PC Drunken Friar said:Ah, thanks for the clarification.
No problem. It's a bit confusing because one wouldn't assume that the NFL would literally tell someone to ignore a district court ruling, but that's what happened here.
PC Drunken Friar said:Ah, thanks for the clarification.
lambeau said:Schefter just reported TB had an answer for everything, genuineness shined through, and it was an A plus performance.
These two accounts seem at odds with each other, no?E5 Yaz said:@BartHubbuch: Tom Brady didn’t speak but attorney Jeff Kessler said: “Tom was there until the BITTER end.”
I think he meant Brady didn't speak to reportersBergs said:These two accounts ts seem at odds with each other, no?
tims4wins said:I think he meant Brady didn't speak to reporters
Well that makes more sense. Gracias.tims4wins said:I think he meant Brady didn't speak to reporters
E5 Yaz said:@BartHubbuch: Tom Brady didn’t speak but attorney Jeff Kessler said: “Tom was there until the BITTER end.”
Hahahahaha, I fucking love this entire thing. I can't wait til it comes out that this was a Kraft and Goodell troll job to show how incompetent the sports media is.soxhop411 said:“@AdamSchefter: Was told by person in today’s appeal that Tom Brady’s greatest ally was…Tom Brady. Offered explanations in all areas. Now up to Goodell.”
soxhop411 said:“@AdamSchefter: Was told by person in today’s appeal that Tom Brady’s greatest ally was…Tom Brady. Offered explanations in all areas. Now up to Goodell.”
TomTerrific said:
Unfortunately this coiuld give RG the out he needs to vacate the suspension, while being able to defend himself that the Wells investigation was necessary because, you know, integrity of the game.
LogansDad said:
Hahahahaha, I fucking love this entire thing. I can't wait til it comes out that this was a Kraft and Goodell troll job to show how incompetent the sports media is.
Edit: And now I look like an idiot, just saw the other responses above.... but my point still stands.
E5 Yaz said:@BartHubbuch: Tom Brady didn’t speak but attorney Jeff Kessler said: “Tom was there until the BITTER end.”
amarshal2 said:
Unfortunately? This is literally the best possible outcome that is even conceivable.
The quips, witty banter, non sequiturs, legal analysis, film breakdown, in depth stats probing.RGREELEY33 said:40 lawyers in a basement arguing with each other about stuff that nobody else in the world really cares about or understands.
We call that SoSH.
Sportsbstn said:I don't expect Brady to accept a single game suspension and think today was an absolute precursor of that. Goodell now gets put into a harder spot where he knows the Wells report is horrendously bad, likely now believes Tom did nothing wrong and needs to figure out a way to slide away from Brady's suspension without giving ammo to Kraft to come back and ask for the team penalty to be struck as well.
I get this, but seeing Brady suit up vs the steelers (with a clean reputation no less) trumps seeing goodell go down in flamesTomTerrific said:
Yes, I realize it could be a lot worse. However, I badly want Goodell rebuked in court, and I'm mostly convinced he would be.
If he didnt have basketball, I was going to drive my son in, just to say he was therePseuFighter said:I'm walking up to 345 Park right now.
I agree that throwing Wells under the bus seems unlikely, I doubt it's because of the $ cost.DennyDoyle'sBoil said:Were McNally or the other guy there?
So much going against Brady here. Just too much institutional pressure for the league. Goodell can't throw Wells under the bus, because then he wasted $5 million. And he's left having taken away draft picks for no reason. The NFL bought its ticket already and I just don't see how they can do anything but ride it to the end of the line.
Do you have any friends that aren't Patriots fans? I ask because the bolded is never going to happen.twibnotes said:I get this, but seeing Brady suit up vs the steelers (with a clean reputation no less) trumps seeing goodell go down in flames
I live in northern nj and work in NYC so I have more than my share of exposure to irrational stupidity re the pats and Brady.Jim Ed Rice in HOF said:Do you have any friends that aren't Patriots fans? I ask because the bolded is never going to happen.
As I've mentioned above, I'm in the mix with idiot NY fans. One little arrogant young dope only comments to me about Brady and the Pats cheating. No other small talk or conversation ever. He's a friend of a friend but I came pretty close to telling him to go fuck himself today. He actually sent me a stupid picture email with Brady with the 4 rings with asinine blurbs/quote boxes attached to each ring. Like he's my pal or something. I'm not accepting Pats Cheating Jokes from my friends, let alone this scum bucket.twibnotes said:I live in northern nj and work in NYC so I have more than my share of exposure to irrational stupidity re the pats and Brady.
So, to clarify, I'd love to see Tb's rep cleared among sane, objective people. I'll take that deal
Yup, I' surrounded by the same swarm of idiots at work. They only say Cheatriots or Defaltegate. Never a congrats on the SB win or anything positive ever. Not that I would expect it, but still.Dahabenzapple2 said:As I've mentioned above, I'm in the mix with idiot NY fans. One little arrogant young dope only comments to me about Brady and the Pats cheating. No other small talk or conversation ever. He's a friend of a friend but I came pretty close to telling him to go fuck himself today. He actually sent me a stupid picture email with Brady with the 4 rings with asinine blurbs/quote boxes attached to each ring. Like he's my pal or something. I'm not accepting Pats Cheating Jokes from my friends, let alone this scum bucket.
Yes - I'm still pissed off
No - there is no Dahabenzapple1.
