarantee you that the package you propose would not be enough to land him. Amaro is a jackass who's absurd trade demands have gained infamy.
Wonder if Amaro's days are numbered, he might not be the one trading Hamels this off season. Anyway, you could probably get Hamels without sacrificing Betts but you'd have to take one of their bad contracts. Pick your poison
 

OnWisc

Microcosmic
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2006
7,088
Chicago, IL
BornToRun said:
Not only am I not trading Betts for Cole Hamels, I guarantee you that the package you propose would not be enough to land him. Amaro is a jackass who's absurd trade demands have gained infamy.
This, assuming that reports on what Ruin Tomorrow was demanding from LAN for Hamels are true. If the asking price really was Pederson, Seager and Urias, then you'd have to assume any successful package from the Red Sox would likely have to be more along the lines of Betts, Owens and Swihart. Which isn't happening.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,984
johnnywayback said:
I'm on #teammatlatos.  Our previously-existing Prospect Depth has only gotten deeper, and our absolute critical need to get a RH power bat into the organization has been somewhat mitigated, so let's go find us an ace in his twenties and pair him with one of Scherzer or Lester.
Both Latos and Cueto are free agents after 2015, Jonny C would probably take a better package in light of the season he's having, but I wonder if the Reds would listen on him as well.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
ehaz said:
Both Latos and Cueto are free agents after 2015, Jonny C would probably take a better package in light of the season he's having, but I wonder if the Reds would listen on him as well.
Cueto's actually a FA after this season. Latos is after 2015. 
 
I missed the team option, you're right, I'm wrong.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,468
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
jimv said:
Wonder if Amaro's days are numbered, he might not be the one trading Hamels this off season. Anyway, you could probably get Hamels without sacrificing Betts but you'd have to take one of their bad contracts. Pick your poison
 
Well .. the rumour was that he asked for Seager AND Pederson AND Urias PLUS taking on the whole contract. Even as an Opening Gambit it was a reeeediculous Ask. And Amaro even had the nerve to blame other GMs for not being aggressive enough, I think he's sacked after the season.
 

Green Monster

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
2,278
CT
MakMan44 said:
Cueto's actually a FA after this season. Latos is after 2015. 
 
I missed the team option, you're right, I'm wrong.
Per Cot's Cueto has a team option for 2015 but not Latos.  Latos should be a FA this fall unless I am missing something.....  Agree that Ben should pursue Latos.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Green Monster said:
Per Cot's Cueto has a team option for 2015 but not Latos.  Latos should be a FA this fall unless I am missing something.....  Agree that Ben should pursue Latos.
Latos has another year of Arb to go, according to BBR and MLBTR.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,984
Regarding the payroll situation, I expect that Henry/Cherington view spending on hitting as more risk-averse than spending it on pitching.  If they weren't thrilled at the prospect of extending Lester to market value, why would they sign both Lester and Scherzer to big deals?
 
- I think they add 4/$70 to Cespedes
- Offer 5/90-100 for Hanley
- Prospects for a SP (Latos, Cueto, Lee, Hamels)
- Sign a veteran SP to shorter money
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Al Zarilla said:
SOSH is a perfect replacement for Lacky with his face, called a pigface by NL rival fans, and his hot wife. 

 
Cat Latos is not pleased he has been forgotten. 
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,127
St. Louis, MO
ehaz said:
Regarding the payroll situation, I expect that Henry/Cherington view spending on hitting as more risk-averse than spending it on pitching.  If they weren't thrilled at the prospect of extending Lester to market value, why would they sign both Lester and Scherzer to big deals?
 
- I think they add 4/$70 to Cespedes
- Offer 5/90-100 for Hanley
- Prospects for a SP (Latos, Cueto, Lee, Hamels)
- Sign a veteran SP to shorter money
Sounds about right.  Hanley at 3B never occurred to me but that's a great solution to get another bat.  Veteran SP I'd love Iwakuma.
 

