Of course. That’s still a really high price Tampa paid for him. Hall got a similar pick and a pupu platter of prospects. Coleman got them a similarly ranged pick and a top 50ish prospect.
Probably pressure from ownership to make the playoffs. They haven’t been there since 2015.Boeser possibly done for the year. Makes the Toffoli trade for VAN more of a head scratcher.
View: https://twitter.com/friedgehnic/status/1229837458445131777?s=21
They may need Zamboni drivers on their blueline at this rate.Leafs lose Jake Muzzin for a month with a broken hand.
As unlucky as the bruins have been with injuries in each of their playoff runs for the past decade, I don't think we should be crackin jokes.They may need Zamboni drivers on their blueline at this rate.
Rangers lose Kreider, the game, and a chance to move into the 2nd wild card spot. Interesting to see where they go from here’s,
How’d that go for them last season?Assuming they don't catch the Bruins, they'll beat whatever lame team finishes third in the division with or without him.
That was a legit really good CBJ squad with all their trade acquisitions. Neither the Leafs nor the Panthers can play any defense.How’d that go for them last season?
I’m assuming this would be for next season correct? Or are they going to play the post season by a different set of rules NFL style?Be still my heart
View: https://twitter.com/DarrenDreger/status/1234892386909728776?
@DarrenDreger
After 3 years of discussions, it appears the NHL will amend the offside rule. Skate in the air...or breaking the plane is expected to be part of the change.
I think they are still talking about the skate in the air, breaking the plane of the blue line while in the air, will still be considered on-side. But I am just guessing. If that's the case, why just the skate? Could it be an extended arm as well?What do they mean by breaking the plane? I assume the puck just needs to be touching blue now to be considered in the zone?
If anything it introduces more of a gray area. I'd be for leaving the criteria as it as is and adding a 30 second timer to challenge and 60 second timer on the refs to view it and make a decision to overturn or not.The issue is two-fold right now, IMO:
The proposed change would fix nothing if they don't change the two issues above
- Coaches have 60-90 seconds now to decide whether to not to even challenge a play
- Once challenged, it can take upwards of 6 min (i.e. the Detroit game) to reach a verdict. That's just ridiculous - if you can't spot a clear reason to overturn within 90 seconds, it stands.