He won't. Outside of this thread, everybody loves what RG did to the Pats. If he goes back on that suspension people will throw a fit and he'll look weak, placating his "dinner buddy" Kraft.RGREELEY33 said:As much as I've been secretly hoping that TB12 would sweep RG off his feet and show him the light, I just don't see how RG can vacate the suspension.
ifmanis5 said:He won't. Outside of this thread, everybody loves what RG did to the Pats.
The Dahabenzapple2 moniker was never meant for this board. As some may know (Jon Abbey especially), it is a musical reference of a recording shown on my avatar. So I'm not sure how I ended up with it here!DrewDawg said:Fight the good fight Dahabenzapple2!!!
We live in Staten Island now and I have the same experience. Maybe it's just the demo of football fans I'm around - dads at my kid's pre-school - or maybe they're just being nice to my face, but when it comes to this issue I pretty much always get a sincere "this is bullshit," unprompted and out of the blue from several of them. Regular (and younger) Jet fans would likely be different, but even those guys happen to be decidedly non-douchebag-ish about the whole thing.Ed Hillel said:I'm moving, but have been in NYC/northern NJ the past 3-4 years. Regarding this issue, most Giants fans I know think the whole thing is stupid and many think Brady never did a thing. The Jets fans are another story, but that's nothing new. You'd think the Jets have won the last 10 Superbowls listening to these guys.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/06/23/exploring-nfls-inconsistent-reactions-to-erroneous-espn-reports/I was occupied with other matters when the minor skirmish emerged regarding whether Tom Brady was limited to four hours in presenting his case during Tuesday’s appeal hearing. To summarize, Adam Schefter of ESPN reported that the four-hour limitation applied, NFL spokesman Greg Aiello promptly tweeted a contradiction, Schefter released the memo suggesting the four-hour limit, and then the case entailed 10 hours of testimony.
Despite the contents of the memo, the league’s version ended up being accurate. But that’s not the point of this blurb. The point is that: (1) ESPN reported something the NFL believed to be inaccurate; and (2) the NFL immediately responded.
So let’s go back to January 20. On that day, Chris Mortensen of ESPN reported that 11 of 12 Patriots footballs used in the AFC title game were measured at a full two pounds under the 12.5 PSI minimum. It was a blatantly false report, but to this day many still believe it to be true.
In response, the NFL uttered not a peep, anywhere. No press release. No tweet from one of the many P.R. employees who work for the NFL. No leak to one of the many journalists who work for the NFL.
The disparity between today’s rapid-fire disagreement with Schefter’s procedural nuance and January’s silence in response to Mortensen’s critical factual assertion is stunning. And it lends credence to the belief that the NFL deliberately leaked false information in order to pin the Patriots against ropes that simply weren’t there.
If Aiello or anyone else from the NFL had responded swiftly to Mortensen’s erroneous report with the true numbers, which were measured by two significantly conflicting pressure gauges, the Patriots would have been able to shout down the readings by explaining the application of the Ideal Gas Law, the mainstream news media never would have paid serious attention to the situation, and Ted Wells never would have been called in to conduct an investigation that by all appearances was aimed at reaching a predetermined result.
The failure to rebut Mortensen’s report therefore bolsters the idea the entire episode was indeed orchestrated to catch the Patriots doing something, even if it’s still not clear what they did.
And Ted Wells investigated none of that. Even though Commissioner Roger Goodell has publicly claimed that Wells did.
Let’s be clear on this: Wells definitely didn’t investigate the leak to Mortensen. Let’s be even more clear: Someone definitely should.
Has ANYONE EVER convinced Goodell his minions got it wrong? There's zero evidence against Brady. Just inferences.
Stephanie Stradley @StephStradley 16h16 hours ago
Looking at all the evidence, I think you are a liar and are guilty. Today is your appeal. Please convince me of your innocence.
Stephanie Stradley @StephStradley 16h16 hours ago
APPEAL DENIED. Too late. And proves zero. RT @vgp100 oh, no problem. I'll send over my email and text records right now. I'm an open book
Stephanie Stradley @StephStradley 15h15 hours ago
APPEAL DENIED. Because I said so. Already punished team, oops. MT @pmsciortino look at 3 independent labs that did tests, all same result
Stephanie Stradley @StephStradley 15h15 hours ago
You are not on trial. You're appealing. You lost. MT @JonnyD80 you're out of order! The whole trial is out of order! It's let's make a deal!
Stephanie Stradley @StephStradley 15h15 hours ago
You agreed that all appeals go to me. I'm the best American. RT @pmsciortino maybe that works for your justice but not in america
Stephanie Stradley @StephStradley 15h15 hours ago
Like I care. Good luck not knowing when you serve your suspension. RT @bruin_9 Let's not waste each other's time. I'll see you in court.
Stephanie Stradley @StephStradley 15h15 hours ago
APPEAL DENIED. If the facts don't fit, I don't give a RT @Ethanhamm If the numbers aren't the same, Brady's not to blame
Corsi said:
amarshal2 said:Stephanie Stradley @StephStradley 16h16 hours ago
Looking at all the evidence, I think you are a liar and are guilty. Today is your appeal. Please convince me of your innocence.
This.ivanvamp said:
This really is incredible, and one of the most frustrating aspects of this entire episode. This entire thing could have been squelched right from the get-go if that Mortensen tweet had been corrected by the NFL. They could have still looked into it, but the national furor that drove the narrative would almost certainly have been doused, and we'd be talking about something on the scale of a very, very minor infraction, if that.
The NFL is totally to blame on this. God I want to see a judge rip Goodell to shreds.