Shamus74

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2001
178
I think the Sox have had  their eyes on Latos and Cueto throughout this season, with a plan for an offseason trade. They know the Reds won't be able to sign both. With so much pitching depth at Portland and Pawtucket, the Sox have to be contemplating a package to hook Cueto (who I would prefer).
 
If they do pull off a trade for a frontline pitcher, they'll probably snag one of the 2nd or 3rd tier SPs on the free agent market this offseason. Jason Hammel, Wandy Rodriguez, Colby Lewis. Maybe Kuroda.
 
I waded into sports radio this morning to take the pulse. Lots of whining about how yesterday's trades left them with no big game pitchers for 2015. Stupid. They're going to target pitching after October.  Now they break in some more rookie arms and try to add some shine to their trade value. If Raunado has a nice August and September, he's a major part of a package for Cueto or Latos.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,127
St. Louis, MO
The Reds seem inclined for a do-over; our lineup outside of Papi projects to be incredibly RHH heavy.  I wonder if there is a blockbuster potential with Votto coming with Latos and them eating a decent amount to make it palatable.  He's an OBP machine that would be incredible in the 2-hole.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
I can't even imagine what we'd have to give up to get Votto and Latos. 
 

Shamus74

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2001
178
bosockboy said:
The Reds seem inclined for a do-over; our lineup outside of Papi projects to be incredibly RHH heavy.  I wonder if there is a blockbuster potential with Votto coming with Latos and them eating a decent amount to make it palatable.  He's an OBP machine that would be incredible in the 2-hole.
 
Yikes, I like Votto, but I don't think the Sox want to tie themselves to the contract, even if the Reds ate some of it. He's locked in til his age 39 season in 2023, with a $7 million buyout on a $25 million option for 2024. And his power has declined steadily over the last few years.
 

jimv

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 5, 2011
1,118
BCsMightyJoeYoung said:
 
Well .. the rumour was that he asked for Seager AND Pederson AND Urias PLUS taking on the whole contract. Even as an Opening Gambit it was a reeeediculous Ask. And Amaro even had the nerve to blame other GMs for not being aggressive enough, I think he's sacked after the season.
Exactly. Phillies ownership must be wondering why the Red Sox were able to move veterans for younger players while Amaro sat around and did nothing. New GM will want to start a "3 year rebuild" and some nice pieces will be available
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,984
Shamus74 said:
 
Yikes, I like Votto, but I don't think the Sox want to tie themselves to the contract, even if the Reds ate some of it. He's locked in til his age 39 season in 2023, with a $7 million buyout on a $25 million option for 2024. And his power has declined steadily over the last few years.
 
With the exception of this season, his production has been silly. Last 5 years of OPS+:
 
2009: 156
2010: 171
2011: 155
2012: 177
2013: 155
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,127
St. Louis, MO
ehaz said:
 
With the exception of this season, his production has been silly. Last 5 years of OPS+:
 
2009: 156
2010: 171
2011: 155
2012: 177
2013: 155
 
And as mentioned, we really need a LH bat.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
bosockboy said:
Sounds about right.  Hanley at 3B never occurred to me but that's a great solution to get another bat.  Veteran SP I'd love Iwakuma.
 
There is no chance Hanley leaves L.A. for 5/100.  He'll be going into his age 31 season so he's getting 6 years at least, and probably closer to 23 or 24 million AAV. And given the amount of left side of the infield depth the Red Sox have in the minors, this would probably a poor use of resources. Use that money somewhere else, like trying to bring Lester back. I'd rather have him at 6/144 than Hanley, given the current 40 man roster.
 
bosockboy said:
The Reds seem inclined for a do-over; our lineup outside of Papi projects to be incredibly RHH heavy.  I wonder if there is a blockbuster potential with Votto coming with Latos and them eating a decent amount to make it palatable.  He's an OBP machine that would be incredible in the 2-hole.
 
 
MakMan44 said:
I can't even imagine what we'd have to give up to get Votto and Latos. 
 
Everything. There is absolutely no chance this happens. Latos might be something the Sox are interested in, but there is simply no way they spend any significant time discussing the possibility of both he and Votto and Votto doesn't really fit with the team in the short term anyway. Right now they have Napoli, Papi and Craig under control through 2015, and Papi and Craig through 2017. There is no need for Votto in the next few years.
 
As for the thread topic, Since we're blowing past the threshold next year and this is all meant to be fun, it's probably not meant to be 100% realistic. So, with the starting point of about 80 million spent before arbitration and other costs (adding Craig, Kelly and Cespedes is +16.5 million, and subtracting Peavy and Lackey is 15 million, so we're at 1.5 more than the roughly 78.5 Cot's has us at currently), I'm going to assume we're at about 115 spent total going into next year.
 
- Offer Koji 10 million the second the World Series ends, but give him a QO if he turns it down or lags in responding. +10 or +15
- Offer Lester and Scherzer 144 with a 72 hour window to accept or reject, citing a need to fill a lot of holes as a reason we can't wait around for an answer. If one accepts, great. +24 If not...
- Look to trade for Latos. If Lester or Scherzer (unlikely, I know) have accepted, I don't go higher than Ranaudo and one of Marrero or Margot. If they both rejected, I offer all three. +12-15
- If one of the previous two hasn't panned out, I offer Shields 3/54 with a vesting option for a 4th year at 18 million, and go as high as 4/80 to get him signed. +20
- Extend Cespedes with a contract that buys out 2015 and replaces it with 4/60. Go to 5/75 if necessary. +4.5
- Find a buyer for Victorino to free up his 13 million. -13
- Sign Russell Martin for 3/39 (throwback contract!) +13
- Package Betts, Swihart, a pitching prospect like Brian Johnson or Matt Barnes and a fully subsidized Allen Craig to Miami for Stanton. Extend him at 10/300. +30
- Give Carp away
 
At worst, we're adding 93.5 million for a payroll of about 208 million to start the 2015 season. However, if a Latos deal goes through, that drops to at least 203 assuming Latos gets 15 million in arb or an extension. Let's assume, since this is fun, we get the best case scenario and have Latos in the organization instead of Shields and have extended him to 4/60. We're at 203 million spent, or about 14 million over the projected threshold of 189. Here's the roster.
 
Lineup: Bogaerts SS, Pedroia 2B, Ortiz, DH, Stanton RF, Napoli 1B, Cespedes LF, Martin, Middlebrooks 3B, Bradley CF
Bench: Holt, Nava, Vazquez, Cecchini
Rotation: Lester, Latos, Buchholz, de la Rosa, Kelly
Bullpen: Koji, Tazawa, Workman, Badenhop, Breslow, Mujica, Hembree
 
Minor League Depth (offense): Shaw, Coyle, Hassan, Brentz, and Ramos
Minor League Depth (pitching): Webster, Owens, Wright, Diaz, Noe Ramirez, and one of Johnson/Barnes
 
Top Prospects: Owens, Devers, Johnson/Barnes, Coyle, Chavis, Kopech, Ball, Rijo, Shaw, Travis, Longhi, Wright, Cosart (not necessarily in that order).
 
World Series won in the next 5 years? 7
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
Rudy Pemberton said:
Isn't Napoli only under control through 2015?
 
And? Are we skipping 2015 and jumping right into 2016?
 
Edit: Oh, you are referring to the serious portion of my post. You are correct. I'll edit it.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Papelbon's Poutine said:
Why waste $13M on Martin?

And I know you said it's unlikely but yeah, Scherzer has already turned down $144. Unless he just really hates Detroit that phone call doesn't even get returned. I do however think you could Lester for that.
He has Vazquez as the back up C, and Swihart being shipped out. 
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Papelbon's Poutine said:
Yes I can see that. Doesn't change my question.

You have plenty of offense in that lineup. Vasquez will work just fine, especially if it's the difference between staying above the luxury tax line or just going over for one year.
Misinterpreted your question, sorry. 
 
Personally, I don't like giving Vasquez the full on starting job next season, but I'm not entirely sure I'd want Martin either because I don't think he'd be too happy shifting to a lesser role as Vasquez got better. 
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
Papelbon said:
Yes I can see that. Doesn't change my question.

You have plenty of offense in that lineup. Vasquez will work just fine, especially if it's the difference between staying above the luxury tax line or just going over for one year.
If someone like Soto can be had for significantly less, that works too. I'm just not sold on Vazquez as a bat for next year and this approach was designed to maximize the chances of a deep playoff run in 2015 to try and grab another title while Papi is around. They'd drop back under the threshold in 2016 and would still be in great shape with either Travis Shaw or Sam Travis taking over for Napoli at league minimum.
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
MakMan44 said:
Misinterpreted your question, sorry. 
 
Personally, I don't like giving Vasquez the full on starting job next season, but I'm not entirely sure I'd want Martin either because I don't think he'd be too happy shifting to a lesser role as Vasquez got better. 
I know what you mean, Vaz is so good behind the dish he might spoil all these  young pitchers and then they'll mutiny when they have to throw someone else.  Total conundrum.   :blink:
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Drek717 said:
I know what you mean, Vaz is so good behind the dish he might spoil all these  young pitchers and then they'll mutiny when they have to throw someone else.  Total conundrum.   :blink:
Yes, yes, we all know his defense is his most polished aspect. Not my point, at all.  
 

Curll

Guest
Jul 13, 2005
9,205
Martin isn't the solution for C. Vaz and Swihart should be fine for 2015. Catcher is such a offensive sinkhole, it isn't worth the money trying to get offensive production via FA.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Snod had Swihart going out, obviously you don't spend if he's still here. 
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Papelbon's Poutine said:
 
You won't see Swihart before 2016 anyway, or at least late in 2015. He won't be counted on to contribute next year either way. 
 
They'll likely have to spend on someone, I'd prefer Soto on something short. But if the options are Martin at 3/$39 and a small trade for a backup to split time with Vaz, I'd prefer that route. 
Yeah, the more I think about it, the less I like Martin. If they think his performance this season is something he can repeat going forward, I can understand Martin in a scenario where Swihart is gone. Other than that, just giving Vazquez the job shouldn't be that much worse than Martin's 2011-2013 numbers (minus the HR totals)
 

pedroia'sboys

New Member
Aug 26, 2007
640
Newington CT
MakMan44 said:
Snod had Swihart going out, obviously you don't spend if he's still here. 
Unless they're getting a top player that's entering his prime I see no way they trade Swihart. A athletic catcher with above average defense and a good bat, he's going to be a top player at his position. I think Ben would trade Mookie, Bradley, and Owens way before he thinks about Swihart.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
pedroia'sboys said:
Unless they're getting a top player that's entering his prime I see no way they trade Swihart. A athletic catcher with above average defense and a good bat, he's going to be a top player at his position. I think Ben would trade Mookie, Bradley, and Owens way before he thinks about Swihart.
Agreed. He heads my untouchable list. That being said, Snod had him going out in a Stanton deal so he fits your "top player entering prime" category. 
 

Curll

Guest
Jul 13, 2005
9,205
Supposing we sign Castillo, the Sox would have a serious surplus of OF'ers. JBJ, Mookie, Cespedes, Craig, Nava, Vic, JBJ, Hassan, Brentz, Gibson, and Castillo would be available for the 2015 Red Sox. None have much trade value beyond Cespedes, but then again Vic is the only one making significant money.
 
I don't really have a good idea as what to do with all of these OF'ers, but at least a few could be second-third tier pieces in trades.
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,080
The Granite State
I think an additional consideration in the whole OF-accumulation discussion is the fact that the Red Sox also need to find a leadoff hitter somewhere.
 
(Don't forget that Holt can play OF in a pinch as well.)
 
A key question is whether the Sox anticipate Holt turning back into a pumpkin or not, which would re-create a hole at the leadoff position that was exposed early in 2014.
 
I don't know if Castillo profiles as a leadoff hitter, but there is a "leadoff profile" for Betts based on his minor league statistics (high OBP, high BA, speed, a little pop).
 
Given the misjudgements made on ML-readiness for Bogaerts and JBJ this year, I think the FO will be hesitant to award leadoff status to Betts.
 
So it is Holt, Castillo, trade, or bust for 2015 at this point.
 
Unsettling.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,639
Curll said:
Supposing we sign Castillo, the Sox would have a serious surplus of OF'ers. JBJ, Mookie, Cespedes, Craig, Nava, Vic, JBJ, Hassan, Brentz, Gibson, and Castillo would be available for the 2015 Red Sox. None have much trade value beyond Cespedes, but then again Vic is the only one making significant money.
 
I don't really have a good idea as what to do with all of these OF'ers, but at least a few could be second-third tier pieces in trades.
 
Whose trade value will be further reduced by recognition around MLB that the Sox have to move them.
 

OttoC

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2003
7,353
Hanley Ramirez will be 31 in December and he has missed a lot of games in recent years:
 
2011 - 92 GP
2012 - 157
2013 - 86
2014 - 100 (missed 29 games already).
 
There are some question marks when it comes to talking about signing him; his durability and the fact that he is making $16M this year.
 
And I'm sure going to need to see more from Cespedes before I would drop a bundle on him.
 
The Red Sox made some stupid decisions, starting with not signing Lester to a contract extension. They should have accepted what was obvious early on that this was going to be a down year; let their kids develop in the minors; let others get healthy; work on a longer range plan for rebuilding. If the club had Lester and Lackey heading up the starting rotation in 2015, then all they would have needed to do this winter was find a bat or two. Now, they need to find and arm or two and a bat or two. They let good people go for damaged goods (Craig) and one whose power seems mostly to be based on the All-Star Game HR Contest. A signed Lester would have brought back a good return this winter if they decided that was the only way to rebuild.
 

Curll

Guest
Jul 13, 2005
9,205
Harry Hooper said:
 
Whose trade value will be further reduced by recognition around MLB that the Sox have to move them.
I suppose so, but the degradation from centerpiece to 2nd/3rd piece essentially nullifies that. I was thinking more Jerry Sands in the Manny trade.
 

OttoC

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2003
7,353
Papelbon's Poutine said:
 
So you wanted them to resign Lester before this season and then trade him in the offseason? 
 
I don't even know where to begin with that...
 
Maybe you should learn how to read. A signed Lester would have brought back a good return this winter if they decided that was the only way to rebuild. That does not say that I wanted them to trade him in the off-season.
 

O Captain! My Captain!

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 3, 2009
3,532
I posted in the Castillo thread that there's an outfield logjam. Who do you think makes up the 2015 outfield. In rough order of likelihood of playing next year
 
MLB
Cespedes (LF)
Castillo (CF)
Victorino (RF)
Holt (supersub)
Craig (1b/LF, pinch hitter)
JBJ (4th OF)
 
AAA
Betts
Nava
Hassan, Brentz, etc
 
is the way I see it. JBJ makes the roster because he provides superior defense at any OF position while Betts makes more sense if you expect to see his bat every day. Holt's spot opens up for someone like Betts if Holt starts in the IF either at 3rd or SS. Craig is really only viable at LF but is Ortiz/Napoli health insurance and first bat off the bench. Nava is totally blocked by Cespedes but makes the most sense if you want both JBJ and Betts to get regular ABs at AAA. Victorino's health worries are the most likely way that someone get the opportunity to displace one of Cespedes/Castilo/Victorino IMO, unless Castillo is absolutely not a CF.